Ingle, James N.

1005 Background: We previously reported that in the E5194 clinical trial patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treated with wide local excision (WLE) without radiation (RT), the DCIS Score was significantly associated with 10 year risk of an ipsilateral breast event (IBE - recurrence of in situ or invasive carcinoma), whether evaluated as a continuous or categorical variable (P=0.02 for both). Here we evaluate correlation between DCIS Score and clinicopathologic (CP) features and if DCIS Score provides independent recurrence risk information. Methods: The study population included 327 women with DCIS prospectively selected for treatment with WLE without RT, including low-intermediate grade tumors ≤2.5 cm or high-grade ≤1 cm. CP variables included age, menopausal status, tamoxifen treatment (used in 29%) and expert centrally determined tumor size, grade, comedo necrosis, tumor type, and margin status. The association between DCIS Score and CP variables was examined by spearman rank correlation, and proportional hazards regression models were used to determine variables significantly associated with IBE. Results: Lesion size (p=0.009) and menopausal status (p=0.03) were significantly associated with IBE, while grade (p=0.69) and comedo necrosis (p=0.47) were not. DCIS Score was significantly associated with IBE after adjustment for CP features and tamoxifen use (p=0.02). DCIS Score was moderately correlated with grade (rs=0.46; 95% CI 0.37,0.54), percentage comedo necrosis (rs=0.49; CI 0.41,0.57), and lesion size (rs=0.18; CI 0.08,0.29) but not other features. Exploratory analyses in all CP subgroups, including the multicomponent Van Nuys Prognostic Index, showed a wide range of DCIS Scores in each subgroup. Concordance of the grades among readers was low: local vs parent central, 68%; local vs central nuclear grade, 45%; parent central vs central nuclear grade, 37%. Conclusions: DCIS Score is moderately correlated with grade, comedo necrosis, and tumor size. DCIS Score provides recurrence risk information independent of these features and identifies subjects with DCIS who are at high risk for local invasive and in-situ local recurrence after WLE alone.

564 Background: Our group previously examined if baseline patient/tumor characteristics, or prior treatment affected cause of death in MA.17, a placebo controlled extended adjuvant trial of the aromatase inhibitor (AI) letrozole. We now examine factor effects on all cause mortality in MA.27. Methods: MA.27 was an adjuvant phase III superiority trial of 5 yrs of exemestane vs anastrozole, in ER+ postmenopausal breast cancer accrued between 2003 and 2008; event free survival was similar. We examined by intention-to-treat, the multivariate time-to-breast cancer-specific (BrCa), cardiovascular (Cardio), and other causes (OT) of death with log-normal survival analysis adjusted by treatment and stratification factors (lymph node status, adjuvant chemotherapy, celecoxib, aspirin, and trastuzumab). We tested whether factors were associated with 1) all cause mortality, and if so, 2) cause-specific mortality. We also fit step-wise forward cause-specific adjusted models. Results: 7,576 women (median age 64.1 years; 5417 (71.5%) <70 yrs and 2159 (28.5%) >70 yrs) were enrolled and followed for a median of 4.1 yrs. The 432 deaths comprised: 187 (43.3%) BrCa, 66 (15.3%) Cardiovascular, and 179 (41.4%) OT MA.27 therapy was not associated with mortality (p=0.84). Five baseline factors were differentially associated with cause of death. Older age was associated with greater BrCa (p=0.03), Cardio (p<0.001), and OT (p<0.001) mortality. Pre-existing cardiovascular history led to worse Cardio mortality (p<0.001). Worse ECOG performance status led to worse OT death (p<0.001). T1 tumors were associated with less BrCa mortality (p<0.001). PgR+ tumors were also associated with less BrCa mortality (p<0.001). There were fewer BrCa deaths with Node –ve disease (p<0.001), ER+ tumors (p=0.001) and without adjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.005); there was worse Cardio mortality (p=0.01) with receipt of trastuzumab; worse OT (p=0.03) for non-whites, and without adjuvant radiotherapy (p=0.003). Conclusions: 56.7% of deaths in MA.27 patients were non-breast cancer related. We showed baseline patient and tumor characteristics, and prior treatment differentially affected cause of death. Clinical trial information: NCT00066573.

