Back to Authors

Sparacio, Dee

Mayo Clinic

Patient Representative, Hightstown, NJ

Citations 3

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed, Advanced Ovarian Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update
Lacchetti, Christina , Armstrong, Deborah K. , Cliby, William A. , Edelson, Mitchell I. , García, Agustin A. , Ghebre, Rahel G., Gressel, Gregory M. , Lesnock, Jamie , Meyer, Larissa A. , Moore, Kathleen N. , Olawaiye, Alexander , Salani, Ritu , Sparacio, Dee, Tew, William P. , Gaillard, Stéphanie , Lacchetti, Christina , Armstrong, Deborah K , Cliby, William A , Gangi, Alexandra , Gressel, Gregory M , Meyer, Larissa A , Moore, Kathleen , O'Cearbhaill, Roisin E , Salani, Ritu , van Driel, Willemien J , Tew, William P , Edelson, Mitchell I , Gaillard, Stéphanie , Ghebre, Rahel G.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 22, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 868-891

10.1200/jco-24-02589 Get It

ASCO Guidelines provide recommendations with comprehensive review and analyses of the relevant literature for each recommendation, following the guideline development process as outlined in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual . ASCO Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy for Clinical Practice Guidelines . Clinical Practice Guidelines and other guidance (“Guidance”) provided by ASCO is not a comprehensive or definitive guide to treatment options. It is intended for voluntary use by clinicians and should be used in conjunction with independent professional judgment. Guidance may not be applicable to all patients, interventions, diseases or stages of diseases. Guidance is based on review and analysis of relevant literature and is not intended as a statement of the standard of care. ASCO does not endorse third-party drugs, devices, services, or therapies and assumes no responsibility for any harm arising from or related to the use of this information. See complete disclaimer in Appendix 1 and 2 (online only) for more . PURPOSE To provide updated guidance regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) among patients with stage III-IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (epithelial ovarian cancer [EOC]). METHODS A multidisciplinary Expert Panel convened and updated the systematic review. RESULTS Sixty-one studies form the evidence base. RECOMMENDATIONS Patients with suspected stage III-IV EOC should be evaluated by a gynecologic oncologist, with cancer antigen 125, computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis, and chest imaging included. All patients with EOC should be offered germline genetic and somatic testing at diagnosis. For patients with newly diagnosed advanced EOC who are fit for surgery and have a high likelihood of achieving complete cytoreduction, PCS is recommended. For patients fit for PCS but deemed unlikely to have complete cytoreduction, NACT is recommended. Patients with newly diagnosed advanced EOC and a high perioperative risk profile should receive NACT. Before NACT, patients should have histologic confirmation of invasive ovarian cancer. For NACT, a platinum-taxane doublet is recommended. Interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) should be performed after ≤four cycles of NACT for patients with a response to chemotherapy or stable disease. For patients with stage III disease, good performance status, and adequate renal function treated with NACT, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy may be offered during ICS. After ICS, chemotherapy should continue to complete a six-cycle treatment plan with the optional addition of bevacizumab. Patients with EOC should be offered US Food and Drug Administration–approved maintenance treatments. Patients with progressive disease on NACT should have diagnosis reconfirmed via tissue biopsy. Patients without previous comprehensive genetic or molecular profiling should be offered testing. Treatment options include alternative chemotherapy regimens, clinical trials, and/or initiation of end-of-life care. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gynecologic-cancer-guidelines . This guideline has been endorsed by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.
Organizing Online Health Content: Developing Hashtag Collections for Healthier Internet-Based People and Communities
Salmi, Liz , Freeman‐Daily, Janet , Utengen, Audun , Dizon, Don S. , Blotner, Charlie , Cooke, David T. , Sparacio, Dee, Staley, Alicia C. , Young, Colleen , Young, Colleen D , Utengen, Audun , Katz, Matthew S. , Anderson, Patricia F , Thompson, Michael A. , Fisch, Michael , Attai, Deanna J.

JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics | June 28, 2019 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: 3 | Pages: 1-10

10.1200/cci.18.00124 Get It

Twitter use has increased among patients with cancer, advocates, and oncology professionals. Hashtags, a form of metadata, can be used to share content, organize health information, and create virtual communities of interest. Cancer-specific hashtags modeled on a breast cancer community, #bcsm, led to the development of a structured set of hashtags called the cancer tag ontology. In this article, we review how these hashtags have worked with the aim of describing our experience from 2011 to 2017. We discuss useful guidelines for the development and maintenance of health-oriented communities on Twitter, including possible challenges to community sustainability and opportunities for future improvement and research.
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed, Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline
Bohlke, Kari , Armstrong, Deborah K. , Cliby, William A. , Dizon, Don S. , Kash, Joseph J., Meyer, Larissa A. , Moore, Kathleen N. , Olawaiye, Alexander , Oldham, Jessica, Salani, Ritu , Sparacio, Dee, Tew, William P. , Vergote, Ignace , Edelson, Mitchell I. , Wright, Alexi A, Bookman, Michael A. , Coleman, Robert L. , Olawaiye, Alexander B, Wright, Alexi A. , Moore, Kathleen , Meyer, Larissa A , Edelson, Mitchell I

Journal of Clinical Oncology | August 9, 2016 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 28 | Pages: 3460-3473

10.1200/jco.2016.68.6907 Get It

Purpose To provide guidance to clinicians regarding the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreduction among women with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods The Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. Results Four phase III clinical trials form the primary evidence base for the recommendations. The published studies suggest that for selected women with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreduction are noninferior to primary cytoreduction and adjuvant chemotherapy with respect to overall and progression-free survival and are associated with less perioperative morbidity and mortality. Recommendations All women with suspected stage IIIC or IV invasive epithelial ovarian cancer should be evaluated by a gynecologic oncologist prior to initiation of therapy. The primary clinical evaluation should include a CT of the abdomen and pelvis, and chest imaging (CT preferred). Women with a high perioperative risk profile or a low likelihood of achieving cytoreduction to < 1 cm of residual disease (ideally to no visible disease) should receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Women who are fit for primary cytoreductive surgery, and with potentially resectable disease, may receive either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary cytoreductive surgery. However, primary cytoreductive surgery is preferred if there is a high likelihood of achieving cytoreduction to < 1 cm (ideally to no visible disease) with acceptable morbidity. Before neoadjuvant chemotherapy is delivered, all patients should have confirmation of an invasive ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/NACT-ovarian-guideline and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .