Gerke, Travis

Abstract Introduction: Most people who die from prostate cancer are older than 75 years. However, prostate cancer diagnosed at younger ages is often more aggressive. While epidemiologic studies have examined the association between age and survival in patients with prostate cancer overall, the clinical drivers of this relationship in patients with advanced disease remain unclear. We leveraged the International Registry of Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer (IRONMAN, NCT03151629) to (1) quantify the association between age and overall survival and (2) explore whether this association is explained by treatments. Methods: We included 3, 734 patients enrolled from 15 countries with new diagnoses of metastatic hormone sensitive (mHSPC, N=2, 642) or castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC, N=1, 092). Age at enrollment was categorized as <55, 55-59, 60-64 (reference), 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, 85+ years. We computed age-specific death rates (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) by disease state (mHSPC, CRPC) at enrollment. To explore whether this relationship was explained by treatment, we fitted disease state-stratified Cox models and sequentially adjusted for (1) de novo metastatic status and country, and (2) baseline treatment (androgen deprivation therapy [ADT] alone, ADT + androgen receptor pathway inhibitors [ARPI], ADT + chemotherapy, ADT + ARPI + chemotherapy, other). Results: Over 5.5 years of follow-up (median: 3.2 years, IQR: 1.7, 4.8), 995 patients died from any cause. Younger patients were more likely to have de novo metastatic disease. Among those with mHSPC at enrollment, the age-specific death rates per 1, 000 person-years followed a J-shaped pattern: 80 (95% CI: 54, 117) in patients under 55 years, 58 (46, 74) in patients aged 60-64, 102 (78, 133) in patients aged 80-84, and 172 (125, 236) in patients aged 85 and older. The death rates among those with CRPC followed a similar pattern, albeit rates were higher in magnitude: 212 (95% CI: 140, 323) in patients under 55 years, 153 (115, 202) in patients aged 60-64, 200 (155, 258) in patients aged 80-84, and 204 (142, 291) in patients aged 85 and older. After adjusting for disease state, country, and the timing of diagnosis of metastases, death rates were substantially higher for ages 75-79 (HR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1, 1.7), 80-84 years (HR 1.6; 95% CI 1.2, 2.1), and 85 years and older (HR 2.0; 95% CI: 1.5, 2.7) compared to ages 60-64 years. Patients aged under 55 years had 1.4-fold higher death rates (95% CI: 1.0, 1.9) compared to those 60-64 years. After additionally adjusting for baseline treatment, overall survival remained worse for the older patients and the youngest age group with hazard ratios remaining meaningfully unchanged. Conclusion: Age at enrollment is associated with overall survival in people with advanced prostate cancer enrolled in IRONMAN in a J-shaped pattern. This relationship is not explained by differences in baseline treatment. Citation Format: Hannah E. Guard, Michelle O. Sodipo, Colleen B. McGrath, Anna Siefkas, Lauren E. Howard, Konrad H. Stopsack, Christopher M. Sauer, Robert Dreicer, Emilio Esteban, Hassan M. Dogo, Ademola Popoola, Charles Waihenya, Anders Bjartell, Kim N. Chi, Sebastien Hotte, Richard Cathomas, Deborah Enting, Scott Tagawa, Michael Ong, Michael Kolinsky, Vincent Khoo, Joaquin Mateo, Chidiebere N. Ogo, Rana R. McKay, Stefanie Fischer, Heather H. Cheng, Russell Szmulewitz, Young E. Whang, Anand Sharma, Frédéric Pouliot, Simon Crabb, Monica S. Chatwal, Miguel A. Climent, Raymond McDermott, Ian D. Davis, Camille Ragin, Folakemi T. Odedina, Simon Anderson, Simone Badal, Natalie Greaves, Karen A. Autio, Laurel Cannon, Alyssa Chan-Cuzydlo, Marie Grant, Travis Gerke, Hannah D. McManus, Philip W. Kantoff, Daniel J. George, Lorelei A. Mucci, IRONMAN investigator team. Disentangling the association between age and overall survival in an international cohort of patients with advanced prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 4935.

