Back to Authors

Edelson, Mitchell I

0000-0001-6708-7380

Mayo Clinic

Jefferson Abington Hospital, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.

Citations 3

Phase II Trial of Ribociclib Plus Letrozole in Women With Recurrent Low-Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneum: A GOG Partners Trial (GOG 3026)
Slomovitz, Brian M. , Weroha, S. John , Chon, Hye Sook, Podder, Vivek , Markham, Merry Jennifer , Backes, Floor , Thomas, Eric D. , Tenney, Meaghan , Miller, David S. , Muller, Carolyn Y., Callahan, Michael J. , Liu, J. Rebecca, Teplinsky, Eleonora , Kamat, Aparna A., Chern, Jing‐Yi , Murphy, Martina, Choong, Grace M. , Moore, Elena Diaz, Alvarez, Edwin , Rodgers, William H. , Copeland, Larry J. , Herzog, Thomas J. , Podder, Vivek , Markham, Merry J , Backes, Floor , Tenney, Meaghan Elizabeth , Westin, Shannon N , Miller, David S , Edelson, Mitchell I , Teplinsky, Eleonora , Guy, Michael , Choong, Grace M , O'Malley, David M , Copeland, Larry J , Herzog, Thomas J , Coleman, Robert , Gershenson, David M , Deng, Wei, Chen, Lee-may , Edelson, Mitchell I. , Holman, Laura L. , Lea, Jayanthi Sivasothy , O’Malley, David M. , Coleman, Robert L. , Gershenson, David M.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | December 12, 2025 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 153-163

10.1200/jco-25-01348 Get It

PURPOSE Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSOC) of the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum is a hormonally driven, relatively chemoresistant malignancy with limited treatment options in the recurrent setting. Given frequent estrogen receptor (ER) expression and dysregulation of the cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6)–p16–Rb pathway, features shared with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer, dual endocrine, and CDK4/6 inhibition is a biologically rational strategy. This phase II trial evaluated ribociclib plus letrozole in recurrent LGSOC. METHODS This open-label, single-arm, multicenter phase II study enrolled women with measurable, recurrent LGSOC. Patients received ribociclib (600 mg orally, once daily, days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle) and letrozole (2.5 mg orally, once daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Secondary end points included clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS Of 74 patients screened, 51 were enrolled and 49 treated. The confirmed ORR was 30.6% (90% CI, 19.9 to 43.2), including one complete and 14 partial responses. Among responders, the median duration of response was 21.2 months. The CBR was 84% (90% CI, 72.5 to 91.6). The median PFS was 14.5 months (90% CI, 10.1 to 28.8), and the median OS was 44.5 months (90% CI, 31.8 to not reached). The most common grade ≥3 adverse event (AE) was neutropenia (47%), managed with dose modifications. Three grade 5 events (6%) occurred but were unrelated to treatment. Treatment discontinuation because of AEs occurred in 4%. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION Ribociclib plus letrozole met the primary end point, achieving meaningful response rates and durable disease control in recurrent LGSOC. The safety profile was consistent with prior CDK4/6 inhibitor studies. This combination represents a therapeutic option in this rare and genomically distinct subtype.
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed, Advanced Ovarian Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update
Lacchetti, Christina , Armstrong, Deborah K. , Cliby, William A. , Edelson, Mitchell I. , García, Agustin A. , Ghebre, Rahel G., Gressel, Gregory M. , Lesnock, Jamie , Meyer, Larissa A. , Moore, Kathleen N. , Olawaiye, Alexander , Salani, Ritu , Sparacio, Dee, Tew, William P. , Gaillard, Stéphanie , Lacchetti, Christina , Armstrong, Deborah K , Cliby, William A , Gangi, Alexandra , Gressel, Gregory M , Meyer, Larissa A , Moore, Kathleen , O'Cearbhaill, Roisin E , Salani, Ritu , van Driel, Willemien J , Tew, William P , Edelson, Mitchell I , Gaillard, Stéphanie , Ghebre, Rahel G.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 22, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 868-891