6018 Background: Disease free survival was significantly improved in women receiving letrozole after standard adjuvant tamoxifen in the MA.17 trial. Based on the results of MA.17 and of other trials of aromatase inhibitors in early stage breast cancer, chronic aromatase inhibitor therapy, in postmenopausal women free of breast cancer recurrence, is now being widely employed. We analyzed the toxicity of letrozole according to ethnic status among women enrolled in MA.17. Methods: The chi-square test was used for comparison of rates of side effects between the two groups, Caucasian vs. ethnic minority (defined as all non-Caucasians). In a subset of women, quality of life (QOL) was assessed by the SF-36 Health Survey. Mean change scores in QOL from baseline were compared between groups for summary measures and domains using the Wilcoxon test. Results: 352 minority women and 4,708 Caucasians were enrolled in MA.17, of which 183 minority women and 2,339 Caucasians were randomized to receive letrozole. Caucasians were older than minority women and had a slightly longer duration of treatment with prior tamoxifen. Tumor size and nodal status were not significantly different between the two groups. In women who received letrozole, minority women had significantly lower incidence of hot flashes (49% vs. 58%; p = 0.02), fatigue (29% vs. 39%; p = 0.005), and arthritis (2% vs. 7%; p = 0.006) compared with Caucasians. Mean QOL change scores of SF-36 domains for women who received letrozole were not different but minority women had better mental health at 6 month assessment (p = 0.02) and worse bodily pain at 12 month assessment (p = 0.046). Conclusions: Minority women tolerated letrozole considerably better than Caucasians in the MA.17 trial. These preliminary findings suggest that minority women respond differently to letrozole in terms of toxicity. Recent demonstration of genotypic variations in the aromatase gene in different ethnic groups plus likely pharmacogenomic differences suggests that further research is needed to clarify the clinical outcomes of aromatase inhibition in women of diverse ethnicities. Future research strategies should focus on examining in vivo genotype-phenotype correlations to determine the effects of genetic variation on response to anticancer therapy and on toxicities and end-organ effects. [Table: see text]

550 Background: 5187 postmenopausal women were originally randomized to NCIC CTG MA.17 to receive letrozole (LET) or placebo (PLAC) after 5 years of tamoxifen. The hazard ratio (HR) for disease-free survival (DFS) was 0.58 (0.450.76, p=0.00004) after a median follow-up of 30 months (mo). The trial was unblinded in October 2003 after the first interim analysis. Women randomized to PLAC were offered LET at the time of unblinding. The goal of this analysis was to determine whether women switching from PLAC to LET benefit in terms of disease outcome and to evaluate treatment related toxicities. Methods: LET and PLAC-LET have been compared to PLAC, based on the hazard ratio and adjusting for baseline patient and disease variables including, among others, tumor size, nodal status and prior adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: Information about their follow-up treatment after unblinding was available on 2268 women originally assigned to PLAC and who were free of recurrence and alive at the time of unblinding. Among them, 1655 crossed over from PLAC to LET while 613 elected no treatment. With 54 mo f/up the HR for DFS was 0.31 (0.18, 0.55: p<0.0001) favoring patients who crossed over to LET compared to those who stayed on no treatment. The treatment switch was well tolerated with no significant difference in bone fractures or cardiovascular events. An updated analysis of DFS, DDFS and OS by nodal and tumor receptor status, prior chemotherapy, menopausal status at the start of tamoxifen, and duration of prior tamoxifen therapy will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: Women with hormone dependent breast cancer prescribed LET after a prolonged delay from completing tamoxifen experienced a significant improvement in outcome (DFS, DDFS, OS) and should be considered for this therapy. [Table: see text]

