Switchenko, Jeffrey M.

Abstract Introduction: CTCLs are rare, heterogeneous non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) with significant regional variability in treatment patterns. Prospective studies characterizing CTCL management, particularly in racially and ethnically diverse populations, remains limited. The LEO-MER multi-center prospective cohort study (NCT02736357) is designed to address the persistent disparities in outcomes research by enrolling historically underrepresented groups of patients diagnosed with lymphoma across the United States (US). Here, we present a real-world analysis of CTCL patients that reflects US academic practice, evaluating treatment patterns, as well as prognostic factors influencing survival outcomes. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with newly diagnosed CTCL were prospectively enrolled in either the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic MER cohort (2002-2015) or the expanded LEO cohort (2015-2020), which included 8 US academic centers. Standardized protocols were used to abstract clinical, pathologic, treatment, and outcome data from medical records. ANOVA/Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher's/chi-square tests were used to compare patient distribution across demographic and clinical characteristics based on data distribution and sample size. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from diagnosis to death or last follow-up. Survival analyses employed Kaplan-Meier estimation supplemented by Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: The LEO-MER cohort enrolled 223 CTCL patients (91 MER and 132 LEO). Subtypes included mycosis fungoides (MF, n=155, 69.5%), Sézary syndrome (SS, n=22, 9.9%), primary cutaneous anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (n=17, 7.6%), subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (n=11, 4.9%), cutaneous CD4+ small/medium T-cell lymphoproliferative-disorder (n=9, 4%), and other rarer CTCL subtypes (n=9, 4%). Among the MF/SS cohort, median age was 64 years (Range: 18-89 years), 58.2% (n=103) were male and race/ethnicity distribution included White (n=123, 69.5%), Black (n=29; 16.4%) and others/unknown (n=25; 14.1%). Stage distribution included 62.7% with early-stage (ES) MF (IA-IIA, n=111), 37.2% with advanced-stage (AS) MF (IIB-IVB, n=66). To complete diagnostic workup, T-cell receptor (TCR) testing was performed in 52.6% of skin biopsies (n=92) and 62.5% of blood samples (n=110), with clonal detection rates of 75% (69/92) in skin and 51.8% (57/110) in blood. Paired TCR matching between skin and blood samples was performed in 31.6% (n=56) of cases, demonstrating 53.6% (30/56) concordance. Blood flow cytometry data were reported in 80.1% (89/111) and 84.4% (56/66) of ES and AS MF cases, with T-cell population being detected in 7.2% (8/111) and 62.1% (41/66) of ES and AS cases. Nodal biopsies were obtained in 23.4% (n=41) of patients and clonality assessment was reported in 18.6% (33/177) of these cases. The MF/SS cohort's lifetime treatment exposure data (n=160) revealed topical skin-directed therapies alone (n=49, 31.8%) as the most common approach followed by lifetime exposure to topical skin-directed and systemic therapies (n=45, 29.2%) followed by multimodal exposure of topical skin-directed, radiation and systemic treatments (n=30, 19.5%). Only 5.6% of patients were enrolled in a clinical trial. First-line (1L) systemic regimens were predominantly a) immunomodulatory agents (n=47, 29.3%); including oral retinoid (n=20), extracorporeal photopheresis (n=18), interferon (n=9) followed by b) chemotherapy (n=30, 18.7%) and c) targeted therapies (n=17, 10.6%) including Brentuximab Vedotin (n=6), Romidepsin (n=5), Mogamulizumab (n=3), Vorinostat (n=2) and Pralatrexate (n=1). Multivariable analysis predicting 1L systemic treatment initiation demonstrated a significant association with presence of N2/N3 stage (N2/N3 vs N0/N1: Odds Ratio (OR): 5.45) and elevated LDH (OR: 5.30). At median follow-up of 91.1 months (mon), median OS was 122.3 mon (95% confidence interval 67.2-159.2 mon). In subset analyses, Black race (p=0.001) and SS (p=0.0001) were associated with worse OS outcomes. Conclusion: We present initial data from our prospective LEO-MER cohort, a large US-based multicenter consortia. Our findings demonstrate variability in both diagnostic staging and treatment approaches for MF/SS patients. The cohort demonstrated worse outcomes with high-risk disease and Black race/ethnicity. These findings warrant further study on the impact of underlying social determinant factors, given the variability noted in this population.

