Hefazi, Mehrdad

Abstract CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T (CART19) cell therapy has shown remarkable outcomes in B cell malignancies and was FDA approved in multiple indications, but durable remissions are limited to ~40%. Inhibitory myeloid cells in the tumor microenvironment have been found to suppress T cell expansion and contribute to CART19 failure. Here, we studied interactions between monocytes, CART19, and tumor cells to understand the impact of monocytes on CART19 effector functions. First, CD28-costimulated CART19 (CART19-28ζ) generated in the lab from healthy donors were cocultured with JeKo-1, a CD19+ mantle cell lymphoma cell line, and freshly isolated monocytes or ex vivo differentiated M2-like macrophages. M2-like macrophages were generated by incubating fresh monocytes with rhGM-CSF followed by coculturing with JeKo-1. CART19 antigen-specific proliferation was significantly inhibited by M2-like macrophages but not fresh monocytes (JeKo-1+CART19 vs JeKo-1+M2+CART19, p=0.00503). Transwell assays indicated that suppression from M2-like macrophages was not contact-dependent. IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) was significantly elevated in M2-like macrophage coculture supernatant (JeKo-1+Mono+CART19 vs JeKo-1+M2+CART19, p=0.0292) and intracellularly in M2-like macrophages after coculture (90%+). We therefore hypothesized that M2-like macrophages inhibit CART19 by secreting IL-1ra, which blocks IL-1 signaling in CART19. We interrogated the role of IL-1ra in CART19. JeKo-1 was cocultured with CART19, supplemented with rhIL-1β only, IL-1β + IL-1ra, or IL-1β +IL-1ra + IL-1ra neutralizing antibody (neuAb). CART19 antigen-specific proliferation was improved by IL-1β (PBS vs IL-1β, p<0.0001). IL-1ra inhibited IL-1β-dependent CART19 proliferation (IL-1β vs IL-1β+IL1ra p=0.0006), which was restored by IL-1ra neutralization (IL-1β+IL-1ra vs IL-1β+IL-1ra+IL-1ra neuAb, p=0.0215). Additionally, expression of IL-1RI, the receptor of IL-1β and IL-1ra, was measured on T cells after coculturing CART19, JeKo-1, and M2-like macrophages. M2-like macrophages downregulated IL-1RI expression on CART cells, which is a potential mechanism of blocking CART response to IL-1β, resulting in further suppression of CART proliferation (JeKo-1+M2+CART19 vs JeKo-1+CART19, p=0.001). Next, we assessed the impact of IL-1ra on CART cell functions in the presence of M2-like macrophage in a mantle cell lymphoma xenograft model. NOD-SCID-γ−/- (NSG) mice were subcutaneously injected with human macrophages and luciferase+ JeKo-1 cells. Upon tumor engraftment by bioluminescent imaging, mice were randomized to treatment with CART19 + IL-1ra neuAb or control IgG for 3 weeks. CART19 + IL-1ra neuAb led to improved antitumor activity (IL-1ra neuAb vs control IgG, p=0.0033). Overall, our study revealed a role of IL-1ra in macrophage-induced CART inhibition mediated by blocking IL-1β signaling through IL-1RI. Citation Format: Kun Yun, Reona Sakemura, Truc Huynh, Claudia Manriquez Roman, Olivia Sirpilla, Carli Stewart, James Girsch, Ekene Ogbodo, Ismail Can, Jennifer Feigin, Long Mai, Hong Xia, Brooke Kimball, Makena Rodriguez, Lionel Kankeu Fonkoua, Mehrdad Hefazi, Michael Ruff, Elizabeth Siegler, Saad Kenderian. Immunosuppressive monocytes suppress CART19 functions through modulation of the IL-1 pathway [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6813.

