Huang, Haojie

SPOP mutations drive opposing molecular and immune landscapes in prostate and endometrial cancers, suggesting tailored therapies

Abstract Androgen receptor (AR) inhibition by androgen deprivation and/or antiandrogen administration is the mainstay therapy for advanced prostate cancer. However, most prostate cancers ultimately become resistant to these therapies, indicating the importance of identifying mechanisms driving resistance to improve patient outcomes. Here we demonstrated that acute treatment with the antiandrogen enzalutamide (ENZ) decreased glutathione (GSH) production, increased lipid peroxidation, and induced ferroptosis in prostate cancer cells. Consistently, meta-analysis of transcriptomic data linked the androgen-AR axis to metabolism-related biological processes, including lipid metabolism. The cystine transporter gene SLC7A11 was a key AR target, and full-length AR (AR-FL) transactivated SLC7A11 transcription by directly occupying the SLC7A11 promoter and putative enhancer regions. AR variants (AR-V) preferentially bound the SLC7A11 enhancer and upregulated SLC7A11 expression, thereby conferring resistance to ferroptosis induced by ENZ treatment. However, this effect was abolished following downregulation of AR-Vs using the dual CBP/p300 and BET inhibitor NEO2734. These findings reveal ferroptosis induction as an anticancer mechanism of antiandrogens and SLC7A11 as a direct target gene of AR-FL and AR-Vs. AR-V-mediated SLC7A11 expression represents a mechanism coupling ferroptosis resistance to prostate cancer progression. Significance: Upregulation of SLC7A11 can be induced by androgen receptor variants to inhibit antiandrogen-induced prostate cancer cell ferroptosis and to drive castration resistance in prostate cancer.

Abstract Retinoblastoma (RB) protein can exert tumor suppressor functions even when it becomes phosphorylated. It is thus essential to understand how phosphorylated RB (p-RB) expression and function are regulated. Here, we demonstrated that RING finger domain protein TRIM28 bound and promoted ubiquitination and degradation of CDK4/6-phosphorylated RB protein. SETDB1, a known TRIM28 binding partner, protected p-RB from degradation through the binding of methylated RB by its Tudor domain independent of its methyltransferase activity. SETDB1 was found to be frequently overexpressed due to gene amplification and positively correlated with p-RB in prostate cancer patient specimens. Inhibition of SETDB1 expression using a gene-specific antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) reduced tumor growth but accelerated RB protein degradation, limiting the therapeutic efficacy. However, coadministration of the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib blocked ASO-induced RB degradation and resulted in a much greater cancer-inhibitory effect than each inhibitor alone both in vitro and in vivo. This study identified CDK4/6-dependent, TRIM28-mediated proteasomal degradation as a mechanism of RB inactivation and reveals SETDB1 as a key inhibitor of this process. Our findings suggest that combined targeting of SETDB1 and CDK4/6 represents a viable approach for the treatment of cancers with SETDB1 gene amplification or overexpression. Significance: The identification of a role for TRIM28 and SETDB1 in regulating CDK4/6-phosphorylated RB stability uncovers a combination strategy using CDK4/6 and SETDB1 inhibition to decrease RB degradation and inhibit cancer growth.

Abstract Speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP) is a substrate-binding adaptor of the CULLIN3/RING-box1 E3 ubiquitin ligase complex. SPOP is frequently mutated in prostate and endometrial cancers, whereas it is overexpressed in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). SPOP can mediate both degradable and nondegradable polyubiquitination of a number of substrates with diverse biological functions such as androgen receptor (AR), SRC-3, TRIM24, BRD4, PD-L1, 53BP1, GLP/G9a, c-Myc, SENP7, among others. Cancer-associated SPOP mutants often impair SPOP binding and polyubiquitination of its substrates to influence various cancer-relevant pathways, which include androgen/AR signaling, DNA repair and methylation, cellular stress surveillance, cancer metabolism, and immunity. Although SPOP is recognized as a tumor suppressor in prostate and endometrial cancers, it acts like an oncoprotein in RCC. This review provides an overview of the recent progress in understanding of the upstream regulators of SPOP and its downstream targets, highlights the significant impact of SPOP mutations and overexpression on cancer pathogenesis, and discusses the potential of targeting SPOP for cancer treatment.

