Wackel, Philip L.

ABSTRACT Background Coronary artery (CA) injury from catheter ablation is an uncommon complication, but the risk is under‐recognized. The risk for CA injury significantly increases when a CA is within 3 mm of the site of ablation, but CA imaging to assess for CA proximity to ablation sites is not commonly performed in children prior to ablation. Objective The aim of the study was to assess CA proximity to potential ablation sites. Methods A retrospective review of all coronary computed tomography angiograms (CTAs) in pediatric patients <18 years of age at Mayo Clinic from 2017 through 2023 was conducted. The proximity of CAs to potential ablation sites in the coronary sinus and the appendage bases were measured. Results Seventy‐two CTAs in 67 patients >15 kg and <18 years old were included. Median age was 12 years, and median weight was 41 kg. In right dominant CA circulation, 23/36 (64%) had a CA within 3 mm of the coronary sinus. In left and co‐dominant CA circulation, 26/26 (100%) had a CA within 3 mm of the coronary sinus. The right CA was within 3 mm of the appendage base in 49/69 (71%). The circumflex CA was within 3 mm of the appendage base in 50/68 (74%). Conclusion Most pediatric patients have a CA ≤ 3 mm from potential ablation sites in the coronary sinus and base of the appendages. Precautions should be taken to avoid CA damage before performing catheter ablation in these areas.

Background: Coronary artery (CA) injury from catheter ablation is an uncommon complication, but the risk is under recognized. In pediatrics, CA imaging to assess for CA proximity is not commonly performed prior to ablation. The risk for CA injury significantly increases when a CA is within 3 mm of the site of ablation. Research Question: How often is there a CA within 3 mm of a potential ablation site in pediatric patients? Methods: A retrospective review of all coronary computed tomography angiograms (CTAs) in pediatric patients <18 years of age at Mayo Clinic from 2017 through 2023 was conducted. The proximity of CAs to potential ablation sites in the coronary sinus and the appendage bases were measured. Results: Seventy-two CTAs in 67 patients >15 kg and <18 years old were included. Median age was 12 years and median weight was 41 kg. In right dominant CA circulation, 23/36 (64%) had a CA within 3 mm of the coronary sinus. For those within 3 mm, the mean distance from the coronary sinus was 1.4 mm +/- 0.2 mm for a length of 10 mm +/- 2 mm (Figure 1A). In left and co-dominant CA circulation, 26/26 (100%) had a CA within 3 mm of the coronary sinus with a mean distance of 1.1 mm +/- 0.2 mm for a length of 27 mm +/- 2 mm (Figure 1B). The right CA was within 3 mm of the appendage base in 49/69 (71%). For those within 3 mm, the mean distance was 1.9 mm +/- 0.2 mm for a length of 17 mm +/- 2 mm. The circumflex CA was within 3 mm of the appendage base in 50/68 (74%). Of the 50 within 3 mm, the mean distance was 2.1 mm +/- 0.2 mm for a length of 9 mm +/- 2 mm. Conclusion: Most pediatric patients have a CA ≤ 3 mm from potential ablation sites in the coronary sinus and base of the appendages. Before performing catheter ablation in these areas, precautions should be taken to avoid CA damage.

ABSTRACTNoonan syndrome (NS) is a predominantly autosomal dominant condition with various cardiac and extra‐cardiac manifestations. Although it has been linked with atrial arrhythmias, ventricular arrhythmias are extremely rare in the absence of underlying structural cardiac abnormalities. We report an instance of aborted sudden cardiac arrest in a 7‐year‐old male with a confirmed SOS1 variant and a lack of evidence to support a structural cardiac, metabolic, or infectious etiology. This is the second reported instance of sudden cardiac arrest related to ventricular fibrillation in a child with SOS1‐related NS in the absence of any structural cardiac defects. Although no definitive correlation can be ascertained from a limited existing body of knowledge surrounding SOS1 and ventricular fibrillation unrelated to structural heart defects, it provokes the idea of an arrhythmia phenotype and future research is warranted to guide proper clinical treatment, monitoring, and management of such individuals.

AbstractBackgroundRoutine defibrillation threshold testing (DFT) of transvenous implantable defibrillators (ICDs) has largely been in decline. In patients with non‐transvenous ICDs that utilize subcutaneous and pleural ICD leads, serial DFT testing can detect a significant number of failures. Data about the utility of follow‐up defibrillation safety margin testing (DSM) testing in pediatric patients and young adults with an epicardial ICD are lacking.MethodsPatients aged < 25 years old who underwent epicardial ICD placement at Mayo Clinic from 2014 to 2023 with at least one follow‐up DSM test were included. The patients were divided into a “routine” (R) and “clinically indicated” (CI) group based on the index of clinical concern. Inadequate DSM was defined as unsuccessful defibrillation at an output of less than 10 J below the maximum output of the device. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of follow‐up DSM testing.ResultsAn epicardial ICD system was placed in 122 patients. A total of 26 patients met inclusion criteria and underwent a total of 47 DSM follow up tests. Inadequate DSM occurred in 1/33 (3%) in the R group and 2/14 (14%) DSM tests in the CI group. The median follow‐up period was 54 and 36 months for the R and CI group, respectively.ConclusionsOur data suggest that epicardial ICDs are reliable and routine follow‐up DSM testing may not be necessary for all patients. DSM testing should be performed in individuals with epicardial ICD systems when there is clinical concern about lead or coil performance.

Background Lead performance is suboptimal in young patients and a main cause of device system failure. Our objective was to assess early and midterm outcomes after epicardial device implantation in a contemporary pediatric cohort. Methods A total of 116 consecutive pediatric patients underwent 137 epicardial device implantations from 2010 to 2019. Forty pacemakers and 97 implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) were implanted. Lead failure was defined as leads repaired, replaced, or abandoned due to fracture, dislodgement, or dysfunction. Freedom from device system failure was determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results Mean age at implantation was 10 ± 5 years, 46 (34%) were younger than 8 years old, 41 (30%) had prior cardiac surgery, and 38 (28%) had prior devices. Main indications were acquired heart block (17/40 [43%]), sinus node dysfunction (14/40 [35%]), and congenital heart block (7/40 [18%]) for pacemakers, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (46/97 [47%]), long QT syndrome (31/97 [32%]), and ventricular arrhythmia (17/97 [18%]) for ICDs. There were no early deaths. Three-year freedom from device system failure was 80% (95% CI 73%, 88%) for all patients and 88% (95% CI 79%, 99%) for patients <8 years old. Device system failure causes included lead fracture (20/34 [59%]), lead dysfunction (5/34 [15%]), lead dislodgement (5/34 [15%]), infection (3/34 [9%]), and pericarditis (1/34 [3%]). Reintervention was required in 26/34 (76%) device system failures. Conclusions Epicardial device implantation is safe, shows acceptable midterm outcomes in children, and is an effective option in patients younger than 8 years old. Close device surveillance continues to be essential to detect lead failure early and ensure timely reintervention.