Back to Authors

Rosen, Bruce R.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8576-0839

Mayo Clinic

Harvard University

Citations 2

Consensus recommendations for a dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI protocol for use in high-grade gliomas
Boxerman, Jerrold L. , Quarles, C. Chad , Hu, Leland , Gerstner, Elizabeth R. , Smits, Marion , Barboriak, Daniel P. , Huang, Raymond, Wick, Wolfgang , Weller, Michael , Kalpathy–Cramer, Jayashree , Shankar, Lalitha , Jacobs, Paula , Chung, Caroline , Bent, Martin J. van den , Chang, Susan M. , Yung, Wai Kuen, Wen, Patrick Y. , Rosen, Bruce R. , Arons, David F., Kingston, Ann E, Sandak, David, Wallace, M. Z., Musella, Al , Haynes, Chas, Weller, Michael , van den Bent, Martin J , Boxerman, Jerrold L , Wick, Wolfgang , Smits, Marion , Barboriak, Daniel P , Erickson, Bradley J. , Kaufmann, Timothy J. , Galanis, Evanthia , Chang, Susan Marina , Yung, W K Al, Cloughesy, Timothy F. , Wen, Patrick Yung , Gilbert, Mark R. , Ellingson, Benjamin M. , Schmainda, Kathleen M

Neuro-Oncology | June 3, 2020 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1262-1275

10.1093/neuonc/noaa141 Get It

Abstract Despite the widespread clinical use of dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI, DSC-MRI methodology has not been standardized, hindering its utilization for response assessment in multicenter trials. Recently, the DSC-MRI Standardization Subcommittee of the Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition issued an updated consensus DSC-MRI protocol compatible with the standardized brain tumor imaging protocol (BTIP) for high-grade gliomas that is increasingly used in the clinical setting and is the default MRI protocol for the National Clinical Trials Network. After reviewing the basis for controversy over DSC-MRI protocols, this paper provides evidence-based best practices for clinical DSC-MRI as determined by the Committee, including pulse sequence (gradient echo vs spin echo), BTIP-compliant contrast agent dosing (preload and bolus), flip angle (FA), echo time (TE), and post-processing leakage correction. In summary, full-dose preload, full-dose bolus dosing using intermediate (60°) FA and field strength-dependent TE (40–50 ms at 1.5 T, 20–35 ms at 3 T) provides overall best accuracy and precision for cerebral blood volume estimates. When single-dose contrast agent usage is desired, no-preload, full-dose bolus dosing using low FA (30°) and field strength-dependent TE provides excellent performance, with reduced contrast agent usage and elimination of potential systematic errors introduced by variations in preload dose and incubation time.