Sems, S.A.

Background: Periprosthetic tibial fractures around a total knee replacement (TKR) remain challenging to manage, with little published information for guidance. The purpose of this study was to review the types, management techniques, and outcomes of periprosthetic tibial fractures in the largest series to date. Methods: We identified 300 periprosthetic tibial fractures (285 patients) around a TKR (43% in primary TKRs and 57% in revision TKRs) sustained between 1996 and 2020. Fractures were classified according to Felix et al. as Type I (tibial plateau), Type II (adjacent to stem), Type III (distal to stem), or Type IV (tibial tubercle), with subtypes A (well-fixed component), B (loose component), and C (intraoperative fracture). Of the fractures in this study, 53% were Type I, 24% were Type II, 16% were Type III, and 8% were Type IV. A total of 46% of fractures occurred intraoperatively, and 54% of fractures occurred postoperatively (61% subtype A, 39% subtype B). The mean patient age at fracture was 67 years, and 64% of patients were female. The mean follow-up was 6 years. Results: The intraoperative fracture incidence was 1.40% in revision TKRs and 0.10% in primary TKRs. Among intraoperative fractures, the 2-year survivorship free from tibial component revision was highest in Type I (100%) and lowest in Type IV (67%) (p < 0.001). For postoperative fractures, the 2-year survivorship free from any reoperation was 29% and the 2-year survivorship free from tibial component revision was 51%. Type-I postoperative fractures had the lowest 2-year survivorship free from tibial component revision (10%), whereas Type-III fractures had the highest survivorship (88%) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Intraoperative periprosthetic fracture of the tibia was fourteenfold more likely in revision TKRs compared with primary TKRs. Among all intraoperative fractures, Type-I fractures were well-tolerated, with 100% survivorship free from tibial component revision at 2 years. Conversely, Type-I postoperative fractures had only 10% survivorship at 2 years. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify the rate at which the anterolateral (AL) tibial plafond is affected in comminuted suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures (OTA/AO 44C2) and to assess how its involvement affects clinical outcomes. METHODS: Design: Retrospective review. Setting: Level 1 Trauma Center. Patient Selection Criteria: Patients with a preoperative computed tomography treated surgically for OTA/AO 44C2 fractures from January 2005 to December 2021. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: The primary outcome measure was the prevalence of AL plafond impaction or a displaced Tillaux-Chaput fracture. Secondary outcome measures included reoperation rate (excluding hardware removal), rate of new-onset ankle osteoarthritis, rate of ankle osteoarthritis progression, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, and the Olerud Molander Ankle Score. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 50 years (range 18–100), and 53% were female. The AL plafond was involved in 26 patients (49%), with AL plafond impaction in 11 patients (21%) and a displaced Tillaux-Chaput fragment in 15 patients (28%). Five patients (19%) received independent fixation of the AL plafond, and 3 of these patients had AL plafond impaction addressed. Thirty-eight patients (72%) had clinical follow-up of at least 6 months. Patients with AL plafond impaction had a higher rate of reoperation (excluding hardware removal) compared with those without any AL plafond involvement (hazard of reoperation = 8.3, 95% confidence interval, 1.4–15.3, P = 0.022) and a higher rate of new-onset ankle osteoarthritis (83% vs. 23%, P = 0.013). There was no difference in the rate of reoperation (11% vs. 9%, P = 0.748) or new-onset osteoarthritis (63% vs. 23%, P = 0.078) when comparing those with a displaced Tillaux-Chaput fracture to those without AL plafond involvement. There were no differences in Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (75% vs. 78% vs. 85%, P = 0.661) or Olerud Molander Ankle Score (70 points vs. 69 points vs. 81 points, P = 0.517) scores when comparing those with AL plafond impaction, those with Tillaux-Chaput fragments, and those with no AL plafond involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography evaluation is recommended in patients with comminuted suprasyndesmotic fibula fractures (OTA/AO 44C2) given their high association with AL plafond impaction and Tillaux-Chaput fracture. Patients with AL plafond impaction have a higher reoperation rate and new-onset ankle osteoarthritis compared with those without AL plafond involvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Case: A 67-year-old woman sustained a periprosthetic tibial tubercle avulsion fracture with extensor mechanism disruption. She underwent open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with orthogonal mini-fragment plates applied in a tension band fashion with patellar tendon suture augmentation. Radiographs, range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes were completed over 1 year. Conclusion: Isolated periprosthetic tibial tubercle fractures with disruption of the extensor mechanism can be treated with ORIF using orthogonal tension band plating. At 1-year follow-up, the surgical technique described in this report yielded radiographic union, clinical restoration of preinjury motion, and excellent patient-reported outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate tranexamic acid (TXA) when administered immediately on hospital presentation in patients with extracapsular peritrochanteric hip fractures to determine its effect on (1) transfusion rates, (2) estimated blood loss, and (3) complications. METHODS: Design: Prospective, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Setting: Single-center, Level 1 trauma center. Patient Selection Criteria: All patients with isolated OTA/AO 31-A fracture patterns from 2018 to 2022 were eligible for inclusion. Study drug was administered in the emergency department at the time of presentation—1-g bolus over 10 minutes followed by a 1-g infusion over 8 hours. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: The primary outcome was the rate of red blood cell transfusion hospital days 1–4. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss and complications including venous thromboembolic events, stroke, myocardial infarction, all-cause 90-day readmissions, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-eight patients were included—64 patients were randomized to intravenous TXA and 64 patients to intravenous normal saline (ie, placebo). There was no difference in the rate of red blood cell transfusion between treatment arms between hospital days 1–4 (27% in the TXA arm vs. 31% in the placebo arm, P = 0.65). Patients randomized to placebo who required transfusion received a mean of 2.30 units compared with 1.94 units in the TXA cohort (P = 0.55). There was no difference in the estimated blood loss between hospital days 1–4. There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative complications including venous thromboembolic events, stroke, myocardial infarction, 90-day readmission, or death. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study do not support the use of preoperative TXA for reducing blood loss for geriatric patients with extracapsular hip fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the difference in failure rates of surgical repair for displaced femoral neck fractures in patients younger than 60 years of age according to fixation strategy. METHODS: Design: This is a retrospective, comparative cohort study. Setting: Twenty-six Level 1 North American trauma centers. Patient Selection Criteria: Patients younger than 60 years of age with a displaced femoral neck fracture (OTA 31-B2, B3) undergoing surgical repair from 2005 to 2017. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Patient demographics, injury characteristics, repair methods used, and treatment failure (nonunion/failed fixation, avascular necrosis, and need for secondary surgery) were compared according to fixation strategy. RESULTS: Five hundred and sixty-five patients met inclusion criteria and were studied. The mean age was 42 years, 36% were female, and the average Pauwels' angle of fractures was 55 degrees. There were 305 patients treated with multiple cannulated screws (MCS) and 260 treated with a fixed-angle (FA) construct. Treatment failures were 46% overall, but was more likely to occur in MCS constructs versus FA devices (55% vs. 36%, P < 0.001). When FA constructs were substratified, the use of a sliding hip screw with addition of a medial femoral neck buttress plate (FNBP) and “antirotation” (AR) screw demonstrated better results than either FNBP or AR screw alone or neither with the lowest overall construct failure rate of 11% (P < 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Historically used fixation constructs for femoral neck fractures (eg, multiple cannulated screws and sliding hip screw) in young and middle-aged adults performed poorly compared with more recently proposed constructs, including those using a medial femoral neck buttress plate and an antirotation screw. Fixed-angle constructs outperformed multiple cannulated screws overall, and augmentation of fixed-angle constructs with a medial femoral neck buttress plate and antirotation screw improved the likelihood of successful treatment. Surgeons should prioritize fixation decisions when repairing displaced femoral neck fractures in patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

