Al‐Hijji, Mohammed

Objective Female sex is a known risk factor for cardiac surgery, and tricuspid valve (TV) disease is more common in women. There are few data on sex-stratified surgical outcomes for isolated TV surgery. An administrative database was used to compare acute in-hospital outcomes between men and women undergoing isolated TV surgery. Methods Patients aged >18 who underwent TV repair or replacement from 2004 to 2013 were identified using the National Inpatient Sample. Patients were excluded if they had congenital heart disease, endocarditis, or were undergoing concomitant cardiac surgeries except coronary bypass. Results were weighted to represent national averages. Sex-stratified analysis was performed using propensity score matching to compare in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications and hospital costs. Results Over 10 years, women represented 58% of the 5005 TV surgeries performed. With propensity matching, hospital mortality (7.9% vs 7.7%; P=0.99) and median length of stay (11 vs 11 days; P=0.99) were similar between men and women. However, median hospital charges were higher for men ($166 000 vs $155 000; P=0.04). Conclusion Isolated TV surgery is rare, but women more commonly undergo the procedure. In-hospital mortality was similar between men and women after propensity matching, but remains markedly high for both men and women in comparison to that reported for left-sided isolated valve surgery.

AbstractBackgroundRacial disparities in cardiovascular care have been extensively investigated. The introduction of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) revolutionized the treatment of aortic stenosis (AS) in the last decade. Whether a racial disparity in the utilization and outcome of TAVR exists is unknown.MethodsWe utilized the nationwide inpatient sample (NIS) to compare utilization rates, and in‐hospital outcomes of Caucasians and African American (AA) patients who underwent TAVR between August 2011 and December 2014.ResultsA total of 7,176 patients (6870 Caucasians, 95.7%) and (306 AAs, 4.3%) were included in this analysis. Among patients who underwent aortic valve replacement between 2011 and 2014, the rates of TAVR utilization increased from 0.32% to 7.6% in AAs and from 0.4% to 8.8% in Caucasians. In propensity‐matched cohorts of patients (n = 300 Caucasians and n = 300 AAs), in‐hospital mortality was similar (3.7% and 3.3%, respectively, P = 0.99). Also, rates of key complications including stroke, permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI), vascular complications, acute kidney injury, new dialysis, blood transfusion, and tamponade were similar in both races. There was also no significant difference between Caucasians and AAs with regards to length of stay, cost of hospitalization, and intermediate care facility utilization.ConclusionsThere was no significant difference in the utilization rates, in‐hospital outcomes, and cost of TAVR between Caucasians and AA patients in contemporary US practice. Further comparative studies of surgical and TAVR in AAs and other racial minorities are warranted.

BackgroundPercutaneous paravalvular leak (PVL) closure is an alternative treatment option for severely symptomatic, high‐surgical risk patients with PVL. Some patients require multiple percutaneous PVL closure procedures. However, the procedural characteristics and success rate of re‐do PVL closure have not been well studied.AimsThe aim of this study is to investigate the indications, procedural characteristics, technical success rate, and 30‐day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients who underwent re‐do PVL closure.MethodsConsecutive patients who underwent percutaneous paramitral or paraaortic leak closure at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota from 2004 through 2015 were studied. Clinical and procedural characteristics of patients who underwent re‐do PVL closure were compared to age‐ and sex‐matched patients who underwent their first percutaneous PVL closure. Procedure success and 30‐day MACE were compared in both the groups.ResultsAmong 223 identified percutaneous PVL closures, 16 (7%) were re‐do procedures. Patients who underwent re‐do PVL closure were predominantly men (87.5%) with a mean age of 68 ± 15 years and an estimated mean Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) 30‐day mortality of 4.6 ± 2.8. Half of the re‐do PVL closures were performed on mechanical valves and 62.5% were performed on paramitral defects. Indications for re‐do PVL closure were: (1) emergence of new significant paravalvular defects in 50%, (2) incomplete index defect closure in 43.75%, and (3) index procedural complication in 6.25% of the cases. Procedural success was 75% in re‐do procedures vs. 85.4% in age‐ and sex‐matched control group (P = 0.45). Thirty‐day MACE was 12.5% in the re‐do group compared to 4.2% in the age‐ and‐sex matched patients who underwent PVL closure for the first time (P = 0.35).ConclusionRe‐do percutaneous PVL closure is feasible with favorable procedural success rate and low 30‐day MACE. Development of new paravalvular defects is the most common indication for re‐do PVL closure, highlighting the importance of careful longitudinal monitoring and follow‐up. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.