Wells, George A.

Background: Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD) is a cause of acute coronary syndrome, particularly among women, and is associated with psychological distress, including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress (PTSD) symptoms. Fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD), a vascular condition that alters the arteries, is often found in patients with SCAD, adding complexity and uncertainty with a second serious diagnosis. This study examined the differences in mental health symptoms between SCAD survivors with and without FMD to better understand their unique psychosocial needs and inform interventions to enhance patient outcomes. Methods: Patients diagnosed with SCAD within the past 3 years were recruited from 6 Canadian cardiac hospitals. Participants completed questionnaires assessing socio-demographics, comorbidities, and validated psychological measures, including Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for depression, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) for generalized anxiety, Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire (CAQ) for cardiac-related anxiety, and PTSD Checklist (PCL-5) for PTSD symptoms. Differences in mental health outcomes between SCAD survivors with and without FMD were analyzed using t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Results: The study included 326 participants (92.9% female; mean age 53.3 years), with 67 participants (20.6%) having a confirmed diagnosis of FMD at the time of questionnaire completion (39.3% FMD at study completion). Post-SCAD, patients with FMD reported significantly higher scores than patients without FMD on the GAD-7 (6.4±5.9 vs. 4.7±4.9, p = .028), CAQ (29.9±13.1 vs. 26.0±12.3, p = .023), and PCL-5 (17.2±15.4 vs. 13.3± 14.0, p = .048). The proportion of SCAD survivors with FMD scoring in the clinically diagnostic range was significantly higher than those in patients without FMD: 32.8% vs. 20.8% for depression, 31.3% vs. 17.4% for anxiety, 64.2% vs. 49.2% for cardiac anxiety, and 25.4% vs. 11.6% for PTSD (all p < .05). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that SCAD survivors with comorbid FMD experience significantly higher distress —depression, generalized anxiety, cardiac-related anxiety, and PTSD symptoms—compared to those without FMD. Longitudinal research is needed to explore the role of these mental health concerns in long-term mental health and cardiac outcomes. Enhanced psychological interventions for those with FMD may be required.

ABSTRACT Aims The impact of treatment for tricuspid regurgitation (TR) across different levels of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of surgical and transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions (TTVI) to conservative (medical) management across LVEF categories. Methods and results Patients with severe isolated TR from the TRIGISTRY, a multicentre international registry, were categorized based on LVEF (preserved ejection fraction [pEF]: ≥50%, mildly reduced ejection fraction [mrEF]: 41–49%, and reduced ejection fraction [rEF]: ≤40%). We assessed the impact of treatment modality and procedural success (mild-to-moderate or lower residual TR) on 2-year survival within each LVEF category. Among 2384 patients, 1383 had pEF, 400 had mrEF, and 601 had rEF. Compared to conservative management, surgery (p &lt; 0.0005) and TTVI (p &lt; 0.0001) were associated with a survival benefit in patients with pEF. No significant survival advantage was observed in patients with mrEF (p = 0.28 for both), nor in those with rEF (p = 0.76 and p = 0.22, respectively). Similar results were obtained when surgical and transcatheter interventions were grouped (p &lt; 0.0001, p = 0.17 and p = 0.29 in patients with pEF, mrEF and rEF, respectively). Patients with residual TR after TTVI exhibited a trend toward worse survival compared to those managed conservatively across all LVEF categories (p = 0.47, p = 0.33 and p = 0.008 in pEF, mrEF and rEF, respectively). Conclusions Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention, whether surgical or transcatheter-based, was associated with improved survival in patients with pEF but not in those with mrEF or rEF. Residual TR remained a significant prognostic factor across the entire LVEF spectrum. These findings highlight the need for careful patient selection when considering TTVI in individuals with rEF.