Abstract Importance The addition of agents targeting critical signal mediators of cancer cell proliferation such as cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) potentiates the efficacy of platinum chemotherapy. Objective To determine the safety and efficacy of palbociclib combined with cisplatin (cis) or carboplatin (carbo) in advanced solid malignancies Design Enrollment on dose escalation (part I) proceeded using the Bayesian adaptive design Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC). Setting Single institution investigator initiated trial. Participants Patients with any advanced cancer after at least one prior therapy were enrolled on dose escalation to determine recommended phase II doses (RP2D). Expansion cohorts were then opened for pancreaticobiliary tract cancers. Intervention Escalating doses of palbociclib in combination with different doses of cisplatin or carboplatin. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included safety, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Results We enrolled 39 patients on dose escalation (part I) and 32 additional patients on dose expansion (part II). RP2D of palbociclib 100 mg on Day 2-22 + Cisplatin (cis) 60 mg/m2 IV on Day 1 Q4W (Arm A); and palbociclib 75 mg on Day 2-22 + Carboplatin (carbo) AUC 6 IV on Day 1 Q4W (Arm B). ORR for Part I were 12.5% (Arm A) and 25% (Arm B). Median PFS and OS for dose expansion were 2.1 and 4.9 months, respectively. For PDAC, mPFS was 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.7, 2.4), and OS was 3.7 months (95% CI: 2.7, 5.7). Most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs—all grade %): Arm A—neutropenia (66%), thrombocytopenia (26%), nausea, fatigue, and anemia (20% each); Arm B—neutropenia (64.7%), thrombocytopenia (53%), and anemia (29%). There were no grade 4-5 TRAEs. Conclusions and Relevance The combination of palbociclib with cisplatin or carboplatin had an acceptable safety profile and clinical responses in some treatment refractory advanced cancers. There was no objective response, but about half of PDAC patients had disease stabilization. Additional efforts are needed to exploit CDK abnormalities in these patients. Clinical trial registration number: NCT02897375

Abstract Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy with dismal prognosis. Most patients present with advanced stages. Heightened levels of serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) are associated with carcinogenesis, immune suppression, and poor prognosis in PDAC. Preclinical data of dual inhibition of IL-6 and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) facilitates CD8+ T-cell migration into pancreatic tumors and was effective in controlling tumor growth in syngeneic and genetically engineered PDAC mouse models. Siltuximab (Sil) is a chimeric monoclonal antibody which targets the IL-6 molecule specifically. Spartalizumab (Sparta) is a high-affinity ligand-blocking humanized IgG4 antibody against the PD-1 receptor. We developed a phase Ib/II trial to evaluate the safety, immunogenicity and preliminary antitumor activity of Sil and Sparta in metastatic PDAC (mPDAC). Methods: Patients (pts) with mPDAC who have progressed on at least one line of systemic chemotherapy were eligible for the trial. Other selected inclusion criteria were ≥18 years of age, ECOG PS 0-1 and measurable disease per RECIST v1.1. The phase Ib trial design is standard 3+3, with a primary endpoint of recommended phase II dose (RP2D). An additional 24 patients were planned for an expansion cohort. Sil was administered at escalating dose levels of 6 mg/kg (DL1) and 11 mg/kg (DL2), in combination with Sparta at 300 mg IV on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Key secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR = CR + PR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: We enrolled 4 patients on DL1 and escalated to DL2/RP2D in the absence of a dose limiting toxicity (DLT). A total of 31 patients were subsequently treated at the RP2D (escalation + expansion). The median age was 68 years, 42% were male. Majority were White (63%) and 20% were Black. About 43% had head of pancreas primary tumors and 86% had liver involvement. The median number of lines of prior therapy was 3 (range 1-4). There was no objective response among the 4 patients on DL1; 1 had stable disease (SD) for 11 weeks as best response. 17 of 31 patients on RP2D had only a baseline assessment and came off study for progression of disease, prior to follow-up imaging assessment for response evaluation. Of the 14 RP2D patients with a follow-up assessment, ORR was 0% (3 were SD and 11 had progression of disease (PD) as best response), mPFS - 2.2 mos (95% CI: 1.9, 2.6), mOS - 5.5mos (95% CI: 2.8, 6.5). Treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade included fatigue (23%), anemia (18%), and increased liver enzymes (9.5%). There were no grade 4-5 TRAEs. Conclusions: The combination Sil/Sparta had an acceptable safety profile but did not elicit responses in advanced PDAC pts. Correlative studies using paired biopsies and blood are ongoing to determine how dual IL-6/PD-1 blockade impacts stromal and immune biomarkers in relationship to the clinical outcome measures. Funding and medications for the study were provided by Novartis and Recordati Rare Diseases Inc (NCT04191421) and NIH/NCI (R21CA266088). Citation Format: Olatunji B. Alese, Olumide Gbolahan, Kathleen M. Coleman, Yichun Cao, Sujata Kane, Sarah Craven, Emily Greene, Natalie Horvat, Andrew McDonald, Walid L. Shaib, Christina S. Wu, Mehmet Akce, Maria Diab, Jeffrey M. Switchenko, Gregory B. Lesinski, Bassel F. El-Rayes. Phase Ib study of siltuximab and spartalizumab in advanced pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT136.

