Back to Authors

Morris, Elizabeth A.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5069-0992

Mayo Clinic

Horizon Oncology Center

Citations 4

Phase 1 study of the folic acid (FA) and tubulysin B hydrazide (TubBH) small molecule drug conjugate (SMDC) EC1456 in patients (pts) with advanced cancers (CA).
Matei, Daniela, Sachdev, Jasgit C. , Klein, Patrick , Burgess, Shelly, Clark, Romnee, Ramanathan, Ramesh K., Harb, Wael A., Matei, Daniela, Edelman, Martin J. , Rao, Satish B. , Morris, Elizabeth A.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 7, 2019 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 2551-2551

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.2551 Get It

Resonate: Reflections and recommendations on implicit biases within the ISMRM
Warnert, Esther A. H. , Nayak, Krishna S. , Menon, Ravi S. , Rice, Curt, Morris, Elizabeth A. , Sodickson, Daniel K. , Sundgren, Pia C. , Miller, Karla L. , Anazodo, Udunna , Port, John D.

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | January 22, 2019 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1509-1511

10.1002/jmri.26593 Get It

High-dimensional regression analysis links magnetic resonance imaging features and protein expression and signaling pathway alterations in breast invasive carcinoma
Lehrer, Michael, Aithala, Sathvik Panambur, Ravikumar, Visweswaran , Zheng, Youyun , Bonaccio, Emerlinda, Net, Jose , Brandt, Kathy R., Ganott, Marie A., Zuley, Margarita L. , Rao, Arvind , Brandt, Kathy, Bhadra, Anindya , Dogan, Basak E , Burnside, Elizabeth S. , Morris, Elizabeth A. , Sutton, Elizabeth J. , Whitman, Gary J.

Oncoscience | February 26, 2018 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 1-2 | Pages: 39-48

10.18632/oncoscience.397 Get It

Using computer‐extracted image phenotypes from tumors on breast magnetic resonance imaging to predict breast cancer pathologic stage
Drukker, Karen , Li, Hui , Bonaccio, Ermelinda, Zuley, Margarita L. , Ganott, Marie A., Net, Jose , Sutton, Elizabeth J. , Brandt, Kathleen R. , Conzen, Suzanne D. , Li, Lan , Zhu, Yitan , Jaffe, C. Carl, Huang, Erich P. , Freymann, John , Kirby, Justin , Morris, Elizabeth A. , Burnside, Elizabeth S. , Whitman, Gary J. , Ji, Yuan , Giger, Maryellen , Drukker, Karen

Cancer | November 30, 2015 | Volume: 122 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 748-757

10.1002/cncr.29791 Get It

BACKGROUNDThe objective of this study was to demonstrate that computer‐extracted image phenotypes (CEIPs) of biopsy‐proven breast cancer on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can accurately predict pathologic stage.METHODSThe authors used a data set of deidentified breast MRIs organized by the National Cancer Institute in The Cancer Imaging Archive. In total, 91 biopsy‐proven breast cancers were analyzed from patients who had information available on pathologic stage (stage I, n = 22; stage II, n = 58; stage III, n = 11) and surgically verified lymph node status (negative lymph nodes, n = 46; ≥ 1 positive lymph node, n = 44; no lymph nodes examined, n = 1). Tumors were characterized according to 1) radiologist‐measured size and 2) CEIP. Then, models were built that combined 2 CEIPs to predict tumor pathologic stage and lymph node involvement, and the models were evaluated in a leave‐1‐out, cross‐validation analysis with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as the value of interest.RESULTSTumor size was the most powerful predictor of pathologic stage, but CEIPs that captured biologic behavior also emerged as predictive (eg, stage I and II vs stage III demonstrated an AUC of 0.83). No size measure was successful in the prediction of positive lymph nodes, but adding a CEIP that described tumor “homogeneity” significantly improved discrimination (AUC = 0.62; P = .003) compared with chance.CONCLUSIONSThe current results indicate that MRI phenotypes have promise for predicting breast cancer pathologic stage and lymph node status. Cancer 2016;122:748–757. © 2015 American Cancer Society.