Back to Authors

Gordon, Max J.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3940-4451

Mayo Clinic

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Citations 3

Key takeaways for knowledge expansion of early-career scientists conducting Transdisciplinary Research in Energetics and Cancer (TREC): a report from the TREC Training Workshop 2022
Kung, Che-Pei , Skiba, Meghan B. , Gorzelitz, Jessica , Lange, Leslie A. , Potiaumpai, Melanie , James, Dara , Galván, Gloria C. , Hornbuckle, Lyndsey M. , Kim, So‐Youn , Kim, Tae-Hyung , Kumar, Amanika , Mahé, Mélanie , Sun, Xinghui , Irwin, Melinda L. , Gorzelitz, Jessica , Li, Yun Rose , Potiaumpai, Melanie , Coleman, Michael F , Kumar, Amanika , Sun, Xinghui , Skiba, Meghan B , Crosby, Erika J. , Kennedy, Mary Ann , Kerr, Bethany A. , Nash, Sarah H. , Kleckner, Amber S. , Fairman, Ciaran M. , Garcia, David O. , Gordon, Max J. , His, Mathilde , McDonnell, Karen Kane , Moore, Jade , Oh, Sangphil

JNCI Monographs | May 4, 2023 | Volume: 2023 | Issue: 61 | Pages: 149-157

10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad005 Get It

Abstract The overall goal of the annual Transdisciplinary Research in Energetics and Cancer (TREC) Training Workshop is to provide transdisciplinary training for scientists in energetics and cancer and clinical care. The 2022 Workshop included 27 early-to-mid career investigators (trainees) pursuing diverse TREC research areas in basic, clinical, and population sciences. The 2022 trainees participated in a gallery walk, an interactive qualitative program evaluation method, to summarize key takeaways related to program objectives. Writing groups were formed and collaborated on this summary of the 5 key takeaways from the TREC Workshop. The 2022 TREC Workshop provided a targeted and unique networking opportunity that facilitated meaningful collaborative work addressing research and clinical needs in energetics and cancer. This report summarizes the 2022 TREC Workshop’s key takeaways and future directions for innovative transdisciplinary energetics and cancer research.
Impact of diagnosis to treatment interval in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma
Switchenko, Jeffrey M. , Bachanová, Veronika , Gerson, James N. , Gordon, Max J. , Danilov, Alexey V. , Grover, Natalie S. , Mathews, Stephanie , Burkart, Madelyn , Hill, Brian T. , Park, Steven , Fenske, Timothy S. , Martin, Peter W., Malecek, Mary‐Kate , Flowers, Christopher R. , Link, Brian K. , Kaplan, Lawrence D. , Inwards, David J. , Maddocks, Kami J. , Blum, Kristie A. , Bartlett, Nancy L. , Leonard, John P. , Cohen, Jonathon B. , Epperla, Narendranath , Switchenko, Jeffrey , Grover, Natalie S , Burkart, Madelyn , Karmali, Reem , Sawalha, Yazeed , Ghosh, Nilanjan , Park, Steven I , Bond, David A , Hamadani, Mehdi , Kahl, Brad S , Link, Brian K , Feldman, Andrew L , Hsi, Eric D , Bartlett, Nancy L , Cerhan, James R , Maurer, Matthew , Cohen, Jonathon B , Bachanova, Veronika , Epperla, Narendranath , Barta, Stefan K , Karmali, Reem , Sawalha, Yazeed , Bond, David A. , Hamadani, Mehdi , Martin, Peter, Kahl, Brad S. , Feldman, Andrew L. , Hsi, Eric D. , Cerhan, James R. , Habermann, Thomas M. , Maurer, Matthew J.

Blood Advances | December 14, 2022 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2287-2296

10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009225 Get It

Abstract The prognostic relevance of diagnosis to treatment interval (DTI) in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is unknown. Hence, we sought to evaluate the impact of DTI on outcomes in MCL using 3 large datasets (1) the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Specialized Program of Research Excellence Molecular Epidemiology Resource, (2) patients enrolled in the ALL Age Asthma Cohort/CALGB 50403, and (3) a multisitecohort of patients with MCL. Patients were a priori divided into 2 groups, 0 to 14 days (short DTI) and 15 to 60 days (long DTI). The patients in whom observation was deemed appropriate were excluded. One thousand ninety-seven patients newly diagnosed with MCL and available DTI were included in the study. The majority (73%) had long DTI (n=797). Patients with short DTI had worse eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS ≥2), higher lactate dehydrogenase, bone marrow involvement, more frequent B symptoms, higher MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI ≥6.2), and were less likely to receive intensive induction therapy than long DTI group. The median progression-free survival (2.5 years vs 4.8 years, p<0.0001) and overall survival (7.8 years vs. 11.8 years, p<0.0001) were significantly inferior in the short DTI group than the long DTI cohort and remained significant for progression-free survival and overall survival in multivariable analysis. We show that the DTI is an important prognostic factor in patients newly diagnosed with MCL and is strongly associated with adverse clinical factors and poor outcomes. DTI should be reported in all the patients newly diagnosed with MCL who are enrolling in clinical trials and steps must be taken to ensure selection bias is avoided.
Intensive induction regimens after deferring initial therapy for mantle cell lymphoma are not associated with improved survival
Shanmugasundaram, Krithika , Goyal, Subir , Switchenko, J., Calzada, Oscar , Churnetski, Michael C. , Kolla, Bhaskar , Bachanová, Veronika , Gerson, James N. , Gordon, Max J. , Danilov, Alexey V. , Mathews, Stephanie , Sawalha, Yazeed , Hill, Brian T. , Park, Steven I., Epperla, Narendranath , Bond, David A. , Badar, Talha , Blum, Kristie A. , Fenske, Timothy S. , Malecek, Mary‐Kate , Martin, Peter , Guo, Jin, Flowers, Christopher R. , Cohen, Jonathon B. , Park, Steven , Sawalha, Yazeed , Bachanova, Veronika , Epperla, Narendranath , Badar, Talha , Park, Steven I , Bond, David A , Barta, Stefan K , Grover, Natalie S. , Burkart, Madelyn , Karmali, Reem , Ghosh, Nilanjan , Hamadani, Mehdi , Kahl, Brad S. , Shanmugasundaram, Krithika

European Journal of Haematology | May 11, 2021 | Volume: 107 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 301-310

10.1111/ejh.13649 Get It

AbstractIntroductionWhile most patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) receive therapy shortly after diagnosis, a subset of patients with indolent‐behaving disease can safely defer treatment. In this subgroup, we evaluated the importance of treatment intensity in patients with MCL who defer initial therapy.MethodsOut of 1134 patients with MCL from 12 academic centers, we analyzed 219 patients who initiated therapy at least 90 days after diagnosis. Patients who received induction with high‐dose cytarabine and/or autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in first remission were considered to have received intensive therapy (n = 88) while all other approaches were non‐intensive (n = 131).ResultsThere was no difference in progression‐free (PFS; P = .224) or overall survival (OS; P = .167) in deferred patients who received non‐intensive vs. intensive therapy. Additionally, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were performed for PFS and OS. Treatment at an academic center (HR 0.43, P = .015) was associated with improved OS in both univariate and multivariate models, while intensity of treatment was not associated with improved OS in either model.ConclusionsThese results indicate that intensified initial treatment is not associated with improved survival after deferring initial therapy, although prospective studies are needed to determine which of these patients with MCL may benefit from intensive therapy.