TPS578 Background: Liver transplantation is a curative treatment option in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) however; up to 20% of patients develop recurrent disease. HCC recurrence post-transplant is usually extrahepatic (up to 67%) hence requires effective systemic therapy options. Available data are limited and restricted to small non-randomized studies and case series. Lack of prospective clinical trial data and limited data indicates an area of unmet need in treatment of recurrent HCC after liver transplantation. This phase II study aims evaluate the safety and efficacy of lenvatinib in patients with recurrent HCC after liver transplantation. Methods: This is a multi-institutional phase II trial with lenvatinib in patients with recurrent HCC after transplantation. Lenvatinib is administered 12 mg daily orally in patients ≥60 kg, and 8 mg daily orally in patients <60 kg. Each cycle is 28 days. Restaging scans will be performed every 8 weeks. Eligible patients must have histologically proven HCC that has recurred after liver transplantation and not amenable for surgical resection, age ≥18 years, ECOG PS 0-1, Child Pugh Class A, measurable disease per RECIST version 1.1, adequate organ function, no prior systemic therapy with lenvatinib or another systemic therapy in the post-transplant setting. Prior liver directed therapy is allowed, should be at least >28 days prior to the study enrollment, and should have at least one measurable untreated lesion by RECIST 1.1 Primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints are safety/tolerability, progression free survival, and overall survival. Pre-treatment and on-treatment peripheral blood samples will be collected for correlative research. A Simon`s two stage Minimax design is employed (H0: ORR = 5%; H1: ORR = 24%; Type I error = 0.05; power = 80%). In the first stage, 11 patients will be accrued, and if there is no objective response among them, the study will be stopped for futility. Otherwise, additional 6 patients will be accrued for a total of 17 patients. This study is currently enrolling patients. Clinical trial information: NCT05103904 .

Background: Event-free survival at 24 months (EFS24) after frontline immunochemotherapy (IC) is an important endpoint in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma, and patients who achieve EFS24 have similar survival compared to age- and sex-matched general population. The role of EFS24 in predicting subsequent survival has not been established in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), possibly due to perceived poor survival historically. In the last decade, the outcomes of MCL are improving in the evolving treatment landscape. In this international multicenter study, we investigated conditional survival and cause of death in patients with MCL who achieved EFS24 after frontline IC in the older and more recent eras. Methods: Outcomes after frontline IC were evaluated in 5 independent cohorts that included over 3000 patients in total: Mayo/Iowa MER prospective cohort, BC Cancer retrospective population-based cohort, US 12-center retrospective cohort, Swedish Lymphoma Registry, and Danish National Lymphoma Registry. For each cohort, 2 treatment eras were defined based on cohort-specific shifts in treatment patterns (Table 1). Overall survival (OS) after diagnosis and after achieving EFS24 were compared to the background age- and sex-matched general population using a standardized mortality ratio (SMR). Cumulative incidences of cause-specific deaths were analyzed using a competing risk model. Results: In the MER cohort, patients treated in Era M1 (2002-2009; n=147) and Era M2 (2010-2015; n=153) both had inferior OS compared to the general US population. A lower SMR in Era M2 vs M1 (2.25 vs 3.46) suggests a narrower gap in OS compared to the general US population. Lymphoma was the leading cause of death in both eras. In Era M1, patients who achieved EFS24 still had inferior OS compared to the general US population (SMR=2.40, 95% CI 1.76-3.19), and lymphoma remained the leading cause of death. For patients in Era M2 who achieved EFS24, the difference in OS compared to the general US population was not statistically significant with current follow-up (SMR=1.43, 95% CI 0.93-2.09), and lymphoma was no longer the leading cause of death (Table 2). In the BC cohort, patients treated in Era B2 (6/2013-2019; n=188) vs Era B1 (2003-5/2013; n=250) had a narrower gap in OS compared to the general British Columbia population (SMR 