Dogo, Hassan

Abstract Introduction: Most people who die from prostate cancer are older than 75 years. However, prostate cancer diagnosed at younger ages is often more aggressive. While epidemiologic studies have examined the association between age and survival in patients with prostate cancer overall, the clinical drivers of this relationship in patients with advanced disease remain unclear. We leveraged the International Registry of Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer (IRONMAN, NCT03151629) to (1) quantify the association between age and overall survival and (2) explore whether this association is explained by treatments. Methods: We included 3, 734 patients enrolled from 15 countries with new diagnoses of metastatic hormone sensitive (mHSPC, N=2, 642) or castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC, N=1, 092). Age at enrollment was categorized as <55, 55-59, 60-64 (reference), 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, 80-84, 85+ years. We computed age-specific death rates (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) by disease state (mHSPC, CRPC) at enrollment. To explore whether this relationship was explained by treatment, we fitted disease state-stratified Cox models and sequentially adjusted for (1) de novo metastatic status and country, and (2) baseline treatment (androgen deprivation therapy [ADT] alone, ADT + androgen receptor pathway inhibitors [ARPI], ADT + chemotherapy, ADT + ARPI + chemotherapy, other). Results: Over 5.5 years of follow-up (median: 3.2 years, IQR: 1.7, 4.8), 995 patients died from any cause. Younger patients were more likely to have de novo metastatic disease. Among those with mHSPC at enrollment, the age-specific death rates per 1, 000 person-years followed a J-shaped pattern: 80 (95% CI: 54, 117) in patients under 55 years, 58 (46, 74) in patients aged 60-64, 102 (78, 133) in patients aged 80-84, and 172 (125, 236) in patients aged 85 and older. The death rates among those with CRPC followed a similar pattern, albeit rates were higher in magnitude: 212 (95% CI: 140, 323) in patients under 55 years, 153 (115, 202) in patients aged 60-64, 200 (155, 258) in patients aged 80-84, and 204 (142, 291) in patients aged 85 and older. After adjusting for disease state, country, and the timing of diagnosis of metastases, death rates were substantially higher for ages 75-79 (HR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1, 1.7), 80-84 years (HR 1.6; 95% CI 1.2, 2.1), and 85 years and older (HR 2.0; 95% CI: 1.5, 2.7) compared to ages 60-64 years. Patients aged under 55 years had 1.4-fold higher death rates (95% CI: 1.0, 1.9) compared to those 60-64 years. After additionally adjusting for baseline treatment, overall survival remained worse for the older patients and the youngest age group with hazard ratios remaining meaningfully unchanged. Conclusion: Age at enrollment is associated with overall survival in people with advanced prostate cancer enrolled in IRONMAN in a J-shaped pattern. This relationship is not explained by differences in baseline treatment. Citation Format: Hannah E. Guard, Michelle O. Sodipo, Colleen B. McGrath, Anna Siefkas, Lauren E. Howard, Konrad H. Stopsack, Christopher M. Sauer, Robert Dreicer, Emilio Esteban, Hassan M. Dogo, Ademola Popoola, Charles Waihenya, Anders Bjartell, Kim N. Chi, Sebastien Hotte, Richard Cathomas, Deborah Enting, Scott Tagawa, Michael Ong, Michael Kolinsky, Vincent Khoo, Joaquin Mateo, Chidiebere N. Ogo, Rana R. McKay, Stefanie Fischer, Heather H. Cheng, Russell Szmulewitz, Young E. Whang, Anand Sharma, Frédéric Pouliot, Simon Crabb, Monica S. Chatwal, Miguel A. Climent, Raymond McDermott, Ian D. Davis, Camille Ragin, Folakemi T. Odedina, Simon Anderson, Simone Badal, Natalie Greaves, Karen A. Autio, Laurel Cannon, Alyssa Chan-Cuzydlo, Marie Grant, Travis Gerke, Hannah D. McManus, Philip W. Kantoff, Daniel J. George, Lorelei A. Mucci, IRONMAN investigator team. Disentangling the association between age and overall survival in an international cohort of patients with advanced prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 4935.

