Orlov, Sergey

9520 Background: Capmatinib (INC280) has shown promising efficacy in patients (pts) with MET exon 14 ( METex14)–mutated NSCLC who were pretreated (cohort 4) or treatment (tx)-naïve (cohort 5b) in the ongoing, multicohort, phase 2 GEOMETRY mono-1 study. We report the results for pts enrolled in the expansion cohort 6 with either high-level MET amplification (gene copy number [GCN] ≥10) or METex14 mutation (any MET GCN) whose disease progressed on 1 prior line of systemic therapy. Methods: Adult pts (≥18 years), ECOG PS 0–1 who had ALK and EGFR wt, stage IIIB/IV NSCLC (any histology) received capmatinib tablets 400 mg twice daily (with or without food). Key efficacy endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) by blinded independent review committee (BIRC) per RECIST v1.1. Other secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed ORR, DOR, disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS; BIRC and investigator assessment) and safety. Results: As of Jan 6, 2020, 34 NSCLC pts with METex14 mutation (n = 31) or high-level MET amplification (n = 3) were included in this analysis. Tx was ongoing for 38.2% of pts. In METex14-mutated NSCLC pts, per BIRC assessment: ORR was 48.4%, median DOR was 6.93 months (mo, not yet mature, 95% CI: 4.17–NE) and median PFS was 8.11 mo (not yet mature, 95% CI: 4.17–9.86). Investigator-assessed responses were similar to BIRC assessment (Table). Only 3 pts with high-level MET amplification were included in this cohort due to challenges in enrollment. All 3 pts had stable disease per BIRC assessment and were on treatment for 48, 85 and 97 days. Most common AEs (≥25%, all grades, N = 34) were peripheral edema (64.7%), nausea (35.3%), fatigue (29.4%), back pain (26.5%) and vomiting (26.5%). Data for pts with brain metastasis will be presented at the ASCO 2020 meeting. Conclusions: Capmatinib was confirmed to be efficacious in 2nd line, METex14-mutated NSCLC pts. This is the first cohort where capmatinib has been administered without fasting restriction and data confirm the favorable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT02414139 . [Table: see text]

7029 Background: CBP501, a synthetic duodecapeptide, enhances the cytotoxicity of cisplatin in cell lines and xenografts, including NCI-H226 human mesothelioma. CBP501 increases cisplatin influx into tumor cells through an interaction with calmodulin, and inhibits cell cycle progression by abrogating DNA repair at the G2 checkpoint. Phase I clinical trials combining CBP501 with cisplatin alone or with pemetrexed showed acceptable safety profiles and suggested activity. The most common toxicity of CBP501 is infusion-related urticaria, which is easily managed with diphenhydramine. Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable MPM were stratified by histology (epithelioid vs other) and performance status (PS 0-1 vs 2) and randomized 2:1 to Arm A: pemetrexed/cisplatin plus CBP501 25 mg/m2 IV (42 pts planned), or Arm B: pemetrexed/cisplatin alone at standard doses (21 pts planned). Patients continued on treatment until progression or intolerance; no maintenance therapy was delivered. The primary endpoint is progression free survival (PFS) in Arm A; if > 23 of the 42 patients remain free of progression more than 4 months, the combination will be deemed worthy of further study. In addition to standard CT imaging to assess response and PFS, PET scans, pulmonary function tests, and mesothelin levels were performed. Results: Enrollment was completed in October 2011. 65 pts from 14 institutions were randomized, and 63 were treated. Patient characteristics in the two arms were similar and as follows: median age 65, 82% male, 71% epithelioid histology, 8% PS2. Grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities were uncommon, no different than expected from standard chemotherapy, and comparable in the two arms. 70% of patients treated with CBP501 had infusion reactions, all grade 1-2. The best overall response rate in evaluable patients (modified RECIST, investigator assessed) was 12/37 (32%) (95% CI 18-50) in Arm A, and 3/22 (14%) (95% CI 3-35) in Arm B. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 5.5 in Arm A, 5 in Arm B. Conclusions: Data on the primary endpoint of PFS in Arm A are maturing and will be presented at the meeting.