Abstract Introduction: The standard of care for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has evolved with the expanded approval of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) alongside androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). ADT alone has been shown to affect cognitive function. However, the cognitive impact of distinct treatment combinations remains unclear. We investigated the association between first-line systemic treatments and the trajectory of subjective cognitive function among mHSPC survivors in the International Registry for Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer (IRONMAN). Methods: This analysis included 2435 newly diagnosed mHSPC patients enrolled across 15 countries between July 2017 and August 2024. Treatments were reported by site personnel and physicians. For this analysis, we focused on first-line systemic treatment and classified treatment groups at enrollment as ADT monotherapy (referent), ADT + ARPIs, or ADT + chemotherapy. Subjective cognitive function was assessed via the EORTC QLQ-C30 Cognitive Function subscale, with patient-reported scores (range 0-100) collected at enrollment and every 3 months for up to 5 years; higher scores reflect better cognitive function. Associations were estimated using linear mixed effects models with clustering by study site and country to examine differences at enrollment and across trajectories of subjective cognitive function by first-line treatment, adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. Results: Median age at enrollment was 70 years, with a median follow-up of 1.7 years. 724 (30%) participants were treated with ADT monotherapy, 1317 (54%) with ADT + ARPIs, and 394 (16%) with ADT + chemotherapy. Mean cognitive function scores at enrollment were 85.4 (Standard Deviation [SD] 19.5) for participants treated with ADT monotherapy, 86.7 (SD 17.3) for ADT + ARPIs, and 86.7 (SD 18.0) for ADT + chemotherapy. Cognitive function scores decreased by -0.60 points (95% Confidence Interval [CI] -0.72, -0.48) per year among those treated with ADT monotherapy, with similar rates observed for those treated with ADT + chemotherapy. Participants treated with ADT + ARPIs had a slower decline in cognitive function, with scores decreasing by -0.36 points (95% CI -0.60, -0.08) per year. Conclusion: In this international cohort of mHSPC survivors, subjective cognitive function scores were generally high at enrollment but declined over time. There was no evidence of worse cognitive function in those treated with ADT + ARPIs nor ADT + chemotherapy over time compared to ADT monotherapy. Cognitive functioning is a key component of survivorship, and defining cognitive trajectories associated with first-line treatment can inform supportive interventions, patient treatment decision-making, and clinical guidelines. Citation Format: Michelle O. Sodipo, Alicia K. Morgans, Erica T. Warner, Emily M. Rencsok, Lauren E. Howard, Colleen B. McGrath, Anna Siefkas, Konrad H. Stopsack, Christopher Sauer, Robert Drecier, Emilio Esteban, Hassan M. Dogo, Ademola Popoola, Charles Waihenya, Anders Bjartell, Kim Chi, Sebastien Hotte, Richard Cathomas, Deborah Enting, Scott Tagawa, Michael Ong, David Lorente, Elisabeth Heath, Rana McKay, Stefanie Fischer, Heather H. Cheng, Young E. Whang, Frederic Pouliot, Simon Crabb, Monica Chatwal, Miguel A. Climent, Raymond McDermott, Ian D. Davis, Camille Ragin, Folakemi Odedina, Natalie Greaves, Simone Badal, Simon Anderson, Sharon Harrison, Karen Autio, Laurel Cannon, Marie Grant, Alyssa Chan-Cuzydlo, Travis Gerke, Hannah D. McManus, Philip W. Kantoff, Daniel George, Sebastien Haneuse, Lorelei A. Mucci, on behalf of the IRONMAN Registry. First-line therapies and subjective cognitive function trajectories among international metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 3630.

