Back to Authors

Landau, Susan

Mayo Clinic

University of California, Berkeley

Citations 28

Does cohort heterogeneity affect relationships between AD biomarkers and cognition?
Liu, Peiwei, Taggett, Jacinda , Snyder, Heather M. , DeCarli, Charles S., Vemuri, Prashanthi, Harvey, Danielle J., Koeppe, Robert A., Jagust, William J., Landau, Susan M., Group, the Alzheimer's Disease NeuroImaging Initiative and the US POINTER Study, Harrison, Theresa M. , DeCarli, Charles , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Harvey, Danielle , Jagust, William J. , Baker, Laura D. , Landau, Susan, Group, the US POINTER Study

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 25, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: S2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz70856_100140 Get It

Abstract Background Extensive evidence links cognition, tau, and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, in U.S. POINTER imaging (a community‐recruited clinical trial cohort selected for high cardiovascular risk, ethnoracial diversity, and increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia) tau PET is more closely linked to cognition than in ADNI. Here, we further explore how ADNI and POINTER differ with respect to relationships between cross‐sectional AD biomarkers, cortical thickness, and different cognitive domains. Method U.S. POINTER imaging (Baseline; N = 775; 68.9±5.2 years, 62.8% female) and ADNI ( N = 405; 69.9±5.4 years, 58% female) were matched by age, sex, clinical status, and APOE4 genotype (Table 1). We examined associations between baseline AD biomarkers (Amyloid‐beta (Aβ) PET in centiloids, harmonized tau PET measures of MK6240 in POINTER and FTP in ADNI), regional cortical thickness, and verbal memory (Delayed Story Recall), executive function (Trail‐Making B), and global cognition (Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite scores) across each cohort, controlling for age, sex, and education. Result Aβ burden in ADNI was associated with worse executive function ( p < .001) and global cognition ( p < .001) but not memory, whereas in POINTER Aβ burden was not associated with any cognitive domain (Figure 1A). Among Aβ+ individuals, tau burden was associated with poorer performance across domains in ADNI, but only with poorer verbal memory in POINTER (Figures 1B&1C). Additionally, there were stronger positive associations between cortical thickness and executive function and global cognition compared to verbal memory, particularly in ADNI Aβ+ individuals even after adjusting for entorhinal tau ( p < .01; Figure 2). Conclusion Cognitive performance was linked to all biomarkers (Aβ, tau, cortical thickness) but these associations were consistently stronger in ADNI compared to POINTER, particularly in Aβ+ individuals. The stronger thickness‐cognition relationships in ADNI were not driven by tau, indicating that there is a tau‐independent role of thickness in explaining cognition. In ADNI, there were subtle differences between cognitive domains such that executive function was more closely linked than verbal memory to Aβ and cortical thickness, whereas verbal memory was linked to tau in both cohorts. Our study highlights that frequently‐reported AD biomarker associations may be attenuated in heterogeneous, community‐recruited cohorts.
Risk factors and clinical relevance of MRI vascular markers in the U.S. POINTER study: a cross‐cohort comparison with the Framingham Heart Study
Vemuri, Prashanthi, Snyder, Heather M. , Beiser, Alexa S, Satizabal, Claudia L, Landau, Susan M., DeCarli, Charles S., Group, the US POINTER Study, Maillard, Pauline , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Baker, Laura D. , Beiser, Alexa , Satizábal, Claudia L. , Romero, José R. , Seshadri, Sudha , Landau, Susan, DeCarli, Charles

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 25, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: S2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz70856_100134 Get It

Abstract Background Our objective is to examine the generalizability of the relationships between four MRI markers of CVD: DTI‐derived free water (FW), fractional anisotropy (FA), perivascular space (PVS) and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) volume, with vascular risk factors (VRF) and cognition in the baseline POINTER Imaging and Framingham Heart Study (FHS) cohorts. Method We studied 907 U.S. POINTER and 797 FHS Offspring participants with available baseline demographic, clinical and imaging data (Table 1). Continuous FW, FA, WMH (log‐transformed) and PVS measurements were regressed against total cranial volume (TCV). Cognitive outcomes included a Global Cognitive Composite and executive function composite score for POINTER and FHS. For each MRI marker, we used linear and logistic regressions to assess the effect of age, sex, hypertension, diabetes and smoking status, adjusting for ethnicity. We then assessed, for each cognitive outcome, the individual effect of MRI markers using separate linear regressions adjusted for demographic and clinical factors, as well as TCV‐adjusted gray matter volume to control for atrophy. Result POINTER and FHS differed across most demographic and biomarker characteristics (Table 1). Despite these differences, there were similar associations between demographic and VRF and the 4 MRI vascular markers in POINTER and FHS (Figure 1): increased age was associated with worse outcomes for the 4 markers, hypertension was associated with increased FW, PVS and lower FA, diabetes was associated with increased FW only, smoking status did not impact any of the four markers. Only exception was that female had lower FW and increased WMH in POINTER and increased PVS in FHS. Associations between CVD measures and cognition were also similar across cohorts: reduced cognitive performance was significantly associated with both decreased FA and increased FW (Figure 2), but not with WMH nor PVS. Conclusion Our study explores four imaging markers representing diverse mechanisms by which CVD could impact brain structure and function in the POINTER and FHS studies. Despite differences in cohort characteristics, we found mostly consistent CVD relationships with demographic, VRF, and cognitive measures between cohorts which supports the generalizability of the relation of these markers with VRF and cognition identified in the POINTER cohort.
Evaluation of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers and cognition in non‐Hispanic Black and non‐Hispanic White participants in ADNI and US POINTER Imaging
Robinson, Talia L. , Papp, Kathryn V, Snyder, Heather M. , Vemuri, Prashanthi, DeCarli, Charles S., Amariglio, Rebecca E. , Landau, Susan M., Group, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative US POINTER Study, Harrison, Theresa M. , Papp, Kathryn V. , Baker, Laura D. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , DeCarli, Charles , Landau, Susan, Group, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative US POINTER Study

