McKie, Paul M.

Background: Preclinical diastolic dysfunction (PDD) is defined as subjects with normal systolic function, moderate or severe diastolic dysfunction determined by Doppler criteria but with no symptoms of heart failure (HF). We have previously demonstrated that an impaired cardiorenal endocrine response to stress by acute volume loading (AVL) exists in PDD and that is corrected by acute administration of sq B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). Type V phosphodiesterase (PDEV) metabolizes cGMP, second messenger of BNP. The objective of the current study is to determine if the combination of PDEV inhibitor (PDEVI) and BNP will result in a greater enhancement of the cardiorenal response to AVL as compared to PDEVI alone in PDD. Methods: Randomized double-blind single placebo-controlled cross-over study in 20 PSD subjects. We determined cardiorenal effects of PDEVI with Tadalafil (T) 5 mg alone and in combination with acute sq BNP (Nesiritide 10 μg/Kg), in response to AVL (normal saline 0.25 ml/kg/min for 1 hour). Each subject had 2 study visits, separated by at least 1 week. At each visit, echocardiogram and renal clearance studies with iothalmate and PAH to measure GFR and renal plasma flow (RPF) were done before and after AVL. Each patient was randomized to receive T at both visits and either placebo or sq-BNP one visit and crossover to the other on the next visit. Results: T+BNP resulted in smaller LA volume index (-4±10 vs 3±7 ml/m 2 , p< 0.05) and lower right ventricular systolic pressure (-4±3 vs 2±6 mmHg, p< 0.05) in response to AVL as compared to T alone. Moreover, T+ BNP resulted in a significant reduction of plasma ANP and LV end-systolic volume in response to AVL while T alone did not. However, the combination to T+BNP did not enhance the renal response to AVL as compared to T alone. Both the change in urine flow (1.7±5 vs 2.4±5 ml/min, p> 0.05) and sodium excretion (129±200 vs 124±270 mEq/min, p>0.05) in response to AVL were similar between T+BNP and T alone. Conclusion: In PDD, the combination of PDEVI and BNP reduced LV filling pressure in response to AVL as compared to PDEVI alone. However, it did not enhance the renal response to AVL. This suggests a differential cardiac versus renal response to the maximization of cGMP system with PDEVI and BNP.

Introduction: Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) plays an important role in blood pressure (BP) regulation via the second messenger cGMP. ANP also induces lipolysis by increasing plasma levels of non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA). MANP is a new Mayo Clinic designed ANP analog consisting of the native ANP with a novel 12-amino-acid C-terminus extension. In experimental models, MANP is more potent than ANP in reducing BP and inducing natriuresis. These actions are mediated by the activation of the pGC-A receptor and generation of cGMP. To date, the BP pressure lowering, cGMP generating and lipolytic actions of MANP remain unexplored along with its safety and tolerability in subjects with hypertension (HTN) associated with metabolic disease. Hypothesis: In subjects with HTN, obesity and metabolic syndrome (MS), MANP administration is safe, well tolerated, activates cGMP and exerts BP lowering and lipolytic properties. Methods: Double-blind, placebo-control clinical trial in 22 subjects (17 receiving MANP) with HTN, obesity and MS involving a single subcutaneous (SQ) injection of MANP (2.5 μg/Kg) or placebo. Subjects were monitored and cardiovascular, cGMP and metabolic parameters were collected during 24 hours after the injection. Results: In all subjects, MANP was safe and well-tolerated with no serious adverse side effects. MANP increased mean cGMP plasma levels after 30 minutes (delta: 4.8 ± 2.0 pmol/mL, p=0.02) and 1 hour (delta: 2.9 ±1.3 pmol/mL, p=0.03) when compared to baseline. Six hours after MANP injection systolic BP decreased by 5.7 ± 2.9 mmHg (p=0.06) whereas subjects receiving placebo had no decrease in blood pressure values compared to baseline. During fasting period, one hour after the administration of MANP, NEFA plasma levels increased by 108.2 ± 37.4 μM (p=0.01). Conclusions: In subjects with HTN, obesity and MS, SQ MANP is safe, well tolerated and activates the pGC-A receptor as measured by a significant increase in the second messenger cGMP. Subjects receiving MANP showed a borderline significant decrease in systolic BP and a significant increase in NEFA circulating levels supporting anti-hypertensive and lipolytic properties. Our findings support MANP as a potential novel therapy for HTN associated with metabolic disease.

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a progressive clinical syndrome commonly associated with left ventricle dilatation and characterized by reduced cardiac output, secondary pulmonary and systemic venous congestion, and inadequate peripheral oxygen delivery. It is common yet complex and requires synthesis of evidence-based guidelines along with strong clinical acumen. The following is a review of an illustrative case that highlights the important clinical considerations in diagnosis, assessment, and management of HFrEF commonly encountered in practice. Explanations provided highlight of the relevant pathophysiology of HFrEF as well as detailed explanations of interpretation of examinations and both noninvasive and invasive assessment in heart failure. The example provided would hopefully serve as a potential point of reference for trainees as well as healthcare practitioners for patients with HFrEF.

