Foster, Nathan R.

AbstractBackground.Preclinical and epidemiological data suggest that metformin might have antineoplastic properties against colon cancer (CC). However, the effect of metformin use on patient survival in stage III CC after curative resection is unknown. The survival outcomes were comparable regardless of the duration of metformin use.Patients and Methods.Before randomization to FOLFOX (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin) with or without cetuximab, 1,958 patients with stage III CC enrolled in the N0147 study completed a questionnaire with information on diabetes mellitus (DM) and metformin use. Cox models were used to assess the association between metformin use and disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and the time to recurrence (TTR), adjusting for clinical and/or pathological factors.Results.Of the 1,958 patients, 1,691 (86%) reported no history of DM, 115 reported DM with metformin use (6%), and 152 reported DM without metformin use (8%). The adjuvant treatment arms were pooled, because metformin use showed homogeneous effects on outcomes across the two arms. Among the patients with DM (n = 267), DFS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59–1.35; p = .60), OS (aHR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.65–1.49; p = .95), and TTR (aHR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.56–1.35; p = .53) were not different for the metformin users compared with the nonusers after adjusting for tumor and patient factors. The survival outcomes were comparable regardless of the duration of metformin use (<1, 1–5, 6–10, ≥11 years) before randomization (ptrend = .64 for DFS, ptrend = .84 for OS, and ptrend = .87 for TTR). No interaction effects were observed between metformin use and KRAS, BRAF mutation status, tumor site, T/N stage, gender, or age.Conclusions.Patients with stage III CC undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy who used metformin before the diagnosis of CC experienced DFS, OS, and TTR similar to those for non-DM patients and DM patients without metformin use.

Although HER2‐positive breast cancers demonstrate a propensity for central nervous system (CNS) metastasis, it is unknown whether other HER2‐positive tumors, including adenocarcinomas of the esophagus/gastroesophageal junction (EAC), share this characteristic. Insight into this association may inform the development of HER2‐targeted therapies that penetrate the blood‐brain barrier. We examined HER2 overexpression and gene amplification in 708 patients with EAC who underwent curative‐intent surgery during a time period (1980–1997) when no patient received HER2‐targeted therapy. We identified patients whose site of first cancer recurrence was CNS and those who had a CNS relapse at any time. After a median follow‐up of 61.2 months, 3.4% (24/708) of patients developed CNS relapse (all involved the brain). Patients with HER2‐positive (vs ‐negative) primary tumors showed a higher 5‐year cumulative incidence of CNS relapse as first recurrence (5.8% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.0058) and at any time (8.3% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.0062). In a multivariable model that included covariates previously associated with HER2 or with CNS relapse in breast cancer, HER2 positivity was the only variable that was statistically significantly associated with shorter time to CNS relapse as first recurrence (p = 0.0026) or at any time (hazard ratio 4.3 [95% confidence interval 1.8 to 10.3]; p = 0.001). These are the first data in a non‐breast cancer to demonstrate an association between HER2 positivity and higher CNS relapse risk after surgery, and suggest that HER2‐positive EACs have a predilection for CNS metastases.