4.53 vs 6.69). Lymphoma was the leading cause of death in both eras. For patients achieving EFS24, the gap in OS was narrower in Era B2 vs B1 (SMR 3.56 vs 4.99). After achieving EFS24, lymphoma was the single leading cause of death for patients in Era B1 but not in Era B2 (Table 2). In the US 12-center cohort, patients treated in Era U1 (2002-2011; n=312) and Era U2 (2012-2016; n=417) both had inferior OS compared to the general US population (SMR 2.68 and 2.92, respectively). In patients who achieved EFS24, with current follow up, the difference in OS compared to the general US population was statistically significant in Era U1 (SMR=2.01, 95% CI 1.50-2.64) but not in Era U2 (SMR=1.44, 95% CI 0.82-2.34). Lymphoma was not the leading cause of death after achieving EFS24 (Table 2). In the Swedish cohort, the gap in OS compared to the general Swedish population was narrower in Era S2 (2013-2018; n=439) vs S1 (2006-2012; n=442), both after frontline IC (SMR 4.8 vs 5.4) and after achieving EFS24 (SMR 2.6 vs 3.4). After achieving EFS24, lymphoma was the leading cause of death for patients in Era S1 but not in Era S2 (Table 2). In the Danish cohort, patients treated in Era D2 (2014-2020; n=370) vs Era D1 (2004-2013; n=461) had a slightly narrower gap in OS compared to the general Danish population (SMR 1.90 vs 2.10). For patients who achieved EFS24, those in Era D1 still had inferior OS compared to the general Danish population (SMR=1.44, 95% CI 1.22-1.68), but the OS difference compared to the general Danish population in Era D2 was not statistically significant (SMR=1.27, 95% CI 0.92-1.72) with current follow-up (Table 2). Cause of death data were not available in this cohort. Conclusion: Survival in patients with MCL who achieved EFS24 after frontline IC improved in the more recent treatment era and moved closer to the background expected survival. After achieving EFS24, lymphoma-related mortality was no longer the leading cause of death in the more recent era. EFS24 following frontline treatment may become a critical endpoint for predicting subsequent outcomes in patients with MCL in the modern era.

Introduction The Ki-67 index has been previously shown to be prognostic, wherein the cut-off of 30% was associated with inferior survival outcomes (Determann O et al, Blood 2008) in newly diagnosed MCL patients (pts). However, this cut-off determination was made in pts treated with CHOP/R-CHOP as the first-line treatment, controlled only for MIPI, and predates the advent of novel agents. Short diagnosis to treatment interval (DTI ≤ 14 days) was recently shown to be prognostic in newly diagnosed MCL but its association with Ki-67 is unknown. We sought to determine the optimal Ki-67 cut-off in MCL and its prognostic relevance in the modern era. Methods This is a pooled analysis of 2 large datasets, one prospective (CALGB 50403) and one retrospective (MCL real world study [MCL-RWS]). CALGB is now part of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. CALGB 50403 is a phase II randomized study wherein newly diagnosed MCL pts received intensive induction chemoimmunotherapy (IIC) followed by autologous transplant, and posttransplant rituximab. The MCL-RWS included adult pts (≥18 years [yrs]) with MCL treated from 2000 to 2017 at 12 participating US sites. Pts from sites in the MCL-RWS that enrolled on CALGB 50403 were excluded. Ki-67 was scored by central review in 10% increments in the CALGB 50403 and per institutional standard in the MCL-RWS. We assessed Ki-67 as a continuous variable and used a restricted quadratic spline fit to find an optimal cut-off. We looked at the associations between Ki-67 and other known/ established MCL prognostic markers including MIPI and DTI. The outcome parameters were PFS and OS. Time-to-event endpoints were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard methods. Results Among the 793 pts (n=666, MCL-RWS and n=127, CALGB 50403) in the pooled analysis, Ki-67 was available in 385 pts (311 from MCL-RWS and 74 from CALGB 50403). The median OS (mOS) and PFS (mPFS) in the entire cohort (n=793) was 11.8 years and 4.7 years, respectively. The two groups (gps), those with and without Ki-67 data, were well balanced including MIPI and DTI. The median age was 62 yrs (range, 32-88), 81% males, 94% with ECOG performance status (PS) 0-1 and 84% with stage 4. We found a Ki-67 cut-off of 50% to be optimal as the relative hazard of death rises after 50%. Pts in the Ki-67 &gt;50% gp had significantly higher proportion with short DTI (36% vs 