Thompson, Elizabeth

Abstract Background In children with non-metastatic atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (ATRT), proton therapy is increasingly utilized worldwide due to the radiosensitivity of afflicted young patients. General questions persist, however, surrounding dose and volume of radiotherapy. Methods Between 2009-2024, 39 children from a single institution with non-metastatic intracranial ATRT received focal proton therapy at a median age of 2.4 years (range 0.7-19). Twenty-two patients had supratentorial tumors and 27 had gross/near total resection prior to radiation. Most common chemotherapy regimens were ACNS0333 and SJYC07 (n = 10 each) and Dana-Farber (n = 6). Four patients received consolidative high-dose chemotherapy after radiation. The median radiation dose was 50.4 Gy (range, 50.4-54). The cumulative incidence method assessed freedom from selected endpoints.The Fine-Gray method assessed the level of statistical significance between levels of selected prognostic factors. Results With a median followup of 5.2 years (range 0.5-16.2), the 5-yr overall survival, progression-free survival, and local control was 63%, 64%, and 97%, respectively. Thirteen patients developed isolated leptomeningeal failure as first site of recurrence. Only subtotal resection was significantly associated with local recurrence (100% vs 92%, p < 0.05). Patient age, tumor site, extent of resection, radiation dose, and chemotherapy regimen were otherwise not significantly associated with disease control or survival. Four patients experienced symptomatic radiation necrosis, including 1 death: Three of 4 cases received 54 Gy and consolidative intrathecal methotrexate (n = 2) or high dose ACNS0333 intravenous chemotherapy (n = 1, fatal) after radiation. The other patient received 50.4 Gy and necrosis was immediately preceded by ventriculoperitoneal shunt failure. Six patients developed hearing loss requiring aids. One patient developed radiation-induced meningioma a decade following treatment. Conclusion This represents the largest experience reporting 5-year outcomes following focal radiation in children with non-metastatic intracranial ATRT. When applied with a variety of modern chemotherapy regimens in real-world settings, focal proton therapy at a dose of 50.4 Gy may offer the best therapeutic ratio but does not eliminate serious toxicity. If avoidance of craniospinal radiation remains an ongoing priority, further improvement in survival will depend upon systemic therapy.

Abstract Osteoporosis-related fractures are undertreated, due in part to misinformation about recommended approaches to patient care and discrepancies among treatment guidelines. To help bridge this gap and improve patient outcomes, the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research assembled a multistakeholder coalition to develop clinical recommendations for the optimal prevention of secondary fractureamong people aged 65 years and older with a hip or vertebral fracture. The coalition developed 13 recommendations (7 primary and 6 secondary) strongly supported by the empirical literature. The coalition recommends increased communication with patients regarding fracture risk, mortality and morbidity outcomes, and fracture risk reduction. Risk assessment (including fall history) should occur at regular intervals with referral to physical and/or occupational therapy as appropriate. Oral, intravenous, andsubcutaneous pharmacotherapies are efficaciousandcanreduce risk of future fracture.Patientsneededucation,however, about thebenefitsandrisks of both treatment and not receiving treatment. Oral bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate are first-line options and are generally well tolerated; otherwise, intravenous zoledronic acid and subcutaneous denosumab can be considered. Anabolic agents are expensive butmay be beneficial for selected patients at high risk.Optimal duration of pharmacotherapy is unknown but because the risk for second fractures is highest in the earlypost-fractureperiod,prompt treatment is recommended.Adequate dietary or supplemental vitaminDand calciumintake shouldbe assured. Individuals beingtreatedfor osteoporosis shouldbe reevaluated for fracture risk routinely, includingvia patienteducationabout osteoporosisandfracturesandmonitoringfor adverse treatment effects.Patients shouldbestronglyencouraged to avoid tobacco, consume alcohol inmoderation atmost, and engage in regular exercise and fall prevention strategies. Finally, referral to endocrinologists or other osteoporosis specialists may be warranted for individuals who experience repeated fracture or bone loss and those with complicating comorbidities (eg, hyperparathyroidism, chronic kidney disease).©2019American Society for Bone andMineral Research.

ABSTRACT Osteoporosis-related fractures are undertreated, due in part to misinformation about recommended approaches to patient care and discrepancies among treatment guidelines. To help bridge this gap and improve patient outcomes, the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research assembled a multistakeholder coalition to develop clinical recommendations for the optimal prevention of secondary fracture among people aged 65 years and older with a hip or vertebral fracture. The coalition developed 13 recommendations (7 primary and 6 secondary) strongly supported by the empirical literature. The coalition recommends increased communication with patients regarding fracture risk, mortality and morbidity outcomes, and fracture risk reduction. Risk assessment (including fall history) should occur at regular intervals with referral to physical and/or occupational therapy as appropriate. Oral, intravenous, and subcutaneous pharmacotherapies are efficacious and can reduce risk of future fracture. Patients need education, however, about the benefits and risks of both treatment and not receiving treatment. Oral bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate are first-line options and are generally well tolerated; otherwise, intravenous zoledronic acid and subcutaneous denosumab can be considered. Anabolic agents are expensive but may be beneficial for selected patients at high risk. Optimal duration of pharmacotherapy is unknown but because the risk for second fractures is highest in the early post-fracture period, prompt treatment is recommended. Adequate dietary or supplemental vitamin D and calcium intake should be assured. Individuals being treated for osteoporosis should be reevaluated for fracture risk routinely, including via patient education about osteoporosis and fractures and monitoring for adverse treatment effects. Patients should be strongly encouraged to avoid tobacco, consume alcohol in moderation at most, and engage in regular exercise and fall prevention strategies. Finally, referral to endocrinologists or other osteoporosis specialists may be warranted for individuals who experience repeated fracture or bone loss and those with complicating comorbidities (eg, hyperparathyroidism, chronic kidney disease). © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.