Abstract Background: Traditional adjuvant therapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) consists of 60-66 Gy of radiation therapy (XRT) given in 2 Gy daily fractions along with high dose cisplatin if the patient has high risk factors. Despite the excellent cure rates for HPV+ OPSCC, one in three patients treated with conventional treatment will develop grade >3 long-term sequelae from therapy. There is intense interest in de-intensifying adjuvant therapy for this patient population in order to maximize quality of life while maintaining excellent historical rates of disease control. Methods: MC1273 is a phase II non-randomized trial open at Mayo Clinic Rochester testing a novel course of aggressive therapy de-escalation following surgery for HPV+ OPSCC. The primary endpoint is local/regional control at 2 years while secondary endpoints include toxicity and quality of life (QOL). The eligibility criteria include all patients with p16-positive OPSCC with less than a ten pack-year smoking history who have had a complete surgical resection. Exclusion criteria include positive surgical margins, prior history of malignancy, and history of connective tissue disorders. Patients are divided into two prospective cohorts depending upon risk factors found at surgery. Patients with intermediate risk disease (≥T3, ≥N2, lymphovascular invasion, or perineural invasion) are enrolled in MC1273A while patients with extracapsular extension (ECE) are enrolled in MC1273B. Patients on MC1273A receive 30 Gy of radiation delivered in 1.5 Gy twice-daily fractions over the course of two weeks along with weekly docetaxel (15 mg/m2) given on day 1 and day 8. Patients on MC1273B receive a similar treatment regimen but also have the nodal level with positive ECE concurrently boosted to 36 Gy in 1.8 Gy twice-daily fractions. In addition to standard of care follow-up, patients receive a swallowing assessment with speech therapy immediately before XRT, one month post-XRT, and one year post-XRT. Patients also have QOL assessment consisting of the XeQOLS, Eq-5D, FACT H&N (Vers 4) and Dermatology Life Quality Index assessed at pre-XRT and 3, 12, and 24 months post-XRT. Results: Each cohort of MC1273 is powered to detect a 10% local/regional failure rate with 85% confidence. Each cohort will accrue 35 evaluable patients and 5 additional patients to account for ineligibilities and violations (40 patients total per cohort.) MC1273A began accrual in September 2013. The first five patients were monitored for grade ≥4 acute toxicities before proceeding to open accrual. MC1273B began accrual in May 2014 and has also proceeded to open accrual. Accrual will also begin in Mayo Clinic Scottsdale in the first quarter of 2015. Conclusions: MC1273 is meeting its accrual targets and should finish accrual by 2016. We anticipate that preliminary results for toxicity will be available by 2017 and local/regional data will be available by 2018. Citation Format: Daniel J. Ma, Katharine A. Price, Eric J. Moore, Joaquin J. Garcia, Scott H. Okuno, Daniel L. Price, Jeff A. Sloan, Nathan R. Foster, Robert L. Foote. MC1273: Phase II evaluation of aggressive dose de-escalation for adjuvant chemoradiation in HPV associated oropharynx cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr CT227. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-CT227

Abstract Background: NPC is endemic to Asia and over 40% of cases harbor PIK3CA amplification. MK2206 is an allosteric AKT inhibitor with activity in NPC in vitro. Methods: Pts who had progressed after palliative chemotherapy (chemo) for metastatic or recurrent NPC, received oral MK-2206 at 200 mg on Days 1, 8, 15 & 22 of each 28-day cycle until disease progression. Plasma samples were collected at serial time points during cycle 1 for EBV DNA analysis, archived tumor samples were collected where feasible. The primary dual endpoints (2-stage design) consisted of RECIST-defined tumor response rate (RR) and 6-month (m) progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), PFS and adverse events (AEs). Results: Of the 21 pts enrolled, the median age was 47 years (range: 32-67), 91% were male, 81% had prior radiotherapy and 81% had > 1 prior line of palliative chemo. At the time of analysis, 20 out of 21 pts have ended treatment. The best responses were: 1 partial response (PR, 5%) lasting 4 ms; 10 stable disease (SD, 50%), 9 progressive disease (PD, 45%). The 6-m PFS rate was 38.9% (95% CI: 18.1-59.3%) and median PFS was 2.7 ms (95% CI: 0.9-7.2 ms). The 6-m OS rate was 67.9% (95% CI: 41.8-84.1%) and median survival has not been reached. In 7 pts who had SD more than or equal to 6 ms, the duration of treatment ranged from 6.4-13.9 ms. Of the 21 pts evaluable for AEs, 12 pts (57%) had at least one grade 3 AE [[Unable to Display Character: –]] macular rash (6 pts - 29%), dysphagia (2 pts - 10%), hyperglycemia (2 pts - 10%) (see Table 1). The tumor samples of 7 pts were analyzed by FISH; 3 showed PIK3CA amplification, including 1 pt with chromosome 3 polysomy. Amongst these pts, 1 had SD more than 6ms, 1 had SD more than 12 ms, and 1 is still on treatment. Pts who had SD less than 6 m or PD did not have PIK3CA amplification. Conclusions: MK2206 is well tolerated and has signs of activity in unselected pts with NPC. Preliminary results suggest that PIK3CA amplification may be related to prolonged disease stabilization from MK2206, and analysis for other PIK3CA gene alterations in more samples will be undertaken. Result of the plasma EBV DNA result will be presented. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):B273. Citation Format: Brigette B. Ma, Boon Cher Goh, Wan Teck Lim, Eng Huat Tan, Gilberto de Lima Lopes, Edwin P. Hui, Ann D. King, Kwok Wai Lo, Herbert Loong, Leung Li, Nathan Foster, Michael Kam, Sing Fai Leung, Charles Erlichman, Anthony TC Chan. Multicenter Phase II study of MK-2206 in previously treated patients (pts) with recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC): Mayo Clinic Phase II Consortium (Protocol: MC1079). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2013 Oct 19-23; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):Abstract nr B273.

