White, Roger D.

Background : Studies have shown an association between obesity and total mortality in patients with and without coronary artery disease. Less is known regarding the impact of obesity after cardiac arrest. Obese survivors of ventricular fibrillation (VF) out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) may have worse outcomes than nonobese patients due to resuscitation challenges, long-term risks of cardiovascular disease, and other comorbidities. Methods : All patients who presented with a VF OHCA in Rochester Minnesota from November 1990-September 2006 were included. Patients were classified by weight (BMI <25, 25–30, >30). ICD shocks for VF/VT were determined by review of subsequent device interrogations. Results : 226 patients (age 63.7±13.5) were treated for VF OHCA with an average call-to-shock time of 6.3±1.8 minutes. 99 patients (44%) survived to hospital discharge with neurologic recovery. Data to calculate BMI were available in 213(95%). There was no difference between the relative distribution of body weight between the hospital survivors [<25(32%), 25–30(37%), >30(31%)] and nonsurvivors [<25(32%), 25–30(44%), >30(28%)], p=0.711. There was no difference in ICD implantation rates between weight groups (p=0.251). The patients were followed for an average of 5.8±4.4 years. The 5-year survival was 80±5%. 5-year survival was lower in underweight/normal patients [<25, 71% (63–79) compared to heavier patients (25–30:88% (82–94), p=0.001]. The survival difference persisted after adjustment for age (p=0.02). Malignancy was the most common cause of death in the underweight group. The 5-year survival free of ICD shocks was 61±7% with no weight-based difference in shocks. Conclusion : There was no apparent weight-based influence on resuscitation survival after VF OHCA. Patients who are under to normal weight had a lower long-term survival and represent a high-risk population primarily due to noncardiac diseases.

Introduction: Left atrial appendage (LAA) flow depends largely on left ventricular compliance and may play a role in mediating the regulation of left atrial volume-pressure relationships. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that LAA emptying flow velocity (LAAEV) is a predictive factor of long-term outcomes (e.g. recurrent AF, stroke, and survival) after cardioversion for non-valvular AF. Method: We identified 3,251 consecutive patients with non-valvular AF who underwent successful TEE-guided electrical cardioversion (ECV) at our institution between May 2000 and March 2012. Successful ECV was defined as sinus rhythm at time of discharge from the cardioversion unit. Patients were monitored following their ECV procedure for first documentation of recurrent AF, stroke or death. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent predictors of long-term outcomes. Patients with >= moderate valvular regurgitation or stenosis were excluded. Results: Among the 3,251 patients who were successfully cardioverted to sinus rhythm, the mean (±SD) LAAEV was 38.43±23 cm/s and the median was 33 cm/s, (interquartile range [IQR], 20-50). Patients with LAAEV <=33 cm/s had higher CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score (2.6±1.2 vs. 1.9±1.3, P =.009), larger LAVI (52.0±20.9 cc/m 2 vs. 43.3±13.6 cc/m 2 , P <.001) than those with LAAEV >33 cm/s. Pre or post-procedure antiarrhythmic drug use was similar between the two groups. During 1-year follow-up, patients with LAAEV <=33 cm/s had significantly higher rate of AF recurrence than those with LAAEV >33 cm/s (55% vs 45%, P <.001). Likewise, during a mean follow-up of 4.9±3.6 years, similar patterns in 5-year rates were observed for first recurrence of AF (81% vs 73%, P <.001), stroke (7% vs 4%, P =.003) and mortality (31% vs 23%, P <.001) for LAAEV <=33 vs > 33cm/s, respectively. Stepwise multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that LAAEV <=33 cm/s, age, CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score were independent predictors of AF recurrence, stroke and mortality. Conclusions: LAA emptying flow velocity is an effective and convenient method for risk stratification of patients undergoing cardioversion for AF. Our data showed that patients with reduced LAAEV have an increased risk for AF recurrence, stroke and death following electrical cardioversion.

Objective:The prognostic role of electroencephalography during and after targeted temperature management in postcardiac arrest patients, relatively to other predictors, is incompletely known. We assessed performances of electroencephalography during and after targeted temperature management toward good and poor outcomes, along with other recognized predictors.Design:Cohort study (April 2009 to March 2016).Setting:Two academic hospitals (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN).Patients:Consecutive comatose adults admitted after cardiac arrest, identified through prospective registries.Interventions:All patients were managed with targeted temperature management, receiving prespecified standardized clinical, neurophysiologic (particularly, electroencephalography during and after targeted temperature management), and biochemical evaluations.Measurements and Main Results:We assessed electroencephalography variables (reactivity, continuity, epileptiform features, and prespecified “benign” or “highly malignant” patterns based on the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society nomenclature) and other clinical, neurophysiologic (somatosensory-evoked potential), and biochemical prognosticators. Good outcome (Cerebral Performance Categories 1 and 2) and mortality predictions at 3 months were calculated. Among 357 patients, early electroencephalography reactivity and continuity and flexor or better motor reaction had greater than 70% positive predictive value for good outcome; reactivity (80.4%; 95% CI, 75.9–84.4%) and motor response (80.1%; 95% CI, 75.6–84.1%) had highest accuracy. Early benign electroencephalography heralded good outcome in 86.2% (95% CI, 79.8–91.1%). False positive rates for mortality were less than 5% for epileptiform or nonreactive early electroencephalography, nonreactive late electroencephalography, absent somatosensory-evoked potential, absent pupillary or corneal reflexes, presence of myoclonus, and neuron-specific enolase greater than 75 µg/L; accuracy was highest for early electroencephalography reactivity (86.6%; 95% CI, 82.6–90.0). Early highly malignant electroencephalography had an false positive rate of 1.5% with accuracy of 85.7% (95% CI, 81.7–89.2%).Conclusions:This study provides class III evidence that electroencephalography reactivity predicts both poor and good outcomes, and motor reaction good outcome after cardiac arrest. Electroencephalography reactivity seems to be the best discriminator between good and poor outcomes. Standardized electroencephalography interpretation seems to predict both conditions during and after targeted temperature management.

