Fein, Luis

7029 Background: CBP501, a synthetic duodecapeptide, enhances the cytotoxicity of cisplatin in cell lines and xenografts, including NCI-H226 human mesothelioma. CBP501 increases cisplatin influx into tumor cells through an interaction with calmodulin, and inhibits cell cycle progression by abrogating DNA repair at the G2 checkpoint. Phase I clinical trials combining CBP501 with cisplatin alone or with pemetrexed showed acceptable safety profiles and suggested activity. The most common toxicity of CBP501 is infusion-related urticaria, which is easily managed with diphenhydramine. Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable MPM were stratified by histology (epithelioid vs other) and performance status (PS 0-1 vs 2) and randomized 2:1 to Arm A: pemetrexed/cisplatin plus CBP501 25 mg/m2 IV (42 pts planned), or Arm B: pemetrexed/cisplatin alone at standard doses (21 pts planned). Patients continued on treatment until progression or intolerance; no maintenance therapy was delivered. The primary endpoint is progression free survival (PFS) in Arm A; if > 23 of the 42 patients remain free of progression more than 4 months, the combination will be deemed worthy of further study. In addition to standard CT imaging to assess response and PFS, PET scans, pulmonary function tests, and mesothelin levels were performed. Results: Enrollment was completed in October 2011. 65 pts from 14 institutions were randomized, and 63 were treated. Patient characteristics in the two arms were similar and as follows: median age 65, 82% male, 71% epithelioid histology, 8% PS2. Grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities were uncommon, no different than expected from standard chemotherapy, and comparable in the two arms. 70% of patients treated with CBP501 had infusion reactions, all grade 1-2. The best overall response rate in evaluable patients (modified RECIST, investigator assessed) was 12/37 (32%) (95% CI 18-50) in Arm A, and 3/22 (14%) (95% CI 3-35) in Arm B. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 5.5 in Arm A, 5 in Arm B. Conclusions: Data on the primary endpoint of PFS in Arm A are maturing and will be presented at the meeting.

Abstract Background: Hsp90 is a molecular chaperone protein required for the stabilization and activation of many proteins, referred to as Hsp90 ‘clients’, such as HER2, HIF1-a, EGFR, ER, PI3K, AKT, P53 and VEGFR. The drug candidate, ganetespib is a novel triazolone inhibitor of Hsp90, with over 700 patients treated to date. Ganetespib has shown activity in preclinical models of HER2+, ER+/PR+ and TNBC. Early clinical trials documented ganetespib single agent activity in heavily pretreated HER2+ and TNBC patients. Ganetespib has been well tolerated in clinical trials with a favorable safety profile. This efficacy-screening study is designed to provide further evidence of ganetespib activity and identify potentially predictive biomarkers in metastatic breast cancer (BC). Methods: The ENCHANT-1 Trial is an international, first-line 2-cohort Phase 2 study in BC patients: Cohort A, HER2 amplified (n = 35), and Cohort B, TNBC (n = 35). Patients who present with previously untreated metastatic disease are eligible for treatment with ganetespib at 150 mg/m2 twice weekly on 3 out of 4 wks, for a total of up to 12 wks. Primary endpoint: ORR assessed using RECIST1.1 criteria. Key secondary endpoints include metabolic response as assessed by PET/CT at wk 3 utilizing modified EORTC criteria. Disease progression (PD) at wk 3 by PET imaging indicates discontinuation of study therapy, and is performed to quickly offer patients with metabolic PD a standard of care treatment. The study is designed as Simon 2-stage requiring at least one OR in 15 patients for the respective cohort to expand to 35 patients. A Steering Committee is established to oversee the overall study and review the interim results. Results: The study was initiated in 23 centers globally. At the time of submission, a total of 17 patients had been enrolled; TNBC (n = 15) and HER2 (n = 2). Here we report the interim analysis in the TNBC cohort. The median age was 54 years (range 30 -77) with ECOG PS 0 (n = 7/15). Most patients (n = 9) presented with de novo metastatic disease. 5 patients were not evaluable for PET assessment (3 had not yet reached wk 3 and 2 withdrawn before wk 3 for clinical progression), and 9 patients were not evaluable for objective response at wk 6 (3 withdrawn before or at wk 3 for clinical progression and 6 had not yet reached wk 6 evaluation). In the 10 patients with evaluable PET imaging, 9 patients achieved metabolic (m) response (2 mPR, 4 mSD with dominant tumor shrinkage and 3 SD) and one patient with mPD. In the 6 patients evaluable for OR at wk 6, one patient achieved PR, 2 SD and 3 PD. Treatment with ganetespib was well tolerated; the most common AEs were mild or moderate diarrhea (8/15, 53%), fatigue (5/15, 33%), decreased appetite (4/15, 27%), insomnia (4/15, 27%), and nausea (4/15, 27%). Conclusion: Ganetespib single agent was generally well tolerated and showed anti-tumor activity TNBC patients as early as 3 weeks following treatment. PET seems to be a good tool to screen antitumor activity of new agents in early settings rather that in heavily pretreated patients. The TNBC cohort has met the protocol criteria for proceeding to stage 2. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-16-23.