Giannakis, Marios

Abstract Background Smoking is associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Previous studies suggested this association may be restricted to certain molecular subtypes of CRC, but large-scale comprehensive analysis is lacking. Methods A total of 9789 CRC cases and 11 231 controls of European ancestry from 11 observational studies were included. We harmonized smoking variables across studies and derived sex study–specific quartiles of pack-years of smoking for analysis. Four somatic colorectal tumor markers were assessed individually and in combination, including BRAF mutation, KRAS mutation, CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and microsatellite instability (MSI) status. A multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between smoking and risk of CRC subtypes by molecular characteristics, adjusting for age, sex, and study. All statistical tests were 2-sided and adjusted for Bonferroni correction. Results Heavier smoking was associated with higher risk of CRC overall and stratified by individual markers (Ptrend < .001). The associations differed statistically significantly between all molecular subtypes, which was the most statistically significant for CIMP and BRAF. Compared with never-smokers, smokers in the fourth quartile of pack-years had a 90% higher risk of CIMP-positive CRC (odds ratio = 1.90, 95% confidence interval = 1.60 to 2.26) but only 35% higher risk for CIMP-negative CRC (odds ratio = 1.35, 95% confidence interval = 1.22 to 1.49; Pdifference = 2.1 x 10-6). The association was also stronger in tumors that were CIMP positive, MSI high, or KRAS wild type when combined (Pdifference < .001). Conclusion Smoking was associated with differential risk of CRC subtypes defined by molecular characteristics. Heavier smokers had particularly higher risk of CRC subtypes that were CIMP positive and MSI high in combination, suggesting that smoking may be involved in the development of colorectal tumors via the serrated pathway.

Abstract Protective associations of fruits, vegetables, and fiber intake with colorectal cancer risk have been shown in many, but not all epidemiologic studies. One possible reason for study heterogeneity is that dietary factors may have distinct effects by colorectal cancer molecular subtypes. Here, we investigate the association of fruit, vegetables, and fiber intake with four well-established colorectal cancer molecular subtypes separately and in combination. Nine observational studies including 9,592 cases with molecular subtypes for microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), and somatic mutations in BRAF and KRAS genes, and 7,869 controls were analyzed. Both case-only logistic regression analyses and polytomous logistic regression analyses (with one control set and multiple case groups) were used. Higher fruit intake was associated with a trend toward decreased risk of BRAF-mutated tumors [OR 4th vs. 1st quartile = 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.65–1.04)] but not BRAF-wildtype tumors [1.09 (0.97–1.22); P difference as shown in case-only analysis = 0.02]. This difference was observed in case–control studies and not in cohort studies. Compared with controls, higher fiber intake showed negative association with colorectal cancer risk for cases with microsatellite stable/MSI-low, CIMP-negative, BRAF-wildtype, and KRAS-wildtype tumors (Ptrend range from 0.03 to 3.4e-03), which is consistent with the traditional adenoma-colorectal cancer pathway. These negative associations were stronger compared with MSI-high, CIMP-positive, BRAF-mutated, or KRAS-mutated tumors, but the differences were not statistically significant. These inverse associations for fruit and fiber intake may explain, in part, inconsistent findings between fruit or fiber intake and colorectal cancer risk that have previously been reported. Significance: These analyses by colorectal cancer molecular subtypes potentially explain the inconsistent findings between dietary fruit or fiber intake and overall colorectal cancer risk that have previously been reported.

SNF'ing out antitumor immunity Immune checkpoint inhibitors induce durable tumor regressions in some, but not all, cancer patients. Understanding the mechanisms that determine tumor sensitivity to these drugs could potentially expand the number of patients who benefit (see the Perspective by Ghorani and Quezada). Pan et al. discovered that tumor cells in which a specific SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex had been experimentally inactivated were more sensitive to T cell–mediated killing. The cells were more responsive to interferon-γ, leading to increased secretion of cytokines that promote antitumor immunity. Miao et al. examined the genomic features of tumors from patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who had been treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Tumors harboring inactivating mutations in PBRM1 , which encodes a subunit of the same SWI/SNF complex, were more likely to respond to the drugs. Science , this issue p. 770 , p. 801 ; see also p. 745