Abstract Bone pain is a well-known quality-of-life detriment for individuals with prostate cancer and is associated with survival. This study expands previous work into racial differences in multiple patient-reported dimensions of pain and the association between baseline and longitudinal pain and mortality. This is a prospective cohort study of individuals with newly diagnosed advanced prostate cancer enrolled in the International Registry for Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer (IRONMAN) from 2017 to 2023 at U.S. sites. Differences in four pain scores at study enrollment by race were investigated. Cox proportional hazards models and joint longitudinal survival models were fit for each of the scale scores to estimate HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association with all-cause mortality. The cohort included 879 individuals (20% self-identifying as Black) enrolled at 38 U.S. sites. Black participants had worse pain at baseline compared with White participants, most notably a higher average pain rating (mean 3.1 vs. 2.2 on a 10-point scale). For each pain scale, higher pain was associated with higher mortality after adjusting for measures of disease burden, particularly for severe bone pain compared with no pain (HR, 2.47; 95% CI: 1.44–4.22). The association between pain and all-cause mortality was stronger for participants with castration-resistant prostate cancer compared with those with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and was similar among Black and White participants. Overall, Black participants reported worse pain than White participants, and more severe pain was associated with higher mortality independent of clinical covariates for all pain scales. Significance: Black participants with advanced prostate cancer reported worse pain than White participants, and more pain was associated with worse survival. More holistic clinical assessments of pain in this population are needed to determine the factors upon which to intervene to improve quality of life and survivorship, particularly for Black individuals.

PURPOSE To describe a newly established international registry recruiting diverse patients with advanced prostate cancer across academic and community practices to address unmet needs in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS Initiated in 2017, IRONMAN (International Registry for Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer) is a prospective cohort of patients with advanced prostate cancer. The study will enroll 5,000 patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) or castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), recruited from Australia, the Bahamas, Barbados, Brazil, Canada, Ireland, Jamaica, Kenya, Nigeria, Norway, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The study is collecting datatypes to study variation in care and treatment of advanced prostate cancer across countries and across academic, community-based, and government practices with a focus on clinical outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, epidemiologic data, biologic subtypes, and clinician questionnaires. RESULTS Through July 2022, 2,682 eligible patients were enrolled in 11 of 12 active countries. Sixty-six percent of patients have mHSPC, and 34% have CRPC. On the basis of self-report, 11% of patients are Black and 9% are Hispanic. Five Veterans Affairs Medical Centers are enrolling patients. Globally, 23% of patients report being veterans of military service. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first international cohort of people newly diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer designed to describe variations in patient management, experiences, and outcomes. IRONMAN aims to identify optimal treatment sequences to improve survival, understand patient-reported outcomes, and explore novel biomarkers to understand treatment resistance mechanisms. Insights from IRONMAN will inform and guide future clinical management of people with mHSPC and CRPC. This cohort study will provide real-world evidence to facilitate a better understanding of the survivorship of people with advanced prostate cancer.