Abstract Introduction: Despite the remarkable activity of CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CART19), durable remissions remain low, especially in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Ibrutinib is an oral irreversible inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase and is a first line therapy for CLL. Preclinical and early clinical data indicate that ibrutinib plus CART19 may be synergistic through inhibition of IL2-inducible T cell kinase. To systematically study the effects of prior ibrutinib treatment on subsequent CART functions, we utilized blood samples from the pivotal clinical trial E1912 (NCT02048813). E1912 was a phase 3 randomized trial comparing treatment with ibrutinib/rituximab (IR) to fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) in previously untreated patients with CLL, which led to the FDA approval of ibrutinib as a first-line therapy in CLL. Methods: We evaluated the ex vivo expansion and effector functions of T cells and CART19 generated from patients (n=12) with CLL progression following treatment with IR or FCR. We generated CART19 from longitudinal samples obtained at baseline (pretreatment), 6 months post-treatment, 12 months post-treatment, and disease progression. Isolated T cells were lentivirally transduced to express CD28- or 41BB-costimulated CAR19. To assess antigen specific killing and proliferation, untransduced T cells or CART19 were co-cultured at a 1:1 ratio with the CD19+ cell line, JeKo-1, as a surrogate for CLL cells. Results: Ex vivo T cell expansion increased from an average of 1.5-fold at baseline to 6.7-fold at 6 months, 11.6-fold at 12 months, and 16.9-fold at progression, following ibrutinib-based therapy (p = 0.02, 0.04, and 0.04, respectively). Improved T cell expansion was independent of disease burden (p = 0.89, 0.73, and 0.54 for expansion vs B cell count at 6 months, 12 months, and progression). T cell expansion significantly worsened following treatment with FCR-based therapy compared to ibrutinib-based therapy (0.6- vs 11.6-fold at 12 months and 0.9- vs 16.9-fold at progression; p = 0.031 and 0.039, respectively). Starting at 6 months post-IR, CART19 demonstrated improved antitumor activity and antigen-specific proliferation against JeKo-1. There was no significant difference in the expansion of 41BB- vs CD28-costimulated CART19 following ibrutinib treatment. However, 41BB-CART19 showed enhanced antigen-specific proliferation upon stimulation with JeKo-1 (p = 0.008, 0.02, and 0.02 at 6 months, 12 months, and progression). Conclusion: Our results indicate significant improvement in T cell expansion and CART19 cell functions in patients with CLL following frontline ibrutinib-based therapy, and worsening T cell functions after FCR treatment. Improvement in T cell functions is independent of malignant B cell eradication and is more significant in 41BB-costimulated CART19. Citation Format: Truc Ngoc Huynh, Victoria Wang, Tait Shanafelt, Elizabeth L. Siegler, Carli M. Stewart, Kun Yun, Long K. Mai, Olivia Sirpilla, James H. Girsch, Claudia Manriquez-Roman, Jennifer M. Feigin, Makena Rodriguez, Brooke L. Kimball, Hong Xia, Reona L. Sakemura, Ismail Can, Omar L. Gutierrez-Ruiz, Ekene J. Ogbodo, Erin E. Tapper, Lionel A. Fonkoua, Mehrdad T. Hefazi, Michael W. Ruff, Sameer Parikh, Neil E. Kay, Saad J. Kenderian. Frontline ibrutinib-based therapy enhances CART cell functions in patients with CLL: Analysis of the phase 3 randomized clinical trial ECOG-ACRIN E1912 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 3849.

Abstract Venetoclax + hypomethylating agent (Ven‐HMA) is currently the standard frontline therapy for older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND‐AML). Our objective in the current retrospective study of 301 adult patients (median age 73 years; 62% de novo) with ND‐AML was to identify molecular predictors of treatment response to Ven‐HMA and survival; European LeukemiaNet (ELN) genetic risk assignment was favorable 15%, intermediate 16%, and adverse 69%. Complete remission, with (CR) or without (CRi), count recovery, was documented in 182 (60%) patients. In multivariable analysis, inclusive of mutations only, “favorable” predictors of CR/CRi were NPM1 (86% vs. 56%), IDH2 (80% vs. 58%), and DDX41 (100% vs. 58%) and “unfavorable” TP53 (40% vs. 67%), FLT3‐ ITD (36% vs. 63%), and RUNX1 (44% vs. 64%) mutations; significance was sustained for each mutation after adjustment for age, karyotype, and therapy‐related qualification. CR/CRi rates ranged from 36%, in the presence of unfavorable and absence of favorable mutation, to 91%, in the presence of favorable and absence of unfavorable mutation. At median follow‐up of 8.5 months, 174 deaths and 41 allogeneic stem cell transplants (ASCT) were recorded. In multivariable analysis, risk factors for inferior survival included failure to achieve CR/CRi (HR 3.4, 95% CI 2.5–4.8), adverse karyotype (1.6, 1.1–2.6), TP53 mutation (1.6, 1.0–2.4), and absence of IDH2 mutation (2.2, 1.0–4.7); these risk factors were subsequently applied to construct an HR‐weighted risk model that performed better than the ELN genetic risk model (AIC 1661 vs. 1750): low ( n = 130; median survival 28.9 months), intermediate ( n = 105; median 9.6 months), and high ( n = 66; median 3.1 months; p < .001); survival in each risk category was significantly upgraded by ASCT. The current study identifies genotype signatures for predicting response and proposes a 3‐tiered, CR/CRi‐based, and genetics‐enhanced survival model for AML patients receiving upfront therapy with Ven‐HMA.