Abstract Introduction: The standard of care for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has evolved with the expanded approval of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) alongside androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). ADT alone has been shown to affect cognitive function. However, the cognitive impact of distinct treatment combinations remains unclear. We investigated the association between first-line systemic treatments and the trajectory of subjective cognitive function among mHSPC survivors in the International Registry for Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer (IRONMAN). Methods: This analysis included 2435 newly diagnosed mHSPC patients enrolled across 15 countries between July 2017 and August 2024. Treatments were reported by site personnel and physicians. For this analysis, we focused on first-line systemic treatment and classified treatment groups at enrollment as ADT monotherapy (referent), ADT + ARPIs, or ADT + chemotherapy. Subjective cognitive function was assessed via the EORTC QLQ-C30 Cognitive Function subscale, with patient-reported scores (range 0-100) collected at enrollment and every 3 months for up to 5 years; higher scores reflect better cognitive function. Associations were estimated using linear mixed effects models with clustering by study site and country to examine differences at enrollment and across trajectories of subjective cognitive function by first-line treatment, adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. Results: Median age at enrollment was 70 years, with a median follow-up of 1.7 years. 724 (30%) participants were treated with ADT monotherapy, 1317 (54%) with ADT + ARPIs, and 394 (16%) with ADT + chemotherapy. Mean cognitive function scores at enrollment were 85.4 (Standard Deviation [SD] 19.5) for participants treated with ADT monotherapy, 86.7 (SD 17.3) for ADT + ARPIs, and 86.7 (SD 18.0) for ADT + chemotherapy. Cognitive function scores decreased by -0.60 points (95% Confidence Interval [CI] -0.72, -0.48) per year among those treated with ADT monotherapy, with similar rates observed for those treated with ADT + chemotherapy. Participants treated with ADT + ARPIs had a slower decline in cognitive function, with scores decreasing by -0.36 points (95% CI -0.60, -0.08) per year. Conclusion: In this international cohort of mHSPC survivors, subjective cognitive function scores were generally high at enrollment but declined over time. There was no evidence of worse cognitive function in those treated with ADT + ARPIs nor ADT + chemotherapy over time compared to ADT monotherapy. Cognitive functioning is a key component of survivorship, and defining cognitive trajectories associated with first-line treatment can inform supportive interventions, patient treatment decision-making, and clinical guidelines. Citation Format: Michelle O. Sodipo, Alicia K. Morgans, Erica T. Warner, Emily M. Rencsok, Lauren E. Howard, Colleen B. McGrath, Anna Siefkas, Konrad H. Stopsack, Christopher Sauer, Robert Drecier, Emilio Esteban, Hassan M. Dogo, Ademola Popoola, Charles Waihenya, Anders Bjartell, Kim Chi, Sebastien Hotte, Richard Cathomas, Deborah Enting, Scott Tagawa, Michael Ong, David Lorente, Elisabeth Heath, Rana McKay, Stefanie Fischer, Heather H. Cheng, Young E. Whang, Frederic Pouliot, Simon Crabb, Monica Chatwal, Miguel A. Climent, Raymond McDermott, Ian D. Davis, Camille Ragin, Folakemi Odedina, Natalie Greaves, Simone Badal, Simon Anderson, Sharon Harrison, Karen Autio, Laurel Cannon, Marie Grant, Alyssa Chan-Cuzydlo, Travis Gerke, Hannah D. McManus, Philip W. Kantoff, Daniel George, Sebastien Haneuse, Lorelei A. Mucci, on behalf of the IRONMAN Registry. First-line therapies and subjective cognitive function trajectories among international metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 3630.

