Back to Authors

Mita, Alain C.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5387-0160

Mayo Clinic

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Citations 2

Randomized phase II trial of pemetrexed/cisplatin with or without CBP501 in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).
Krug, Lee M., Wozniak, Antoinette J., Kindler, Hedy L. , Feld, Ronald, Koczywas, Marianna , Morero, José Luis, Rodriguez, Cristina P. , Ross, Helen J. , Bauman, Julie E. , Ruckdeschel, John C. , Mita, Alain C. , Fein, Luis , Kawabe, Takumi, Sharma, Sunil, Orlov, Sergey , Fernández, Cristian , Hall, Robert

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 11, 2020 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 7029-7029

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.7029 Get It

7029 Background: CBP501, a synthetic duodecapeptide, enhances the cytotoxicity of cisplatin in cell lines and xenografts, including NCI-H226 human mesothelioma. CBP501 increases cisplatin influx into tumor cells through an interaction with calmodulin, and inhibits cell cycle progression by abrogating DNA repair at the G2 checkpoint. Phase I clinical trials combining CBP501 with cisplatin alone or with pemetrexed showed acceptable safety profiles and suggested activity. The most common toxicity of CBP501 is infusion-related urticaria, which is easily managed with diphenhydramine. Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable MPM were stratified by histology (epithelioid vs other) and performance status (PS 0-1 vs 2) and randomized 2:1 to Arm A: pemetrexed/cisplatin plus CBP501 25 mg/m2 IV (42 pts planned), or Arm B: pemetrexed/cisplatin alone at standard doses (21 pts planned). Patients continued on treatment until progression or intolerance; no maintenance therapy was delivered. The primary endpoint is progression free survival (PFS) in Arm A; if > 23 of the 42 patients remain free of progression more than 4 months, the combination will be deemed worthy of further study. In addition to standard CT imaging to assess response and PFS, PET scans, pulmonary function tests, and mesothelin levels were performed. Results: Enrollment was completed in October 2011. 65 pts from 14 institutions were randomized, and 63 were treated. Patient characteristics in the two arms were similar and as follows: median age 65, 82% male, 71% epithelioid histology, 8% PS2. Grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities were uncommon, no different than expected from standard chemotherapy, and comparable in the two arms. 70% of patients treated with CBP501 had infusion reactions, all grade 1-2. The best overall response rate in evaluable patients (modified RECIST, investigator assessed) was 12/37 (32%) (95% CI 18-50) in Arm A, and 3/22 (14%) (95% CI 3-35) in Arm B. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 5.5 in Arm A, 5 in Arm B. Conclusions: Data on the primary endpoint of PFS in Arm A are maturing and will be presented at the meeting.
Phase I Study of PSMA-Targeted Docetaxel-Containing Nanoparticle BIND-014 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors
Hoff, Daniel D. Von , Mita, Monica , Ramanathan, Ramesh K., Mita, Alain C. , LoRusso, Patricia , Burris, Howard A. , Hart, Lowell L., Low, Susan C. , Parsons, Donald M., Zale, Stephen E., Summa, Jason M., Youssoufian, Hagop , Sachdev, Jasgit C. , Weiss, Glen J.

Clinical Cancer Research | February 4, 2016 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 3157-3163

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-2548 Get It

Abstract Purpose: First-in-human phase I trial to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of BIND-014, a novel, tumor prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–targeted nanoparticle, containing docetaxel. Experimental Design: Patients with advanced solid tumors received BIND-014 every three weeks (n = 28) or weekly (n = 27), with dose levels ranging from 3.5 to 75 mg/m2 and 15 to 45 mg/m2, respectively. Results: BIND-014 was generally well tolerated, with no unexpected toxicities. The most common drug-related toxicities (>20% of patients) on either schedule included neutropenia, fatigue, anemia, alopecia, and diarrhea. BIND-014 demonstrated a dose-linear pharmacokinetic profile, distinct from docetaxel, with prolonged persistence of docetaxel-encapsulated circulating nanoparticles. Of the 52 patients evaluable for response, one had a complete response (cervical cancer on the every three week schedule) and five had partial responses (ampullary adenocarcinoma, non–small cell lung, and prostate cancers on the every-three-week schedule, and breast and gastroesophageal cancers on the weekly schedule). Responses were noted in both PSMA-detectable and -undetectable tumors. Conclusions: BIND-014 was generally well tolerated, with predictable and manageable toxicity and a unique pharmacokinetic profile compared with conventional docetaxel. Clinical activity was noted in multiple tumor types. The recommended phase II dose of BIND-014 is 60 mg/m2 every three weeks or 40 mg/m2 weekly. Clin Cancer Res; 22(13); 3157–63. ©2016 AACR.