65 Background: DNA repair genes including BRCA1 are commonly altered in metastatic prostate tumors. However, mutations and copy number aberrations in these genes are rare in primary tumors. Instead, preliminary studies suggest that higher tumor expression of the BRCA1 protein may be associated with worse prognosis. Methods: We undertook a prospective study of tumor BRCA1 protein expression and lethal prostate cancer among men with clinically localized prostate cancer in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. We performed immunohistochemical staining for BRCA1 on tumor tissue microarrays using a validated antibody and scored expression as positive or negative. We also assessed tumor proliferation by immunostaining for Ki67, angiogenesis by immunostaining for CD34, and apoptosis using a TUNEL assay. Proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the association between BRCA1 protein expression and development of lethal prostate cancer (metastasis or cancer-specific death). Results: Ten percent of tumors (60 of 589) stained positive for the BRCA1 protein. BRCA1-positive tumors were characterized by higher Gleason scores, a higher proliferative index, and a higher apoptotic index. During a median follow-up of 14.3 years, 18 men (34%) in the BRCA1-positive group and 74 men (14%) in the BRCA1-negative group developed lethal prostate cancer. There was a strong positive association between BRCA1 protein expression and lethal prostate cancer in both unadjusted analyses (HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.73–4.26) and after adjusting for clinical factors (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.26–3.18). The positive association with BRCA1 protein expression was also independent of proliferation index. Conclusions: Primary prostate tumors expressing the BRCA1 protein have a highly proliferative phenotype and are more likely to progress to lethal disease, independent of its higher proliferative index. Assessing tumor protein expression of BRCA1 may help elucidate the Janus-faced role of DNA repair pathways in prostate cancer progression.[Table: see text]

Abstract Background: We recently discovered that mRNA expression of SQLE, coding for squalene monooxygenase, the second rate-limiting enzyme of cholesterol synthesis, is associated with lethality after prostate cancer diagnosis. Here, we investigate how expression of SQLE and other key regulators of cholesterol homeostasis, identified by prior mechanistic studies, aid risk prediction for lethal prostate cancer. Methods: The Health Professionals Follow-up Study and the Physicians' Health Study prostate cancer tissue cohorts collected tissue from prostatectomy or transurethral resection of the prostate at cancer diagnosis. Whole-transcriptome profiling was performed. The outcome of interest was lethal cancer defined as prostate cancer mortality or development of metastases in contrast to non-lethal cancer without evidence of metastases after at least eight years of follow up. Discrimination for prostate lethal cancer was assessed by comparing c-statistics using bootstrap resampling. Results: Combining both cohorts, 112 men had lethal prostate cancer; 290 men had non-lethal cancer. A prognostic model for lethal cancer including Gleason grade, pathologic stage, age, and year of diagnosis had a high c = 0.885; adding body mass index, smoking status, family history of prostate cancer, and diabetes diagnosis increased c to 0.889. A model containing only SQLE (linear) achieved c = 0.663. Adding SQLE to the fully adjusted model increased c to 0.903 (p = 0.027). None of the other cholesterol regulators ABCA1, ACAT1, LDLR, and SCARB1 improved discrimination. Conclusions: SQLE performs well as a single biomarker of prostate cancer lethality after primary therapy, in contrast to other markers of intratumoral cholesterol regulation. Improvements in prognostication are minimal when SQLE is added to a model that contains a centrally re-reviewed Gleason grade. Most importantly, SQLE may be an actionable, predictive biomarker of benefit from statin therapy, which addresses the cholesterol synthesis pathway regulated by SQLE. Citation Format: Konrad H. Stopsack, Travis A. Gerke, Lorelei A. Mucci, Jennifer R. Rider. Prostate cancer prognostication based on an actionable metabolic pathway. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Improving Cancer Risk Prediction for Prevention and Early Detection; Nov 16-19, 2016; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PR09.

Glioma incidence is highest in non‐Hispanic Whites, and to date, glioma genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) to date have only included European ancestry (EA) populations. African Americans and Hispanics in the US have varying proportions of EA, African (AA) and Native American ancestries (NAA). It is unknown if identified GWAS loci or increased EA is associated with increased glioma risk. We assessed whether EA was associated with glioma in African Americans and Hispanics. Data were obtained for 832 cases and 675 controls from the Glioma International Case–Control Study and GliomaSE Case–Control Study previously estimated to have <80% EA, or self‐identify as non‐White. We estimated global and local ancestry using fastStructure and RFMix, respectively, using 1,000 genomes project reference populations. Within groups with ≥40% AA (AFR ≥0.4 ), and ≥15% NAA (AMR ≥0.15 ), genome‐wide association between local EA and glioma was evaluated using logistic regression conditioned on global EA for all gliomas. We identified two regions (7q21.11, p = 6.36 × 10 −4 ; 11p11.12, p = 7.0 × 10 −4 ) associated with increased EA, and one associated with decreased EA (20p12.13, p = 0.0026) in AFR ≥0.4 . In addition, we identified a peak at rs1620291 ( p = 4.36 × 10 −6 ) in 7q21.3. Among AMR ≥0.15 , we found an association between increased EA in one region (12q24.21, p = 8.38 × 10 −4 ), and decreased EA in two regions (8q24.21, p = 0. 0010; 20q13.33, p = 6.36 × 10 −4 ). No other significant associations were identified. This analysis identified an association between glioma and two regions previously identified in EA populations (8q24.21, 20q13.33) and four novel regions (7q21.11, 11p11.12, 12q24.21 and 20p12.13). The identifications of novel association with EA suggest regions to target for future genetic association studies.