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 25, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: S2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz70856_100136 Get It

Abstract Background Given low representation of diverse populations in Alzheimer's disease (AD) research, it remains unclear if AD biomarker relationships observed primarily in non‐Hispanic White (NHW) cohorts generalize to other groups. Here we evaluate associations between key AD biomarkers and cognitive performance among cognitively unimpaired non‐Hispanic Blck (NHB) and NHW participants across 2 cohorts with unique sample characteristics. Method Participants included cognitively unimpaired NHB and NHW participants with Aβ and tau PET in ADNI (69 NHB, 402 NHW) and POINTER Imaging (135 NHB, 637 NHW). We examined harmonized measures of global Aβ (in centiloids), entorhinal cortex (EC) tau (quantified with MK6240 in POINTER and FTP in ADNI) and Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (PACC) scores. Regression models within each ethnoracial group evaluated relationships between 1) Aβ and EC tau, and 2) EC tau and PACC performance. Interaction models within each cohort were also conducted to assess differences in these associations by ethnoracial group. All models were adjusted for age and gender. Models with PACC additionally adjusted for education. Result In US POINTER, NHBs had lower Aβ and EC tau burden compared to NHWs (Table 1). In ADNI, there was no difference in EC tau between groups, and no differenence in Aβ after adjusting for age and gender. In US POINTER, the positive Aβ‐EC tau relationship was observed in both ethnoracial groups whereas in ADNI, Aβ was associated with higher EC tau in the NHW but not the NHB group. In both cohorts, EC tau was associated with worse PACC performance in both NHB and NHW and there were no differences in this association by ethnoracial group in interaction models (Figure 1). Conclusion NHBs had lower Aβ and EC tau than NHWs in POINTER but not ADNI, and there were inconsistent associations between Aβ and EC tau across cohorts. Despite these differences, AD biomarkers appear similarly related to cognitive outcomes across ethnoracial groups in both cohorts. Future analyses will attempt to further determine the generalizability of AD biomarker relationships in diverse samples by considering matching on relevant health and demographic characteristics, and inclusion of additional cohorts with harmonized biomarker and cognitive measurements.
Association of neighborhood deprivation with Alzheimer's Disease pathologies, gray matter volume, white matter hyperintensities and cognition by sex, race or ethnicity and APOE4 status in Non‐demented Older Adults
Aguilar, Pablo Analuisa, Lockhart, Sam, Masdeu, Joseph C. , Snyder, Heather M. , Landau, Susan M., Arenaza‐Urquijo, Eider M, Holland, Thomas Monroe , Masdeu, Joseph C , Neumann, Lycia Tramujas Vasconcellos , Baker, Laura D. , Landau, Susan, Arenaza‐Urquijo, Eider M.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 23, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: S6 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz70860_105535 Get It

