Alexander, Amy E.

BACKGROUND: Selection of skull base approaches is a critical skill for complex cranial surgery, which demands nuanced understanding of neuroanatomy and pathology. OBJECTIVE: To develop novel pedagogical resources for approach selection education and assessment. METHODS: A prospectively maintained skull base registry was screened for posterior fossa tumors amenable to 3-dimensional (3D) modeling of multiple operative approaches. Inclusion criteria were high-resolution preoperative and postoperative computed tomography and MRI studies (≤1 mm) and consensus that at least 3 posterior fossa craniotomies would provide feasible access. Cases were segmented using Mimics and modeled using 3-Matic. Clinical Vignettes, Approach Selection Questionnaire, and Clinical Application Questionnaire were compiled for implementation as a teaching/testing tool. RESULTS: Seven cases were selected, each representing a major posterior fossa approach group. 3D models were rendered using clinical imaging for the primary operative approach, as well as a combination of laboratory neuroanatomic data and extrapolation from comparable craniotomies to generate 2 alternative approaches in each patient. Modeling data for 3D figures were uploaded to an open-sourced database in a platform-neutral fashion (.x3d) for virtual/augmented reality and 3D printing applications. A semitransparent model of each approach without pathology and with key deep structures visualized was also modeled and included for comprehensive understanding. CONCLUSION: We report a novel series of open-source 3D models for skull base approach selection training, with supplemental resources. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first such series designed for pedagogical purposes in skull base surgery or centered on open-source principles.

Abstract Background To determine whether virtual surgical planning and three‐dimensional printed cutting guides (3D/VSP) improved radiographic bone union compared to conventional methods (CM) in fibula free flap (FFF) reconstruction of the mandibles. Methods Retrospective study from the years 2000–2018 at a tertiary hospital. Osseous union was evaluated by a radiologist blinded to each patient's treatment. Results Two hundred sixty patients who underwent FFF tissue transfer, 28 with VSP and 3D cutting guides. Bony union was not achieved in 46 (20%) patients who underwent CM compared to 1 (4%) of patients with VSP and guides ( p = 0.036). FFF complication was significantly higher in CM with 87 patients (38%) compared to three patients (11%) in 3D/VSP ( p = 0.005). Median time to bony union for patients who underwent CM was 1.4 years compared to 0.8 years in 3D/VSP. Conclusions 3D/VSP reduced the rate of radiographic nonunion and flap‐related complications in FFF reconstruction for mandibular defects.

Abstract Background 3D printing—also known as additive manufacturing—has a wide range of applications. Reproduction of low-cost, high-fidelity, disease- or patient-specific models presents a key developmental area in simulation and education research for complex cranial surgery. Methods Using cadaveric dissections as source materials, skull base models were created, printed, and tested for educational value in teaching complex cranial approaches. In this pilot study, assessments were made on the value of 3D printed models demonstrating the retrosigmoid and posterior petrosectomy approaches. Models were assessed and tested in a small cohort of neurosurgery resident subjects (n = 3) using a series of 10 radiographic and 2 printed case examples, with efficacy determined via agreement survey and approach selection accuracy. Results All subjects indicated agreement or strong agreement for all study endpoints that 3D printed models provided significant improvements in understanding of neuroanatomic relationships and principles of approach selection, as compared to 2D dissections or patient cross-sectional imaging alone. Models were not superior to in-person hands-on teaching. Mean approach selection accuracy was 90% (±13%) for 10 imaging-based cases, or 92% (±7%) overall. Trainees strongly agreed that approach decision-making was enhanced by adjunctive use of 3D models for both radiographic and printed cases. Conclusion 3D printed models incorporating skull base approaches and/or pathologies provide a compelling addition to the complex cranial education armamentarium. Based on our preliminary analysis, 3D printed models offer substantial potential for pedagogical value as dissection guides, adjuncts to preoperative study and case preparation, or tools for approach selection training and evaluation.