Abstract Background In children with non-metastatic atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (ATRT), proton therapy is increasingly utilized worldwide due to the radiosensitivity of afflicted young patients. General questions persist, however, surrounding dose and volume of radiotherapy. Methods Between 2009-2024, 39 children from a single institution with non-metastatic intracranial ATRT received focal proton therapy at a median age of 2.4 years (range 0.7-19). Twenty-two patients had supratentorial tumors and 27 had gross/near total resection prior to radiation. Most common chemotherapy regimens were ACNS0333 and SJYC07 (n = 10 each) and Dana-Farber (n = 6). Four patients received consolidative high-dose chemotherapy after radiation. The median radiation dose was 50.4 Gy (range, 50.4-54). The cumulative incidence method assessed freedom from selected endpoints.The Fine-Gray method assessed the level of statistical significance between levels of selected prognostic factors. Results With a median followup of 5.2 years (range 0.5-16.2), the 5-yr overall survival, progression-free survival, and local control was 63%, 64%, and 97%, respectively. Thirteen patients developed isolated leptomeningeal failure as first site of recurrence. Only subtotal resection was significantly associated with local recurrence (100% vs 92%, p < 0.05). Patient age, tumor site, extent of resection, radiation dose, and chemotherapy regimen were otherwise not significantly associated with disease control or survival. Four patients experienced symptomatic radiation necrosis, including 1 death: Three of 4 cases received 54 Gy and consolidative intrathecal methotrexate (n = 2) or high dose ACNS0333 intravenous chemotherapy (n = 1, fatal) after radiation. The other patient received 50.4 Gy and necrosis was immediately preceded by ventriculoperitoneal shunt failure. Six patients developed hearing loss requiring aids. One patient developed radiation-induced meningioma a decade following treatment. Conclusion This represents the largest experience reporting 5-year outcomes following focal radiation in children with non-metastatic intracranial ATRT. When applied with a variety of modern chemotherapy regimens in real-world settings, focal proton therapy at a dose of 50.4 Gy may offer the best therapeutic ratio but does not eliminate serious toxicity. If avoidance of craniospinal radiation remains an ongoing priority, further improvement in survival will depend upon systemic therapy.
Tandem pediatric neurosurgery: treatment of synostosis and intractable epilepsy. Illustrative case
BACKGROUND Hemispherectomy is a surgical procedure reserved for hemispheric intractable epilepsy. Sagittal craniosynostosis is a congenital disorder treated with open or endoscope-assisted approaches for synostosis correction. These procedures are not commonly performed in the same setting. OBSERVATIONS In this report, the authors present a 6-month-old female with sagittal craniosynostosis, hemimegalencephaly, and intractable epilepsy who underwent a left hemispherotomy with open sagittal synostosis correction followed by cranial molding orthosis therapy. LESSONS The report highlights the technical nuances of the procedure, but also discusses the possible genetic disorder responsible for both conditions, megalencephaly-capillary malformation syndrome.
Flow diversion for complex intracranial aneurysms in young children
Pediatric intracranial aneurysms are exceedingly rare and account for less than 5% of all intracranial aneurysms. Open surgery to treat such aneurysms has been shown to be more durable than endovascular techniques, and durability of treatment is particularly important in the pediatric population. Over the past 2 decades, however, a marked shift in aneurysm treatment from open surgery toward endovascular procedures has occurred for adults. The authors describe their early experience in treating 3 unruptured pediatric brain aneurysms using the Pipeline embolization device (PED). The first patient, a girl with Majewski osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism Type II who was harboring multiple intracranial aneurysms, underwent two flow diversion procedures for a vertebrobasilar aneurysm and a supraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm. The second patient underwent PED placement on a previously coiled but enlarging posterior communicating artery aneurysm. All procedures were uneventful, with no postsurgical complications, and led to complete angiographic obliteration of the aneurysms. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first series of flow diversion procedures in children reported in the medical literature. While flow diversion is a new and relatively untested technology in children, outcomes in adults have been promising. For challenging lesions in the pediatric population, flow diversion may have a valuable role as a well-tolerated, safe treatment with durable results. Many issues remain to be addressed, such as the durability of flow diverters over a very long follow-up and vessel response to growth in the presence of an endoluminal device.