Urbauer, Diana L.

BACKGROUNDPreclinical evidence has suggested that sustained adrenergic activation can promote ovarian cancer growth and metastasis. The authors examined the impact of beta‐adrenergic blockade on the clinical outcome of women with epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers (collectively, epithelial ovarian cancer [EOC]).METHODSA multicenter review of 1425 women with histopathologically confirmed EOC was performed. Comparisons were made between patients with documented beta‐blocker use during chemotherapy and those without beta‐blocker use.RESULTSThe median age of patients in the current study was 63 years (range, 21‐93 years). The sample included 269 patients who received beta‐blockers. Of those, 193 (71.7%) were receiving beta‐1–adrenergic receptor selective agents, and the remaining patients were receiving nonselective beta antagonists. The primary indication for beta‐blocker use was hypertension but also included arrhythmia and postmyocardial infarction management. For patients receiving any beta‐blocker, the median overall survival (OS) was 47.8 months versus 42 months for nonusers (P =.04). The median OS based on beta‐blocker receptor selectivity was 94.9 months for those receiving nonselective beta‐blockers versus 38 months for those receiving beta‐1–adrenergic receptor selective agents (P<.001). Hypertension was associated with decreased OS compared with no hypertension across all groups. However, even among patients with hypertension, a longer median OS was observed among users of a nonselective beta‐blocker compared with nonusers (38.2 months vs 90 months; P<.001).CONCLUSIONSUse of nonselective beta‐blockers in patients with EOC was associated with longer OS. These findings may have implications for new therapeutic approaches. Cancer 2015;121:3435–43. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Objective To evaluate how many patients could have undergone partial nephrectomy ( PN ) rather than radical nephrectomy ( RN ) before and after neoadjuvant axitinib therapy, as assessed by five independent urological oncologists, and to study the variability of inter‐observer agreement. Patients and Methods Pre‐ and post‐systemic treatment computed tomography scans from 22 patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma in a phase II neoadjuvant axitinib trial were reviewed by five independent urological oncologists. R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score and κ statistics were calculated. Results The median R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score changed from 11 before treatment to 10 after treatment ( P = 0.002). Five tumours with moderate complexity before axitinib treatment remained moderate complexity after treatment. Of 17 tumours with high complexity before axitinib treatment, three became moderate complexity after treatment. The overall κ statistic was 0.611. Moderate‐complexity κ was 0.611 vs a high‐complexity κ of 0.428. Before axitinib treatment the κ was 0.550 vs 0.609 after treatment. After treatment with axitinib, all five reviewers agreed that only five patients required RN (instead of eight before treatment) and that 10 patients could now undergo PN (instead of three before treatment). The odds of PN feasibility were 22.8‐times higher after treatment with axitinib. Conclusions There is considerable variability in inter‐observer agreement on the feasibility of PN in patients treated with neoadjuvant targeted therapy. Although more patients were candidates for PN after neoadjuvant axitinib therapy, it remains difficult to identify these patients a priori .