Background: The 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) genetic-risk stratification for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), assigns favorable prognosis to t(8;21)(q22;q22.1)/ RUNX1:: RUNX1T1, inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22)/ CBFB:: MYH1, NPM1 mutations without FLT3-ITD or adverse karyotype, and bZIP in-frame CEBPA mutations (Döhner , Blood, 2022 ). This risk stratification was derived from intensively treated patients; accordingly, prognostication in ELN favorable genetic risk AML, following venetoclax and hypomethylating agent (VEN-HMA) therapy, remains unclear and was the subject of the current study. Methods: Under an institutional review board approved minimum risk protocol, the Mayo Clinic database was searched to identify AML patients with favorable genetic risk, who received treatment with VEN-HMA in the frontline setting. All patients received at least one cycle of either azacitidine 75 mg/m 2 days 1-7 or decitabine 20 mg/m 2 days 1-5 with VEN dose adjusted based on azole antifungal prophylaxis. Genetic risk stratification and treatment response were assessed according to the 2022 ELN criteria. Survival was estimated from the time of VEN-HMA treatment start to last follow-up or death. Results: Patient characteristics A total of 46 newly-diagnosed AML patients with ELN 2022 favorable genetic risk [ NPM1 mutation, n=36 (78%), CEPBA bZIP mutation, n=7 (15%) and t(8;21)(q22;q22.1)/ inv(16)(p13.1q22), n=4 (9%)] received a median of 4 cycles (range 1-32) of VEN-HMA. Median age was 71 years, with 63% males, and 87% de novo AML. Additional mutations frequently involved TET2 in 17/43 (40%), DNMT3A in 14/45 (31%), SRSF2 in 10/43 (23%), K/NRAS in 10/45 (22%), IDH1 in 8/46 (17%), FLT3-TKD in 7/46 (15%), ASXL1 in 6/43 (14%) and IDH2 in 6/46 (13%),of informative cases.Myelodysplasia (MDS)-related gene mutations ( ASXL1, RUNX1, BCOR, EZH2, SRSF2, U2AF1, SF3B1, STAG2, and/or ZRSR2) were present in 15 of 40 (38%) of patients (93% males). Predictors of response Of the 39 (85%) patients that achieved complete remission, with (CR) ( n=24; 52%), or without count recovery (CRi) ( n=15; 33%); CR/CRi rates were not significantly higher in patients with NPM1 mutations (89%), t(8;21)(q22;q22.1)/ inv(16)(p13.1q22) (75%), or CEPBA bZIP mutations (67%) ( p=0.37). Among patients achieving CR/CRi, measurable residual disease by multiparametric flow cytometry was negative in 15 of 16 (94%) of evaluable cases after cycles 1 or 2. In addition, NPM1 qPCR was negative in 15 of 24 (63%) informative patients. Median time to response was 1.2 months with median response duration of 9.4 months. CR/CRi rates were significantly higher in females vs males (100% vs 76%, p=0.01), and in the absence vs presence of MDS-related gene mutations (96% vs 60%, p=0.004). Multivariable analysis confirmed superior response in the absence of MDS-related gene mutations ( p=0.04). Predictors of survival At a median follow-up of 10.6 months (range; 1.1-51 months), 21 patients (46%) have died, 9 relapsed (23% of those achieving CR/CRi), and 6 (13%) underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Median overall survival was 21 months with 1/2/3-year survival rates of 65%/41%/41% (Figure 1a); median relapse-free survival (RFS) was not reached; 1/2/3-year RFS rates were 81%/66%/57% (Figure 1b). Overall survival was superior in patients achieving CR/CRi (23 months vs 5.6 months; p&lt;0.01), in females vs males (not reached vs 9.7 months; p&lt;0.01), and in the absence of MDS-related gene mutations (not reached vs 5.6 months; p=0.01) (Figure 1c). Subsequent multivariable analysis identified female gender ( p=0.01), and absence of MDS-related mutations ( p=0.17) as independent predictors of superior survival. Similar results were obtained when analysis was restricted to NPM1 mutated patients. Conclusions: In the current retrospective study, VEN-HMA therapy in elderly/unfit AML patients with ELN 2022 favorable genetic risk, resulted in response rates that were comparable to those previously appreciated from published reports of patients receiving intensive induction therapy; however, follow-up in the current study was too short to accurately assess long-term overall and relapse-free survival impact. Our study also highlights the adverse prognosis retained by MDS-related gene mutations.

