Back to Authors

Christersson, Christina

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9116-8084

Mayo Clinic

Uppsala University

Citations 3

Management of patients on antithrombotic therapy with severe infections: a joint clinical consensus statement of the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis, the ESC Working Group on Atherosclerosis and Vascular Biology, and the International Society on Thrombosis
Gigante, Bruna , Levy, Jerrold H. , Gorp, Eric C. M. Van , Bartoloni, Alessandro , Bochaton‐Piallat, Marie‐Luce , Bäck, Magnus , Cate, Hugo Ten , Christersson, Christina , Ferreiro, José Luis , Geisler, Tobias , Lutgens, Esther , Storey, Robert F. , Thachil, Jecko , Vilahur, Gemma , Liaw, Patricia C. , Rocca, Bianca , van Gorp, Eric , Ten Cate, Hugo , Schulman, Sam , Storey, Robert F , Thachil, Jecko , Vilahur, Gemma , Liaw, Patricia C , Rocca, Bianca , Bochaton-Piallat, Marie-Luce , Lutgens, Esther , Bäck, Magnus

European Heart Journal | May 31, 2023 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 32 | Pages: 3040-3058

10.1093/eurheartj/ehad388 Get It

Abstract Patients with severe infections and a pre-existing indication for antithrombotic therapy, i.e. antiplatelet agents, anticoagulant drugs, or their combinations, require integrated clinical counselling among coagulation, infectious disease, and cardiology specialists, due to sepsis-induced coagulopathy that frequently occurs. Bacterial and viral pathogens constitute an increasing threat to global public health, especially for patients with ongoing antithrombotic treatment who have a high risk of thrombotic recurrences and high susceptibility to severe infections with increased morbidity and mortality. Similarly, sepsis survivors are at increased risk for major vascular events. Coagulopathy, which often complicates severe infections, is associated with a high mortality and obligates clinicians to adjust antithrombotic drug type and dosing to avoid bleeding while preventing thrombotic complications. This clinical consensus statement reviews the best available evidence to provide expert opinion and statements on the management of patients hospitalized for severe bacterial or viral infections with a pre-existing indication for antithrombotic therapy (single or combined), in whom sepsis-induced coagulopathy is often observed. Balancing the risk of thrombosis and bleeding in these patients and preventing infections with vaccines, if available, are crucial to prevent events or improve outcomes and prognosis.
Effect of apixaban compared with warfarin on coagulation markers in atrial fibrillation
Wallentin, Lars , Andersson, Ulrika , Alexander, John H. , Caterina, Raffaele De , Granger, Christopher B. , Halvorsen, Sigrun , Hanna, Michael , Huber, Kurt , Siegbahn, Agneta , Hanna, Michael G. , Huber, Kurt , Granger, Christopher B , Christersson, Christina , Alings, Marco , Gersh, Bernard J. , Hylek, Elaine M. , Lópes, Renato D. , Oh, Byung‐Hee

Heart | February 16, 2019 | Volume: 105 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 235-242

10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313351 Get It

Objectives Compare the effect of apixaban and warfarin on coagulation and primary haemostasis biomarkers in atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods The biomarker substudy from the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation trial included 4850 patients with AF randomised to treatment with apixaban or warfarin. Sixty per cent of patients used vitamin K antagonist (VKA) within 7 days before randomisation. Prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2), D-dimer, soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) and von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen were analysed at randomisation and after 2 months of study treatment. Results In patients not on VKA treatment at randomisation, F1+2 and D-dimer levels were decreased by 25% and 23%, respectively, with apixaban, and by 59% and 38%, respectively, with warfarin (p<0.0001 for treatment differences for both). In patients on VKA at randomisation, F1+2 and D-dimer levels increased by 41% and 10%, respectively, with apixaban and decreased by 37% and 11%, respectively, with warfarin (p<0.0001 for treatment differences for both). sCD40L levels were slightly increased at 2 months, regardless of VKA or randomised treatment. Apixaban and warfarin also both reduced vWF antigen regardless of VKA treatment. The efficacy (stroke) and safety (bleeding) of apixaban compared with warfarin was similar irrespectively of biomarker levels at 2 months. Conclusions Treatment with apixaban compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with AF was associated with less reduction in thrombin generation and fibrin turnover. This effect of apixaban could contribute to the clinical results where apixaban was superior to warfarin both in stroke prevention and in reducing bleeding risk. Trial registration number NCT00412984.
How to use D-dimer in acute cardiovascular care
Mair, Johannes , Siegbahn, Agneta , Huber, Kurt , Jaffe, Allan S. , Thygesen, Kristian , Möckel, Martin , Mueller, Christian, Giannitsis, Evangelos , Christersson, Christina , Jaffe, Allan S. , Peacock, William Frank , Plebani, Mario , Lindahl, Bertil , Huber, Kurt , Mockel, Martin

European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care | October 8, 2015 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 69-80

10.1177/2048872615610870 Get It