BackgroundFewer than 5 % of cancer patients participate in clinical research. Although this paltry rate has led to extensive research on this topic, previous studies have not sought verbatim comments in a real‐time, comprehensive manner to understand why patients decline.MethodsThis study used a low‐risk, non‐interventional parent study that focused on cancer‐associated weight loss to understand patients' reasons for declining research participation. A research assistant wrote down the name and verbatim reason of all patients who declined to participate. These comments with accompanying patient demographic data are the subject of this report.ResultsOf the 334 patients, 51 (15 %) declined parent study enrollment; three comment‐related themes emerged: (1) a repelling sense of too much institutional research, (2) overwhelming personal health issues, and (3) a low likelihood of returning to the institution. In univariate and multivariate analyses, only age (older) and gender (female) were associated with non‐enrollment. Interestingly, 41 patients with fatigue scores of 7 or worse and 26 with pain scores of 7 or worse were enrolled.ConclusionsAlthough many factors were associated with declining to participate in research, symptom severity was not. Upfront education might help cancer patients better prioritize their participation in research, particularly as some patients felt overwhelmed by too much research in the institution; and for now, investigators should continue to keep asking patients for their participation.

Abstract Background: In patients with Barrett's esophagus, chronic reflux injury and inflammation are associated with esophageal adenocarcinoma, one of the most rapidly increasing lethal cancers. Epidemiological and preclinical studies support decreased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma with NSAID use. Gastroesophageal refluxate contents can promote carcinogenesis in Barrett's metaplasia by activating AKT, which up regulates COX-2 expression and prostaglandin biosynthesis. We recently noted that neoplastic transformation in Barrett's esophagus is associated with increased AKT expression, particularly isoform AKT1. The AIM of this study is to investigate the effect of NSAID (Aspirin) use in patients with Barrett's esophagus on AKT1 expression using frozen tissue from the randomized, phase II trial of aspirin and esomeprazole for esophageal cancer chemoprevention in Barrett's esophagus patients and to assess the functional consequences of AKT1 expression in-vitro. Methods and Results: In a subset of patients (12 of 120 patients) with Barrett's esophagus who were randomized to placebo, lower dose (81 mg) or higher dose (325 mg) Aspirin for 4 weeks, both PCR and Western blot revealed marked reduction in AKT1 expression in patients who received 325 mg of Aspirin daily compared to patients who received placebo. Our in-vitro experiments support that AKT1 expression is functionally relevant to the process of carcinogenesis in Barrett's epithelial cells. Using adenovirus to induce AKT1 expression, we show that increased AKT1 expression increases Barrett's epithelial cell growth, facilitates RAS-mediated transformation of pre-neoplastic epithelial cells and promotes colony formation. Since AKT1 is known as Warburg kinase and regulates cellular glucose uptake to support aerobic glycolysis during growth de-regulation and neoplasia, we examined the uptake of fluorescent deoxyglucose analog (2-NBDG) in Barrett's epithelial cells transduced with AKT1 adenovirus. At 48 hrs, compared to control, AKT1 overexpression resulted in increased glucose uptake both by metaplastic and neoplastic Barrett's epithelial cells. Transcriptional repression of AKT1 abrogated the 2-NBDG uptake by these cells. Finally, we did pathway specific qPCRs and noted that use of Aspirin is associated with altered expression of chromatin remodelers that could down-regulate AKT1 expression. Conclusion: Collectively, our results demonstrate that Aspirin mediated down-regulation of Warburg kinase AKT1 in patients with Barrett?s esophagus is a novel mechanism for the regulation of Barrett?s epithelial cell growth. The in-depth characterization of molecular mechanisms is currently underway. This abstract is also presented as Poster A82. Citation Format: Navtej S. Buttar, Gary W. Falk, Cathrine J. DeMars, Sonia Chowdhury, Ahmed Elebiary, Anamay Sharma, Sidhartha Chaudhry, Nathan R. Foster, Katie L. Allen Ziegler, Yvonne Romero, Norman E. Marcon, Thomas Schnell, Douglas A. Corley, Prateek Sharma, Marcia R. Cruz-Correa, Chin Hur, David E. Fleischer, Amitabh Chak, Kenneth R. DeVault, David S. Weinberg, Gary Della’Zanna, Ellen Richmond, Thomas C. Smyrk, Sumithra Mandrekar, Paul J. Limburg. Aspirin mediated downregulation of Warburg kinase AKT1 in patients with Barrett's esophagus: Implications in neoplastic transformation. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research; 2012 Oct 16-19; Anaheim, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Prev Res 2012;5(11 Suppl):Abstract nr PR-03.