504 Background: CYP2D6 genetic variants and concurrent administration of potent inhibitors (Inh) of the enzyme markedly reduce the plasma concentrations of endoxifen (Jin. JNCI 2005;97:30–9). We have shown that genetic variation in CYP2D6 is associated with a higher risk of relapse in Tam treated patients (pts) (Goetz. JCO 2005;23:9312–18), but the impact of CYP2D6 inhibition on Tam clinical outcome is unknown. Methods: Using the North Central Cancer Treatment Group 89–30–52 adjuvant Tam trial (1989–1994), we evaluated the effect of co-administration of CYP2D6 Inh and CYP2D6*4 genotype on relapse in pts receiving tam alone. Patient charts were reviewed at each randomizing site to record the following known CYP2D6 Inh: fluoxetine (F), paroxetine (P), sertraline (S), cimetidine (C), amiodarone (A), doxepin (D), ticlopidine (T) and haloperidol (H). Poor metabolizers (PM) were defined as pts who were CYP2D6 *4/*4 and/or known to receive a CYP2D6 Inh. Intermediate metabolizers (IM) were defined as WT/*4 without CYP2D6 Inh, and extensive metabolizers (EM) as WT/WT without CYP2D6 Inh. The association between CYP2D6 status and Tam clinical outcome was determined using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox modeling was performed using traditional prognostic factors. Results: CYP2D6*4 genotype was obtained in 190 of 256 eligible pts, with a CYP2D6*4/*4 genotype frequency of 6.8% as described previously (Goetz JCO 2005). Medication history was available in 171/256 eligible pts and in 143/190 pts with CYP2D6 genotype. Eleven of 173 patients were concomitantly administered these CYP2D6 Inh: F(2), P(2), S(2), H(1), C(4), and D(1). The median duration of use was 2.5 yrs. Twenty-four pts met criteria for PM [13 by *4/*4 genotype and 11 by CYP2D6 Inh (7 WT/WT, 1 WT/*4, and 3 unknown genotype)], 21 for IM, and 102 for EM. Compared with either IM or EM, PMs had significantly worse time to recurrence and disease free survival in both the univariate (HR 2.5, p=0.02; and 2.2, p=0.01) and multivariate (HR 2.7, p=0.01; and HR 2.2 p=.02) analyses utilizing tumor size, nodal status, and tumor grade. Conclusion: Our data indicate that CYP2D6 status can be used to identify pts who should receive tam therapy and tam treated pts should not be co-administered potent CYP2D6 inhibitors. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

576 Background: In node-negative, ER + breast cancer, gene expression profiling can identify level of risk and, in the case of ODX, may also identify pts with a higher chance of benefiting from adjuvant chemotherapy. Because the gene profile in ODX includes an assessment of ER, HER2, and proliferation, we hypothesized that clinicians using standardized criteria could discriminate risk (high versus low/intermediate) as specified by ODX. Methods: We identified Mayo Clinic patients with node-negative, ER + breast cancer, for whom ODX scores were available. Tumor slides were reviewed by an expert breast pathologist to confirm tumor size, histology, and tumor grade. Both ER and PR were quantitated; HER-2 was determined by IHC (FISH, if 2+). These clinical cases were presented to six academic oncologists, blinded to the ODX score, to predict ODX risk (low, intermediate, or high) and give their recommendation for chemotherapy (CTX) (yes/no). Afterwards, they were presented with the same cases with the actual ODX score, to give recommendations regarding CTX. Results: ODX scores in tumors from 31 patients were low in 18 pts, intermediate in 10 pts, and high in 3 pts. Concordance between predicted and actual ODX scores being low/intermediate vs high exceeded 87% for each oncologist. The most frequent discrepancies were actual low scores predicted as intermediate (31/80 discordant) and actual intermediate scores predicted as low (29/80 discordant). Overall agreement of predicted scores (high vs low/intermediate) among the oncologists was substantial (kappa=0.75, p<0.0001). CTX recommendations following provision of the ODX scores changed on average 18.2% (range 12.9%-25.8%) of the time, with slightly fewer changing for, versus against, a CTX recommendation. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the proper evaluation and interpretation of traditional prognostic criteria will identify most node negative, ER + patients at high risk of recurrence (as predicted by ODX) but poorly discriminate low versus intermediate risk. The provision of ODX data changed the recommendation for CTX in approximately 20% of cases. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract Purpose: To determine if the degree of estrogen suppression with aromatase inhibitors (AI: anastrozole, exemestane, letrozole) is associated with efficacy in early-stage breast cancer, and to examine for differences in the mechanism of action between the three AIs. Experimental Design: Matched case–control studies [247 matched sets from MA.27 (anastrozole vs. exemestane) and PreFace (letrozole) trials] were undertaken to assess whether estrone (E1) or estradiol (E2) concentrations after 6 months of adjuvant therapy were associated with risk of an early breast cancer event (EBCE). Preclinical laboratory studies included luciferase activity, cell proliferation, radio-labeled ligand estrogen receptor binding, surface plasmon resonance ligand receptor binding, and nuclear magnetic resonance assays. Results: Women with E1 ≥1.3 pg/mL and E2 ≥0.5 pg/mL after 6 months of AI treatment had a 2.2-fold increase in risk (P = 0.0005) of an EBCE, and in the anastrozole subgroup, the increase in risk of an EBCE was 3.0-fold (P = 0.001). Preclinical laboratory studies examined mechanisms of action in addition to aromatase inhibition and showed that only anastrozole could directly bind to estrogen receptor α (ERα), activate estrogen response element-dependent transcription, and stimulate growth of an aromatase-deficient CYP19A1−/− T47D breast cancer cell line. Conclusions: This matched case–control clinical study revealed that levels of estrone and estradiol above identified thresholds after 6 months of adjuvant anastrozole treatment were associated with increased risk of an EBCE. Preclinical laboratory studies revealed that anastrozole, but not exemestane or letrozole, is a ligand for ERα. These findings represent potential steps towards individualized anastrozole therapy.