Androgen receptor (AR) messenger RNA (mRNA) alternative splicing variants (AR-Vs) are implicated in castration-resistant progression of prostate cancer (PCa), although the molecular mechanism underlying the genesis of AR-Vs remains poorly understood. The CDK12 gene is often deleted or mutated in PCa and CDK12 deficiency is known to cause homologous recombination repair gene alteration or BRCAness via alternative polyadenylation (APA). Here, we demonstrate that pharmacological inhibition or genetic inactivation of CDK12 induces AR gene intronic (intron 3) polyadenylation (IPA) usage, AR-V expression, and PCa cell resistance to the antiandrogen enzalutamide (ENZ). We further show that AR binds to the CCNK gene promoter and up-regulates CYCLIN K expression. In contrast, ENZ decreases AR occupancy at the CCNK gene promoter and suppresses CYCLIN K expression. Similar to the effect of the CDK12 inhibitor, CYCLIN K degrader or ENZ treatment promotes AR gene IPA usage, AR-V expression, and ENZ-resistant growth of PCa cells. Importantly, we show that targeting BRCAness induced by CYCLIN K down-regulation with the PARP inhibitor overcomes ENZ resistance. Our findings identify CYCLIN K down-regulation as a key driver of IPA usage, hormonal therapy–induced AR-V expression, and castration resistance in PCa. These results suggest that hormonal therapy–induced AR-V expression and therapy resistance are vulnerable to PARP inhibitor treatment.

Abstract NRG-1 signals through epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family members. Despite promising preclinical data, HER2 blockade in prostate cancer has failed to improve outcomes in clinical trials.1-4 We have discovered a novel complex systemic role of NRG-1 that drives sensitivity and resistance to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in castration-sensitive (CSPC) and castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), respectively. Significantly, sensitivity to ADT can be restored in CRPC by manipulating NRG-1 signaling. Our data posit NRG-1 as a systemic “switch” in prostate cancer. Plasma NRG-1 is elevated in our cohort of patients with metastatic CRPC (mean 4.9ng/ml) versus healthy controls (mean 3.2ng/ml, p<0.0001) or metastatic CSPC (mean 3.4ng/ml, p<0.0001). Paradoxically, high systemic NRG-1 predicted superior OS and PFS in CSPC but inferior clinical outcomes in CRPC. Consistently, opposite cell survival between LNCaP (CSPC) vs Du145 & PC3 (CRPC) was observed with recombinant human NRG-1 and enzalutamide (ENZ). ENZ combined with increasing NRG-1 concentration induced LNCaP cell death in an additive manner, but NRG-1 rescued Du145 & PC3 from ENZ-induced death in a dose-dependent manner. We next hypothesized that differential NRG-1 downstream signaling is mediated by engagement with distinct EGFR receptor dimers. While HER2 expression is similar, LNCaP express higher HER3 than Du145 & PC3. High ratio of HER2 to HER3 in Du145 & PC3 mirrors clinical reports of HER2 upregulation in CRPC5,6 and also predicts patient survival in the Stand Up to Cancer cohort.7 Significantly, we recapitulated the CRPC phenotype in LNCaP by inducing HER2 overexpression, HER3 suppression, and chemically-mediated HER2/HER3 dimerization. Conversely, HER2 knockdown sensitized Du145 cells to ENZ. Next, we queried composite single-cell whole human8 and CRPC9 transcriptomes for NRG-1 expression and discovered that the source of NRG-1 is the patients’ own mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Bone-derived MSC outgrowth cells produced copious NRG-1, which was increased substantially by coincubation with prostate cancer cell supernatants. Importantly, we were able to manipulate MSCs to reduce their NRG-1 production as a possible clinical translation. Similarly, patients treated with these compounds showed significant reduction in plasma NRG-1 levels after treatment. Additional clinical studies are pending. Together, our observations confirm that NRG-1 has differential signaling: HER3 homodimerization leads to prostate cancer cell death, whereas heterodimerization of HER3 with HER2 leads to prostate cancer cell survival via ADT resistance in a plasma NRG-1 dependent manner. Consequently, HER2 and HER3 receptor availability determine the molecular switch of NRG-1 in prostate cancer. Therefore, NRG-1 can be both a prognostic marker and therapeutic target in CRPC, and multiple clinical trials are pending. Citation Format: Jacob Orme, Roman Thaler, Dejie Wang, Siven Chinniah, Jacob Hirdler, Fernando Quevedo, Lance Pagliaro, Kwon Eugene, Alan Bryce, Brian Costello, Haojie Huang, Sean Park. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived systemic NRG-1 mediates a targetable molecular switch in metastatic prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 397.

In this study, we discovered 3-aminophthalic acid as a new ligand of cereblon (CRBN) E3 ubiquitin ligase and developed a phthalic acid-based O’PROTAC for ERG destruction, expanding the pool of ligands for development of PROTACs, especially O’PROTACs.

