Fleming, Gini F.

5020 Background: V+C was well tolerated in a phase I trial and responses and prolonged disease stabilization were observed in BRCA + patients (pts).To assess the relative contribution of the PARP inhibitor to the efficacy observed for the combination, we conducted a randomized multicenter trial comparing the response rate (RR) of V and C to the RR of C alone in patients with deleterious BRCA mutations and recurrent ovarian, or primary peritoneal, fallopian tube or high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Methods: Pts were ≥ 18 yrs, KPS ≥ 70%, had adequate organ function, prior therapy with PARP inhibitors was allowed.Both drugs were administered orally qd; C 50 mg, V 60 mg; 21 day cycles. Pts were randomized to receive either C alone or V+C. At disease progression, pts on C alone were allowed to cross over to the combination. Radiologic imaging was performed at baseline and q 3 cycles for assessment of response. Dose reduction of V was allowed to 40 mg for gr 3 non-hematologic or gr 4 hematologic toxicities. The study design had an 88% power to detect the difference between a 15% RR for C alone versus 35% for V+C, early closure if fewer responses were observed on the combination arm in the first 65 pts enrolled (half of the total projected accrual). Results: Total of 74 pts were enrolled (36 pts C, 38 pts V+C), median age 58 (37-79 yrs), # of prior therapies: median 4 (1-9), 2 pts had prior PARP therapy. Treatment was well tolerated, Gr ≥ 2 toxicities per arm for initial regimen (# of pts): C alone: lymphopenia (2), mucositis (1); V+C: lymphopenia (4), anemia (2), leucopenia (2), neutropenia (2). Of the 74 pts evaluable for response at the interim analysis, 3 PRs observed in 36 pts on V+C and 5 PRs of 38 pts on C alone arm; thus accrual was stopped. PAR levels assessed by validated ELISA were inhibited (>80%) in PBMCs in 9/10 pts 4 hours post V, no inhibition with C alone. Conclusions: Addition of V, a PARP inhibitor, to C did not improve RR versus C alone. Exomic sequencing, gene expression studies, and Fanconi Anemia triple stain immunofluorescence (FATSI) assay for FancD2 nuclear foci formation using archival tissue are ongoing.

534 Background: mTOR plays a critical role in promoting tumor cell growth. In preclinical studies, the anti-tumor activity of mTOR inhibitors is attenuated by feedback up-regulation of AKT mediated by IGF-1R. We designed a phase I trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and pharmacodynamic effects of the IGF-1R antibody IMC-A12 in combination with temsirolimus (tem) in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) where mTOR is frequently activated. Methods: A 3+3 phase I design was chosen. Tem and IMC-A12 were administered IV days (d) 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 4-week cycle in pts with MBC refractory to standard therapies. Tumor response was evaluated by RECIST. Adverse events (AE) were reported using CTC v3.0. Serum IGF 1 and C-peptide levels on d2 (24h post infusion) and d8 prior to drug infusion were compared to baseline (BL) using paired t-test. Results: Of 26 pts enrolled, 4 did not complete cycle 1 due to progression (3) or co-morbid condition (1). MTD was determined from remaining 22 pts aged 34-72 (median 48) years with ECOG PS 0 (55%) or 1 (45%). 86% had ER+ cancer. Median number of regimens for MBC was 4. Two DLTs at the starting DL (DL 1) necessitated dose de-escalation of tem to 20mg (DL-1), then to 15 mg (DL-2) which was tolerable (Table). Subsequent dose escalation of IMC-A12 led to DLTs in 0 of 6 in DL-2A and 2 of 3 pts in DL-2B. The MTD was defined as DL-2A. Other AEs included gr 1/2 fatigue, neutropenia, anemia, and hyperglycemia. No CR or PR, but 4 SD lasting ≥ 4 months were observed. At DL-2, -2A and -2B, serum IGF 1 levels were significantly elevated on d2 (p <0.002) and d8 compared to BL (p <0.001), but C-peptide levels were not found to differ from BL. Conclusions: The MTD for the combination of IMC-A12 and tem in pts with MBC is lower than that observed for single agents alone. A phase II study is ongoing in MBC. The study is supported in part by ASCO CDA, Komen Craft to CXM, N01-CM62205 and N01-CM-2011-00071. [Table: see text]

