Pochettino, Alberto

Abstract Objectives This study examined the indications, frequency, and outcomes of cardiac surgery following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) at a single institution. As TAVR volumes increase, understanding the nature and outcomes of subsequent cardiac operations is critical, particularly as the procedure expands to younger, lower-risk populations. Methods We analysed outcomes of 61 patients who underwent cardiac surgery after TAVR at our institution from August 2011 to September 2023, excluding periprocedural complications and staged procedures. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: those requiring surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with or without concomitant procedures (n = 33) and those undergoing non-SAVR cardiac operations (n = 28). Data were collected from a prospectively maintained cardiovascular surgery database and electronic health records. Indications for surgery, operative characteristics, and outcomes were analysed, with survival assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Results The median interval between TAVR and cardiac surgery was 19 months. Indications for SAVR included infective endocarditis (36%), non-structural valve deterioration (36%), structural valve deterioration (12%), and valve thrombosis (6%). Non-SAVR operations primarily addressed mitral valve disease (43%) and coronary artery disease (29%). Operative mortality was 6.6%, with no deaths in the endocarditis subgroup. Postoperative complications included prolonged mechanical ventilation (18%), new-onset renal failure (7%), and stroke (2%). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were 83% at 1 year and 50% at 5 years. Conclusions Although complex, cardiac operations in patients who have undergone TAVR can be performed with acceptable mortality rates. Structural valve deterioration, paravalvular leak, and endocarditis were the primary indications for SAVR, while mitral valve and coronary artery disease predominated in non-SAVR cases. These findings highlight the importance of considering nonaortic valve pathologies in TAVR planning, particularly as the procedure expands to younger, lower-risk populations.

Abstract Objectives Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is rare in patients aged ≤30 years, and data on this population remain limited. This study aimed to characterize the underlying aetiology, and outcomes of invasively treated young patients with TBAD, with a focus on the impact of heritable thoracic aortic disease (HTAD). Methods A retrospective multicentre analysis was conducted across 19 international aortic centres, including 139 patients aged ≤30 years with TBAD. Patients with chronic TBAD (n = 42) were excluded for the final analysis. The cohort was classified as uncomplicated (n = 86) or complicated (n = 53) TBAD. Clinical, radiologic, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected using standardized forms. Outcomes were compared between subgroups defined by TBAD complexity, HTAD status, and surgical strategy. Kaplan-Meier and Andersen-Gill analyses were used for survival and recurrent aortic intervention, respectively. Results Mean follow-up time was 6.5 years. HTAD was identified in 57% of patients. Most presented with uncomplicated TBAD (62%), while high-risk uncomplicated cases were uncommon. Endovascular repair was predominant in complicated TBAD, while open repair was more frequent in uncomplicated cases. Early mortality was low (n = 3), and mid-term survival was excellent across all subgroups. HTAD was a significant predictor of recurrent aortic interventions (HR = 3.3, P = .004). No significant differences were observed in survival or reintervention rates between uncomplicated and complicated TBAD or between operative strategies. Conclusions In young patients, TBAD predominantly occurs in the context of HTAD. Both open and endovascular repair are associated with excellent early outcomes and mid-term survival. However, HTAD remains a significant predictor of recurrent aortic interventions.

Aortic dilation following single ventricle palliation is increasingly recognized, although its long-term clinical implications remain unclear. We present the case of a 38-year-old male born with a bicuspid aortic valve, d-transposition of the great arteries, ventricular septal defect, right ventricular hypoplasia with a straddling right atrioventricular valve. He was palliated with Fontan circulation and developed severe neo-aortic root and arch dilation with native aortic valve stenosis, requiring surgical intervention. His neo-aortic root measured 81 × 65 mm, necessitating a Bentall procedure with total arch and native aortic valve replacement. This case underscores the variable progression of aortic dilation in patients with palliated single ventricle physiology and the need for strict surveillance and individualized management. Larger cohort studies are needed to further refine the criteria for surgical intervention in this unique population.