OBJECTIVES: To study the results of displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in adults less than 60 years of age by comparing patients, injury, treatment, and the characteristics of treatment failure specifically according to patients' age at injury, that is, by their “decade of life” [ie, “under 30” (29 years and younger), “the 30s” (30–39 years), “the 40s” (40–49 years), and “the 50s” (50–59 years)]. METHODS: Design: Multicenter retrospective comparative cohort series. Setting: Twenty-six North American Level 1 Trauma Centers. Patient Selection Criteria: Skeletally mature patients aged 18–59 years with operative repair of displaced FNFs. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Main outcome measures were treatment failures (fixation failure and/or nonunion, osteonecrosis, malunion, and the need for subsequent major reconstructive surgery (arthroplasty or proximal femoral osteotomy). These were compared across decades of adult life through middle age (<30 years, 30–39 years, 40–49 years, and 50–59 years). RESULTS: Overall, treatment failure was observed in 264 of 565 (47%) of all hips. The mean age was 42.2 years, 35.8% of patients were women, and the mean Pauwels angle was 53.8 degrees. Complications and the need for major secondary surgeries increased with each increasing decade of life assessed: 36% of failure occurred in patients <30 years of age, 40% in their 30s, 48% in their 40s, and 57% in their 50s ( P < 0.001). Rates of osteonecrosis increased with decades of life (under 30s and 30s vs. 40s vs. 50s developed osteonecrosis in 10%, 10%, 20%, and 27% of hips, P < 0.001), while fixation failure and/or nonunion only increased by decade of life to a level of trend ( P = 0.06). Reparative methods varied widely between decade-long age groups, including reduction type (open vs. closed, P < 0.001), reduction quality ( P = 0.030), and construct type (cannulated screws vs. fixed angle devices, P = 0.024), while some variables evaluated did not change with age group. CONCLUSIONS: Displaced FNFs in young and middle-aged adults are a challenging clinical problem with a high rate of treatment failure. Major complications and the need for complex reconstructive surgery increased greatly by decade of life with the patients in their sixth decade experiencing osteonecrosis at the highest rate seen among patients in the decades studied. Interestingly, treatments provided to patients in their 50s were notably different than those provided to younger patient groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