Background Venetoclax (Ven) in combination with hypomethylating agent (HMA) is the standard treatment for newly diagnosed elderly/unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Treatment options for patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) disease following Ven-HMA are limited in the absence of targetable mutations. In a recent phase 2 study, the addition of Ven to cladribine (CDA) plus low-dose cytarabine (LDAC), in newly-diagnosed elderly/unfit AML, resulted in complete remission with (CR) or without (CRi) count recovery rate of 93% ( J Clin Oncol 20;40(33)). In the current study, we share our experience with this regimen in patients relapsed or refractory to Ven-HMA, treated outside of clinical trials. Methods Under an institutional review board approved minimum risk protocol, the Mayo Clinic (MN, AZ, FL) database was searched to identify patients with AML who failed treatment with Ven-HMA and subsequently received at least one cycle of salvage therapy with Ven-CDA-LDAC: Ven 100-400 mg, dose adjusted, d1-21, CDA 5 mg/m 2 d1-5, LDAC 20 mg twice daily d1-10, outside of clinical trials. Cytogenetic and molecular studies were performed at the time of Ven-CDA-LDAC initiation in most cases, by conventional karyotype and next-generation sequencing, respectively. The 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria were applied to define risk and response. Survival was calculated from the time of Ven-CDA-LDAC treatment start to last follow-up or death. Results Patient characteristics A total of 39 RR AML patients (median age 65 years, 67% male, 64% de novo), with prior exposure to Ven-HMA, received Ven-CDA-LDAC (median 1 cycle; range 1-5). Study patients had received one ( n=16), two ( n=14), three ( n=5), four ( n=2), five ( n=1) or nine ( n=1) prior therapies, including Ven-HMA. Nine (23%) patients had relapsed following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT). ELN cytogenetic risk included intermediate (46%, n=18), and adverse (54%, n=21). Mutations involved TP53 in 9 patients (23%), K/ NRAS in 8 (21%), RUNX1 in 7 (18%), TET2 in 6 (15%), ASXL1 in 5 (13%), and STAG2 in 5 (13%). Response and toxicity Eleven (28%) patients achieved CR ( n=2; 5%) or CRi ( n=9; 23%); median time to response was 1 month and median response duration 3.4 months. In addition, 2 (5%) patients each experienced partial remission (PR) and bone marrow aplasia without fulfilling criteria for morphologic leukemia free state. Measurable residual disease (MRD) was negative by multiparametric flow cytometry in 2 of 7 (29%) informative CR/CRi cases. CR/CRi rates were higher in females (54% vs 15%; p=0.01), de novo vssecondary AML (40% vs 7%; p=0.02), and absence of adverse karyotype (50% vs 9%; p&lt;0.01), K/NRAS (35% vs 0%, p=0.01), ASXL1 (32% vs 0%, p=0.05), or STAG2 mutations (32% vs 0%, p=0.05) (Table 1). Multivariable analysis confirmed superior response in de novo AML (p&lt;0.01), absence of adverse karyotype, (p&lt;0.01), and absence of K/NRAS mutations (p=0.02). CR/CRi rates were not significantly affected by relapsed vs refractory setting ( p=0.95), number of prior therapies ( p=0.51), prior AHSCT ( p=0.64), or TP53 mutations ( p=0.64) (Table 1). Treatment-emergent toxicities included infections (49%, n=19), comprising bacteremia ( n=11), pneumonia ( n=10), peri-rectal abscess ( n=6), and laboratory evidence of tumor