Objective: To evaluate treatment trends and compare outcomes following fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR) of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA). Background: FB-EVAR has been increasingly utilized as a less invasive alternative to OSR for treatment of TAAAs. Methods: We studied patients who underwent elective FB-EVAR or OSR of TAAAs (2008-2020), since the initiation of an Advanced Endovascular Aortic Program. Primary endpoints were early major adverse events (MAE) and early and late all-cause mortality. Propensity score overlap weighting analysis was performed to adjust for measured confounders between groups. Results: There were 357 (70.8%) patients treated by FB-EVAR and 147 (29.2%) with OSR. The use of FB-EVAR increased from 16.7% in 2008 to >80% since 2017 ( P <0.001). Incidences of early MAEs were 25.8% and 49.0%, respectively; early mortality rates for FB-EVAR and OSR were 2.5% and 6.8%, respectively. In the weighted cohort, FB-EVAR patients had decreased early MAEs (weight-adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.41; P <0.001) and mortality (aOR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17-0.73; P =0.005) versus OSR patients. Five-year survival estimates were 52.2% (95% CI, 45.2-60.4%) and 78.0% (95% CI, 70.6-86.2%), respectively. In the weighted cohort, there was no significant difference in late survival between groups (weight-adjusted hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.74-2.39; P =0.34). Conclusions: This study confirmed the change in practice from OSR to FB-EVAR for treatment of TAAAs over the past decade. Incidences of early MAEs and mortality were lower with FB-EVAR, with no significant difference in late survival in the weighted cohort.

Objective: To compare target artery (TA) outcomes after fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) versus open surgical repair (OSR) of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). Background: Few studies have compared TA outcomes after endovascular incorporation and open reconstruction. Methods: Among consecutive patients who underwent elective OSR or FB-EVAR of TAAAs (2008–2020), we reviewed those who had postoperative imaging studies evaluating TA. Data of FB-EVAR patients were obtained from a prospectively maintained institutional database. TAs included celiac, superior mesenteric, right, and left renal arteries treated during TAAA repairs. The primary endpoint was TA patency (primary and secondary). Results: There were 131 patients (487 TAs) treated by OSR and 350 (1300 TAs) by FB-EVAR. In the OSR group, 440 TAs (90.3%) were reconstructed by bypasses, and 47 (9.7%) by reimplantation. In the FB-EVAR group, 841 TAs (64.7%) were incorporated by fenestrations and 459 (35.3%) by directional branches. Thirty-day TA primary patency rates were not significantly different between FB-EVAR and OSR (99.4%% vs 99.0%, P = 0.36), but the secondary patency rate was higher after FB-EVAR (99.8% vs 99.0%, P = 0.02). Three-year primary patency rates were 95.9% (95% CI: 94.7%–97.2%) and 94.7% (95% CI: 92.2%–97.2%), respectively; secondary patency rates were 98.5% (95% CI: 97.7%–99.2%) and 94.7% (95% CI: 95.7%–99.2%), respectively. There were no significant differences in late primary patency and secondary patency between groups (each P < 0.05). Conclusions: TA primary and secondary patency rates following elective OSR or FB-EVAR were high. Endovascular repair was not associated with loss of primary patency and late secondary patency.

Objectives: CABG and PCI are used for revascularization of multivessel coronary artery disease (MVCAD). However, limited information is available comparing the rates of in-hospital and 30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (early MACCE), including early death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat revascularization, among patients with multiple arterial CABG (MultArt) vs PCI. Methods: We reviewed 12,615 MVCAD patients with isolated primary CABG or PCI from 1993 through 2009. CABG patients (n=6,667) were grouped by number of arterial grafts into left internal mammary artery/saphenous vein (LIMA/SV) (n=5,712) or MultArt (n=955); PCI patients (n=5,948) into balloon angioplasty (BA) (n=1,020), bare metal stent (BMS) (n=3,242), and drug-eluting stent (DES) (n=1,686). Results: Early MACCE rate was significantly greater for PCI than CABG (8.5% vs 4.1% [P<.001]) and lower for MultArt than LIMA/SV or PCI (1.5% vs 4.5% and 8.5%, respectively [P<.001]). Stroke and early death rates were higher in CABG vs PCI (2.2% vs 0.4% [P<.001], and 1.5% vs 1.0% [P=0.01], respectively), whereas MI and repeat revascularization were lower (0.5% vs 6.0% and 0.3% vs 2.2%, respectively [P<.001]). Stroke and early death were similar in MultArt and PCI and lower vs LIMA/SV (0.6% and 0.4% vs 2.6%, and 0.5% and 1.0% vs 1.7%, respectively [P<.001]); MI and repeat revascularization rates were similar in MultArt and LIMA/SV and lower vs PCI (0.4% and 0.6% vs 6.0%, and 0.3% and 0.3% vs 2.3%, respectively [P<.001]). In propensity score-matched analysis, CABG had significantly improved early MACCE rate compared with BA (4.7% vs 13.2% [P<.001]), BMS (4.3% vs 8.3% [P<.001]), and DES (2.9% vs 5.5% [P=.008]), and MultArt compared with PCI (1.8% vs 7.8% [P<.001]) fig. Conclusions: In MVCAD patients undergoing isolated primary revascularization, CABG conferred lower early MACCE rate vs PCI. Early MACCE rate was markedly decreased after MultArt compared with LIMA/SV, BA, BMS, and DES.

Background: The bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) exhibits abnormal geometry and transvalvular flow and is susceptible to calcification with subsequent cardioembolic stroke from calcific embolic material. However, the description of embolic ischemic strokes in patients with BAV is limited to case reports. Methods: Consecutive patients from 1975-2015 with BAV (n=5401) at our institution were retrospectively identified. Patients with ischemic stroke before aortic valve replacement (AVR) were analyzed, and the stroke was characterized. Patients were grouped according to stroke etiology: calcific embolism from a BAV (BAV stroke); large artery atherosclerotic or lacunar stroke (LA stroke); and non-BAV, non-large artery embolic stroke (nLA stroke). Results: There were 83/5401 (1.5%) patients with ischemic stroke. Mean age was 54 ± 12 years and 28% were female. Stroke etiology was BAV stroke in 26/83 (31%), LA stroke in 23/83 (28%), nLA stroke in 30/83 (36%), and other in 4/83 (5%). Stroke was embolic in 72/83 (87%), as shown in Figure 1. CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was not different in patients with BAV stroke (1.4 ± 1.2) versus nLA stroke (1.8 ± 1.2, p=0.188) but was higher in LA stroke (2.3 ± 1.2, p=0.005 vs. BAV stroke). Recurrent stroke occurred in 41% overall (50% BAV stroke vs. 30% LA stroke vs. 47% nLA stroke, both p=NS vs. BAV stroke). BAV stroke was more commonly located in the retinal circulation (39% BAV stroke vs. 13% LA stroke [p=0.044] vs. 0% nLA stroke [p=0.002]). Patients with BAV and LA stroke were more likely to have moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis and undergo AVR sooner after stroke compared to patients with nLA stroke. Conclusions: Stroke is an important complication in patients with BAV. The most common type of stroke in BAV is embolic. Greater than one-third of embolic stroke resulted from embolism from a calcific aortic valve. Patients with BAV stroke commonly have a history of recurrent cerebral ischemic events, severe valvular disease, and proceed to AVR soon after stroke.

Objective: To describe a single-center experience of “complete aortic repair” consisting of surgical or endovascular total arch replacement/repair (TAR) followed by thoracoabdominal fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR). Methods: We reviewed 480 consecutive patients who underwent FB-EVAR with physician-modified endografts (PMEGs) or manufactured stent-grafts between 2013 and 2022. From those, we selected only patients treated with open or endovascular arch repair and distal FB-EVAR for aneurysms involving the ascending, arch and thoracoabdominal aortic segments (zones 0-9). Manufactured devices were used under an investigational device exemption protocol. Endpoints included early/in-hospital mortality, mid-term survival, freedom from secondary intervention, and target artery instability. Results: There were 22 patients, 14 men and 8 women with a median age of 72±7 years. Thirteen postdissection and 9 degenerative aortic aneurysms were repaired with a mean maximum diameter of 67±11 mm. Time from index aortic procedure to aneurysm exclusion was 169 and 270 days in those undergoing 2- and 3-stage repair strategies, respectively. The ascending aorta and aortic arch were treated with 19 surgical and 3 endovascular TAR procedures. Three (16%) surgical arch procedures were performed elsewhere, and perioperative details were unavailable. Mean bypass, cross-clamp, and circulatory arrest times were 295±57, 216±63, and 46±11 minutes, respectively. There were 4 major adverse events (MAEs) in 2 patients: both required postoperative hemodialysis, 1 had postbypass cardiogenic shock necessitating extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and the other required evacuation of an acute-on-chronic subdural hematoma. Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair was performed with 17 manufactured endografts and 5 PMEGs. There was no early mortality. Six (27%) patients experienced MAEs. There were 4 (18%) cases of spinal cord injury with 3 (75%) experiencing complete symptom resolution before discharge. Mean follow-up was 30±17 months in which there were 5 patient deaths—0 aortic related. Eight patients required ≥1 secondary intervention, and 6 target arteries demonstrated instability (3 IC, 1 IIIC endoleaks; 2 TA stenoses). Kaplan-Meier 3-year estimates of patient survival, freedom from secondary intervention, and target artery instability were 78±8%, 56±11%, and 68±11%, respectively. Conclusion: Complete aortic repair with staged surgical or endovascular TAR and distal FB-EVAR is safe and effective with satisfactory morbidity, mid-term survival, and target artery outcomes. Clinical Impact The presented study demonstrates that repair of the entirety of the aorta - via total endovascular or hybrid means- is safe and effective with low rates of spinal cord ischemia. Cardiovascular specialists within comprehensive aortic teams at should feel confident that staged repair of the most complex degenerative and post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms can be safely performed in their patients with complication profile similar to that of less extensive repairs. Meticulous and intentional case planning is imperative for immediate and long-term success.

Background Description of cerebral and retinal infarction in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is limited to case reports. We aimed to characterize cerebral and retinal infarction and examine outcomes in patients with BAV. Methods and Results Consecutive patients from 1975 to 2015 with BAV (n=5401) were retrospectively identified from the institutional database; those with confirmed cerebral or retinal infarction were analyzed. Infarction occurring after aortic valve replacement was not included. Patients were grouped according to infarction pathogenesis: embolism from a degenerative calcific BAV (BAVi); non‐BAV, large artery atherosclerotic or lacunar infarction (LAi); and non‐BAV, non‐large artery embolic infarction (nLAi). There were 83/5401 (1.5%) patients, mean age 54±12 years and 28% female, with confirmed cerebral or retinal infarction (LAi 23/83 [28%]; nLAi 30/83 [36%]; BAVi 26/83 [31%]; other 4/83 [5%]). Infarction was embolic in 72/83 (87%), and 35/72 (49%) were cardioembolic. CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score was 1.4±1.2 in BAVi ( P =0.188 versus nLAi) and 2.3±1.2 in LAi ( P =0.005). Recurrent infarction occurred in 41% overall (50% BAVi, P =0.164 and 0.803 versus LAi and nLAi). BAVi was more commonly retinal (39% BAVi versus 13% LAi, P =0.044 versus 0% nLAi, P =0.002). Patients with BAVi and LAi were more likely to have moderate‐to‐severe aortic stenosis and undergo aortic valve replacement compared with patients with nLAi. Conclusions Cardioembolism, often from degenerative calcification of the aortic valve, is a predominant cause of cerebral and retinal infarction in patients with BAV and is frequently recurrent. Cerebral and retinal infarction should be regarded as a complication of BAV.