Abstract The Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO) in collaboration with the Colorectal Cancer Family Registry (CCFR) aims to identify genetic variants and environmental risk factors that impact colorectal cancer (CRC). Over 30 studies from North America, Europe, and Australia participate in GECCO. These studies have collected clinical, epidemiological, and survival data, as well as blood and tumor biospecimens, for over 80,000 CRC cases and controls. The current study aims to conduct targeted deep sequencing of tumors and matching normal DNA to identify recurrent and novel somatic and germline variants in 4,200 CRC cases. To achieve this goal, an AmpliSeq targeted sequencing panel of 1.12 Mbp was constructed to sequence the coding regions of 190 significantly mutated genes identified from whole exome sequencing datasets generated by the Nurses’ Health Study and Health Professional’s Follow-up Study, and The Cancer Genome Atlas. The panel also covers coding regions of 15 genes with germline high penetrance mutations in CRC, 54 regions to detect CRC-related copy number alterations (CNAs), and microsatellite and homopolymer repeat regions to identify defective DNA mismatch repair. Primers were also included to detect Fusobacterium nucleatum DNA in tumor biopsies, as F. nucleatum is thought to promote CRC carcinogenesis. Sequencing of the DNA libraries on Illumina HiSeq 2500 produced a mean coverage of greater than 500X for tumor DNA and 100X for normal DNA, with >85% of the bases covered at the target at 50x. So far, targeted sequencing of >1,500 DNA samples from CRC tumors and normal tissues has identified recurrent and novel somatic mutations, germline genetic variants, and hypermutation status of the tumors due to defective DNA mismatch repair or pathogenic mutations in the POLE gene. Targeted sequencing has also allowed quantification of the F. nucleatum DNA in tumor biopsies; the results were validated by a multiplex QPCR assay. At the AACR annual meeting, we will present targeted sequencing results generated from the first two GECCO-participating studies (n=1,300 cases). These data will be valuable for future association testing of somatic mutations, CNAs, hypermutation status, and F. nucleatum with germline genetic variants, lifestyle, and environmental risk factors and survival. This large study will allow development of better strategies for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of CRC. Citation Format: Syed H. Zaidi, Wei Sun, Jeroen Huyghe, Catherine S. Grasso, Quang Trinh, Charles Connolly, Amy French, Jasmine Mu, Marios Giannakis, Eve Shinbrot, Ivan Borozan, Michael J. Quist, Hermann Brenner, Daniel Buchanan, Peter Campbell, Andrew Chan, Jenny Chang-Claude, Vincent Ferretti, Charles Fuchs, Andrea Gsur, Marc Gunter, Tabitha Harrison, Michael Hoffmeister, Wen-Yi Huang, Paul Krzyzanowski, Stephen Lee, Mathieu Lemire, Jessica Miller, Danielle Pasternack, Cherie Teney, Elaine Mardis, Polly Newcomb, Lincoln Stein, Lee Timms, David Wheeler, Christina Yung, Niha Zubair, Levi Garraway, Shuji Ogino, Li Hsu, Steven Gallinger, Stephen Thibodeau, Thomas Hudson, Ulrike Peters. Targeted deep sequencing of colorectal tumor tissues to study associations of tumor subtypes with germline genetic, lifestyle, and environmental risk factors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1286. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1286

Abstract The completion of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project for colorectal cancer (CRC) has enabled a new, focused phase of sequencing tumor samples for which genome-wide genetic, epidemiological, clinical and lifestyle data have been collected. By combining somatic mutational profiles with these aforementioned data, we may identify and report effective prevention and treatment approaches for a broader population of individuals. The advent of targeted deep sequencing approaches using DNA obtained from formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissues has made possible the genetic characterization of the large numbers of patients needed to make such an effort relevant. As a first step, we describe a custom gene panel designed from large-scale studies for targeted deep sequencing, and its application to over 4,200 CR tumors, collected by the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium (GECCO). This study is designed to identify recurrent somatic mutations and copy number alterations (CNAs) for association testing with germline genetic and lifestyle and environmental risk factors for CRC, and thereby identify relevant approaches to impact cancer prevention. The targeted CRC panel includes 205 genes. Genes were primarily selected as significantly mutated genes identified from the Nurses’ Health Study and Health Professional's Follow-up Study (n = 700), and TCGA (n = 525). We also included 15 genes associated with high penetrance germline mutations and augmented the list to include genes in pathways of somatically altered genes, identified by literature review, from public databases and known to be associated with loss of heterozygosity. For these 205 genes, amplification primers were designed to include all coding regions of transcripts that are listed in the UCSC Genome Browser. For regions with CNAs, the TCGA dataset was analyzed to include regions with greater than or equal to 2 copy focal gains or losses that were found in more than 4 or 3 tumors, respectively. Candidate genes in regions with significant CNAs from the TCGA CRC publication (Nature 2012) were also included. For CNAs, 6 to 12 amplicons were designed for each of the 56 selected regions (32 gains and 24 losses). Additional target regions include: 1) 25 microsatellite loci previously used to identify defective DNA mismatch repair and 212 homoploymer repeats. These include microsatellite loci recommended by the NCI Consensus Panel for identifying MSI; 2) amelogenin (for gender); and 3) Fusobacterium to detect a putative CRC-associated pathogen in tumor biopsies. At the AACR annual meeting, we expect to present results for deep sequencing (∼1,000X) of the first 1,000 CR tumors, including any preliminarily identified pathways and subtypes that may provide the basis for association testing with germline genetic and lifestyle and environmental risk factors needed for inferring better approaches to prevention and treatment of CRC. Citation Format: Syed H. Zaidi, Catie Grasso, Jasmine Mu, Eve Shinbrot, Marios Giannakis, Charles Connolly, Ivan Borozan, Hermann Brenner, Peter Campbell, Andrew Chan, Jenny Chang-Claude, Mengmeng Du, Vincent Ferretti, Amy French, Charles Fuchs, Steven Gallinger, Levi Garraway, Andrea Gsur, Marc Gunter, Tabitha Harrison, Michael Hoffmeister, Li Hsu, Wen-Yi Huang, Jeroen Huyghe, Mathieu Lemire, Elaine Mardis, John McPherson, Polly Newcomb, Lincoln Stein, Wei Sun, Lee Timms, Quang Trinh, David Wheeler, Christina Yung, Niha Zubair, Shuji Ogino, Stephen Thibodeau, Ulrike Peters, Thomas Hudson. Linking the molecular profile of colorectal tumors to germline genetic and environmental risk factors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 5221.