Abstract A micro version of a nuclear binding assay to assess the biological activity of receptors for steroid hormones was developed for application to small (needle) biopsies of human tumors for the purpose of predicting responses to steroid therapy. This easier assay requires 10-fold less tissue than the original nuclear binding assay described for progesterone receptors in the avian oviduct, endometrium, and endometrial carcinomas (Spelsberg TC, et al., Endocrinology 1987;121:631). We describe the application of this micro assay to normal avian oviduct and cancers of the human breast, and we demonstrate a tissue specificity and saturation of nuclear binding. The micro assay reliably measured as little as 0.5 mg equivalents of tissue per assay tube. Results for breast tumors determined to be estrogen-receptor-positive by the standard dextran-coated charcoal method were also determined with this nuclear binding assay. As described previously for progesterone receptors in endometrial carcinomas, some receptor-positive breast biopsies displayed negligible capacity for nuclear binding. Therefore, with the present assay we have identified nonfunctional receptors in these biopsies, which may be useful for accurate prediction of patients' responses to therapy with hormones.

Abstract Background Adjuvant bisphosphonates, when given in a low-estrogen environment, can decrease breast cancer recurrence and death. Treatment guidelines include recommendations for adjuvant bisphosphonates in postmenopausal patients. SWOG/Alliance/Canadian Cancer Trials Group/ECOG-ACRIN/NRG Oncology study S0307 compared the efficacy of three bisphosphonates in early-stage breast cancer. Methods Patients with stage I–III breast cancer were randomly assigned to 3 years of intravenous zoledronic acid, oral clodronate, or oral ibandronate. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) with overall survival as a secondary outcome. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results A total of 6097 patients enrolled. Median age was 52.7 years. Prior to being randomly assigned, 73.2% patients indicated preference for oral vs intravenous formulation. DFS did not differ across arms in a log-rank test (P = .49); 5-year DFS was 88.3% (zoledronic acid: 95% confidence interval [CI] = 86.9% to 89.6%), 87.6% (clodronate: 95% CI = 86.1% to 88.9%), and 87.4% (ibandronate: 95% CI = 85.6% to 88.9%). Additionally, 5-year overall survival did not differ between arms (log rank P = .50) and was 92.6% (zoledronic acid: 95% CI = 91.4% to 93.6%), 92.4% (clodronate: 95% CI = 91.2% to 93.5%), and 92.9% (ibandronate: 95% CI = 91.5% to 94.1%). Bone as first site of recurrence did not differ between arms (P = .93). Analyses based on age and tumor subtypes showed no treatment differences. Grade 3/4 toxicity was 8.8% (zoledronic acid), 8.3% (clodronate), and 10.5% (ibandronate). Osteonecrosis of the jaw was highest for zoledronic acid (1.26%) compared with clodronate (0.36%) and ibandronate (0.77%). Conclusions We found no evidence of differences in efficacy by type of bisphosphonate, either in overall analysis or subgroups. Despite an increased rate of osteonecrosis of the jaw with zoledronic acid, overall toxicity grade differed little across arms. Given that patients expressed preference for oral formulation, efforts to make oral agents available in the United States should be considered.