Coleman, Robert L.

Abstract High-grade epithelial ovarian carcinomas containing mutated BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) homologous recombination (HR) genes are sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors (PARPi), while restoration of HR function due to secondary mutations in BRCA1/2 has been recognized as an important resistance mechanism. We sequenced core HR pathway genes in 12 pairs of pretreatment and postprogression tumor biopsy samples collected from patients in ARIEL2 Part 1, a phase II study of the PARPi rucaparib as treatment for platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian carcinoma. In 6 of 12 pretreatment biopsies, a truncation mutation in BRCA1, RAD51C, or RAD51D was identified. In five of six paired postprogression biopsies, one or more secondary mutations restored the open reading frame. Four distinct secondary mutations and spatial heterogeneity were observed for RAD51C. In vitro complementation assays and a patient-derived xenograft, as well as predictive molecular modeling, confirmed that resistance to rucaparib was associated with secondary mutations. Significance: Analyses of primary and secondary mutations in RAD51C and RAD51D provide evidence for these primary mutations in conferring PARPi sensitivity and secondary mutations as a mechanism of acquired PARPi resistance. PARPi resistance due to secondary mutations underpins the need for early delivery of PARPi therapy and for combination strategies. Cancer Discov; 7(9); 984–98. ©2017 AACR. See related commentary by Domchek, p. 937. See related article by Quigley et al., p. 999. See related article by Goodall et al., p. 1006. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 920

Purpose To provide guidance to clinicians regarding the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreduction among women with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods The Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. Results Four phase III clinical trials form the primary evidence base for the recommendations. The published studies suggest that for selected women with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreduction are noninferior to primary cytoreduction and adjuvant chemotherapy with respect to overall and progression-free survival and are associated with less perioperative morbidity and mortality. Recommendations All women with suspected stage IIIC or IV invasive epithelial ovarian cancer should be evaluated by a gynecologic oncologist prior to initiation of therapy. The primary clinical evaluation should include a CT of the abdomen and pelvis, and chest imaging (CT preferred). Women with a high perioperative risk profile or a low likelihood of achieving cytoreduction to < 1 cm of residual disease (ideally to no visible disease) should receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Women who are fit for primary cytoreductive surgery, and with potentially resectable disease, may receive either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary cytoreductive surgery. However, primary cytoreductive surgery is preferred if there is a high likelihood of achieving cytoreduction to < 1 cm (ideally to no visible disease) with acceptable morbidity. Before neoadjuvant chemotherapy is delivered, all patients should have confirmation of an invasive ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/NACT-ovarian-guideline and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .

BACKGROUNDPreclinical evidence has suggested that sustained adrenergic activation can promote ovarian cancer growth and metastasis. The authors examined the impact of beta‐adrenergic blockade on the clinical outcome of women with epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers (collectively, epithelial ovarian cancer [EOC]).METHODSA multicenter review of 1425 women with histopathologically confirmed EOC was performed. Comparisons were made between patients with documented beta‐blocker use during chemotherapy and those without beta‐blocker use.RESULTSThe median age of patients in the current study was 63 years (range, 21‐93 years). The sample included 269 patients who received beta‐blockers. Of those, 193 (71.7%) were receiving beta‐1–adrenergic receptor selective agents, and the remaining patients were receiving nonselective beta antagonists. The primary indication for beta‐blocker use was hypertension but also included arrhythmia and postmyocardial infarction management. For patients receiving any beta‐blocker, the median overall survival (OS) was 47.8 months versus 42 months for nonusers (P =.04). The median OS based on beta‐blocker receptor selectivity was 94.9 months for those receiving nonselective beta‐blockers versus 38 months for those receiving beta‐1–adrenergic receptor selective agents (P<.001). Hypertension was associated with decreased OS compared with no hypertension across all groups. However, even among patients with hypertension, a longer median OS was observed among users of a nonselective beta‐blocker compared with nonusers (38.2 months vs 90 months; P<.001).CONCLUSIONSUse of nonselective beta‐blockers in patients with EOC was associated with longer OS. These findings may have implications for new therapeutic approaches. Cancer 2015;121:3435–43. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Abstract Background: PARP inhibitors are thought to be effective therapy for cancers with homologous recombination (HR) deficiency, best shown to date in patients (pts) with a germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutation. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) estimated ∼ 50% of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (OC) pts have an HR defect (HRD) due to a BRCA mutation (germline or somatic), other HR gene mutation, or another mechanism, e.g., BRCA1 promoter methylation. A randomized maintenance trial of olaparib in recurrent OC demonstrated a clinical benefit in both gBRCA-mutated and gBRCA-wild-type pts. Currently, the best molecular predictors of PARPi response (other than a BRCA mutation) are not known. Platinum sensitivity, often used as a surrogate predictive indicator for PARPi response, is inadequate. A better technique, such as molecular analysis of tumor tissue, could be a superior method for selection of pts for PARPi therapy. Methods: The rucaparib development plan in OC employs a unique strategy of conducting the key trials in parallel, allowing the Phase 2 (ARIEL2) to complete first so that a molecular HRD signature, associated with sub-groups most likely to benefit, can be prospectively applied to the final analysis of the Phase 3 pivotal trial (ARIEL3). ARIEL2 is an ongoing, single-arm, open-label biomarker study designed to refine the molecular signature associated with a response to rucaparib. Eligible pts (n=180) have relapsed, platinum-sensitive, high-grade OC and measurable disease. All pts undergo a pre-dose biopsy and provide archival tumor tissue. Tumor tissue HR status is assessed using Foundation Medicine's next generation sequencing (NGS) platform and University of Washington's BROCA-HR panel, with the current HRD algorithm developed using in vitro/in vivo and TCGA (and similar) bioinformatic data. The key efficacy analyses to be correlated with tumor HR status are response by RECIST v1.1, GCIG-defined CA-125 response, and PFS. The number of gBRCA pts is limited to maximize non-gBRCA response predictors. Exploratory biomarkers include assessment of tissue NHEJ competency (candidate predictive biomarker) and circulating tumor DNA (candidate efficacy surrogate). The optimized algorithm will then be tested prospectively in ARIEL3 (n=540), an international, randomized (2:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled maintenance trial in platinum-sensitive OC in remission after platinum-based therapy. The primary endpoint of ARIEL3 is PFS in molecularly-defined HRD subgroups as determined by NGS analysis of archival tumor tissue using the optimized algorithm, refined (as required) through ARIEL2.Conclusion: This pair of clinical trials seeks to determine prospectively the appropriate population, among all women with platinum-sensitive OC, who derive a meaningful benefit from PARPi treatment in the maintenance setting. Citation Format: Elizabeth Swisher, Iain McNeish, Robert L. Coleman, James D. Brenton, Scott H. Kaufmann, Andrew Allen, Mitch Raponi, Heidi Giordano, Lara Maloney, Jeffrey Isaacson, Jonathan A. Ledermann. Prospective molecular identification of ovarian cancer patients benefiting from PARP inhibitor (PARPi, rucaparib) maintenance therapy - reaching beyond germline BRCA mutations. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr CT339. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-CT339