lysis syndrome (3%, n=1). Survival At a median follow-up of 3.9 months, from initiation of Ven-CDA-LDAC, 31 deaths (79%), 6 relapses (15%), and 7 AHSCT (18%; including 5 in CR/CRi, 1 in aplasia) were documented. Median survival following Ven-CDA-LDAC was 4.6 months, and superior in the presence vs absence of CR/CRi (8.1 vs 2.9 months; p=0.01), and in patients receiving AHSCT (10.5 vs 3.4 months; p=0.02). Absence of adverse karyotype was also associated with superior survival (6 vs 3.4 months; p=0.05). Multivariable analysis confirmed the favorable survival impact of CR/CRi ( p=0.03) and AHSCT ( p=0.05); survival impact was not apparent for secondary AML ( p=0.29) or K/NRAS ( p=0.70) or TP53 ( p=0.10) mutations. Conclusions The current study suggests transplant bridging value for Ven-CDA-LDAC in AML patients relapsed or refractory to Ven-HMA, especially in the absence of adverse karyotype or K/NRAS mutation. AHSCT and achievement of CR/CRi appear to be indispensable for favorable post-Ven-CDA-LDAC survival.

INTRODUCTION: The Stromal Antigen 2 ( STAG2), on Xq25, is the most common cohesin complex gene mutated in myeloid neoplasms (MN) (5-10%). STAG2 mutations ( STAG2m) were incorporated in the ELN2022 as AML-MDS defining genetic mutations inferring poor prognosis and is a genetic marker in IPSS-M risk stratification. The PHD-finger protein 6 ( PHF6) gene, on Xq26.3, is a tumor suppressor gene, mutated in 3% of MN, and is more common in T-ALL. PHF6m is believed to be a late event in MN with little data on its prognostic implications in MN. Both STAG2m and PHF6m are more prevalent in males, but their implications on the clinical presentation of MN have not been compared prior. METHOD: Our study is a multicenter study at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Florida, Arizona). After IRB approval, we retrospectively analyzed charts of 7935 patients who had NGS between 2016-2022. STAG2m was found in 96 patients, and PHF6m in 116 (including 3 with concurrent STAG2m and PHF6m). We excluded 4 PHF6m patients who had T-ALL. Data was captured at time of NGS. MDS risk stratification was by IPSS-M and AML by ELN2022. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from date of NGS to date of last follow-up. BlueSky Software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Characteristics: We compared 96 STAG2m vs 112 PHF6m MN patients. Of STAG2m cases, 78% were male vs 76% in PHF6m MN. Median age was 72 vs 73 years, respectively. Diagnoses included AML (29% of STAG2m vs 34% of PHF6m MN), MDS (54% vs 28%), MDS/MPN (10% vs 21%) and MPN (3% vs 9%). MDS was more common among STAG2m MN (p&lt;.001) while MDS/MPN was more common among PHF6m MN (=.05). MDS-IB was the most common subtype in both (69% vs 52% in STAG2m vs PHF6m MDS). MDS-LB and 5q subtypes were only found in PHF6m MDS, and there was more PHF6m MDS-RS (13% vs 2%). Median IPSS-M score was 0.9 vs 0.8 in STAG2m vs PHF6m MDS (both high-risk). Majority of STAG2m AML were adverse risk (96%) while PHF6m AML were intermediate (79%) (p&lt;.001). AML cases included 43% vs 30% secondary AML (sAML) in STAG2m vs PHF6m AML. Among STAG2m and PHF6m MN, 17% of each were tMN. Cytogenetic abnormalities were more common in PHF6m MN (50% vs 31%, p=.005). The median bone marrow (BM) blasts count among STAG2m MN was 7% vs 4% in PHF6m MN (p=.03). Genetic characteristics: STAG2m were nonsense, frameshift