Starling, Amaal J.

Abstract Objectives/Background Our objectives were to characterize the geographic distribution and local availability of United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties‐certified headache specialists across US counties, hospital referral regions, and states, and to examine associations with socioeconomic deprivation, social vulnerability, and urbanicity. Headache disorders are highly prevalent and disabling, yet local availability of certified headache subspecialty care in the United States remains uneven. Although prior studies have described national and state‐level distributions of United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties‐certified headache specialists, important gaps remain in understanding county‐level availability and disparities in access. Prior state‐level summaries may mask within‐state differences in access to United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties‐certified headache specialists. Methods We conducted a cross‐sectional geospatial workforce analysis of United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties‐certified headache specialists in the United States as of January 7, 2026. Practice locations were mapped to counties, hospital referral regions, and states, and compared with general neurologist supply from the National Provider Identifier registry. Estimated population need was calculated by applying a national migraine prevalence to adult population denominators. We examined associations between specialist distribution and county‐level socioeconomic vulnerability, urbanicity, and region. Results Among 3144 US counties, 2870 (91.3%) had no United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties‐certified headache specialists, and 2085 (66.3%) had no neurologists. Headache specialists were entirely absent from counties without neurologists. Median county‐level headache specialist density was 0 per 100,000 adults, reflecting the absence of local subspecialty care in most US counties. Accounting for county adult population, neurologist density, urbanicity, and region, higher Area Deprivation Index and Social Vulnerability Index scores were associated with lower headache specialist rates. Each 10‐point increase in Area Deprivation Index was associated with lower expected headache specialist rate (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 0.87, 95% confidence interval = 0.82–0.93), and each 0.1‐unit increase in Social Vulnerability Index was also associated with lower expected rate (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 0.94, 95% confidence interval = 0.90–0.98). Headache specialist availability relative to estimated population need varied markedly across counties, with substantial estimated local differences between migraine burden and certified subspecialty supply that were not apparent in state‐level summaries. Conclusion United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties‐certified headache specialists are unevenly distributed across the United States, with limited local availability of certified headache subspecialty care in socioeconomically disadvantaged and nonmetropolitan counties. County‐level analyses identified substantial local gaps in certified headache subspecialty availability that were not apparent in state‐level summaries.

Aim Incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into clinical practice and real-world research is essential to enable a more holistic assessment of treatment effectiveness, beyond migraine frequency alone. Given the number of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-targeted treatments available, switching between CGRP-targeted preventive therapies is a common practice. Real-world evidence on switching to intravenous eptinezumab in adults with migraine for whom prior subcutaneous or oral CGRP-targeted preventive therapies failed is limited. The ongoing INFUSE study was designed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of switching to eptinezumab in US clinical practice among adults with migraine for whom ≥1 prior CGRP-targeted preventive therapy had failed. Methods INFUSE, a real-world, non-interventional study evaluating the effectiveness of eptinezumab in US clinical practice, included adults with migraine for whom ≥1 prior CGRP-targeted preventive therapy had failed and who were newly initiating eptinezumab treatment. PROs were collected electronically. To provide an overall assessment of the change in migraine disease, Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) was utilized. Other outcomes allowed for the evaluation of novel end points, such as brain fog and participant-defined good days. Results The baseline population included 190 participants (female, 88.9%; 35–54 years of age, 53.7%). At month 6, 44.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 35.3–53.4%) of participants reported “much/very much improved” on PGIC, and 75.7% (95% CI: 66.9–82.7%) reported any improvement. Mean good days increased by 6.3 per month at month 6 ( P < 0.001). Among participants reporting brain fog at baseline (93.7%), 55.8% (95% CI: 46.2–64.9%) reported improvement at month 6. Conclusion This research provides insights into capturing the broader migraine burden and the holistic impact of preventive treatment and highlights the potential for achieving ambitious goals. In this population for whom ≥1 prior CGRP-targeted preventive therapy had failed, switching to eptinezumab was associated with participant-reported, clinically meaningful improvements in PROs, including frequency, disability, disease status, and brain fog.