Abstract Background Neighborhood socio‐economic conditions may increase Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk through amyloid, tau, atrophy or vascular pathways, potentially varying by genetic risk, race or ethnicity and sex. We examined associations between Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and cognition, AD pathology, gray matter (GM) and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) volume in cognitively unimpaired older adults by race or ethnicity, sex and APOE4 status. Method We included 1896 non‐demented older adults from US POINTER study with available cognitive evaluations, ADI level – a census–based neighborhood disadvantage metric (categorized as low, moderate and high) and a subsample with neuroimaging data ( N = 806). Linear/logistic regressions were used to assess interactions of ADI with sex, race or ethnicity, and APOE4 on (1) the Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite, (PACC‐5), (2) MRI‐derived GM volume meta‐ROI (entorhinal, fusiform, parahippocampal, mid‐temporal, inferior temporal), (3) WMH and (4) AD pathology (amyloid and tau PET), adjusted by age, sex and intracranial volume when appropriate. Result African American participants ( p <0.001) and females ( p <0.001) were more likely to live in deprived areas. African American participants had significantly lower PACC‐5 ( p <0.001) and GM volume ( p <0.001), “Other or multiple races” participants showed significantly higher amyloid burden ( p = 0.001), and White participants higher WMH ( p = 0.013). Females showed higher PACC‐5 scores ( p <0.001), while APOE4 carriers showed lower PACC‐5 ( p = 0.042) and higher amyloid burden ( p <0.001) (Table 1). Race and ADI interacted on PACC‐5 ( p = 0.043) and showed a borderline interaction on Tau ( p = 0.079), with higher ADI linked to lower PACC‐5 in White, Hispanic, and “Other or Multiple Races” and higher Tau in Hispanic. Further, there was a borderline ADI*APOE4 status interaction on WMH ( p = 0.059) and a significant ADI*APOE4 interaction on amyloid ( p = 0.001), where APOE4 carriers in deprived areas showed higher WMH and lower amyloid burden (Figure 1). No significant ADI*sex interactions were observed. Conclusion Neighborhood disadvantage was more commonly observed in African American participants, but interaction with cognition was primarily seen in other racial/ethnic groups. APOE4 carriers showed increased amyloid burden, but those from more disadvantaged neighborhoods exhibited a higher vascular component alongside lower amyloid‐driven pathology. These results may indicate varying effects of social disadvantages across groups or sample bias.
Association of neighborhood social and built environment with physical activity in U.S. POINTER
Aguilar, Pablo, Lockhart, Sam, Masdeu, Joseph C. , Garcia‐Aymerich, Judith, Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark, Snyder, Heather M. , Landau, Susan M., Arenaza‐Urquijo, Eider M, Aguilar, Pablo Analuisa, Holland, Thomas Monroe , Masdeu, Joseph C , Neumann, Lycia Tramujas Vasconcellos , Valentín, Antònia , Petricola, Sami , García‐Aymerich, Judith , Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J , Baker, Laura D. , Landau, Susan, Arenaza‐Urquijo, Eider M.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 23, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: S6 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz70860_105496 Get It

Abstract Background Neighborhood social and built environment characteristics may promote physical activity, a modifiable factor for dementia risk, which may in turn promote cognitive and brain health. We explored the associations of the U.S. National Walkability Index ‐ a nationwide geographic data resource that ranks block groups according to their relative walkability – with cognitive function, gray matter (GM) and white matter hyperintensities (WMH), neighborhood disadvantage, sedentary behavior and frequency of physical activity in cognitively unimpaired older adults at increased Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk. Method We included baseline data from 1398 older adults (68.3 ± 5.17 years, 68.3% females, 30.5% APOE4 carriers) from the U.S. POINTER trial. Walkability was classified as: least, below average, above average and most walkable. Neighborhood disadvantage (low, moderate and high) was assessed using Area Deprivation Index (ADI) ( N = 1384). Physical inactivity was assessed using the Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ, hours sitting/week, N = 1106), and physical activity was measured with a composite score from the Community Health Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) questionnaire. Linear and logistic regressions examined associations between walkability and (1) physical activity and sedentary behavior; and (2) cognition assessed with the Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (PACC‐5), GM volume and WMHs, Additionally, associations between neighborhood disadvantage and physical activity and sedentary behavior were explored. Models were adjusted for age, sex, race, APOE4 and total intracranial volume. Result More deprived areas were generally less walkable (β = ‐0.008, p < 0.001) (Figure 1). Higher walkability (Above average: β = 0.192, p = 0.011 and most walkable: β = 0.183, p = 0.032) was associated with higher PACC‐5 (Figure 2A) scores but not with more preserved GM or lower WMH. Walkability scores were not associated with physical activity and sedentary measurements, while greater neighborhood disadvantage was linked to sedentary behavior (β = 0.126, p < 0.001) (Figure 2B). Conclusion These results suggest that physical inactivity in more deprived areas is associated with neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantages rather than built environment. Additionally, walkability scores were not associated with any measure of physical activity or brain health, suggesting the need to further investigate other health effects of neighborhood disadvantage and walkability.
Sociodemographic associations with AD biomarkers in POINTER, UBRAIN, and ADNI
Aguilar, Pablo Analuisa, Colceriu, Carmen M, López, A., Franquesa‐Mullerat, María , Zsadanyi, Sara E, Farias, Sarah, Lockhart, Sam, Masdeu, Joseph C. , Fortea, Juan M., Lleó, Alberto, Snyder, Heather M. , Sánchez‐Valle, Raquel, Landau, Susan M., Arenaza‐Urquijo, Eider M, Colceriu, Carmen M, Zsadanyi, Sara Erzsebet , Pérez‐Millan, Agnès , Farias, Sarah Tomaszewski , Tort‐Merino, Adrià , Holland, Thomas Monroe , Masdeu, Joseph C , Neumann, Lycia Tramujas Vasconcellos , Valentín, Antònia , Petricola, Sami , Fortea, Juan , Lleó, Alberto , Baker, Laura D. , Sánchez‐Valle, Raquel , Bejanin, Alexandre , Landau, Susan, Arenaza‐Urquijo, Eider M.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 23, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: S6 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz70860_101102 Get It