OBJECTIVES: To compare three fluoroscopic methods for determining femoral rotation. METHODS: Native femoral version was measured by computed tomography in 20 intact femurs from 10 cadaveric specimens. Two Steinmann pins were placed into each left femur above and below a planned transverse osteotomy which was completed through the diaphysis. Four surgeons utilized the true lateral (TL), neck-horizontal angle (NH), and lesser trochanter profile (LTP) techniques to correct the injured femur's rotation using the intact right femur as reference, yielding 120 measurements. Accuracy was assessed by comparing the angle subtended by the two Steinmann pins before and after manipulation and comparing against version measurements of the right femur. RESULTS: Absolute mean rotational error in the fractured femur compared to its uninjured state was 6.0° (95% CI, 4.6-7.5), 6.6° (95% CI, 5.0-8.2), and 8.5° (95% CI, 6.5-10.6) for the TL, NH, and LTP techniques, respectively, without significant difference between techniques (p = 0.100). Compared to the right femur, absolute mean rotational error was 6.6° (95% CI, 1.0-12.2), 6.4° (95% CI, 0.1-12.6), and 8.9° (95% CI, 0.8-17.0) for the TL, NH, and LTP techniques, respectively, without significant difference (p = 0.180). Significantly more femurs were malrotated by >15° using the LTP method compared to the TL and NH methods (20.0% vs 2.5% and 5.0%, p = 0.030). Absolute mean error in estimating femoral rotation of the intact femur using the TL and NH methods compared to CT was 6.6° (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1-8.2) and 4.4° (95% CI, 3.4-5.4), respectively, with significant difference between the two methods (p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: The true lateral (TL), neck-horizontal angle (NH), and the lesser trochanter profile (LTP) techniques performed similarly in correcting rotation of the fractured femur, but significantly more femurs were malrotated by >15° using the LTP technique. This supports preferential use of the TL or NH methods for determining femoral version intraoperatively.

Case: This report describes the case of an athletic 12-year-old boy who presented with a 64° left proximal humeral varus angulation deformity and physeal bar secondary to multiple operations for a proximal humeral metaphyseal cystic lesion and pathologic fracture. Using a combined lateral closing and medial opening-wedge osteotomy, a 68° valgus correction was achieved with excellent clinical and functional outcomes at 16-month follow-up. Forward flexion increased from 120 to 170° preoperatively to postoperatively while abduction improved from 110° preoperatively to 170° postoperatively. Conclusion: A combined lateral closing and medial opening-wedge osteotomy of the proximal humerus can successfully treat cases of extreme proximal humerus varus in the growing shoulder where unilateral or dome osteotomies are not suitable.

Case: A 76-year-old woman with multiple myeloma and osteoporosis presented with right hip pain and an impending atypical femoral fracture in the setting of chronic bisphosphonate use. After preoperative medical optimization, she was scheduled for prophylactic intramedullary nail fixation. Intraoperatively, the patient experienced episodes of severe bradycardia and asystole associated with intramedullary reaming, which ceased after distal venting of the femur. No additional intraoperative or postoperative complications were encountered, and the patient recovered uneventfully. Conclusion: Femoral canal venting may be an appropriate intervention for similar transient dysrhythmias caused by intramedullary reaming.

Objectives: To describe a reproducible technique for reduction assessment and percutaneous reduction of unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with a cephalomedullary nail on a traction table. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Level-1 trauma center. Patients: Two-hundred 20 consecutive patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Intervention: Initial closed reduction performed on a traction table. Accessory incisions were used to facilitate a reduction in 77 patients (35%). All fractures were stabilized with a cephalomedullary nail. Main Outcome Measurements: Radiographic outcome including union, cutout, and fracture collapse (FC). Surgical outcomes including infection and hematoma were also reported. Results: Mechanical complications (nonunion, cutout, and varus collapse) occurred in 8.8% of patients at 1 year. Eleven of 13 patients who developed these complications had either suboptimal implant placement (tip-to-apex distance >25 mm) or a varus reduction. There was no difference in the incidence of reoperation, nonunion, lag screw cutout, or posttraumatic arthritis based on the use of an accessory incision for fracture reduction. There was a significant increase in FC in patients who received an accessory incision (6.8 mm vs. 5.4 mm, P = 0.04). One patient (1%) developed a hematoma in the accessory incision cohort, and 1 patient (0.7%) who did not have an accessory incision developed a postoperative infection. Conclusions: The current study suggests utilization of accessory incisions assist in reduction is safe and is associated with a low rate of complications. The surgeon should prioritize fracture reduction and optimal implant placement and not hesitate to use an accessory incision to assist with fracture reduction. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.