AbstractSrc tyrosine kinases are overexpressed in pancreatic cancers, and the oral Src inhibitor saracatinib has shown antitumor activity in preclinical models of pancreas cancer. We performed a CTEP‐sponsored Phase II clinical trial of saracatinib in previously treated pancreas cancer patients, with a primary endpoint of 6‐month survival. A Simon MinMax two‐stage phase II design was used. Saracatinib (175 mg/day) was administered orally continuously in 28‐day cycles. In the unselected portion of the study, 18 patients were evaluable. Only two (11%) patients survived for at least 6 months, and three 6‐month survivors were required to move to second stage of study as originally designed. The study was amended as a biomarker‐driven trial (leucine rich repeat containing protein 19 [LRRC19] > insulin‐like growth factor‐binding protein 2 [IGFBP2] “top scoring pairs” polymerase chain reaction [PCR] assay, and PIK3CA mutant) based on preclinical data in a human pancreas tumor explant model. In the biomarker study, archival tumor tissue or fresh tumor biopsies were tested. Biomarker‐positive patients were eligible for the study. Only one patient was PIK3CA mutant in a 3′ untranslated region (UTR) portion of the gene. This patient was enrolled in the study and failed to meet the 6‐month survival endpoint. As the frequency of biomarker‐positive patients was very low (<3%), the study was closed. Although we were unable to conclude whether enriching for a subset of second/third line pancreatic cancer patients treated with a Src inhibitor based on a biomarker would improve 6‐month survival, we demonstrate that testing pancreatic tumor samples for a biomarker‐driven, multicenter study in metastatic pancreas cancer is feasible.

Abstract Background: Colon cancer is categorized by the acquisition of a number of molecular alterations in both oncogenes and in tumor suppressor genes. Although cMYC alterations have been reported in colon cancer cell lines, little other information exists in primary colon tumors. We sought to determine the frequency of cMYC amplification in primary colon cancer and its relationship to other well defined colon tumor alterations. Methods: An initial set of 392 tumors were evaluated. All samples were tested for the BRAF V600E mutation and all were classified as proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) based on both IHC and microsatellite analysis of tumor tissue. A second set of 522 tumors was selected to replicate associations identified in the first set of samples. Similar to the initial cohort, both the BRAF V600E and the mismatch repair status of the tumors were assessed. The second cohort, however, included tumors that were both pMMR and dMMR. In both sets of samples, fluorescent in situ hybridization was used to evaluate cMYC gene amplification. Results: In cohort 1, cMYC amplification was observed in 15 of the 362 (4%) pMMR tumors successfully analyzed (Table 1). cMYC amplification was detected in 10 of 323 (3%) tumors with normal BRAF status vs. 5 of 39 (13%) tumors with altered BRAF status (p=0.015). In the second cohort, cMYC amplification was found in 20 of the 522 (4%) tumors. Only 1 of the 152 (&lt;1%) dMMR tumors had cMYC amplification vs. 19 of the 370 (5%) pMMR tumors (p=0.012). Of the pMMR tumors, cMYC amplification was detected in 13 of 333 (4%) tumors with normal BRAF status vs. 6 of 37 (16%) tumors with altered BRAF status (p=0.007), nearly identical to the first group. Conclusion: cMYC amplification in colon cancer is an infrequent event. However, when present, cMYC amplification occurs almost exclusively in tumors that are pMMR. Additionally, among pMMR tumors, cMYC amplification is associated with the presence of the BRAF V600E mutation. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1151. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-1151