Abstract Background In aging and dementia research, the relationships between modifiable risk factors and biomarkers often vary across cohorts. We aim to evaluate the consistency and generalizability of the association between the area deprivation index (ADI) ‐ an indicator of socioeconomic/resource disadvantage within a specific area ‐ and cognition and Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers across three distinct research cohorts, two from the U.S. (U.S. POINTER Imaging, ADNI) and one from Spain (UBRAIN). Method We included a total of 3091 participants without dementia, 1879 from U.S. POINTER Imaging, 282 from ADNI and 930 from UBRAIN (Table 1). The ADI was calculated using validated indices from the US and Spain, with neighborhood deprivation ranked as Low, Moderate, and High in the US, and Low and High in Spain. Outcomes of interest included (1) the preclinical Alzheimer's cognitive composite (PACC‐5), (2) MRI‐derived gray matter volumes in AD‐vulnerable regions and (3) PET or CSF‐derived amyloid status (+/‐). We ran logistic regression models with ADI level as predictor adjusted by sex, age, and APOE4 and considered education and race or ethnicity (only US cohorts) in our analyses. Result Participants in more deprived areas had lower education across cohorts and were more likely to be female (U.S. POINTER) and African American (U.S. POINTER and ADNI, Table 1). Independent of age, sex and APOE4 status, higher ADI was associated with lower PACC in U.S. POINTER (Moderate: β=‐0.165, p <0.001; High β=‐0.412, p <0.001) and UBRAIN (ADI: High β=‐0.096, p = 0.022) but not in ADNI (Figure 1). After controlling for education, this association remained significant in U.S. POINTER (Moderate: β=‐0.166, p = 0.002; High: β=‐0.248, p = 0.007) but not in UBRAIN (β=‐0.021, p = 0.66). In U.S. POINTER, there was a trend towards an association of higher ADI with lower GM volume in AD‐vulnerable regions (β=‐0.126, p = 0.089) that was not observed in ADNI or UBRAIN (Figure 2). No associations between ADI and amyloid status were found across cohorts. Conclusion We observed differing associations in neighborhood deprivation and cognition across US cohorts, as well as between the US and Spain cohorts. Country‐specific factors and sample representativeness must be considered when investigating the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying social determinants and disparities in AD.
Every Centiloid, from Everywhere, All at Once
Snyder, Heather M. , Apostolova, Liana G., Bombois, Stéphanie, Bourgeat, Pierrick, Braskie, Meredith N. , Carrillo, Maria, Casaletto, Kaitlin B, Chang, C. -C., Chang, Hsin‐I., Chao, Yishu , Chetelat, Gaël, Collij, Lyduine E., Dickerson, Brad C., Dubois, Bruno, Valdez, Alfonso Fajardo, Farrar, Gill , Fortea, Juan M., Frisoni, Giovanni B, Gu, Yuna , Guo, Tengfei, Hansson, Oskar H., Huang, Q., Huang, Shu‐Hua , Ishii, Kenji, Jagust, William J., Kato, Takashi , Koeppe, R. A., Kramer, Joel H, Landau, Susan M., Landeau, Brigitte, Lee, Sangwon, Lopresti, Brian J. , Lowe, Val J. , Mao, Xiaoxie, March, Andrew, Masters, Colin L., Mézenge, Florence, Mormino, Elizabeth C. , Franquesa‐Mullerat, María , Nakamura, Akinori, O'Bryant, Sid E., Pappas, Ioannis G., Rowe, C. C., Schott, Jonathan M, Schwartz, Daniel L. , Schwarz, Christopher G, Seo, Sang Won, Shekari, Mahnaz, Smith, Ruben, Sokołowski, Andrzej , Soleimani‐Meigooni, David, Sperling, Reisa A., Sun, Pan , Toga, Arthur W., Vaillancourt, David E. , Flier, Wiesje M. van der, Vemuri, Prashanthi, Villain, Nicolas , Villemagne, Victor L., Villeneuve, Sylvia , Wang, Wei‐En, Weiner, Michael S. W., Xiao, Cally , Xie, Fang, Yoon, Yeojun, Yun, M R , Rabinovici, Gil D., Wang, Wei‐en , Blazhenets, Ganna , Apostolova, Liana G. , Asken, Breton M. , Bejanin, Alexandre , Bombois, Stéphanie , Bourgeat, Pierrick , Casaletto, Kaitlin B. , Cash, David M. , Chang, Hsin‐I , Chételat, Gaël , Coath, William , Collij, Lyduine , Colmant, Lise , Dickerson, Brad C., Dubois, Bruno , Fortea, Juan , Frisoni, Giovanni B. , Gardner, Raquel C. , Garibotto, Valentina , Guo, Tengfei , Hanseeuw, Bernard , Hansson, Oskar , Harrison, Theresa M. , Ishii, Kazunari , Jagust, William J. , Kramer, Joel H. , Landau, Susan, Landeau, Brigitte , Masters, Colin L. , Mézenge, Florence, Nakamura, Akinori , O’Bryant, Sid E. , Peretti, Débora Elisa , Quenon, Lisa , Salvadó, Gemma , Schott, Jonathan M. , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Seo, Sang Won , Shekari, Mahnaz , Silbert, Lisa C. , Sokolowski, Andrzej, Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Sperling, Reisa Anne , Sun, Pan , Toga, Arthur W. , Giessen, Elsmarieke van de , Flier, Wiesje M. van der , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Villemagne, Victor L. , Weiner, Michael W. , Xie, Fang , Young, Christina B. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Joie, Renaud La