Background Neuroimaging for headache commonly exceeds published guideline recommendations and may be overutilized. Methods We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of all outpatient community patients at Mayo Clinic Rochester who underwent a neuroimaging study for a headache indication in 2015. We assessed the neuroimaging utilization pattern, clinical application of red flags, and concordance with neuroimaging guidelines. Results We identified 190 outpatients who underwent 304 neuroimaging studies for headache. The median age was 46.5 years (range 18–91 years), 65% were female, and most reported no prior history of headache (n = 97, 51%). A minority of patients had prior brain imaging studies (n = 44, 23%) and neurological consultations for headache (n = 29, 15%). Few studies were ordered after consultation with a neurologist (n = 14, 7%). Seventy-seven percent of patients were documented to have a “red flag” justifying the imaging study. Abnormal neuroimaging findings were found in 3.1% of patients with warning flags (5/161); carotid dissection (n = 3) and reversible cerebral vasoconstrictive syndrome (n = 2). An estimated 35% of patients were imaged against guidelines. Conclusions The prevalence of serious causes of headache in a community practice was low despite the presence of a documented red flag symptom. Inadequate understanding or application of red flags may be contributing to recommendations to image patients against current guidelines. Interventions to reduce unnecessary neuroimaging of patients with headache need to be designed and implemented.

Introduction Clinical practice guidelines facilitate optimal clinical practice. Point of care access, interpretation and application of such guidelines, however, is inconsistent. Informatics-based tools may help clinicians apply guidelines more consistently. We have developed a novel clinical decision support tool that presents guideline-relevant information and actionable items to clinicians at the point of care. We aim to test whether this tool improves the management of hyperlipidaemia, atrial fibrillation and heart failure by primary care clinicians. Methods/analysis Clinician care teams were cluster randomised to receive access to the clinical decision support tool or passive access to institutional guidelines on 16 May 2016. The trial began on 1 June 2016 when access to the tool was granted to the intervention clinicians. The trial will be run for 6 months to ensure a sufficient number of patient encounters to achieve 80% power to detect a twofold increase in the primary outcome at the 0.05 level of significance. The primary outcome measure will be the percentage of guideline-based recommendations acted on by clinicians for hyperlipidaemia, atrial fibrillation and heart failure. We hypothesise care teams with access to the clinical decision support tool will act on recommendations at a higher rate than care teams in the standard of care arm. Ethics and dissemination The Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board approved all study procedures. Informed consent was obtained from clinicians. A waiver of informed consent and of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorisation for patients managed by clinicians in the study was granted. In addition to publication, results will be disseminated via meetings and newsletters. Trial registration number NCT02742545 .

Background Soluble ST2 is a biomarker that is elevated in certain systemic inflammatory diseases. Comorbidity‐driven microvascular inflammation is postulated to play a key role in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction ( HF p EF ) pathophysiology, but data on how sST 2 relates to clinical characteristics or inflammatory conditions or biomarkers in HF p EF are limited. We sought to determine circulating levels and clinical correlates of sST 2 in HF pEF. Methods and Results At enrollment, patients (n=174) from the Phosphodiesterase‐5 Inhibition to Improve Clinical Status And Exercise Capacity in Diastolic Heart Failure (RELAX) trial of sildenafil in HF p EF had sST 2 levels measured. Clinical characteristics; cardiac structure and function; exercise performance; and biomarkers of neurohumoral activation, systemic inflammation and fibrosis, and myocardial necrosis were assessed in relation to sST 2 levels. Median sST 2 levels in male and female HFpEF patients were 36.7 ng/mL (range 30.9–49.2 ng/mL; reference range 4–31 ng/mL) and 30.8 ng/mL (range 25.3–39.3 ng/mL; reference range 2–21 ng/mL), respectively. Among HF p EF patients, higher sST 2 levels were associated with the presence of diabetes mellitus; atrial fibrillation; renal dysfunction; right ventricular pressure overload and dysfunction; systemic congestion; exercise intolerance; and biomarkers of systemic inflammation and fibrosis, neurohumoral activation, and myocardial necrosis ( P <0.05 for all). sST 2 was not associated with left ventricular structure or left ventricular systolic or diastolic function. Conclusions In HF p EF , sST 2 levels were associated with proinflammatory comorbidities, right ventricular pressure overload and dysfunction, and systemic congestion but not with left ventricular geometry or function. These data suggest that sST2 may be a marker of systemic inflammation in HF p EF and potentially of extracardiac origin. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 00763867.

Abstract Aims Guided by predictive characteristics of cardiovascular biomarkers, we explored the clinical implications of a simulated biomarker-guided heart failure (HF) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) prevention strategy in the community. Methods and results In a community cohort (n = 1824), the predictive characteristics for HF and MACE of galectin-3 (Gal-3), ST2, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hscTnI), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) were established. We performed number needed to screen (NNS) and treat (NNT) with the intervention analyses according to biomarker screening strategy and intervention efficacy in persons with at least one cardiovascular risk factor. In the entire cohort, for both HF and MACE, the predictive characteristics of NT-proBNP and hscTnI were superior to other biomarkers; alone, in a multimarker model, and adjusting for clinical risk factors. An NT-proBNP-guided preventative intervention with an intervention effect size (4-year hazard ratio for intervention in biomarker positive cohort) of ≤0.7 would reduce the global burden of HF by ≥20% and MACE by ≥15%. From this simulation, the NNS to prevent one HF event or MACE in 4 years would be ≤100 with a NNT to prevent one HF event of ≤20 and one MACE of ≤10. Conclusions The predictive characteristics of NT-proBNP and hscTnI for HF or MACE in the community are superior to other biomarkers. Biomarker-guided preventative interventions with reasonable efficacy would compare favourably to established preventative interventions. This data provides a framework for biomarker selection which may inform design of biomarker-guided preventative intervention trials.