Gandhi, Manish J.

Background. At 5 and 10 y after kidney transplantation, chronic histologic changes such as arteriolar hyalinosis and mesangial expansion are common; however, determining cause is difficult. We compared surveillance biopsies in living donor kidney transplants (LDKTx) from HLA-matched siblings (termed HLA-identical [HLA-ID]) with HLA non-ID to investigate which histologic changes were likely due to alloimmune injury and which were due to nonalloimmune injury. Methods. We performed a retrospective, cohort study comparing HLA-ID sibling LDKTx (n = 175) with HLA non-ID LDKTx (n = 175; matched for age, sex, and year of transplant ±2 y) performed at a single institution from March 1999 to November 2018. Results. Baseline characteristics and maintenance immunosuppression were similar. Mortality rates were similar, but in the HLA-ID group, 10-y death-censored graft survival was higher (93.8% versus 80.9% HLA non-ID LDKTx; P < 0.001), rejection rates were lower (after 1 y 9.6% versus 27.1%; P < 0.001), and Banff inflammation scores including glomerulitis and peritubular capillaritis were lower on surveillance biopsies at 1, 5, and 10 y. In contrast, chronic Banff scores (interstitial fibrosis, arteriolar hyalinosis, mesangial expansion, etc) were similar in prevalence and severity on surveillance biopsies at 1, 5, and 10 y. Conclusions. HLA-ID LDKTx have less inflammation and less transplant glomerulopathy, but most chronic histologic changes were similar to less well-matched LDKTx. We conclude that these types of chronic changes are not associated with HLA mismatches and may be due to nonimmunologic causes (hypertension, obesity, etc), suggesting that new management approaches to prevent these lesions may be needed.

Context.— As pharmacogenetic testing is incorporated into routine care, it is essential for laboratories to provide accurate and consistent results. Certified laboratories must successfully complete proficiency testing. Objectives.— To understand and examine trends in participation and performance of laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists pharmacogenetic proficiency testing surveys. Design.— Results from College of American Pathologists pharmacogenetic proficiency testing challenges from 2012 through 2017 were reviewed for concordance with expected genotype and phenotype for each sample (intended responses). Results.— Laboratories correctly reported results for 96.7% to 100% of samples with no variants. Excluding CYP2D6, laboratories correctly detected and reported variant alleles for each gene (93.7%–99.2% correct). CYP2D6 showed lower concordance, with 83.1% of laboratories reporting the intended genotype across all samples; however, in many cases, the laboratories that did not report a variant allele did not test for that allele. Among laboratories reporting the intended genotype, most successfully reported the intended phenotype (85.9%–99.0%). Conclusions.— Although laboratories are generally performing well, there is room for additional improvement, particularly for challenging genes, such as CYP2D6. Efforts in the field of pharmacogenomics to recommend alleles that should be included in clinical tests, identify reference materials, and standardize translation from genotype to phenotype may address some of the remaining variability in results.

AbstractBackground and objectivesThe risk of de novo donor‐specific antibody (dnDSA) development following BK viremia (BKV) or nephropathy (BKN) after kidney transplant remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the relationships among dnDSA, BKV (BK blood PCR > 15 000 copies), BKN, antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR), and allograft loss.Patients and methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of 904 solitary kidney transplant recipients transplanted between 10/2007 and 5/2014. Cox proportional hazards regression with time‐dependent covariates were used to assess the relationships among BKN, isolated BKV, dnDSA, and the subsequent risk of AMR and allograft loss.ResultsIn multivariate analysis, we observed that BKN, but not BKV was a risk factor for dnDSA (HR, 3.18, P = .008). Of the patients with BK nephropathy, 14.0% (6/43) developed dnDSA, which occurred within 14 months of BK diagnosis. DnDSA in this setting remains a risk factor for subsequent AMR (HR 4.75, P = .0001) and allograft loss (HR 2.63, P = .018).ConclusionsBKN is an independent risk factor for development of dnDSA. Improved understanding of the characteristics of patients with BKN who are at highest risk for development of dnDSA would be valuable to customize immunosuppression reduction in this population.

BACKGROUNDWe compared three instruments for double red blood cell (DRBC) collection to efficiently optimize our RBC inventory.STUDY DESIGN AND METHODSInstruments compared were the TerumoBCT Trima Accel (Trima), the Fenwal Alyx (Alyx), and the Haemonetics MCS+ 8150 (MCS+). Forty consecutive collections (80 products) per instrument were evaluated for hemoglobin (Hb) content, leukoreduction, collection time, instrument efficiency, donor acceptance, and reactions. The total number of whole blood donors who could be eligible for DRBC collection was analyzed. All collections were as per the manufacturer recommendations with target volume of 360 or 400mL. Leukoreduction was integral to the collection procedure for the Alyx and Trima, while it was a separate process for the MCS+.RESULTSThe total numbers of whole blood donors who could be eligible for DRBC collection were 10,116 for the MCS+, 9378 for the Alyx, and 8573 for the Trima. All units collected had more than 42.5 g of Hb. Mean Hb levels were as follows: Trima, 59.2 g; Alyx, 56.8 g; and MCS+, 51.5 g. Donor times for the Trima, Alyx, and MCS+ were 52, 45, and 52 minutes, respectively. Technician times for the Trima, Alyx, and MCS+ (without filtration) were 87, 73, and 64 minutes. All collected products had fewer than 5 × 106 white blood cells.CONCLUSIONSAll three instruments would be capable of collecting an acceptable leukoreduced DRBC product. The Alyx was most portable, with the shortest donor time and total technician time (considering filtration time) and highest collection efficiency and would collect from more donors than the Trima. We thus chose the Alyx as it best fits the specific needs of our center.