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 23, 2025 | Volume: 21 | Issue: S8 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz70862_110011 Get It

Abstract Background Ten years after the original publication, the Centiloid framework is now broadly used to harmonize amyloid‐PET quantification, facilitate data sharing and comparison across cohorts, and even assist visual interpretation in clinical settings. We evaluated the global implementation of Centiloids by comparing their distribution and corresponding positivity thresholds across cohorts. Methods We gathered data from publicly available cohorts and reached out to investigators across the world to collect cross‐sectional Centiloids, demographic and clinical information, and visual read data. Gaussian mixture models (GMM, k=2) were fitted to Centiloid values for each cohort and cutoffs were calculated as mean + 2SD of the lower Gaussian. When visual reads were available, we determined Centiloid cutoffs that maximized correspondence with visual reads (Cohen’s kappa). Data was combined across cohorts using random effects meta‐analyses. Results As of January 2025, we included 37 cohorts ( n = 41,678 participants) with heterogeneous pipelines, radiotracers, and clinical and demographic characteristics (Table‐1). The low Gaussian peaks ranged from ‐9 to 10CL; the meta‐analysis identified a common peak at 1CL. The second peaks were more heterogeneous (range=38‐102CL; meta‐analysis outcome=64CL). Across cohorts, the proportion of cognitively unimpaired versus impaired participants impacted the position of both peaks, with better separation in cohorts enriched in impaired individuals (Figure‐1C). The meta‐analysis indicated a GMM‐based cutoff of 19CL (95%CI: 16‐21CL, Figure‐1B); subgroup analyses showed no evidence of significant effect between single versus multicenter settings (17 versus 20CL, p = 0.30), MRI‐based or PET‐only processing (18 versus 19CL, p = 0.88), and no evidence of difference across radiotracers (Flutemetamol: 16CL; PIB: 17CL, Flutafuranol: 18CL, Florbetaben: 19CL, Florbetapir: 20CL, p = 0.78). In a subset of 29,496 participants with visual reads available, binary visual reads corresponded well to Centiloids (common kappa=0.86, Figure‐2A). The visual read‐based cutoff of 24CL (95%CI: 21‐27CL, Figure‐2B) maximized correspondence between visual read and quantification and was slightly higher than the GMM‐based cutoff. All meta‐analysis models showed high non‐random heterogeneity (I 2 >80%) across studies, suggesting non‐random differences in peaks and cutoffs. Conclusions Meta‐analysis‐based cutoffs align well with thresholds from the existing literature. High heterogeneity among studies underscores the need to investigate contributing factors, raising concerns about applying common cutoffs.
Associations of lifestyle factors with amyloid pathology in persons without dementia
Oomens, Julie Elisabeth , Vos, Stephanie J. B. , Maserejian, Nancy N., Didic, Mira , Engelborghs, Sebastiaan , Fladby, Tormod, Fröhlich, Lutz, Gill, Kiran Dip, Grimmer, Timo, Itoh, Yoshiaki , Landau, Susan, Lleó, Alberto, Meyer, Philipp T. , Pardini, Matteo , Rami, Lorena , Reiman, Eric M. , Rinne, Juha O. , Sánchez‐Juan, Pascual, Scarmeas, Nikolaos , Villeneuve, Sylvia , Waldemar, Gunhild , Alcolea, Daniel, Altomare, Daniele , Baldeiras, Inês , Blennow, Kaj , Cerman, Jiří , Chipi, Elena , Day, Gregory S. , Förster, Stefan , Frings, Lars , Guedj, Éric , Habeck, Christian , Hausner, Lucrezia , Jiménez‐Bonilla, J., Juaristi, Arantxa, Kern, Silke , Kirsebom, Bjørn‐Eivind , Legdeur, Nienke , Xiong, Chengjie , Maier, W., Marquié, Marta, Minatani, Shinobu, Prabhakar, Sudesh, Ramakers, Inez H.G.B. , Rodríguez‐Rodríguez, Eloy , Ruiz, Agustín, Rüther, E., Sakhardande, Jayant, Selnes, Per, Spiru, Luiza , Vermunt, Lisa , Wallin, Åsa K., Zettergren, Anna , (ADNI), for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, group, A4 Study, (DIAN), Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network, (KBASE), Japan Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (J-ADNI), Korean Brain Aging Study for the Early Diagnosis and Prediction of Alzheimer's Disease, Ossenkoppele, Rik, Verhey, Frans RJ, Visser, Pieter Jelle, Jansen, Willemijn J, Marquié, Marta , Selnes, Per , Day, Gregory S , Xiong, Chengjie , Oomens, Julie E , Boada, Merçé , Fladby, Tormod , Flier, Wiesje M. van der , Frisoni, Giovanni B. , Fröhlich, Lutz, Grimmer, Timo , Hort, Jakub , Iwatsubo, Takeshi , Klimkowicz‐Mrowiec, Aleksandra , Lee, Dong Young , Lleó, Alberto , Martínez‐Lage, Pablo , Mendonça, Alexandre de , Parchi, Piero , Parnetti, Lucilla , Popp, Julius , Rodrigue, Karen M. , Santana, Isabel , Scheltens, Philip , Skoog, Ingmar , Sperling, Reisa Anne , Stern, Yaakov , Wiltfang, Jens , Zetterberg, Henrik , Alcolea, Daniel , Allegri, Ricardo , Bateman, Randall J. , Baiardi, Simone , Braber, Anouk den , Buchem, Mark A. van , Byun, Min Soo , Chen, Kewei , Drzezga, Alexander E. , Ekblad, Laura L. , Fortea, Juan , Freund‐Levi, Yvonne , Handels, Ron , Hellwig, Sabine , Kandimalla, Ramesh , Kornhuber, Johannes , Morbelli, Silvia , Mroczko, Barbara , Ntanasi, Eva , Oliveira, Catarina Resende , Orellana, Adelina , Peters, Oliver , Ruiz, Agustı́n , Silva, Dina , Soininen, Hilkka S. , Takeda, Akitoshi , Teunissen, Charlotte E. , Tijms, Betty M. , Wiels, Wietse A. , Yannakoulia, Mary , Yi, Dahyun , (ADNI), for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, group, A4 Study, (DIAN), Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network, (KBASE), Japan Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (J-ADNI), Korean Brain Aging Study for the Early Diagnosis and Prediction of Alzheimer's Disease, Ossenkoppele, Rik, Verhey, Frans R.J. , Visser, Pieter Jelle , Jansen, Willemijn J.

Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease | November 14, 2025 | Volume: 108 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 1043-1059

10.1177/13872877251379083 Get It

Background The association between lifestyle factors and Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathophysiology remains incompletely understood. Objective The aim of this study was to assess the association of alcohol consumption, smoking behavior, sleep quality and physical, cognitive, and social activity with cerebral amyloid pathology. Methods For this cross-sectional study, we selected participants from the Amyloid Biomarker Study data pooling initiative. We used generalized estimating equations to assess associations of dichotomized lifestyle measures with amyloid pathology. Results We included 9171 participants with normal cognition (NC) and 2555 participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from the Amyloid Biomarker Study. Of participants with NC, 58% were women, 34% were APOE ε4 carrier, and 27% had amyloid pathology. Of participants with MCI, 48% were women, 47% were APOE ε4 carrier, and 57% had amyloid pathology. In NC, cognitively active participants were less likely to have amyloid pathology (OR = 0.77, 95%CI 0.66–0.89, p < 0.001). In MCI, participants who had ever smoked or had sleep problems were less likely to have amyloid pathology (OR = 0.85, 95%CI 0.73–0.99, p = 0.029; OR = 0.62, 95%CI 0.45–0.86, p = 0.004). Conclusions In NC, cognitive activity was associated with a lower frequency of amyloid pathology. In MCI, favorable lifestyle behaviors were not associated with a lower frequency of amyloid pathology. The results of the current study contribute to the broader evidence base on lifestyle and AD by further characterizing the role of lifestyle behaviors in AD pathology across different clinical stages.
Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 217 to Identify Preclinical Alzheimer Disease
Janelidze, Shorena, Bali, Divya , Dolado, Anna Orduña , Binette, Alexa Pichet , Rahmouni, Nesrine , Blennow, Kaj, Doré, Vincent , Feizpour, Azadeh , Rowe, Christopher C., Villeneuve, Sylvia , Petersen, Ronald C., Jack, Clifford R. , Groups, ADNI, ALFA, and PREVENT-AD Study, Adegoke, Olusegun, Hussen, Kedir Adem, Aisen, Paul, Ajayi, Adeyinka, Amaza, Hannatu, Apostolova, Liana G. , Ashford, Miriam T. , Ayo, Omobolanle, Bernard, Marie , Bernhardt, Haley, Boatwright, Virginia, Borowski, Bret, Brylska, Magdalena, Buckholtz, Neil, Cabrera, Yuliana, Cairns, Nigel J. , Carrillo, Maria, Choe, Mark, Clanton, Taylor, Conti, Cat, Craft, Hannah, Crawford, Karen , DeCarli, Charles , Benedetto, Joseph Di, Diaz, Adam , Drake, Erin, Faber, Kelley, Felmlee, Joel P. , Fidell, Andrea, Flenniken, Derek , Fockler, Juliet , Forghanian-Arani, Arvin, Frank, R.T., Franklin, Erin , Glittenberg, Matt, Gunter, Jeff, Guzmán, Vanessa , Harvey, Danielle, Hedberg, Caitie, Hergesheimer, Lindsey, Hoang, Isabella, Jackson, Jonathan , Jagust, William, Jahanshad, Neda , Jenkins, Cecily, Jiménez, Gustavo , Jin, Chengshi , Kachaturian, Zaven, Kaddurah-Daouk, Rima, Kantarci, Kejal, Karlawish, Jason , Khachaturian, Zaven S., Knaack, Alexander , Korecka, Magdalena , Kormos, Adrienne, Germano, Kaori