Back to Authors

Nallapareddy, Sujatha

Mayo Clinic

Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers

Citations 2

A phase 2/3 randomized study of CTX-009 combination in 2L biliary tract cancer: COMPANION-002.
Aranha, Olivia , Javle, Milind , Rosales, Minori Koshiji, Hu, Zishuo Ian , Faridi, Amir A., Paulson, Scott, Richards, Donald , Höchster, Howard S. , Cosgrove, David , Azad, Nilofer S. , Brown‐Glaberman, Ursa, Cline, Vivian Jean M., Shumway, Nathan M., Tejani, Mohamedtaki Abdulaziz, Nallapareddy, Sujatha, Kelley, Robin Kate , Şahin, İlyas , Borad, Mitesh J. , Goyal, Lipika

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 29, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 3_suppl | Pages: TPS587-TPS587

10.1200/jco.2024.42.3_suppl.tps587 Get It

TPS587 Background: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is characterized by generally poor prognoses with limited treatment options. Systemic chemotherapy usually begins with gemcitabine, platinum agents, and a checkpoint inhibitor followed by 5-FU and oxaliplatin, irinotecan or a taxane. Presently, there is no consensus second-line therapy for patients with BTC. The DLL/Notch signaling pathway has been described to be a major driver of cholangiocarcinogenesis and VEGF-A overexpression has been reported in BTC tumors, correlating with stage, metastasis, and prognosis of the disease. CTX-009 is a recombinant bispecific antibody that binds both delta-like ligand-4 (DLL4) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A). The antibody simultaneously inhibits the DLL4-Notch 1 and VEGF A-VEGF receptor signaling pathways. Methods: COMPANION-002 (CTX-009 -002) is an open-label, randomized, controlled study in patients in second line advanced or metastatic BTC. To be eligible, patients must have radiologically documented progression after a prior gemcitabine and platinum containing chemotherapy regimen as first line therapy for locally advanced unresectable or metastatic disease. 150 patients will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either CTX-009 plus paclitaxel or paclitaxel alone. The stratification factors to be used at randomization include stage (locally advanced vs. metastatic), anatomic subsite of primary tumor (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma vs. other, i.e. extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder, or ampullary), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance status (0 vs. 1). Patients will be treated in 28-day cycles, with CTX-009 administered at 10 mg/kg IV on Day 1 and 15, and paclitaxel administered at 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15. The patients randomized to paclitaxel arm can crossover after disease progression if selection criteria continue to be met. The primary objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of CTX-009 in combination with paclitaxel vs. paclitaxel alone, as measured by Overall Response Rate (ORR) assessed by an Independent Central Radiology (ICR) review. Key secondary objectives include overall survival, progression-free survival, and duration of response. Clinical trial information: 251040.
Biomarker‐driven trial in metastatic pancreas cancer: feasibility in a multicenter study of saracatinib, an oral Src inhibitor, in previously treated pancreatic cancer
Arcaroli, John J., Quackenbush, Kevin S., Powell, Rebecca W., McManus, Martine C., Tan, Aik Choon , Foster, Nathan R. , Wright, John, Nallapareddy, Sujatha, Erlichman, Charles , Hidalgo, Manuel , Messersmith, Wells A. , Dasari, Arvind , Picus, Joel , Wright, John, Tan, Aik Choon

Cancer Medicine | August 16, 2012 | Volume: 1 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 207-217

10.1002/cam4.27 Get It

AbstractSrc tyrosine kinases are overexpressed in pancreatic cancers, and the oral Src inhibitor saracatinib has shown antitumor activity in preclinical models of pancreas cancer. We performed a CTEP‐sponsored Phase II clinical trial of saracatinib in previously treated pancreas cancer patients, with a primary endpoint of 6‐month survival. A Simon MinMax two‐stage phase II design was used. Saracatinib (175 mg/day) was administered orally continuously in 28‐day cycles. In the unselected portion of the study, 18 patients were evaluable. Only two (11%) patients survived for at least 6 months, and three 6‐month survivors were required to move to second stage of study as originally designed. The study was amended as a biomarker‐driven trial (leucine rich repeat containing protein 19 [LRRC19] > insulin‐like growth factor‐binding protein 2 [IGFBP2] “top scoring pairs” polymerase chain reaction [PCR] assay, and PIK3CA mutant) based on preclinical data in a human pancreas tumor explant model. In the biomarker study, archival tumor tissue or fresh tumor biopsies were tested. Biomarker‐positive patients were eligible for the study. Only one patient was PIK3CA mutant in a 3′ untranslated region (UTR) portion of the gene. This patient was enrolled in the study and failed to meet the 6‐month survival endpoint. As the frequency of biomarker‐positive patients was very low (<3%), the study was closed. Although we were unable to conclude whether enriching for a subset of second/third line pancreatic cancer patients treated with a Src inhibitor based on a biomarker would improve 6‐month survival, we demonstrate that testing pancreatic tumor samples for a biomarker‐driven, multicenter study in metastatic pancreas cancer is feasible.