Abstract Introduction Despite being more common in males, thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) have worse prognosis in females. Females with TAA are 3x more likely to experience acute aortic syndromes, and 40% more likely to die than their male counterparts, but mechanisms underlying this paradox are incompletely understood. The estimated aortic pulse wave velocity (e-PWV) is a marker of aortic stiffness that can be used widely due to its simplicity, as it does not require specialized equipment. We have previously shown that e-PWV was independently associated with faster TAA growth,(1) and that this association was twice as strong in females than males, but the role of e-PWV as a predictor of adverse outcomes in TAA remains unknown. Purpose We sought to evaluate the sex-specific association of e-PWV with adverse outcomes in patients with TAA. Methods We performed a prospective study of 102 males and 48 females with TAA. e-PWV was calculated according to validated equations utilizing age, mean arterial pressure, and presence/absence of cardiovascular risk factors.(2) The primary outcome was a composite of acute aortic syndromes, death, or elective aortic surgery. We used a Cox proportional hazard model to determine the independent association of e-PWV with the primary outcome, adjusted for age, BSA, aneurysm size and location, hypertension, and pulse pressure. Sex-specific models were performed if the interaction of sex*e-PWV was significant (P≤0.05). Univariate logistic regression models were performed to determine the c-statistic for e-PWV in predicting adverse outcomes, and the best e-PWV cutoff for this prediction was established based on sensitivity and specificity. Kaplan-Meier curves were performed using this cut-off. Results A summary of study design and results is presented in Picture 1. Mean age was 62±12 years, 70 (47%) had degenerative etiology, baseline aneurysm size was 46.3±4.3mm, and e-PWV was 9.5±1.9 m/s (not different between sexes, P&gt;0.07 for each). Mean follow-up was 4.6±2.4 years in females and 5.5±2.3 years in males, P=0.031. The primary outcome occurred in 37 (25%) participants (3 dissections, 3 intramural hematomas, 1 aortic rupture, 22 elective surgical repairs and 11 deaths - 3 of which followed surgery). The interaction term sex*e-PWV was significant (P=0.0001), so sex-specific models were performed. e-PWV independently predicted the primary outcome in females (HR for 1m/s increase in e-PWV: 3.4; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-14.7, P=0.033), but not in males (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.50-1.51, P=0.622). In females, e-PWV had a c-statistic of 0.860 for the detection of the primary outcome, with a best e-PWV cutoff of 11.58 m/s (73% sensitivity, 92% specificity). Kaplan-Meier curves for the primary outcome in females using this cutoff are shown in Picture 2. Conclusion e-PWV independently predicts adverse outcomes in females with TAA, highlighting a novel marker for risk stratification and therapeutic targeting.Study summaryKaplan-Meier curves

Abstract Background and Aims Severe tricuspid regurgitation is associated with increased mortality rates, but benefit of its correction and ideal timing are not clearly determined. This study aimed to identify patient subsets who might benefit from the surgery. Methods In TRIGISTRY, an international cohort study of consecutive patients with severe isolated functional tricuspid regurgitation (33 centres, 10 countries), survival rates up to 10 years were compared between patients who underwent isolated tricuspid valve surgery (repair or replacement) and those conservatively managed, overall and according to TRI-SCORE category (low: ≤3, intermediate: 4–5, and high: ≥6). Results One thousand and two hundred seventeen were managed conservatively, and 551 underwent isolated tricuspid valve surgery (200 repairs and 351 replacements). TRI-SCORE distribution was 33% low, 32% intermediate, and 35% high. At 10 years, survival rates were similar between surgical and conservative management [41% vs. 36%; hazard ratio (HR) .97; 95% confidence interval (CI) .88–1.08, P = .57]. Surgery improved survival compared with conservative management in the low TRI-SCORE category (72% vs. 44%; HR .27; 95% CI .20–.37, P &lt; .0001), but not in the intermediate (36% vs. 37%; HR 1.17; 95%CI .98–1.40, P = .09) or high categories (20% vs. 24%; HR 1.06; 95% CI .91–1.25, P = .45). Both repair and replacement improved survival in the low TRI-SCORE category (84% and 61% vs. 44%; HR .11; 95% CI .06–.19, P &lt; .0001, and HR .65; 95% CI .47–.90, P = .009). Repair showed benefit in the intermediate category (59% vs. 37%; HR .49; 95% CI .35–.68, P &lt; .0001) while replacement was possibly harmful (25% vs. 37%; HR 1.43; 95% CI 1.18–1.72, P = .0002). Conclusions Higher survival rates were observed with repair than replacement and benefit of intervention declined as TRI-SCORE increased with no benefit of any type of surgery in the high TRI-SCORE category. These results emphasize the importance of timely intervention and patient selection to achieve the best outcomes and the need for randomized controlled trials.

