Keilin, Steven

INTRODUCTION: Prophylactic pancreatic stent placement (PSP) is effective for preventing pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in high-risk cases, but the optimal technical approach to this intervention remains uncertain. METHODS: In this secondary analysis of 787 clinical trial patients who underwent successful stent placement, we studied the impact of (i) whether pancreatic wire access was achieved for the sole purpose of PSP or naturally during the conduct of the case, (ii) the amount of effort expended on PSP, (iii) stent length, (iv) stent diameter, and (v) guidewire caliber. We used logistic regression models to examine the adjusted association between each technical factor and post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). RESULTS: Ninety-one of the 787 patients experienced PEP. There was no clear association between PEP and whether pancreatic wire access was achieved for the sole purpose of PSP (vs occurring naturally; odds ratio [OR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37–1.84), whether substantial effort expended on stent placement (vs nonsubstantial effort; OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.73–3.45), stent length (>5 vs ≤5 cm; OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.63–1.61), stent diameter (≥5 vs <5 Fr; OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.65–1.96), or guidewire caliber (0.035 vs 0.025 in; 0.83, 95% CI 0.49–1.41). DISCUSSION: The 5 modifiable technical factors studied in this secondary analysis of large-scale randomized trial data did not appear to have a strong impact on the benefit of prophylactic PSP in preventing PEP after high-risk ERCP. Within the limitations of post hoc subgroup analysis, these findings may have important implications in procedural decision making and suggest that the benefit of PSP is robust to variations in technical approach.

Abstract Background/Aim Limited data exists on 30-day readmission rates, readmission causes and predictors following Ischemic Colitis (IC). The aim is to identify etiologies for the above using a national database. Methods A retrospective cohort study using the 2019 National Readmission Database (NRD) of adult patients with an index admission (IA) for IC from January to November and were readmitted within 30 days of discharge was performed. The primary outcome was readmission of any cause. Secondary outcomes were mortality and resource utilization associated with readmission. Independent risk factors for all-cause readmission were identified using Cox regression analysis. Results A total of 6,853 IC patients were identified. Readmission within 30 days occurred in 762 (11%). The primary readmission cause was sepsis. A total of 325 patients died during the IA and additional 30 patients died within 30 days of discharge. Independent predictors of readmission were discharge to short term hospital, a Charlson comorbidity index score ≥ 2 and admission at large size hospital. Having private insurance and undergoing colonoscopy were associated with lower readmission odds. Economic burden of readmission was $12 million in total costs and $51.4 million in total charges. Conclusion Among admitted IC patients, 30-day readmission rate was 11% with half of those secondary to sepsis. Undergoing colonoscopy during the IA is associated with 34% less risk of readmission and disposition to other facilities appears associated with increased early readmission risk. Prospective evaluation to confirm these findings along with development of optimal care strategies to reduce readmission post IC episodes are needed.

Objectives: Brush cytology has a low sensitivity for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma. This study aimed to compare the standard approach (brush cytology) with a triple modality approach utilizing brush cytology, forceps biopsy and fluorescence in situ hybridization in terms of sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma. Methods: In a retrospective study at a single academic center, 50 patients underwent triple modality testing. Additionally, 61 patients underwent brush cytology alone. Intervention was endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with brush cytology, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and forceps biopsy. The main outcome measures included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Results: Overall, 50 patients underwent triple tissue sampling, and 61 patients underwent brush cytology alone. Twenty-two patients were eventually diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma. Brush cytology had a sensitivity of 42%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100% and negative predictive value of 88%. Triple tissue sampling had an overall sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, and negative predictive value of 87%. Within the triple test group, brush cytology had a sensitivity of 27%, forceps biopsy had a sensitivity of 50%, and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis had a sensitivity of 59%. Conclusions: A triple modality approach results in a marked increase in sensitivity for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma compared with single modality testing such as brush cytology and should be considered in the evaluation of indeterminate or suspicious biliary strictures.