and splice site (54%, 36% and 11%). PHF6m were nonsense, frameshift, splice site, missense and start loss variant mutations (44%, 33%, 12%, 10% and 1%). The median variant allele frequency (VAF) of STAG2m MN was 50% compared to 32% in PHF6m MN (p=.008). Co-mutations: The median number of co-mutations was 3 in STAG2m and 4 in PHF6m MN (p=.04). The most common were TET2m (37% in STAG2m MN vs 45% in PHF6m MN), RUNX1m (31% in both), SRSF2m (39% vs 20%), ASXL1m (66% vs 38%), BCORm (19% vs 6%), U2AF1m (13% vs 14%) and IDH2m (18% vs 7%). ASXL1m, SRSF2m, BCORm, IDH2m and SF3B1m were more common among STAG2m MN (p=&lt;.001, .003, .006, .02, .09). JAK2m, IDH1m are more common among PHF6m MN (p=.02, .06). Survival: Of STAG2m and PHF6m MN, 70% and 72% of patients received treatment. HSCT was performed in 23 (24%) and 23 (21%) of STAG2m and PHF6m patients, including AML (n=9, n=10), MDS (n=12, n=8), MDS/MPN (n=2, n=2). OS among STAG2m and PHF6m MN was 20.5 and 22.1 months, respectively. OS among AML cases was 13.5 vs 21 months (p=.6) in STAG2m vs PHF6m, was NR vs 22 months (p=.4) in MDS, 11.7 vs 17.6 months in MDS/MPN (p=.4), and 10.4 vs 27.4 months (p=.5) in MPN. There was no difference between males and females in either STAG2m or PHF6m MN. HSCT led to longer OS among both STAG2m (NR vs 19.9 months, p=.01) and PHF6m MN patients (NR vs 17.6 months, p=.07). Among AML patients, HSCT did not significantly impact OS (18 vs 9.6 months, p=.3 and 25.1 vs 21 months, p=.2, in STAG2m and PHF6m). HSCT improved OS in STAG2m MDS (NR vs 20.5 months, p=.03). In PHF6m MDS, OS was 22.1 vs 13.1 months in HSCT vs non-HSCT (p=.3). CONCLUSION: STAG2m and PHF6m are 2 X-linked mutations that occur in MN. Both commonly occur in elderly males. MDS was the most common diagnosis in STAG2m MN. STAG2m co-occurred particularly with SRSF2m ASXL1m and BCORm, which are associated with poor prognosis. In our cohort, STAG2m AML carried a poorer prognosis than PHF6m AML. Our study confirms the ELN2022 AML risk stratification. MDS risk classification and OS did not differ between STAG2m and PHF6m in our cohort. A larger cohort is required to confirm our findings and may provide stronger validation.

Our group has reported that transient CD19 antigen masking of leukemic cells with the CD19 monoclonal antibody (mAb), tafasitamab, resulted in reduction of CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART19) apoptosis, enhanced CAR T proliferation, improved anti-tumor activity, diminished tumor pyroptosis, and reduced severity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in preclinical models. In this report, we aimed to study the mAb characteristics responsible for these observations. Specifically, we hypothesized that binding affinity of CD19 mAbs might affect the subsequent activation and apoptosis of CART19 as well as tumor cell pyroptosis in preclinical models. To test our hypothesis, we first determined the affinities of the CD19-targeting antibodies tafasitamab, HD37 and FMC63 to recombinant human CD19 protein. Tafasitamab demonstrated the strongest binding affinity among the three tested antibodies [tafasitamab ( K D: 1.0±0.2 nM), HD37 ( K D: 4.1±0.3 nM), FMC63 ( K D: 3.4±1.2 nM)]. Next, we studied CART19 apoptosis in the presence of these CD19 mAbs with different binding affinities. Here, we co-cultured CART19, CD19 + mantle cell lymphoma JeKo, and 400 μg/mL of