Aim To determine whether there is a difference in the time to complete a rapid number naming task during the interictal state compared to prodrome, migraine headache, postdrome phases of migraine and non-migraine headache, and characterize non-headache symptoms experienced during these phases. Methods This prospective longitudinal cohort study evaluated 30 adults with migraine with or without aura who completed diary entries and a timed rapid number naming task at least three times daily for up to four months from October 2020 to July 2022 at a tertiary headache center. Diary entries included self-report of current migraine phase (having a migraine headache, non-migraine headache, prodrome, postdrome, or interictal baseline) and detailed symptoms experienced. The outcome of interest for the timed rapid number naming task was the time to complete the task with zero errors. Results Compared to the interictal baseline, the time with zero errors for the rapid number naming task was significantly slower during the prodrome (median (Q1, Q3) 1.0 s slower (0.4, 2.9), p -value 0.010), migraine headache (median (Q1, Q3) 3.8 s slower (2.6, 7.5), p -value <0.001), and postdrome (median (Q1, Q3) 0.9 s slower (0.2, 2.1), p -value 0.011) phases of migraine, and non-migraine headache attacks (median (Q1, Q3) 1.2 s slower (0.1, 3.1), p -value 0.006). For those with migraine with aura (N = 15), the time with zero errors was significantly slower during all phases compared to interictal phase. For those with migraine without aura (N = 15), the time with zero errors was significantly slower only during the migraine headache, but not other phases compared to the interictal phase. The top 5 most reported non-headache symptoms during any phase of migraine and non-migraine headache attacks included fatigue, neck stiffness, light sensitivity, blurred vision/vision changes, and difficulty concentrating. Conclusions Among the overall participant cohort, the time with zero errors to complete a rapid number naming task was significantly slower during all ictal phases compared to interictal phase. This was also the case in the migraine with aura cohort but in the migraine without aura cohort there was only a significant difference during the migraine headache phase versus interictal phase. There is overlap in non-headache symptoms between the prodrome, migraine headache, postdrome, and non-migraine headache phases, which may make distinguishing between these phases difficult. Combining subjective data, such as symptom diaries, with objective measures, such as rapid number naming tasks, may allow for more refined assessment of migraine phases and distinguishing migraine from non-migraine headache attacks.

Abstract Background OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT‐A) is an established preventive treatment for chronic migraine but involves 31 to 40 injections per session, often causing discomfort and post‐procedural headaches. Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) is a noninvasive therapy with efficacy in migraine treatment via conditioned pain modulation but has not been evaluated for procedural pain. This study evaluated REN's effectiveness in reducing acute procedural pain and postprocedural headache associated with BoNT‐A injections. Methods This was an investigator‐initiated single‐center, randomized, single‐blind, sham‐controlled crossover study enrolled 80 adults (aged 22 to 74 years) with chronic migraine undergoing routine BoNT‐A treatment. Each participant received one injection session without a device, followed by sessions using active REN and sham in randomized order. REN was applied to the upper arm 10 min prior to injections and removed after injection completion. Pain intensity was measured using a visual analog scale (0 to 100) at pre‐procedure, intra‐procedure, and post‐procedure time points. The primary outcome was procedural pain intensity, and secondary outcomes included post‐procedural headache incidence and adverse events. Due to clear benefit, the study was terminated early based on predefined stopping criteria. Results Final analysis of 60 participants (mean age 48.0 years; 49/60, 82% female) demonstrated that pre‐procedural pain levels were not significantly different between baseline and the active REN or sham ( p > 0.999 and p = 0.485, respectively). However, during and after BoNT‐A administration, the active REN group reported significantly lower pain scores compared to both the sham and baseline conditions. At intra‐procedure, the REN group experienced a mean pain reduction of 15.0 points ( p < 0.001), and at post‐procedure experienced a 19.1‐point reduction ( p < 0.001). Sham treatment did not result in significant pain reduction compared to baseline ( p > 0.999 for both intra‐procedure and post‐procedure). Additionally, REN lowered the incidence of headache as an adverse event, with only 15% (8/52) of participants experiencing post‐procedural headache compared to 55% (29/53) in the sham group and 39% (23/59) at baseline (odds ratio = 0.28, 95% confidence interval: 0.10 to 0.69, p = 0.008). No additional adverse events were reported. Conclusions REN significantly reduces procedural pain and post‐procedural headache associated with BoNT‐A injections for chronic migraine and may serve as a noninvasive, easily implemented pain management strategy for acute procedural pain. REN represents a promising approach to improving patient comfort during routine migraine treatment as well as reducing post‐procedural headache.

