Whiteside, Stephen P. H.

ABSTRACT Objectives Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is the most researched treatment for childhood anxiety disorders (CADs). Improving outcomes and efficiency of CBT will require identifying and optimizing the most efficacious therapeutic components. Towards this end, a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) found that Parent Coached Exposure Therapy (PCET) led to greater symptom improvement in less time than traditional CBT. To better understand and maximize these advantages, the current study explores the timing and course of symptom improvement in these two treatments for CADs, CBT, and PCET. Methods In this secondary analysis of data from the RCT, 56 youth aged 7−17 years (73.2% female) and a parent provided weekly ratings of anxiety symptom severity. Results The mean anxiety severity ratings decreased significantly in both conditions, but a significant condition by time interaction suggested that the pace of change differed between treatment for parent report, F (6.2, 335) = 2.96, p = 0.007. A series of post‐hoc comparisons indicated that the ratings became significantly lower in the PCET group beginning in session 3 (effect size = 0.77) through post‐treatment assessment. In addition, within each treatment condition the largest change in severity ratings occurred after the introduction of exposure, effect sizes of 0.68 for PCET and 0.56 for CBT. The child severity ratings followed a similar pattern but did not reach statistical significance. Discussion The implications of these exploratory and hypothesis‐generating findings for designing treatment protocols to deliver exposure in a manner to maximize the amount, and pace, of improvement are discussed.

Childhood mental health problems are a leading cause of disability and frequently go untreated. Barriers to children receiving the most effective care available include shortfalls in three areas: identification, referral to specialists, and delivery of evidence-based treatment (EBT). The current paper details an effort to develop a digital health intervention, the Mental Health Advisor (MHA), to increase the number of children with mental health problems who receive optimal care through identification, specialty referral, and fidelity to EBT. We present this pilot as a case example to help guide other efforts to improve mental health care through technology.

AbstractObjectiveThe goal of the current study is to advance efforts to increase the quality of care for childhood anxiety disorder (CADs) through (1) detailing the content of community‐based treatment sessions, (2) exploring the validity of therapist surveys, (3) examining the influence of setting differences, and (4) testing the effects of a technology‐based training on use of nonexposure strategies.MethodsThirteen therapists were randomly assigned to technology‐based training in the use of exposure therapy or treatment as usual (TAU) for CADs. Therapeutic techniques were coded from 125 community‐based treatment sessions.ResultsConsistent with survey responses community therapists spent the majority of session time reviewing symptoms (34% of session time), implementing nonexposure cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT; 36%), and rarely engaged in exposure (3%). An integrated behavioral health setting was associated with greater endorsement of exposure on survey, p < 0.05, although this difference was not significant in session recordings, p = 0.14. Multilevel models indicated that technology‐based training that has been shown to increase exposure, also decreased use of nonexposure CBT techniques (2% vs. 29%, p < 0.001).ConclusionThe study supports the validity of survey‐based findings that community‐based care for CADs consists of non‐exposure CBT techniques. Efforts should be invested in dissemination of within‐session exposure.

ABSTRACT: Background: When adolescents present with symptoms of unexplained weight loss, underweight, or poor appetite, eating disorders (EDs) are commonly on the list of differential diagnoses. However, the relationship of these symptoms to other psychiatric disorders is often less clear. Methods: Using the Rochester Epidemiology Project database, a retrospective cohort study of adolescents (13–18 years) with billing diagnoses of weight loss, underweight, or loss of appetite was conducted between January 2005 and December 2017. Patients who presented with conditions commonly associated with weight loss, underweight, or poor appetite (e.g., cancer) were excluded. This study sought to examine the proportion of patients who received ED and psychiatric diagnoses within 5 years of the index visit and patient characteristics associated with these diagnoses. Results: Of 884 patients diagnosed with symptoms of unexplained weight loss, underweight, or poor appetite, 662 patients (M age = 15.8; SD = 1.6; 66.0% female) met study criteria. Within 5 years of the index visit, the lifetime prevalence of all psychiatric disorders was 70% (n = 461) and of EDs was 21% (n = 141). For both psychiatric disorders and EDs, sex and race were significantly associated with receiving a diagnosis within 5 years. Decrease in body mass index (BMI) percentile was associated with receiving an ED diagnosis, whereas the highest historical BMI percentile was associated with receiving a psychiatric diagnosis. Conclusion: Patients presenting with symptoms of unexplained weight loss, underweight, or poor appetite are at risk not only for EDs but also for other psychiatric disorders that may require further assessment and follow-up.

Abstract Although community therapists rarely use exposure when treating youth with anxiety disorders, they are more likely to endorse the use of imaginal exposure, relative to in vivo or interoceptive exposure. Such use of imaginal exposure could reflect a sub-optimal replacement for in vivo exposure or a targeted intervention to address anxiety-provoking thoughts, such as in generalized anxiety disorder. The current study used the survey responses of 178 community-based clinicians to examine these competing hypotheses. The results indicated that therapist endorsement of more clearly defined imaginal exposure was significantly lower than other techniques such as cognitive restructuring or that imaginal exposure was other used instead of more intensive forms of exposures. In addition, most of the endorsed interventions were targeted at helping youth cope with anxiety rather than corrective learning. Alternatively, there was no observed association between imaginal exposure and treatment of general anxiety. These finding suggest that community therapist use of imaginal exposure is suboptimal and unlikely to improve treatment outcomes.