CD19 mAb for 1 hour and measured CD3 + 7-AAD - Annexin V + T cells with flow cytometry. The number of apoptotic CART19 cells was significantly reduced by tafasitamab co-treatment compared to HD37, FMC63, or control IgG [control IgG (mean = 19.1, standard deviation (SD) = 0.8), tafasitamab (mean = 13.1, SD = 2.9), HD37 (mean = 17.8, SD = 0.8), FMC63 (mean = 18.4, SD = 1.0)]. We also performed an in vitro high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) assay to assess if different affinities of the CD19 mAbs affect tumor cell pyroptosis triggered by CART19. Here, we co-cultured CART19, CD19 + JeKo, and 400 μg/mL of CD19 mAb for 24 hours and assessed HMGB1 on JeKo. In analogy to the apoptosis data, tafasitamab was the only mAb that prevented tumor cell pyroptosis, indicated by reduced HMGB1 expression (Fig 1A). Given these results, we aimed to study the impact of CD19 occupancy with different CD19 mAbs prior to CART19 infusion on tumor pyroptosis in vivo. We utilized a mouse model that mimics CAR T toxicities. Immunocompromised NSG mice were inoculated via tail vein with 5x10 6 leukemic cells derived from patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Two weeks later (day -7), tumor burden was assessed by peripheral blood sampling. Leukemic cells were defined as murine CD45 -, human CD45 + CD19 + CD20 + via flow cytometry, and volumetric absolute number was calculated. Mice were then randomized according to tumor burden to receive IgG control [Group 1 (G1)], tafasitamab (G2), HD37 (G3), or FMC63 (G4) (5 mg/kg, ip) at day -7. CRS was determined by weight loss, development of motor weakness, poor body posture, and elevated serum cytokine levels. At day 0, all mice received 3x10 6 luciferase + CART19 via tail vein. Mice were monitored with daily bioluminescent imaging (BLI) to track and quantify CART19 expansion and physical assessment to detect toxicity. BLI on day 4 revealed that CART19 expansion in the tafasitamab-treated group (G2, mean = 1x10 7, SD = 2.3x10 7) was significantly lower than in the control group (mean = 3.5x10 7, SD = 9.3x10 7), the HD37-treated group (G3, mean = 4x10 7, SD = 6.6x10 7), and the FMC63-treated group (G4, mean = 2x10 7, SD = 3.59x10 7), [G1 vs G2: 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.5x10 7 to 1.1x10 8, p &lt;0.0001, G1 vs G3: 95% CI -7.5x10 7 to -1.1x10 8, p=0.005, G1 vs G4: 95% CI -4.5x10 7 to 1.9x10 7, p=0.71] indicating that tafasitamab pretreatment significantly reduced early activation of CART19 compared to IgG control and HD37 in this model. Mice were bled on day 4 to analyze plasma cytokine. Tafasitamab-treated mice (G2) secreted significantly less IFNγ (Fig 1B), IL10 (Mean G1: 78, G2: 2.52, G3: 12.2, G4: 13.9 pg/mL), MDC (Mean G1: 4072, G2: 445, G3: 921, G4: 1364 pg/mL), and MIP1β (Mean G1: 283, G2: 59.1, G3: 148, G4: 123 pg/mL) compared to G1, G3, and G4. Satellite mice were euthanized on day 1 and spleens were harvested. Western blot analysis of splenocytes revealed that G1, 3, and 4 showed significantly lower expression of apoptosis-inducing protein gasdermin E on leukemic cells compared to G2, indicating reduced tumor pyroptosis in G2. In summary, application of the high affinity mAb tafasitamab prior to CART19 resulted in reduced CAR T apoptosis, diminished tumor cell pyroptosis, and reduction of CRS compared to lower affinity CD19 mAbs in preclinical models.