Kubo, Kwang, Winnie, Lacy, Kaci, Landau, Susan, Lopresti, Brian J. , Magana, Fabiola, Mahboubi, Payam, Malone, Ian G., Masliah, Eliezer , Masterman, Donna, Matoush, Leonard, Miller, Melanie J. , Molchan, Susan, Montine, Tom, Moore-Weiss, John, Neu, Scott, Nosheny, Rachel L. , Ogwang, Sheila, Okonkwo, Ozioma, Parkins, Shaniya, Perrin, Richard J. , Petersen, Ronald, Pizzola, Jeremy, Potter, Zoë, Potter, William Z., Rafii, Michael, Raman, Rema , Reyes, Calvin, Reyes, Denise , Robison, Justin , Chen, Stephanie Rossi, Ryan, Laurie, Sachdev, Pallavi, Saito, Naomi , Salazar, Jennifer, Thao, Mai Seng, Shaffer, Elizabeth , Shaw, Leslie M. , Silverberg, Nina, Strong, Joe, Talavera, Sandra , Taylor‐Reinwald, Lisa, Thal, Leon J., Thomas, Lisa , Thompson, Paul , Tosun, Duygu , Trojanowki, John Q., Sacrey, Diana Truran, Villemagne, Victor L. , Walter, Sarah , Wan, Yang , Ward, Chad, Webb, Caitlin, Weiner, Michael W. , Weisensel, Trinity, Zimmerman, Caileigh, Poirier, Judes, Breitner, John C.S. , Badawy, Mohamed , Baril, Andrée‐Ann, Aguilar, Ricardo A, Gorriti, Annabella B, Gispert, Lidia C, Martinez, Alba C, Iglesias, Ruth D, Julian, Sherezade F, Serra, P, González‐Escalante, Armand , Penas, Laura H, Rodriguez, Gema H, Ninou, Jordi H, Gamaz, Laura Iglesias, Knezevic, Iva, Alvarez, Paula M, Diaz, Tania M, Palacios, Eva , Ballester, A, Mendez, Sandra P, Freixedes, Laura Ros, Vila, Aleix S, Harster, Lluis S, Prat, Anna S, Jaramillo, Marc V, Jack, Clifford R , Feizpour, Azadeh , Doré, Vincent , Pichet Binette, Alexa , Salvadó, Gemma , Janelidze, Shorena , Therriault, Joseph , Brum, Wagner Scheeren , Stomrud, Erik , Mattsson, Niklas , Palmqvist, Sebastian , Coomans, Emma M. , Teunissen, Charlotte E. , Flier, Wiesje M. van der , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Gispert, Juan Domingo , Blennow, Kaj , Alcolea, Daniel , Fortea, Juan , Johnson, Sterling C. , Rosa-Neto, Pedro , Schindler, Suzanne E. , Suárez‐Calvet, Marc , Ossenkoppele, Rik , Hansson, Oskar , Groups, ADNI, ALFA, and PREVENT-AD Study, Aisen, Paul , Barnes, Lisa L. , Beckett, Laurel , Das, Sandhitsu R. , Donohue, Michael , Drake, Erin, Erickson, Claire M. , Fletcher, Evan M. , Arani, Arvin , Foroud, Tatiana , Fox, Nick C. , Frank, Richard, González, Hector, Green, Robert C. , Grill, Joshua D. , Harkins, Kristin , Ho, Carole , Hsiao, John , Jo, Taeho, Kaddurah‐Daouk, Rima , Kantarci, Kejal , Koeppe, Robert A. , Largent, Emily A. , Lee, Edward B. , Lee, Virginia M.‐Y. , Morris, John C. , Nho, Kwangsik T. , Nir, Talia M. , Nudelman, Kelly , Okonkwo, Ozioma, Petersen, Ronald, Rabinovici, Gil D. , Rafii, Michael S. , Reid, Robert, Reyes, Denise, Risacher, Shannon L. , Mindt, Mónica Rivera , Sachdev, Pallavi, Saykin, Andrew J. , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Senjem, Matthew L. , Li, Shen , Smith, Stephanie R. , Snyder, Peter J. , Thomopoulos, Sophia I. , Toga, Arthur W. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Yushkevich, Paul A. , Badawy, Mohamed, Baillet, Sylvain , Minguillón, Carolina , Brugulat‐Serrat, Anna , Cacciaglia, Raffaele , Campo, Marta del , Pascual, Maria, Rodríguez‐Fernández, Blanca , Vilor‐Tejedor, Natàlia

JAMA Neurology | September 15, 2025 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1122