ABSTRACT Background This post hoc analysis examined the reduction in monthly headache days ( MHDs ) by frequency category shifts and associated improvements following eptinezumab treatment. Methods The DELIVER trial evaluated eptinezumab in adults with migraine for whom 2–4 previous preventive treatments failed. During a 24‐week, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled period followed by a 48‐week extension period, participants received IV eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo every 12 weeks, with all receiving eptinezumab beginning Week 25 (dose‐blinded). Participants were categorized by MHD frequency: > 14, 8–14, 4 to < 8, 1 to < 4, 0. MHD category shifts were evaluated in the total population and several subgroups (including participants with > 14 baseline MHDs and early ≥ 50% responders). In participants reporting < 8 MHDs after all doses, the associated changes in headache intensity and disease status were evaluated. Results Of randomized participants, 88% (782/890) completed the trial. The percentage of participants randomized initially to eptinezumab who reported < 4 MHDs was 23% (138/592) over Weeks 1–12 and 47% (236/498) over Weeks 61–72; 9% reported 0 MHDs after the final dose. Of participants randomized initially to eptinezumab who shifted from ≥ 8 MHDs at baseline to < 8 over Weeks 1–12, 71% (170/241) reported < 8 MHDs for the rest of the trial; of those who shifted from > 14 to < 8 MHDs, 66% (49/74) reported < 8 MHDs for the rest of the trial. Reduction to < 8 MHDs was associated with robust improvements in headache intensity and disease burden. Conclusions Eptinezumab was associated with sustained reduction in MHD category, with some achieving headache/migraine freedom in patients with a history of preventive treatments that failed. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT04418765; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04418765 ) and EudraCT (identifier: 2019‐004497‐25; https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr‐search/search?query=2019‐004497‐25 )

Abstract Objectives The aim of this work was to develop an American Headache Society position statement addressing diagnostic screening for migraine among girls and women. Background Despite its high prevalence and substantial negative impacts, migraine is underdiagnosed and undertreated. Diagnostic screening for migraine enables more patients to receive timely, appropriate, and effective management. Methods Development of this position statement followed the rules established by the American Headache Society Guidelines Committee. The published literature was reviewed to determine if migraine meets criteria for when disease screening is justified, to guide recommendations for screening tools, and to determine subpopulation(s) for which migraine screening is indicated. After author consensus was reached, the position statement was reviewed and approved by the American Headache Society Board of Directors. Results Migraine fulfills established criteria for conditions in which screening is appropriate since it is highly prevalent, results in significant morbidity, and exerts substantial economic and social costs. Migraine incidence and prevalence are exceptionally high among girls and women during adolescence and through menopause. Furthermore, there are valid and reliable diagnostic screening methods (e.g., ID Migraine) and effective treatments that reduce migraine symptoms and disease impact. Conclusion Yearly diagnostic screening for migraine should be included as part of women's preventive healthcare services, particularly from adolescence to menopause.