Abstract Although the Sonic hedgehog (SHH) signaling pathway has been implicated in promoting malignant phenotypes of prostate cancer, details on how it is activated and exerts its oncogenic role during prostate cancer development and progression is less clear. Here, we show that GLI3, a key SHH pathway effector, is transcriptionally upregulated during androgen deprivation and posttranslationally stabilized in prostate cancer cells by mutation of speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP). GLI3 is a substrate of SPOP-mediated proteasomal degradation in prostate cancer cells and prostate cancer driver mutations in SPOP abrogate GLI3 degradation. Functionally, GLI3 is necessary and sufficient for the growth and migration of androgen receptor (AR)–positive prostate cancer cells, particularly under androgen-depleted conditions. Importantly, we demonstrate that GLI3 physically interacts and functionally cooperates with AR to enrich an AR-dependent gene expression program leading to castration-resistant growth of xenografted prostate tumors. Finally, we identify an AR/GLI3 coregulated gene signature that is highly correlated with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer and predictive of disease recurrence. Together, these findings reveal that hyperactivated GLI3 promotes castration-resistant growth of prostate cancer and provide a rationale for therapeutic targeting of GLI3 in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Implications: We describe two clinically relevant mechanisms leading to hyperactivated GLI3 signaling and enhanced AR/GLI3 cross-talk, suggesting that GLI3-specific inhibitors might prove effective to block prostate cancer development or delay CRPC.

AbstractDNA‐binding proteins, including transcription factors (TFs), play essential roles in various cellular processes and pathogenesis of diseases, deeming to be potential therapeutic targets. However, these proteins are generally considered undruggable as they lack an enzymatic catalytic site or a ligand‐binding pocket. Proteolysis‐targeting chimera (PROTAC) technology has been developed by engineering a bifunctional molecule chimera to bring a protein of interest (POI) to the proximity of an E3 ubiquitin ligase, thus inducing the ubiquitination of POI and further degradation through the proteasome pathway. Here, the development of oligonucleotide‐based PROTAC (O'PROTACs), a class of noncanonical PROTACs in which a TF‐recognizing double‐stranded oligonucleotide is incorporated as a binding moiety of POI is reported. It is demonstrated that O'PROTACs of lymphoid enhancer‐binding factor 1 (LEF1) and ETS‐related gene (ERG), two highly cancer‐related transcription factors, successfully promote degradation of these proteins, impede their transcriptional activity, and inhibit cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo. The programmable nature of O'PROTACs indicates that this approach is also applicable to destruct other TFs. O'PROTACs not only can serve as a research tool but also can be harnessed as a therapeutic arsenal to target DNA binding proteins for effective treatment of diseases such as cancer.

Objectives To investigate the genetic alterations of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) with and without intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC‐P). Patients and Methods We performed targeted sequencing of plasma cell‐free DNA on 161 patients with prostate adenocarcinoma (PAC) with IDC‐P and 84 without IDC‐P. Genomic alterations were compared between these two groups. The association between genetic alterations and patients’ survival outcomes was also explored. Results We identified that 29.8% (48/161) and 21.4% (18/84) of patients with and without IDC‐P harboured genomic alterations in DNA repair pathways, respectively ( P = 0.210). Pathogenic germline DNA repair alterations were frequently detected in IDC‐P carriers compared to IDC‐P non‐carriers (11.8% [19/161] vs 2.4% [two of 84], P = 0.024). Germline BReast CAncer type 2 susceptibility protein ( BRCA2 ) and somatic cyclin‐dependent kinase 12 ( CDK12 ) defects were specifically identified in IDC‐P carriers relative to PAC ( BRCA2 : 8.7% [14/161] vs 0% and CDK12 : 6.8% [11/161] vs 1.2% [one of 84]). Patients with IDC‐P had a distinct androgen receptor (AR) pathway alteration, characterised by an enrichment of nuclear receptor corepressor 2 ( NCOR2 ) mutations compared with patients with pure PAC (21.1% [34/161] vs 6.0% [five of 84], P = 0.004). Increased AR alterations were detected in patients harbouring tumours with an IDC‐P proportion of ≥10% vs those with an IDC‐P proportion of <10% (6.4% [five of 78] vs 18.1% [15/83], P = 0.045). For IDC‐P carriers, tumour protein p53 ( TP53 ) mutation was associated with shorter castration‐resistant‐free survival (median 10.9 vs 28.9 months, P = 0.026), and BRCA2 alteration was related to rapid prostate‐specific antigen progression for those receiving abiraterone treatment (median 9.1 vs 11.9 months, P = 0.036). Conclusion Our findings provide genomic evidence explaining the aggressive phenotype of tumours with IDC‐P, highlighting the potential therapeutic strategies for this patient population.