PURPOSE There is limited cancer clinical research in sub-Saharan African countries despite the significant burden of cancers. The primary objective of this strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis was to understand and document factors affecting the successful implementation of prostate cancer (CaP) clinical research in Nigeria. METHODS The research team used a qualitative design involving International Registry of Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer (IRONMAN) study team members as participants from four regional sites in Nigeria. One-hour listening sessions were conducted via Zoom at each site, focusing on SWOT related to the IRONMAN study. All sessions were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed. Themes were inductively coded and then synthesized across all four sites. RESULTS The study teams identified several strengths and weaknesses in conducting the IRONMAN study at their respective sites. Key strengths included access to robust patient population for recruitment and the availability of essential resources, such as lab space, clinical knowledge, and adequate staffing. Weaknesses centered on the social determinants of health that hinder patient participation, such as transportation challenges, distance to clinics, limited access to care, and insufficient biorepository space for sample storage. A prominent opportunity identified was the potential for Nigerian institutions to engage in more clinical research, particularly multisite global trials. Threats included difficulties in retaining research staff and political instability. CONCLUSION This study highlights the promising research opportunities in Nigeria. The lessons learned from the IRONMAN study provide valuable insights into the feasibility of conducting CaP clinical research and trials tailored to the needs of Black men in sub-Saharan Africa. These findings offer a roadmap for future research efforts, with the potential to expand clinical trials and improve health outcomes across the region.

Abstract Background: The need to increase understanding of prostate cancer (CaP) is ever increasing. Unfortunately, there is limited understanding of how CaP affects men of African ancestry (MAA) despite significant disparities in CaP prevention, diagnosis, and treatment due to genetic and sociobehavioral factors. Conducting CaP clinical trials (CTs) in Africa presents multiple opportunities to improve upon collective knowledge of CaP in MAA experiences, expand patient access to CTs, and provide opportunities for African scientists and urologists to contribute to research on the global stage. The International Registry of Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer (IRONMAN) seeks to reduce CaP disparities by sponsoring sites throughout Africa. Four Prostate Cancer Transatlantic Consortium (CaPTC) institutions in Nigeria currently participate in IRONMAN: University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Federal Medical Center, University of Maiduguri, and Lagos State University Teaching Hospital. Because CTs of this scale are infrequently conducted in Africa, there are special considerations when conducting CTs in low-middle-income countries (LMICs) like Nigeria. Methods: Hourlong interviews dedicated to site staff were conducted via Zoom in Spring 2023 (four total). Interviews utilized a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis approach. Each interview was recorded, transcribed, and validated by study staff for accuracy. Themes from each were inductively coded and then collated across all four sites. Results: The urologists, oncologists, phlebotomists, pathologists, nurses, research coordinators that make up the study teams identified the holistics of conducting the IRONMAN study at their sites. Strengths included a large patient population to recruit from and appropriate resources to conduct the study (ex., lab space, clinical knowledge, staffing levels). Weaknesses included the social determinants of health that negatively impact patient participation, limited biorepository space to store samples, and the need for patient-physician trust. The greatest opportunity presented was Nigerian institutions joining more CTs in the future, particularly multi-site global trials. Described threats included staff turnover, national stability, and increased economic disparities. Discussion: While increasing the overall number of CTs in Africa is a noble cause, sponsors and institutions should note the unique circumstances in implementing CTs in Africa when designing CTs and recruiting sites. Listening to the experiences of study teams is pivotal in ensuring CTs are Africa-minded - they will be complimentary to established research infrastructure, appropriately funded, and culturally responsive all in the name of equitable research. By doing so, ethical compliance and quality data collection will ensue and reduce disparities at the micro, mezzo, and macro levels. Citation Format: Opeyemi Oreoluwa Bolajoko, Parisa Fathi, Oluwaseyi Toye, Dottington D. Fulwood, Ademola Popoola, Chidiebere Ogo, Hassan Dogo, Omolara Fatiregun, Anthonia Sowumi, Paul Jibrin, Mutiu A. Jimoh, Faruk Mohammed, Folakemi Odedina, Prostate Cancer Transatlantic Consortium. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of conducting clinical trials in Nigeria: The IRONMAN study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 1013.