10.1200/jco-24-02589 Get It

ASCO Guidelines provide recommendations with comprehensive review and analyses of the relevant literature for each recommendation, following the guideline development process as outlined in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual . ASCO Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy for Clinical Practice Guidelines . Clinical Practice Guidelines and other guidance (“Guidance”) provided by ASCO is not a comprehensive or definitive guide to treatment options. It is intended for voluntary use by clinicians and should be used in conjunction with independent professional judgment. Guidance may not be applicable to all patients, interventions, diseases or stages of diseases. Guidance is based on review and analysis of relevant literature and is not intended as a statement of the standard of care. ASCO does not endorse third-party drugs, devices, services, or therapies and assumes no responsibility for any harm arising from or related to the use of this information. See complete disclaimer in Appendix 1 and 2 (online only) for more . PURPOSE To provide updated guidance regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) among patients with stage III-IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (epithelial ovarian cancer [EOC]). METHODS A multidisciplinary Expert Panel convened and updated the systematic review. RESULTS Sixty-one studies form the evidence base. RECOMMENDATIONS Patients with suspected stage III-IV EOC should be evaluated by a gynecologic oncologist, with cancer antigen 125, computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis, and chest imaging included. All patients with EOC should be offered germline genetic and somatic testing at diagnosis. For patients with newly diagnosed advanced EOC who are fit for surgery and have a high likelihood of achieving complete cytoreduction, PCS is recommended. For patients fit for PCS but deemed unlikely to have complete cytoreduction, NACT is recommended. Patients with newly diagnosed advanced EOC and a high perioperative risk profile should receive NACT. Before NACT, patients should have histologic confirmation of invasive ovarian cancer. For NACT, a platinum-taxane doublet is recommended. Interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) should be performed after ≤four cycles of NACT for patients with a response to chemotherapy or stable disease. For patients with stage III disease, good performance status, and adequate renal function treated with NACT, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy may be offered during ICS. After ICS, chemotherapy should continue to complete a six-cycle treatment plan with the optional addition of bevacizumab. Patients with EOC should be offered US Food and Drug Administration–approved maintenance treatments. Patients with progressive disease on NACT should have diagnosis reconfirmed via tissue biopsy. Patients without previous comprehensive genetic or molecular profiling should be offered testing. Treatment options include alternative chemotherapy regimens, clinical trials, and/or initiation of end-of-life care. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gynecologic-cancer-guidelines . This guideline has been endorsed by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed, Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline
Bohlke, Kari , Armstrong, Deborah K. , Cliby, William A. , Dizon, Don S. , Kash, Joseph J., Meyer, Larissa A. , Moore, Kathleen N. , Olawaiye, Alexander , Oldham, Jessica, Salani, Ritu , Sparacio, Dee, Tew, William P. , Vergote, Ignace , Edelson, Mitchell I. , Wright, Alexi A, Bookman, Michael A. , Coleman, Robert L. , Olawaiye, Alexander B, Wright, Alexi A. , Moore, Kathleen , Meyer, Larissa A , Edelson, Mitchell I

Journal of Clinical Oncology | August 9, 2016 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 28 | Pages: 3460-3473

10.1200/jco.2016.68.6907 Get It

Purpose To provide guidance to clinicians regarding the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreduction among women with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods The Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. Results Four phase III clinical trials form the primary evidence base for the recommendations. The published studies suggest that for selected women with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreduction are noninferior to primary cytoreduction and adjuvant chemotherapy with respect to overall and progression-free survival and are associated with less perioperative morbidity and mortality. Recommendations All women with suspected stage IIIC or IV invasive epithelial ovarian cancer should be evaluated by a gynecologic oncologist prior to initiation of therapy. The primary clinical evaluation should include a CT of the abdomen and pelvis, and chest imaging (CT preferred). Women with a high perioperative risk profile or a low likelihood of achieving cytoreduction to < 1 cm of residual disease (ideally to no visible disease) should receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Women who are fit for primary cytoreductive surgery, and with potentially resectable disease, may receive either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary cytoreductive surgery. However, primary cytoreductive surgery is preferred if there is a high likelihood of achieving cytoreduction to < 1 cm (ideally to no visible disease) with acceptable morbidity. Before neoadjuvant chemotherapy is delivered, all patients should have confirmation of an invasive ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/NACT-ovarian-guideline and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .