Mathur, Amit K.

Objective: To develop and validate a risk score for predicting post-transplant recurrence in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) patients. Background: pCCA is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. Although neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) followed by liver transplantation (LT) offers a potential cure for patients with unresectable, early-stage de novo or primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)-associated pCCA, post-transplant recurrence negatively impacts survival. Currently, no risk stratification tools exist. Methods: This retrospective study included consecutive patients with unresectable de novo or PSC-associated pCCA who underwent neoadjuvant CRT followed by LT at Mayo Clinic (1993–2024). Predictors of post-transplant recurrence were identified using multivariable Cox regression with LASSO variable selection. The Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence after Transplant (PRETREAT) risk score was created by assigning points from model coefficients. Score performance was evaluated by discrimination (c-statistic), internally validated with 10-fold cross-validation, and externally validated in a separate cohort. Survival outcomes were compared across 3 PRETREAT risk groups and between 2 time periods. Results: This study included 399 patients (development: 301; validation: 98). The 5-year cumulative incidence of post-transplant recurrence was 29.7% in the development cohort and 27.6% in the validation cohort. Multivariable analysis identified 4 independent predictors: macroscopic residual tumor on explant [hazard ratio (HR): 12.4], vascular encasement (HR: 2.18), lymphovascular invasion (HR: 2.04), and radial tumor diameter (HR: 1.02/mm). The PRETREAT score (0–22), based on these factors, demonstrated excellent performance in both internal and external validation (C-index 0.83 and 0.85, respectively). Patients were stratified into low-risk (0–7), moderate-risk (8–15), and high-risk (16–22) groups. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates significantly differed across low-risk, moderate-risk, and high-risk groups (89.0%, 38.3%, and 15.4%, respectively; P<0.001). Over the last decade, overall survival improved significantly only in moderate-risk patients (70.4% vs 46.9%, P=0.024), without significant improvement in recurrence-free survival. Conclusions: The PRETREAT score provides a valuable tool for guiding post-transplant management of pCCA, enabling risk-stratified surveillance, and laying the foundation for future clinical trials.

ABSTRACT Introduction Donation after circulatory death (DCD) allografts are underutilized in liver transplantation (LT) due to increased risk of complications. These risks stem from ischemic injury sustained during the total donor warm ischemia time (tDWIT), historically limited to 30 min. Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) can mitigate these risks and facilitate LT of DCD grafts with extended tDWIT. We aimed to compare outcomes of DCD allografts with extended tDWIT preserved on NMP versus static cold storage (SCS). Methods This single‐center study included adult DCD LT with tDWIT ≥ 30 from 2019 to 2023. Outcomes of NMP and SCS were compared including EAD, IC, graft survival, and patient survival. Results Among 68 DCD LT with tDWIT ≥ 30, 64.7% ( n = 44) were preserved with NMP and 35.3% ( n = 24) with SCS. No differences in donor or recipient demographics were observed. The median tDWIT was 33 min for NMP and 30.5 min for SCS ( p < 0.01). Despite longer tDWIT, the NMP group had lower rates of EAD (4.5% vs. 66.7%, p < 0.01) and IC (2.3% vs. 29.2%, p < 0.01). One‐year graft survival was higher in NMP ( p < 0.01), and 1‐year patient survival was comparable between groups ( p = 0.18). Conclusion NMP challenges traditional tDWIT constraints and can increase the pool of viable DCD allografts for transplantation.

Importance Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) has been shown to reduce peritransplant complications. Despite increasing NMP use in liver transplant (LT), there is a scarcity of real-world clinical experience data. Objective To compare LT outcomes between donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) allografts preserved with NMP or static cold storage (SCS). Design, Setting, and Participants This single-center, retrospective observational cohort study included all consecutive adult LTs performed between January 2019 and December 2023 at the Mayo Clinic in Arizona. Data analysis was performed between February 2024 and June 2024. Outcomes of DBD-SCS, DBD-NMP, DCD-SCS, and DCD-NMP transplants were compared. Exposure DBD and DCD livers preserved on NMP or SCS. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were early allograft dysfunction (EAD), intraoperative transfusion, and post-LT hospital resource use, including length of stay (LOS) and readmissions. Secondary outcomes included acute kidney injury (AKI) and 1-year graft and patient survival. Results A total of 1086 LTs were included in the following 4 groups: DBD-SCS (n = 480), DBD-NMP (n = 63), DCD-SCS (n = 264), and DCD-NMP (n = 279). Among LT recipients, median (IQR) age was 60.0 years (52.0-66.0); 399 LT recipients (36.7%) were female. DCD-NMP had the lowest EAD rate (17.5%), followed by DCD-SCS (50.0%), DBD-NMP (36.8%), and DBD-SCS (27.3%) ( P &amp;lt; .001). DCD-NMP had the lowest intraoperative transfusion requirement compared to all other groups. Hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) LOS were shortest in DCD-NMP (median [IQR] hospital LOS, 5.0 days [4.0-7.0]; P = .01; median [IQR] ICU LOS, 1.5 days [1.2-3.1]; P = .01). One-year cumulative readmission probability was 86% lower for DCD-NMP vs DCD-SCS (95% CI, 0.09-0.22; P &amp;lt; .001) and 53% lower for DBD-NMP vs DBD-SCS (95% CI, 0.26-0.87; P &amp;lt; .001). AKI events were lower in DCD-NMP (31.1%) vs DCD-SCS (47.4%) ( P = .001). Compared to SCS, the NMP group had a 78% overall reduction in graft failure (hazard ratio [HR], 0.22; 95% CI, 0.10-0.49; P &amp;lt; .001). For those receiving DCD allografts, the risk reduction was even more pronounced, with an 87% decrease in graft failure (HR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.05-0.33; P &amp;lt; .001). NMP was significantly protective from patient mortality vs SCS (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.12-0.80; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance In this observational high-volume cohort study, NMP significantly improved LT clinical outcomes and reduced hospital resource use, especially in DCD allografts. NMP may enhance access to LT by addressing the challenges historically linked with DCD liver use.

BACKGROUND: During orthotopic liver transplantation, allograft reperfusion is a dynamic point in the operation and often requires vasoactive medications and blood transfusions. Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) of liver allografts has emerged to increase the number of transplantable organs and may have utility during donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation in reducing transfusion burden and vasoactive medication requirements. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study involving 226 DCD liver transplant recipients who received an allograft transported with NMP (DCD-NMP group) or with static cold storage (DCD-SCS group). Veno-venous bypass was not used in any patients. Infusion doses of norepinephrine, epinephrine, and vasopressin as well as bolus doses of vasoactive medications during reperfusion were recorded. Blood component therapy was recorded according to phase of liver transplantation and during the first 24 hours postprocedure. RESULTS: A total of 103 recipients in the DCD-NMP group and 123 patients in the DCD-SCS group were included. Post-reperfusion syndrome (PRS) incidence was reduced in the DCD-NMP group compared to the DCD-SCS group (10.7% [95% confidence interval, CI, 5.5%–18.3%] vs 42.3% [95% CI, 33.4%–51.5%]; P < .001). During the reperfusion period, patients in the DCD-SCS group required increased bolus doses of epinephrine and vasopressin compared to the DCD-NMP group (24.6 vs 7.5 µg; P < .001) and (5.4 vs 2.4 units; P < .001), respectively. The DCD-SCS group received a higher infusion dose of epinephrine during anhepatic phase, at reperfusion, and up to 90 minutes after reperfusion. In the postreperfusion period, there were significant increases in the transfusion of red blood cells (RBCs; 5.3 vs 3.7 units; P = .006), fresh frozen plasma (FFP; 3.4 vs 1.9 units; P < .001), cryoprecipitate (2.7 vs 1.8 pooled units; P = .015) and platelets (0.9 vs 0.4 units; P = .008) in the DCD-SCS group compared to the DCD-NMP group. During the first 24 hours postprocedure, transfusion of RBCs, FFP, and cryoprecipitate in the DCD-SCS group was increased compared to the DCD-NMP group ([2.6 vs 1.7 units; P = .028], [1.6 vs 0.8 units; P < .001], [1.5 vs 0.9 pooled units; P = .031]) respectively. Administration of tranexamic acid was more frequent in the DCD-SCS group during the post-reperfusion period compared to the DCD-NMP group (13% [95% CI, 5.7%–17.4%] vs 3.9% [95% CI, 1.1%–9.6% 95%]; P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: In DCD liver transplantation, use of NMP was associated with reduced incidence of PRS and decreased vasopressor and inotrope requirements at the time of allograft reperfusion compared to using SCS. Additionally, NMP was associated with reduced transfusion of all blood product components as well as antifibrinolytic agent administration in the post-reperfusion period. Reduced transfusion burden in the DCD-NMP group also occurred during the first 24 hours posttransplant.

Background. The availability of in situ normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) or ex situ normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) has revolutionized donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplant (LT). While some have suggested that NRP and NMP may represent competing technologies for DCD LT, there are many scenarios where these technologies can function in a complementary manner. Methods. Between January 2022 and March 2024, 83 DCD LTs were performed using NRP (62 NRP alone and 21 NRP + NMP) and were compared with 297 static cold storage (SCS) DCD LTs. NRP + NMP was used in scenarios with (1) long travel distances, (2) complicated transplant recipients, or (c) the need for additional liver graft recovery in “marginal” cases. Results. Ischemic cholangiopathy was lower in the NRP alone group (0%) and the NRP + NMP group (0%) compared with the SCS group (16.8; P < 0.001 and P = 0.04, respectively). In addition, early allograft dysfunction, number of packed red blood cells transfused, and acute kidney injury were lower in the NRP alone and NRP + NMP groups compared with the SCS group. Graft survival was higher in cases where NRP was used than in cases where SCS was used ( P = 0.016). In all the cases where lactate remained elevated at the end of NRP (mean 8.2 ± 2.0), it ultimately normalized at the end of NMP (0.92 ± 0.56). Conclusions. The present study demonstrates lower rates of ischemic cholangiopathy and improved graft survival with NRP alone or NRP + NMP compared with SCS when using liver grafts from DCD donors. It also demonstrates that excellent outcomes can be achieved with sequential NRP + NMP in cases with prolonged travel distances, complicated recipients, or when there is a need for additional liver recovery in “marginal” cases.

There is a paucity of data on the impact of cold ischemia time before the initiation of normothermic machine perfusion (NMP), particularly in more susceptible organs such as livers from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors. The present analysis aimed to investigate the impact of prolonged time from cross-clamp until NMP start on early allograft dysfunction and other peri–liver transplant (LT) outcomes. All DCD LT performed and placed on NMP at Mayo Clinic Arizona, Florida, and Rochester from January 2022 to March 2024 were included. The decision was made a priori to divide the population into 2 groups based on terciles: typical cross-clamp to on-pump time (lower 2 terciles) versus prolonged cross-clamp to on-pump time (upper tercile; >2 h 45.6 min). Three hundred eighty-four DCD LT undergoing NMP met the inclusion criteria. The rate of early allograft dysfunction was significantly higher in the prolonged cross-clamp to on-pump group (51.2%) compared to the typical cross-clamp to on-pump group (37.6%) (p = 0.01). The prolonged cross-clamp to on-pump group also had higher rates of acute kidney injury and the number of packed red blood cells transfused during LT. No significant difference in ischemic cholangiopathy (2.4% vs. 3.1%; p = 0.68) or graft survival at 12 months was seen between the prolonged cross-clamp to on-pump and typical cross-clamp to on-pump group, respectively. Following cross-clamp, DCD liver grafts should be placed on the NMP pump as quickly as is safely and logistically possible. In cases where delays are unavoidable, such as waiting for biopsy results or liver reallocation with another center, acceptable results can still be achieved, and therefore, livers with prolonged times should still be used.

ABSTRACTThis single‐center retrospective study investigated subclinical rejection prevalence and significance in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant (SPKT) recipients. We analyzed 352 SPKT recipients from July 2003 to April 2022. Our protocol included pancreas allograft surveillance biopsies at 1, 4, and 12months post‐transplant. After excluding 153 patients unable to undergo pancreas biopsy, our study cohort comprised 199 recipients. Among the 199 patients with protocol pancreas biopsies, 107 had multiple protocol pancreas biopsies in the first year, totaling 323. Subclinical rejection was identified in 132 episodes (41%). Of these, 72% were Grade 1, 20% were indeterminate, and 8% were Banff Grade 2 or higher. All episodes of subclinical rejection were treated. Rates of pancreas graft loss (10% vs. 7%) and clinical rejection (21% vs. 20%) at 3 years were similar between those with and without subclinical rejection. Subclinical rejection Banff Grade 2 or more was associated with poor pancreas graft survival HR of 5.5 (95% CI: 1.24–24.37, p = 0.025). Of 236 simultaneous protocol kidney and pancreas biopsies, 102 (43%) showed pancreas subclinical rejection, while only 17% had concurrent kidney subclinical rejection. Our findings suggest limited predictive value of pancreatic enzymes and euglycemia in detecting pancreas rejection. Furthermore, poor concordance existed between pancreas and kidney subclinical rejection.

Introduction: Living donation increases the organ supply, but associated non-medical expenses can disincentivize donation. Programs aimed at increasing living donation need to better understand how financial obstacles, including lost wages, impact the decision to pursue donation. Methods/Approach: Forty-eight interviews were conducted and analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Findings: Three key themes were identified that influenced decision-making: emotional attachment, temporal flexibility, and job security. These themes emerged when dividing interview participants into 3 groups: close relationship donors, broader network donors, and non-directed donors, representing donation to a family member or friend, a specific person they do not know well or at all, or a non-specified individual, respectively. Most close relationship donors wanted to donate regardless of personal financial cost, based on emotional attachment to the recipient. Wage reimbursement did not typically affect their decision-making but could reduce stress. Since non-directed donors did not donate to a specific individual, they could wait to achieve financial stability before donating, if needed. While wage reimbursement might create more proximate stability, non-directed donors had the flexibility to postpone donations until they could independently achieve financial stability. Lacking emotional attachment and temporal flexibility, broader network donors were particularly active decision-makers and most influenced by wage reimbursement. Across all groups, donors with job security were more resolute about donating. Conclusion: The findings underscore the importance of lost wage reimbursement to facilitate donation and reduce stress, and policies to protect donor job security.

Ex-situ machine perfusion of the liver has surmounted traditional limitations associated with static cold storage in the context of organ preservation. This innovative technology has changed the landscape of liver transplantation by mitigating ischemia perfusion injury, offering a platform for continuous assessment of organ quality, and providing an avenue for optimizing the use of traditionally marginal allografts. This review summarizes the contemporary clinical applications of machine perfusion devices and discusses potential future strategies for real-time viability assessment, therapeutic interventions, and modulation of organ function after recovery.