17%, p&lt;0.001), ECOG PS ≥2 (12% vs 5%, p=0.02), elevated LDH (58% vs 39%, p=0.005), and MIPI ≥6.2 (38% vs 20%, p=0.007) compared to Ki-67 of ≤50%. Ki-67 &gt;50% was associated with significantly inferior PFS with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.10 (95%CI 1.50-2.92) compared to Ki-67 ≤50% with a mPFS of 2.1 vs 5.3 yrs, respectively, regardless of the age (young [≤65 yrs], 2.6 vs 5.3 yrs or old [&gt;65 yrs], 1.1 vs 5.4 yrs) or receipt of IIC (2.2 vs 5.9 yrs). Figure 1 shows the statistically significant difference in PFS between the Ki-67 gps of ≤10%, &gt;10% to &lt;30%, ≥30 to ≤50%, and &gt;50%. Ki-67 &gt;50% remained prognostic for PFS in multivariable analysis (MVA) after adjusting for significant variables in univariable analysis (UVA) including short DTI, ECOG PS ≥2, stage 4, elevated LDH, and MIPI ≥6.2 with adjusted HR (aHR) 2.19, 95%CI 1.38-3.48, p &lt;0.001. Ki-67 &gt;50% was associated with significantly inferior OS with a HR of 2.10 (95%CI 1.33-3.32) compared to Ki-67 ≤50% with a mOS of 9.4 yrs vs not reached (NR), respectively, regardless of the age or receipt of IIC. Figure 2 shows the statistically significant difference in OS between the Ki-67 gps of ≤10%, &gt;10% to &lt;30%, ≥30 to ≤50%, and &gt;50%. Ki-67 &gt;50% was not prognostic for OS in MVA after adjusting for significant variables in the UVA (MIPI and sex), aHR 1.79, 95% CI 0.92-3.49, p=0.08. Similar findings were seen in multivariable analysis with Ki-67 &gt;30%, which showed no prognostic significance (aHR 1.46, 95%CI 0.82-2.58, p=0.19). Because of disparate datasets, we performed sensitivity analysis looking at the prognostic relevance of in individual datasets (CALGB 50403 and MCL-RWS) and found Ki67 &gt;50% was prognostic for PFS and OS in both of the datasets consistent with the primary analysis. Conclusions This study evaluating the optimal Ki-67 cut off for pts with newly diagnosed MCL in the modern era found that Ki-67 &gt; 50% was prognostic for PFS but not OS in MVA. A potential reason for the lack of prognostic relevance for OS in this more recent dataset is the availability of effective options at relapse. We also found that short DTI was associated with high Ki-67 gp which is a novel finding.

Background Preclinical studies showed metformin reduces exhaustion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and potentiates programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) blockade. We hypothesized that metformin with nivolumab would elicit potent antitumor and immune modulatory activity in metastatic microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC). We evaluated this hypothesis in a phase II study. Methods Nivolumab (480 mg) was administered intravenously every 4 weeks while metformin (1000 mg) was given orally, two times per day following a 14-day metformin only lead-in phase. Patients ≥18 years of age, with previously treated, stage IV MSS CRC, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0–1, having received no prior anti-PD-1 agent were eligible. The primary endpoint was overall response rate with secondary endpoints of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Correlative studies using paired pretreatment/on-treatment biopsies and peripheral blood evaluated a series of immune biomarkers in the tumor microenvironment and systemic circulation using ChipCytometry and flow cytometry. Results A total of 24 patients were enrolled, 6 patients were replaced per protocol, 18 patients had evaluable disease. Of the 18 evaluable patients, 11/18 (61%) were women and the median age was 58 (IQR 50–67). Two patients had stable disease, but no patients had objective response, hence the study was stopped for futility. Median OS and PFS was 5.2 months (95% CI (3.2 to 11.7)) and 2.3 months (95% CI (1.7 to 2.3)). Most common grade 3/4 toxicities: Anemia (n=2), diarrhea (n=2), and fever (n=2). Metformin alone failed to increase the infiltration of T-cell subsets in the tumor, but combined metformin and nivolumab increased percentages of tumor-infiltrating leukocytes (p=0.031). Dual treatment also increased Tim3+ levels in patient tissues and decreased naïve CD8+T cells (p=0.0475). Conclusions Nivolumab and metformin were well tolerated in patients with MSS CRC but had no evidence of efficacy. Correlative studies did not reveal an appreciable degree of immune modulation from metformin alone, but showed trends in tumorous T-cell infiltration as a result of dual metformin and PD-1 blockade despite progression in a majority of patients.