Background: Venetoclax (Ven) in combination with hypomethylating agent (HMA) is the preferred treatment for elderly/unfit patients with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Current prognostication for AML is based on European LeukemiaNet (ELN) genetic risk stratification which has limited applicability in patients treated with Ven-HMA ( Blood, 2022). Accordingly, our primary objective was to determine predictors of treatment response and survival outcomes in treatment-naïve AML patients receiving Ven-HMA. Methods: Our study population was recruited from Mayo Clinic (MN, FL, AZ), after institutional review board approval and based on documentation of newly-diagnosed AML treated with Ven-HMA outside of clinical trials between November 2018 and April 2023. Cytogenetic and molecular studies were performed by conventional karyotype, and next-generation sequencing, respectively. Response was assessed according to the 2022 ELN criteria Results: Patient characteristics A total of 301 newly-diagnosed AML patients (median age 73 years, 66% male, 62% de novo) received a median of 3 cycles (range 1-48) of azacitidine 75 mg/m2 days 1-7 ( n=100) or decitabine 20 mg/m2 days 1-5 ( n=201) with Ven. ELN 2022 cytogenetic risk included favorable (1%, n=4), intermediate (61%, n=184) or adverse (38%, n=113). Mutations involved TP53 in 77/301 (25%), ASXL1 in 54/279 (19%), RUNX1 in 54/296 (18%), NPM1 in 44/299 (15%), DNMT3A in 40/296 (13%), K/NRAS in 41/296 (14%), IDH1 in 20/301 (6%), IDH2 in 30/301 (10%), FLT3-ITD in 25/301 (8%) and DDX41 in 9/247 (4%) of informative cases. Predictors of response Complete remission, with (CR) or without (CRi), count recovery, was documented in 182 (60%) patients, including CR in 36% and measurable residual disease (MRD) negative by flow cytometry in 77% of 105 informative cases that achieved CR/CRi. Median time to CR/CRi was 1.4 months. In univariate analysis, CR/CRi was more likely to occur in the presence of NPM1 mutation, (86% vs. 56%; p &lt; .01), IDH2 mutation, (80% vs. 58%; p = .02), DNMT3A mutation, (78% vs. 57%; p = .01), or DDX41 mutation, (100% vs. 58%; p &lt;.01), and in the absence of adverse karyotype, (71% vs. 42%; p &lt; .01), TP53 mutation, (67% vs. 40%; p &lt;.01), FLT3-ITD mutation, (63% vs. 36%; p = .01), or RUNX1 mutation, (64% vs. 44%; p = .01); in multivariable analysis, adverse karyotype, ( p &lt; .01), FLT3-ITD ( p &lt; .01), RUNX1 ( p &lt; .01), NPM1 ( p = .03), IDH2 ( p = .04), and DDX41, ( p = .01) mutations remained significant. Predictors of survival After a median follow-up of 8.5 months (range 0.5-56), 13.2 months for living patients, 174 (58%) deaths, 73 relapses (40% of those achieving CR/CRi), and 41 (14%; including 35 in CR/CRi) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell tranplants (AHSCT) were documented. In univariate analysis of pre-treatment variables, thrombocytopenia &lt; 100 x 10 9/l, (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.03-2.2; p = .03), adverse karyotype, (HR 2.8, 95% CI 2.1-3.8; p &lt; .01) TP53 mutation, (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.8-3.5; p &lt; .01), or absence of IDH2 mutation, (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.7-7.6; p &lt; .01) predicted inferior survival. Failure to achieve CR/CRi (HR 4.5, 95% CI 3.3-6.1; p &lt; .01) was also associated with inferior survival and in multivariable analysis, failure to achieve CR/CRi, (HR 3.4, 95% CI 2.5-4.8; p&lt; .01), presence of adverse karyotype, (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.6; p = .02), TP53 mutation, (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.002-2.4; p = .04), and absence of IDH2 mutation (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.004-4.7; p = .04) were identified as risk factors for survival. Subsequent HR-weighted scoring resulted in three-tiered risk stratification: low (0-1 point; n= 130), intermediate (2-3 points; n= 105), and high (4-5 points; n= 66), with respective median survival (3-year rate) of 28.9 (48%), 9.6 (6%), and 3.1 (0%) months ( p &lt; .01) (Figure). AHSCT had an independent favorable impact on survival (HR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.6; p &lt; .01), most apparent in low ( p =0.04), and intermediate ( p &lt;.01), as opposed to high ( p = .06) risk. Conclusions: In the current single institutional series of Ven-HMA treated newly-diagnosed AML, response to Ven-HMA was the foremost predictor of survival. Additional risk factors for survival included adverse karyotype, presence of TP53 and absence of IDH2 mutations. These observations allowed for a three-tiered genetics-enhanced survival model with CR/CRi as a backbone, and also confirmed survival advantage from AHSCT, regardless of risk category.