5517 Background: Anti-angiogenic therapy is active in OC; the combination of VEGF and mTOR inhibitors is hypothesized to further improve activity. This report is the OC cohort of a multi-histology phase II study assessing the activity and toxicity of B/T. Methods: Patients (Pts) with recurrent epithelial OC who had received ≤ 2 chemotherapy regimens and no prior treatment with a VEGF or mTOR inhibitor were eligible. A two-stage design was used with second stage accrual if >6 pts had objective responses (OR) or >10 pts of the first 25 remained progression-free (PF) at six months (mo). Pre-defined end-points for a recommendation for further clinical trial evaluation included at least 15/50 with OR or 26/50 PF at six mo. Treatment included T 25 mg IV wkly and B 10 mg/kg IV q14 days on 28 day cycles. Results: 58 pts were enrolled (the first 50 pts are used to determine a final recommendation). Median age=62 (range 35-82). A median of 4 (range 1-23) cycles were administered. 24 were platinum-sensitive, 34 resistant. Off-study reasons included 13 adverse events and disease progression in 38. 3 refused further therapy due to toxicity. 14 of the first 50 pts had partial response (PR) (9 platinum-resistant); 25/50 remained PF (8 PR, 15 SD, 2 non-progressing) at 6 mo. Grade (gr) 3/4 toxicities occurring >2 events include: fatigue (4), stomatitis (7), hypertension (5), neutropenia (4), thrombocytopenia (4), hypokalemia (3). One rectal and one vaginal fistula, and two colonic perforations (one gr 2 and one gr 3 during cycles 3 and 1 respectively) were observed. Episodes of gr 1/2 oral, nasal, pulmonary, vaginal and gastrointestinal hemorrhage were also observed. Conclusions: Although the OR and PFS did not reach pre-defined standards, the numbers of OR and 6 mo PFS suggest potential enhanced activity with a combination of mTOR inhibitor with anti-angiogenic therapy. Other combinations of these targeted agents may result in more satisfactory activity with less toxicity. N01-CM-62203 (PMH) N01-CM-62208 (Southeast Phase 2) N01 CM-62209 (CCCP) N01-CM-62204 (NYCC) N01-CM-2011-0071C (Chicago) N01-CM62205 (Mayo) Clinical trial information: NCT01010126.

5012 Background: VEGF receptor-mediated-signaling contributes to ovarian cancer pathogenesis. Elevated VEGF expression and serum levels are associated with poor clinical outcomes. We investigated RAM, a fully human VEGFR-2 antagonist antibody, in patients (pts) with persistent or recurrent EOC/FTC/PPC. Methods: Adult women with EOC/FTC/PPC who had completed ≥1 platinum (P)-based chemotherapeutic (ct) regimen and had a P-free interval (PFI) of <12 months (m), progression on, or persistent disease after P-based therapy were eligible. Any number of prior ct regimens was allowed. ECOG PS 0-1 and adequate organ function were required. Pts received 8 mg/kg RAM IV every 2 weeks. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival at 6m (PFS-6) and confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.0. Results: 60 pts were treated; 1 remains on study as of Dec 2011. Median age was 62 years (range 27-80). Median number of prior regimens was 3 (range 1– 14). 51 pts (85%) received ≥ 2 prior regimens; 25 pts (42%) received >3 prior regimens. 45 pts (75%) were P resistant or refractory, with 65% (39 pts) serous tumors. PFS-6: 34.2% (95% CI: 21.7% – 47%). Best overall response: 3 PR (5%), 34 SD (57%), 20 PD (33%) and 3 not evaluable (5%). Median duration of PR: 5.6m (3.7, 5.6, 17.5); median PFS: 3.5m (95% CI: 2.3 – 5.3). Median OS: 11.1m (95% CI: 8.3 – 17.0). No unexpected toxicities were observed. Grade (G) 3 adverse events (AEs) observed in >5% of pts were: headache (10%) and fatigue (8%). No G4 AEs were observed in >5% of pts. 5 deaths occurred on RAM or within 30 days of discontinuation; 4 due to PD, and 1 due to intestinal perforation. 1 G4 bowel perforation and one G4 colo-vaginal fistula were noted. All 3 cases of perforation/fistula occurred in the setting of progressive, large-volume disease. Correlative biomarker studies are ongoing to identify patients most likely to benefit. Conclusions: Ramucirumab was reasonably tolerated and demonstrated single-agent activity in persistent or recurrent ovarian carcinoma, with approximately one-third of patients progression free at 6 months.

e17039 Background: Treatment strategies are needed for platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is associated with poor prognosis in ovarian cancer. GR signaling inhibits chemotherapy-induced cell death via transcriptional regulation of anti-apoptotic proteins. Non-selective (mifepristone) and selective GR antagonists (Relacorilant, Corcept Therapeutics) are under clinical development (eg. NCT02046421, NCT03776812). We hypothesized that GR antagonism would improve chemotherapy sensitivity in ovarian cancer patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Methods: Five PDX models were selected based on GR expression above median RNA seq levels. Tissues were transplanted into 300 female SCID-Bg mice at the Mayo Clinic. Once tumor diameter reached 0.2 cm, mice were randomized into treatment arms (2-25 mice per arm) and treated intraperitoneal (i.p): control (9% saline, CTL) on day 0 (D0), 1, 7, 8, 14, 15, 21, 22; mifepristone (MIF), 15 mg/kg D0, 1, 7, 8, 14, 15, 21, 22; relacorilant (134), 20 mg/kg D0, 1, 7, 8, 14, 15, 21, 22; carboplatin (CBDCA) at the MTD, 51 mg/kg D1, 8, 15, 22; CBDCA + MIF; CBDCA + 134. Tumor area was measured by ultrasound weekly (D0-D28), and the ratio calculated relative to D0. Tumor growth curves were compared between arms for each PDX via a linear mixed effects regression test of coincident curves. Time to progression was also evaluated and will be presented. Results: In 1/5 models (PH160), CBDCA + MIF significantly suppressed tumor growth compared to CBDCA alone (p < 0.05, Table 1). Addition of 134 to CBDCA did not suppress tumor growth compared to CBDCA alone in any model. In the 2 models with no difference of CBDCA versus CTL (PH160, PH454), addition of a GR antagonist to CBDCA suppressed tumor growth versus CTL. Conclusions: Addition of GR antagonists can improve response to chemotherapy. Work is ongoing to identify the GR transcriptional network, tumor, and host characteristics which predict responses to GR antagonists. [Table: see text]