Abstract Aims Aortic stenosis (AS) is a progressive disease predominantly affecting elderly patients that carries significant morbidity and mortality without aortic valve replacement, the only proven treatment. Our objective was to determine the cost-effectiveness of AS screening using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in a geriatric population from the perspective of the publicly funded healthcare system in Canada. Methods and results Markov models estimating the cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for AS screening with a one-time TTE were developed. The model included diagnosed and undiagnosed AS health states, hospitalizations, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and post-TAVR health states. Primary analysis included screening at 70 and 80 years of age with intervention at symptom onset, with scenario analysis included for early intervention at the time of severe asymptomatic AS diagnosis. Monte Carlo simulation of 5000 replications was completed with a lifetime horizon and a 1.5% discount for costs and outcomes.Screening for AS at the age of 70 years was associated with an ICER of $156 722, and screening at 80 years of age was associated with an ICER of $28 005, suggesting that screening at 80 years of age is cost-effective when willingness-to-pay per QALY is $50 000. Scenario analysis with early intervention was not cost-effective, with an ICER of $142 157 at 70 years and $124 651 at 80 years. Conclusion Screening for AS at 80 years of age with a one-time TTE, in a Canadian population, improves quality of life and is cost-effective in a publicly funded healthcare system providing, TAVR is reserved for symptomatic patients.

Introduction There is emerging evidence supporting the use of the radial artery (RA) as a preferred secondary conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as it is associated with higher rates of graft patency at 5 years when compared with saphenous vein grafts (SVG). The modified Allen’s test (MAT) is traditionally regarded as the standard of care in the assessment of ulnar artery (UA) patency prior to RA harvesting. Unfortunately, due to high false-positive rates, a substantial number of pre-CABG patients are found to have an abnormal MAT despite normal UA patency, resulting in inappropriate exclusion from RA harvesting. The SVG is generally used in its place when this occurs, resulting in potentially lower rates of long-term graft patency. Methods and analysis The CAPITAL iRADIAL-CABG trial is currently enrolling participants 18 years of age or older undergoing CABG for whom the treating physician is considering the use of an RA conduit. Eligible patients will be randomised in a 1:1 fashion to MAT or smartphone-based photoplethysmography application assessment to assess collateral palmar circulation prior to RA harvesting. The primary outcome of the trial is the use of the RA as a conduit during CABG. The primary safety outcome is postoperative palmar ischaemia as determined by clinical assessment or requirement of vascular intervention. Secondary outcomes include vascular complications, early graft failure, need for rescue percutaneous coronary intervention during the index hospitalisation and a composite cardiovascular outcome of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death prior to discharge from hospital. A total of 236 participants are planned to be recruited. Ethics and dissemination The study was approved by the Ottawa Heart Science Network Research Ethics Board (approval number 20180865-01H). The study results will be disseminated via conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications. Trial registration number NCT03810729.

Abstract This is a protocol for a co‐registered Cochrane and Campbell Review (Methodology). The objectives are as follows: To identify, describe and assess methods for: when to replicate a systematic review; how to replicate a systematic review.

Background —Approximately 360 000 Americans experience sudden cardiac arrest each year; current treatments are expensive and not very effective. Public access defibrillation (PAD) is a novel treatment for out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest that refers to use of automated external defibrillators by the lay public or by nonmedical personnel such as police. A clinical trial has been proposed to evaluate the effectiveness of public access defibrillation, but it is unclear whether such early defibrillation will offer sufficient value for money. Our objective was to estimate the potential cost-effectiveness of public access defibrillation by use of decision analysis. Methods and Results —A decision model compared the potential cost-effectiveness of standard emergency medical services (EMS) systems with that of EMS supplemented by PAD. We considered defibrillation by lay responders or police, using an analysis with a US health-care perspective. Input data were derived from published data or fiscal databases. Future costs and effects were discounted at 3%. Monte Carlo simulation was performed to estimate the variability in the costs and effects of each program. Sensitivity analyses assessed the robustness of the results to changes in input data. A standard EMS system had a median cost of $5900 per cardiac arrest patient (interquartile range, IQR, $3200 to $10 900) and yielded a median of 0.25 quality-adjusted life years (IQR, 0.20 to 0.30). PAD by lay responders had a median incremental cost of $44 000 per additional quality-adjusted life year (IQR, $29 000 to $68 900). PAD by police had a median incremental cost of $27 200 per additional quality-adjusted life year (IQR, $15 700 to $47 800). The results were sensitive to changes in the cost and relative survival benefit of PAD. Conclusions —Although more expensive than standard EMS for sudden cardiac arrest, PAD may be economically attractive. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of PAD should be assessed in a randomized, controlled trial.