Background Survivors of ventricular fibrillation out of hospital cardiac arrest ( VF ‐ OHCA ) due to a potentially reversible cause such as acute myocardial infarction (MI) or ischemia are considered to be at low risk of recurrent arrhythmia. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators ( ICD ) are not routinely recommended in such patients. However, the outcome of these patients in the era of rapid coronary revascularization and ICD therapy is not known. Methods and Results We examined the outcome of 114 consecutive survivors of VF OHCA due to acute MI or ischemia in Olmsted County, MN from 1990 to 2011. An ICD was implanted in 45/114 patients. ICD recipients had lower EF [median ( IQR ) 38 (26 to 54) versus 48 (35 to 58) %, P =0.04]. During a median ( IQR ) follow‐up of 9.9 (4.4 to 14.6) years, ICD implantation was associated with reduced cardiac mortality ( HR 0.24 [0.07 to 0.88], P =0.031) and a trend towards reduced all‐cause mortality ( HR 0.56 [0.30 to 1.02], P =0.059) after adjusting for the first principal component. One or more appropriate ICD therapies were delivered in 19/45, with half of the patients receiving therapy within 1 year. Patients with EF ≤35% at discharge continued to be at long‐term risk for ICD therapy compared with those with EF >35% who were at increased risk predominantly in the first 8 months. EF and revascularization were not significantly associated with ICD therapy in the multivariable analysis. Conclusions Patients with VF ‐ OHCA in the setting of acute MI or myocardial ischemia remain at high risk of recurrent ventricular arrhythmias, particularly if EF ≤35%. This suggests that ICD implantation may be reasonable if EF ≤35%.

Background— Despite several advances in postresuscitation care over the past decade, population-based mortality rates for patients hospitalized with cardiac arrest in the United States have not been studied over this time period. The aim of this study was to determine the annual in-hospital mortality rates of patients with cardiac arrest from 2001 to 2009. Methods and Results— The US mortality rates for hospitalized patients with cardiac arrest were determined using the 2001 to 2009 US National Inpatient Sample, a national hospital discharge database. Using the International Classification of Diseases , 9 th Edition, code 427.5, we identified patients hospitalized in the United States with cardiac arrest from 2001 to 2009. The main outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. A total of 1 190 860 patients were hospitalized with a diagnosis of cardiac arrest in the United States from 2001 to 2009. The in-hospital mortality rate decreased each year from 69.6% in 2001 to 57.8% in 2009. In multivariable analysis, when controlling for age, sex, race, and comorbidities, earlier year was a strong independent predictor of in-hospital death. The mortality rate declined across all analyzed subgroups, including sex, age, race, and stratification by comorbidity. Conclusions— The in-hospital mortality rate of patients hospitalized with cardiac arrest in the United States decreased by 11.8% from 2001 to 2009.

Background —Approximately 360 000 Americans experience sudden cardiac arrest each year; current treatments are expensive and not very effective. Public access defibrillation (PAD) is a novel treatment for out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest that refers to use of automated external defibrillators by the lay public or by nonmedical personnel such as police. A clinical trial has been proposed to evaluate the effectiveness of public access defibrillation, but it is unclear whether such early defibrillation will offer sufficient value for money. Our objective was to estimate the potential cost-effectiveness of public access defibrillation by use of decision analysis. Methods and Results —A decision model compared the potential cost-effectiveness of standard emergency medical services (EMS) systems with that of EMS supplemented by PAD. We considered defibrillation by lay responders or police, using an analysis with a US health-care perspective. Input data were derived from published data or fiscal databases. Future costs and effects were discounted at 3%. Monte Carlo simulation was performed to estimate the variability in the costs and effects of each program. Sensitivity analyses assessed the robustness of the results to changes in input data. A standard EMS system had a median cost of $5900 per cardiac arrest patient (interquartile range, IQR, $3200 to $10 900) and yielded a median of 0.25 quality-adjusted life years (IQR, 0.20 to 0.30). PAD by lay responders had a median incremental cost of $44 000 per additional quality-adjusted life year (IQR, $29 000 to $68 900). PAD by police had a median incremental cost of $27 200 per additional quality-adjusted life year (IQR, $15 700 to $47 800). The results were sensitive to changes in the cost and relative survival benefit of PAD. Conclusions —Although more expensive than standard EMS for sudden cardiac arrest, PAD may be economically attractive. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of PAD should be assessed in a randomized, controlled trial.