e17038 Background: Carcinosarcomas (CS) are aggressive gynecologic malignancies defined by a biphasic tumor histology of carcinomatous and sarcomatous components. High expression of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is associated with aggressive tumor biology in triple-negative breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancers. GR activation results in transcriptional regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) genes. Therefore, we hypothesized that the sarcomatous component of Müllerian CS may be associated with relatively higher GR expression compared to the carcinomatous portion. Methods: Müllerian CSs from the University of Chicago tissue bank diagnosed from 5/19/2009 – 8/25/2014 were identified and pathology confirmed (RL). In addition, we evaluated GR expression in a mouse PDX CS model. Immunohistochemical expression of nuclear estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), androgen (AR), and GR was quantified using the H-score. Scores between the sarcomatous and carcinomatous components were compared using a paired t-test. Results: Mean GR H-score was relatively higher in the sarcomatous vs carcinomatous component, overall (144.44 vs 38.89, P = 0.0014). Mean H-score also differed between sarcomatous and carcinomatous components for ER (3.06 vs 63.06, P = 0.016), PR (1.67 vs 47.22, P = 0.004), and AR (0 vs 2.78, P = 0.056). The significantly higher sarcomatous GR expression was replicated in IHC evaluation of the mouse PDX model. Conclusions: GR expression is significantly higher in the sarcomatous than the carcinomatous component of Müllerian CS, while ER, PR, and AR expression is significantly lower. Recent data suggest that an EMT gene signature is more prominently expressed in the sarcomatous versus carcinomatous component. We hypothesize that GR expression and activity may mediate EMT gene expression and represent a therapeutic target for CS. [Table: see text]

5518 Background: Platinum resistant ovarian cancer (OC) remains a therapeutic challenge. High grade serous OC (HGSOC) harbors TP53 mutations leading to increased dependency on S- and G2-phase checkpoints. Wee1 inhibition with Adavosertib (AZD 1775) (A) induces G2 checkpoint escape. Gemcitabine (G) is an antimetabolite therapy and blocks the progression of cells through the G1/S phase. We hypothesized that combining G+A would be synergistic and overcome resistance. Methods: We conducted a multicentre double-blind 2:1 randomized phase 2 trial to assess the progression free survival (PFS) in women with recurrent platinum-resistant/refractory HGSOC receiving G+A or G+placebo (P) (NCT02151292). Eligibility required measurable disease and feasibility of paired tumor biopsies; no limitation in prior lines of therapy. Non HGSOC histologic subtypes were enrolled in a separate non-randomized exploratory cohort. A/P was given orally at 175mg QD on D1-2, D8-9 and D15-16 with G 1000mg/m² IV D1, D8 and D15 in a 28-day cycle until progression or unacceptable AE. Tumor staging was scheduled every 8 weeks. TP53 mutations were analyzed on archival tissue with Sanger sequencing, TAm-Seq and IHC. TP53 mutation will be also assessed in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Whole exome and RNA sequencing were performed on paired tumor tissues. Results: 124 patients (pts) with median of 3 prior lines of therapy (range 1-10) from 12 centres across Canada and US were enrolled between Sep 2014 to May 2018, with 99 pts randomized (65 in Arm G+A and 34 in G+P). 5 pts were ineligible; 64 pts have died. The median follow-up was 14.3 months. Main related AE was hematologic toxicity (Anemia G≥3: 31% in G+A vs 18% in G+P; Thrombocytopenia G≥3: 31% vs 6%; Neutropenia G≥3: 62% vs 30%). PFS was significantly improved from 3.0 to 4.6 months (HR 0.56 (95%CI: 0.35-0.90, p=0.015 Log rank). There was a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) from 7.2 to 11.5 months (HR 0.56 (95%CI: 0.34-0.92, P=0.022). Partial response by RECIST 1.1 was observed in 13 (21%) and 1 (3%) pts for Arms G+A and G+P, respectively (p=0.02). From the 25 pts in the exploratory cohort, 3 (12%) partial responses were observed. Final results will be reported at the meeting. Conclusion: Addition of adavosertib to gemcitabine in women with platinum resistant/refractory OC improved response rate, PFS and OS with manageable toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT02151292.