Abstract Introduction: Epidemiologic data support an inverse association between statin use and risk of lethal prostate cancer, but contributing mechanisms have not been elucidated. Herein, using data from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS), we updated our previous analysis of statins and lethal prostate cancer with a decade of additional follow-up, and incorporated immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based biomarkers and gene expression profiling to identify putative molecular mechanisms contributing to the association. Methods: We included data from 44,076 HPFS participants who were cancer free in 1990, with follow-up through 2012. Participants reported prediagnostic statin use on biennial questionnaires. Statin use was categorized as current vs. never/past use, with current users further categorized as long-term vs. short-term users (≥6 vs. &lt;6 years). To classify prostate cancer molecular subtypes, genetically validated IHC assays for TMPRSS2:ERG fusion and PTEN loss were conducted on tissue microarrays for 891 and 660 cases, respectively. Whole-genome mRNA profiling of tumor and adjacent normal tissue was completed for 237 and 114 cases, respectively, using Affymetrix GeneChip Human Gene 1.0 ST arrays. We used Cox proportional hazards analysis to generate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between statin use and risk of overall, advanced (stage T3b or higher at diagnosis, metastatic or fatal), and lethal (metastatic or fatal) prostate cancer, as well as molecular subtypes, adjusted for PSA testing behavior and potential confounders including obesity and smoking. Moreover, we explored gene expression pathways in tumor and adjacent normal prostate tissue of statin users vs. nonusers using gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Results: During 22 years of follow-up, 6,144 men were diagnosed with prostate cancer; 1,051 (17%) had advanced disease and 827 (13%) developed lethal prostate cancer. Of cases with molecular subtype available, 48% were ERG-positive and 14% PTEN-null. In multivariable analysis, relative to never/past use, current statin use was inversely associated with risk of advanced (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.68-1.04) and lethal (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.68-1.01) prostate cancer. These associations were more pronounced in long-term users, where ≥6 years of prediagnosis statin use was significantly associated with a lower risk of advanced (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.53-0.97) and lethal prostate cancer (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.45-0.92), relative to nonuse. Long-term statin use was not associated with overall prostate cancer risk, whether ERG-positive (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.59-1.35) or ERG-negative (HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.74-1.50). However, relative to nonuse, a longer duration of prediagnosis statin use was associated with reduced risk of PTEN-null cancers (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.20-0.90), but not PTEN-intact disease (HR 1.18; 95% CI 0.95-1.46; p-heterogeneity=0.01). In GSEA, we identified T cell, B cell, and phosphatidylinositol (PI3K) signaling among the top pathways enriched in tumor-adjacent normal prostate tissue of current statin users, relative to never users. Intriguingly, no gene sets were differentially expressed by statin use in the tumor. Discussion: Our updated findings from the HPFS are consistent with our prior findings and other epidemiologic data supporting a role for statins in lethal prostate cancer prevention. Molecular classification of tumors identified PTEN/PI3K signaling and inflammation/immune activation as two potential mechanisms contributing to this association. Elucidating molecular mechanisms mediating the association between statin use and lower risk of lethal prostate cancer will provide support for a causal effect of statins on lethal prostate cancer risk and could inform statin clinical trials with appropriate intermediate endpoints. Citation Format: Emma H. Allott, Ericka M. Ebot, Amparo G. Gonzalez-Feliciano, Sarah C. Markt, Kathryn M. Wilson, Thomas U. Ahearn, Travis A. Gerke, Mary K. Downer, Konrad H. Stopsack, Jennifer R. Rider, Stephen J. Freedland, Elizabeth A. Platz, Meir J. Stampfer, Edward L. Giovannucci, Christopher J. Sweeney, Stephen P. Finn, Lorelei A. Mucci. Molecular tumor profiling to identify mechanisms linking statin use with lower risk of lethal prostate cancer: Results from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Prostate Cancer: Advances in Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research; 2017 Dec 2-5; Orlando, Florida. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(16 Suppl):Abstract nr A015.