10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.3217 Get It

Importance Advances in Alzheimer disease (AD) have shifted research focus to earlier disease stages, necessitating more scalable approaches to identify cognitively unimpaired individuals with amyloid β (Aβ) pathology. Objective To assess the utility of plasma phosphorylated tau 217 (p-tau217) for classifying Aβ status in cognitively unimpaired individuals, both as a stand-alone test and in a 2-step approach where positive plasma results were confirmed using a second modality (Aβ positron emission tomography [PET] or cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]). Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional cohort study used data collected between June 2009 and March 2024. We included 2916 cognitively unimpaired participants from 12 international independent observational cohorts in the US, Europe, Australia, and Canada with available plasma p-tau217 levels and CSF or PET Aβ biomarkers. Performance comparisons between mass spectrometry and immunoassay-based p-tau217 measurements were also performed (n = 964). Exposures Plasma p-tau217 levels measured by immunoassay. Main Outcome and Measures Aβ status, determined by CSF or Aβ PET biomarkers. Results Participants had a mean (SD) age of 66.9 (9.9) years; 971 (33.3%) were Aβ positive by either CSF or PET, 1667 (57.2%) were women, and 1108 (38.1%) carried at least 1 APOE ε4 allele. As a stand-alone test, plasma p-tau217 achieved a positive predictive value (PPV) of 79% (95% CI, 74-84) and an overall accuracy of 81% (95% CI, 80-82). In a 2-step workflow, the PPV and accuracy significantly increased to 91% (95% CI, 86-95). While this approach required screening of 677 individuals with plasma p-tau217 to identify 100 Aβ-positive individuals, compared to 536 participants when using PET alone, it reduced the need for PET testing to 124. Immunoassays demonstrated comparable PPVs to mass spectrometry (80% [95% CI, 74-86] vs 85% [95% CI, 81-90]; P = .12) but significantly lower overall accuracy (82% [95% CI, 79-84]% vs 88 [95% CI, 86-90]; P &amp;lt; .001) and true Aβ-positive detection rate (49% [95% CI, 43-55] vs 69% [95% CI, 64-75]; P &amp;lt; .001). Conclusions and Relevance The findings highlight the potential of plasma p-tau217 as a stand-alone test—or when used in a sequential 2-step approach alongside PET or CSF testing—as a cost-effective, scalable, and minimally burdensome strategy for identifying preclinical AD. Tailored screening workflows that incorporate p-tau217 can improve efficiency in participant selection for preclinical AD trials and, in the future, help guide access to disease-modifying treatments.
Amyloid PET in Sporadic Early‐ Versus Late‐Onset Alzheimer's Disease: Comparison of the LEADS and ADNI
Lagarde, Julien , Blazhenets, Ganna , Zhang, J. , Eloyan, Ani , Thangarajah, Maryanne, Taurone, Alexander, Allen, Isabel Elaine , Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Zeltzer, Ehud , Windon, Charles , Raya, Maison Abu , Smith, Karen, Shankar, Ranjani , Amuiri, Alinda, Rocha, Salma, Hammers, Dustin B. , Dage, Jeffrey L. , Kirby, Kala, Aisen, Paul, Koeppe, Robert, Landau, Susan, Carrillo, María C. , Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Brickhouse, Michael , Raman, Rema , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan, Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Grant, Ian , Rogalskı, Emily , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Salloway, Stephen , Sha, Sharon J. , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S. , Apostolova, Liana G. , Joie, Renaud La , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Blazhenets, Ganna , Soleimani-Meigooni, David , Zeltzer, Ehud , Windon, Charles , Abu Raya, Maison , Vrillon, Agathe , Nudelman, Kelly N , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Day, Gregory S , Masdeu, Joseph C , Musiek, Erik , Sha, Sharon , Wingo, Thomas S , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Dage, Jeffrey L , Maiti, Piyush , Schonhaut, Daniel R. , Hammers, Dustin B , Nudelman, Kelly , Kirby, Kala, Vemuri, Prashanthi , Beckett, Laurel , Atri, Alireza , Honig, Lawrence S. , Jones, David T., Womack, Kyle , Wolk, David A. , Dickerson, Bradford Clark

Annals of Neurology | March 17, 2025 | Volume: 98 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 236-248

10.1002/ana.27233 Get It

Objective Early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) differ in many respects. Here, we address the issue of possible differences in fibrillar amyloid pathology as measured by positron emission tomography (PET), which remains unresolved due to the lack of large‐scale comparative studies. Methods Three hundred ninety‐nine cognitively impaired participants younger than 65 years of age from the multicenter Longitudinal Early‐onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS) and 450 cognitively impaired participants older than 65 years from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) underwent clinical assessment, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and amyloid PET and were included in this study. We compared amyloid PET outcomes (positivity rate based on visual read and quantified tracer uptake expressed as Centiloids [CLs]) between the 2 cohorts and studied their association with age, sex, APOE genotype, and cognition. Results The amyloid positivity rate was higher in LEADS (78%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 74–82) than in ADNI (71%, 95% CI = 67–75, p = 0.02). Lower Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) and APOE4 genotype increased the odds of amyloid positivity in both cohorts. Visually positive scans had higher CLs in LEADS (EOAD, mean = 95.3 ± 26.1) than in ADNI (LOAD, mean = 80.9 ± 36.8, p < 0.0001), predominantly in parietal cortex/precuneus, superior temporal, and frontal cortices. In amyloid‐positive patients, (1) CLs were higher in female patients in both cohorts; (2) APOE4 carriership was associated with lower CLs in EOAD, which was not observed in LOAD; and (3) correlations between CLs and MMSE scores were significantly stronger in EOAD than in LOAD. Interpretation Differences in the burden of amyloid pathology may contribute to differences in clinical and anatomic patterns in sporadic EOAD and LOAD, and have implications for optimizing therapeutic strategies in each group. ANN NEUROL 2025;98:236–248