Abstract The prognostic relevance of diagnosis to treatment interval (DTI) in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is unknown. Hence, we sought to evaluate the impact of DTI on outcomes in MCL using 3 large datasets (1) the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Specialized Program of Research Excellence Molecular Epidemiology Resource, (2) patients enrolled in the ALL Age Asthma Cohort/CALGB 50403, and (3) a multisitecohort of patients with MCL. Patients were a priori divided into 2 groups, 0 to 14 days (short DTI) and 15 to 60 days (long DTI). The patients in whom observation was deemed appropriate were excluded. One thousand ninety-seven patients newly diagnosed with MCL and available DTI were included in the study. The majority (73%) had long DTI (n=797). Patients with short DTI had worse eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS ≥2), higher lactate dehydrogenase, bone marrow involvement, more frequent B symptoms, higher MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI ≥6.2), and were less likely to receive intensive induction therapy than long DTI group. The median progression-free survival (2.5 years vs 4.8 years, p&lt;0.0001) and overall survival (7.8 years vs. 11.8 years, p&lt;0.0001) were significantly inferior in the short DTI group than the long DTI cohort and remained significant for progression-free survival and overall survival in multivariable analysis. We show that the DTI is an important prognostic factor in patients newly diagnosed with MCL and is strongly associated with adverse clinical factors and poor outcomes. DTI should be reported in all the patients newly diagnosed with MCL who are enrolling in clinical trials and steps must be taken to ensure selection bias is avoided.

4097 Background: Given a high recurrence rate, surgical resection for localized intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) is curative in only 30-35% of patients. BILCAP has established a standard of care for adjuvant therapy with monotherapy capecitabine. Gemcitabine, cisplatin and nab-paclitaxel combination chemotherapy (GAP) was associated with a response rate of 45% in biliary cancer and 20% of patients who were previously inoperable underwent margin negative resection. Based on these data, we conducted a neoadjuvant study of GAP for resectable but high-risk IHCC. Methods: A multi-institutional prospective single-arm phase II trial was conducted for patients with resectable high-risk disease, as defined by tumor size > 5cm, multiple tumors, presence of radiographic major vascular invasion, and lymph node involvement. Patients were administered 4 cycles (3 months) of preoperative GAP (gemcitabine 800 mg/m2, cisplatin 25 mg/m2 and nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle) prior to an attempt at curative-intent surgical resection. The primary endpoint was completion of all therapy, including both preoperative chemotherapy and resection. Secondary endpoints were toxicity, radiologic response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) criteria, RFS, and OS. Thirty evaluable patients provided 73% power to reject a null therapy completion rate of 50%, with a target completion rate of 70% using a one-sided exact test with a Type I error of 0.05. Results: Thirty-seven patients were screened and 30 evaluable patients were enrolled. The trial was sequentially activated at each of the 4 sites from 09/18-02/21 and the final patient was enrolled in 09/21. Median age was 60.5 years and 40% were female. Twenty-three patients (77%, 90% CI: 60.6-88.5%; p = 0.0026) completed all preoperative chemotherapy and underwent surgical resection. Ten patients (33%) experienced grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events, the most common being neutropenia and diarrhea; 47% required at least one dose reduction. Partial response rate was 23% and disease control rate was 90% (PD: 10%, PR: 23%, SD: 67%). Of the 23 patients who successfully underwent surgical resection, 2 (9%) had minor postoperative complications. Median size of largest tumor was 5.5cm, median number of tumors was 3, and 39% were lymph node positive. Median length of hospital stay was 4 days. There was zero treatment related mortality. Conclusions: This study met its primary endpoint and demonstrated that neoadjuvant gemcitabine/cisplatin/nab-paclitaxel is feasible and safe prior to resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and does not adversely impact perioperative outcomes. Continued follow-up for RFS and OS with this treatment strategy is underway and larger validation studies are planned. Clinical trial information: NCT03579771.