Abstract Background: Inflammation is linked to prostate cancer progression and is mediated by NF-κB. Tristetraprolin is a key node of NF-κB activation and we investigated its biological and prognostic role in lethal prostate cancer. Methods: In vitro assays assessed the function of tristetraprolin and the association between low mRNA tristetraprolin levels and lethal prostate cancer (metastatic disease or death) was assessed across independent prostatectomy cohorts: (i) nested case-control studies from Health Professionals Follow-up Study and Physicians’ Health Study, and (ii) prostatectomy samples from Cleveland Clinic, Mayo Clinic, Johns Hopkins and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Tristetraprolin expression levels in prostatectomy samples from patients with localized disease and biopsies of metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) were assessed in a Cornell University cohort. Results: In vitro tristetraprolin expression was inversely associated with NF-κB–controlled genes, proliferation, and enzalutamide sensitivity. Men with localized prostate cancer and lower quartile of tumor tristetraprolin expression had a significant, nearly two-fold higher risk of lethal prostate cancer after adjusting for known clinical and histologic prognostic features (age, RP Gleason score, T-stage). Tristetraprolin expression was also significantly lower in mCRPC compared with localized prostate cancer. Conclusions: Lower levels of tristetraprolin in human prostate cancer prostatectomy tissue are associated with more aggressive prostate cancer and may serve as an actionable prognostic and predictive biomarker. Impact: There is a clear need for improved biomarkers to identify patients with localized prostate cancer in need of treatment intensification, such as adjuvant testosterone suppression, or treatment de-intensification, such as active surveillance. Tristetraprolin levels may serve as informative biomarkers in localized prostate cancer.

5062 Background: Inflammation has been linked to prostate cancer (PCa) progression which may be mediated by the transcription factor nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB). Using a bioinformatic screen focused on NFκB pathway activation in lethal PCa, we identified the tumor suppressor ZFP36 as a key node of the NFκB network. We also showed in vitro that ZFP36 expression was inversely associated with both NFκB-controlled gene levels and proliferation and sensitivity to enzalutamide. We examined the role of ZFP36 and PCa progression in patient cohorts. Methods: The association between low mRNA expression of ZFP36 (levels in the lower quartile) and lethal PCa (defined as metastatic disease or death) was assessed with logistic regression among men with localized PCa in two independent cohorts treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). The discovery cohort was RP samples from Health Professional Follow-up Study and Physicians Health Study and the validation cohort was RP samples from Cleveland Clinic, Mayo Clinic, Johns Hopkins and MSKCC. In a third cohort from Cornell University, ZFP36 expression levels were assessed in RP samples from patients with localized PCa and biopsies of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Results: Table 1 shows men with localized PCa and lower quartile of tumor ZFP36 expression had a nearly 2-fold higher risk of lethal PCa after adjusting for known clinical and histological prognostic features (age, RP Gleason score, T-stage); an association confirmed in the validation cohort. ZFP36 gene expression was also significantly lower in mCRPC (n=53) compared with a localized RP cohort (n=68) (p-value <0.0001). Conclusions: In humans lower ZFP36 in RP specimens is associated with clinically significant risk of lethal PCa after treatment with curative intent and lower ZFP36levels are found in metastatic tissue. [Table: see text]