Salvi, Erika

Background There exists a wide interindividual variability in blood pressure ( BP ) response to β 1 ‐blockers. To identify the genetic determinants of this variability, we performed a pharmacogenomic genome‐wide meta‐analysis of genetic variants influencing β 1 ‐blocker BP response. Methods and Results Genome‐wide association analysis for systolic BP and diastolic BP response to β 1 ‐blockers from 5 randomized clinical trials consisting of 1254 patients with hypertension of European ancestry were combined in meta‐analysis and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with P <10 −4 were tested for replication in 2 independent randomized clinical trials of β 1 ‐blocker–treated patients of European ancestry (n=1552). Regions harboring the replicated SNP s were validated in a β 1 ‐blocker–treated black cohort from 2 randomized clinical trials (n=315). A missense SNP rs28404156 in BST 1 was associated with systolic BP response to β 1 ‐blockers in the discovery meta‐analysis ( P =9.33×10 −5 , β=−3.21 mm Hg) and replicated at Bonferroni significance ( P =1.85×10 −4 , β=−4.86 mm Hg) in the replication meta‐analysis with combined meta‐analysis approaching genome‐wide significance ( P =2.18×10 −7 ). This SNP in BST 1 is in linkage disequilibrium with several SNP s with putative regulatory functions in nearby genes, including CD 38 , FBXL 5 , and FGFBP 1 , all of which have been implicated in BP regulation. SNP s in this genetic region were also associated with BP response in the black cohort. Conclusions Data from randomized clinical trials of 8 European ancestry and 2 black cohorts support the assumption that BST 1 containing locus on chromosome 4 is associated with β 1 ‐blocker BP response. Given the previous associations of this region with BP , this is a strong candidate region for future functional studies and potential use in precision medicine approaches for BP management and risk prediction.

Genome-wide association studies have identified >50 common variants associated with kidney function, but these variants do not fully explain the variation in eGFR. We performed a two-stage meta-analysis of associations between genotypes from the Illumina exome array and eGFR on the basis of serum creatinine (eGFRcrea) among participants of European ancestry from the CKDGen Consortium ( n Stage1 : 111,666; n Stage2 : 48,343). In single-variant analyses, we identified single nucleotide polymorphisms at seven new loci associated with eGFRcrea ( PPM1J , EDEM3, ACP1, SPEG, EYA4, CYP1A1 , and ATXN2L ; P Stage1 <3.7×10 −7 ), of which most were common and annotated as nonsynonymous variants. Gene-based analysis identified associations of functional rare variants in three genes with eGFRcrea, including a novel association with the SOS Ras/Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 2 gene, SOS2 ( P =5.4×10 −8 by sequence kernel association test). Experimental follow-up in zebrafish embryos revealed changes in glomerular gene expression and renal tubule morphology in the embryonic kidney of acp1- and sos2 -knockdowns. These developmental abnormalities associated with altered blood clearance rate and heightened prevalence of edema. This study expands the number of loci associated with kidney function and identifies novel genes with potential roles in kidney formation.

Background Identification of genetic markers of antihypertensive drug responses could assist in individualization of hypertension treatment. Methods and Results We conducted a genome‐wide association study to identify gene loci influencing the responsiveness of 228 male patients to 4 classes of antihypertensive drugs. The Genetics of Drug Responsiveness in Essential Hypertension ( GENRES ) study is a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled cross‐over study where each subject received amlodipine, bisoprolol, hydrochlorothiazide, and losartan, each as a monotherapy, in a randomized order. Replication analyses were performed in 4 studies with patients of European ancestry ( PEAR Study, N=386; GERA I and II Studies, N=196 and N=198; SOPHIA Study, N=372). We identified 3 single‐nucleotide polymorphisms within the ACY 3 gene that showed associations with bisoprolol response reaching genome‐wide significance ( P <5×10 −8 ); however, this could not be replicated in the PEAR Study using atenolol. In addition, 39 single‐nucleotide polymorphisms showed P values of 10 −5 to 10 −7 . The 20 top‐associated single‐nucleotide polymorphisms were different for each antihypertensive drug. None of these top single‐nucleotide polymorphisms co‐localized with the panel of >40 genes identified in genome‐wide association studies of hypertension. Replication analyses of GENRES results provided suggestive evidence for a missense variant (rs3814995) in the NPHS 1 (nephrin) gene influencing losartan response, and for 2 variants influencing hydrochlorothiazide response, located within or close to the ALDH 1A3 (rs3825926) and CLIC 5 (rs321329) genes. Conclusions These data provide some evidence for a link between biology of the glomerular protein nephrin and antihypertensive action of angiotensin receptor antagonists and encourage additional studies on aldehyde dehydrogenase–mediated reactions in antihypertensive drug action.