Abstract Background Post-traumatic headache (PTH) is a common acute and persistent symptom following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Symptoms of cutaneous allodynia and presence of nociceptive sensitization might be associated with acute PTH and its persistence. The objectives of this study were to compare allodynia symptoms and cutaneous heat pain thresholds amongst males and females with acute PTH to healthy controls (HC) and determine if pain thresholds and allodynia symptoms are associated with PTH outcomes. Methods This prospective longitudinal study enrolled 139 adults with acute PTH attributed to mTBI as defined by the International Classification of Headache Disorders and 95 HC. All PTH participants completed a baseline research visit near PTH onset and a follow-up visit three to four months later. All PTH participants and a subset of HC completed the Allodynia Symptom Checklist (ASC-12) at each research visit. A different subset of the participants underwent quantitative sensory testing (QST) during baseline, 4-week, and 16-week research visits to quantify cutaneous heat pain thresholds at the forehead and forearms. Data from daily headache diaries were used to determine longitudinal PTH improvement versus non-improvement at three months. ASC-12 score and pain threshold comparisons were made between PTH and HC groups, PTH improved versus non-improved cohorts, and between PTH males and females. Results Participants with PTH had an average age of 42.6 years and 64.0% were female. HC had an average age of 40.0 years and 65.3% were female. At the first visit, PTH participant ASC-12 scores averaged 3.6 versus 0.1 amongst HC, p < 0.001. 44.8% of PTH participants had headache improvement at 3 months. ASC-12 scores were higher in the PTH non-improved versus improved group at baseline (4.0 versus 2.4, p = 0.038) and 3-month follow-up (3.4 versus 1.9, p = 0.012). ASC-12 scores were higher in females than males at baseline (4.7 versus 1.6, p < 0.001) and 3-months (3.9 versus 1.2, p < 0.001). Cutaneous heat pain thresholds at the forehead and forearm did not differ between any group. Conclusions PTH attributed to mTBI is associated with symptoms of cutaneous allodynia. Greater allodynia symptoms are present in females with PTH compared to males and may be associated with PTH non-improvement.

Background Headache is a common symptom following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Post-traumatic headache (PTH), a secondary headache disorder that develops after mTBI, often persists for months or years. To identify potential recovery mechanisms and prognostic biomarkers, the present study investigated whether longitudinal changes in pain-induced brain activation differ between healthy controls (HC) and PTH participants showing headache improvement and those without improvement. Methods Thirty-three participants who met International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, criteria for acute PTH within 59 days post-mTBI and 33 HC participants were included with no significant differences in demographics. All participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging scans at baseline, four weeks, and 16 weeks post-enrollment using a thermal stimulation paradigm with noxious and non-painful heat stimuli. ‘Painful vs. Non-Painful Heat’ contrasts were generated using SPM12. PTH improvement was assessed at three months post-enrollment via electronic headache diaries. Two-sample t -tests compared the brain activation between HC and PTH at baseline. Linear mixed-effects models examined longitudinal changes for HC, PTH improvement and non-improvement groups across visits. Generalized linear models compared these groups within visits. Results Baseline analysis revealed several regions with significantly higher activation in acute PTH compared to HC, including bilateral postcentral gyrus, right superior temporal gyrus, right middle temporal gyrus, left inferior parietal gyrus, right superior parietal gyrus, left ventral striatum, left olfactory cortex, left gyrus rectus, and left middle occipital gyrus. Over time, the PTH improvement group demonstrated progressive normalization across all identified brain regions, whereas the non-improvement group showed only partial normalization in left ventral striatum, left olfactory cortex, and left gyrus rectus. Sustained elevated activation in specific regions distinguished PTH participants without headache improvement from those with headache improvement, suggesting potential biomarkers for persistent PTH. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate significantly altered pain-induced brain activations in participants with acute PTH compared to HC. Longitudinal analysis revealed distinct recovery trajectories: progressive normalization in the improvement group versus persistent alterations in the non-improvement group. These neuroimaging patterns may serve as biomarkers for identifying individuals at risk for persistent PTH, with implications for early intervention and personalized treatment approaches.