Thompson, Nicolas R.

Abstract Objectives/Background Our objectives were to characterize the geographic distribution and local availability of United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties‐certified headache specialists across US counties, hospital referral regions, and states, and to examine associations with socioeconomic deprivation, social vulnerability, and urbanicity. Headache disorders are highly prevalent and disabling, yet local availability of certified headache subspecialty care in the United States remains uneven. Although prior studies have described national and state‐level distributions of United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties‐certified headache specialists, important gaps remain in understanding county‐level availability and disparities in access. Prior state‐level summaries may mask within‐state differences in access to United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties‐certified headache specialists. Methods We conducted a cross‐sectional geospatial workforce analysis of United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties‐certified headache specialists in the United States as of January 7, 2026. Practice locations were mapped to counties, hospital referral regions, and states, and compared with general neurologist supply from the National Provider Identifier registry. Estimated population need was calculated by applying a national migraine prevalence to adult population denominators. We examined associations between specialist distribution and county‐level socioeconomic vulnerability, urbanicity, and region. Results Among 3144 US counties, 2870 (91.3%) had no United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties‐certified headache specialists, and 2085 (66.3%) had no neurologists. Headache specialists were entirely absent from counties without neurologists. Median county‐level headache specialist density was 0 per 100,000 adults, reflecting the absence of local subspecialty care in most US counties. Accounting for county adult population, neurologist density, urbanicity, and region, higher Area Deprivation Index and Social Vulnerability Index scores were associated with lower headache specialist rates. Each 10‐point increase in Area Deprivation Index was associated with lower expected headache specialist rate (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 0.87, 95% confidence interval = 0.82–0.93), and each 0.1‐unit increase in Social Vulnerability Index was also associated with lower expected rate (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 0.94, 95% confidence interval = 0.90–0.98). Headache specialist availability relative to estimated population need varied markedly across counties, with substantial estimated local differences between migraine burden and certified subspecialty supply that were not apparent in state‐level summaries. Conclusion United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties‐certified headache specialists are unevenly distributed across the United States, with limited local availability of certified headache subspecialty care in socioeconomically disadvantaged and nonmetropolitan counties. County‐level analyses identified substantial local gaps in certified headache subspecialty availability that were not apparent in state‐level summaries.

ABSTRACTObjectiveClinical outcome measures for autoimmune encephalitis (AE) are not yet well defined. Cognitive outcome measures (CogOs) and patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) may capture the symptoms of AE, beyond clinician‐reported outcomes (ClinROs) (the Modified Rankin Scale [mRS] and Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis [CASE]).MethodsThis retrospective cohort study examined LGI‐1‐IgG AE patients at Cleveland Clinic. CogOs included the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test (BVMT). PROs included Neuro‐QoL, PROMIS Global Physical (GPH) and Mental Health (GMH). Abnormal RAVLT, BVMT (≤ −1.5 SD), Neuro‐QoL, and PROMIS (≥ 10 T‐scores) proportions were analyzed. CogOs and PROs were correlated with ClinROs using Spearman's rank correlation.ResultsForty‐four patients (64% male, mean age 68 [SD = 11], median follow‐up 19 months) were included. ClinROs improved, with median mRS decreasing from 2.5 (IQR = 2–3) to 2 (IQR = 1–2), and CASE from 5 (IQR = 3–6) to 3 (IQR = 2–3) (all p < 0.05). RAVLT (n = 15), BVMT (n = 16), Neuro‐QoL (n = 21), and PROMIS (n = 34) were available. At > 12 months from diagnosis, cognition was impaired on BVMT (56%) and RAVLT (20%). PROs showed impairments in Neuro‐QoL lower (38%) and upper (27%) extremity function, cognition (31%), and PROMIS‐GPH (25%). RAVLT correlated with Neuro‐QoL cognition, depression, and stigma, while BVMT correlated with PROMIS‐GMH (all unadjusted p < 0.05). Neither RAVLT nor BVMT correlated with ClinROs. ClinROs correlated with Neuro‐QoL lower extremity function, cognition, and social roles (all p < 0.05).InterpretationLGI‐1‐IgG AE patients have long‐term impairments in cognition, physical health, and social roles, which can be objectively measured using CogOs and PROs and are not captured by ClinROs.

Abstract Objectives To compare clinical characteristics among outpatient headache clinic patients who do and do not self‐report visiting the emergency department for headache. Background Headache is the fourth most common reason for emergency department visits, compromising 1%–3% of visits. Limited data exist about patients who are seen in an outpatient headache clinic but still opt to frequent the emergency department. Clinical characteristics may differ between patients who self‐report emergency department use and those who do not. Understanding these differences may help identify which patients are at greatest risk for emergency department overutilization. Methods This observational cohort study included adults treated at the Cleveland Clinic Headache Center between October 12, 2015 and September 11, 2019, who completed self‐reported questionnaires. Associations between self‐reported emergency department utilization and demographics, clinical characteristics, and patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs: Headache Impact Test [HIT‐6], headache days per month, current headache/face pain, Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 [PHQ‐9], Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Global Health [GH]) were evaluated. Results Of the 10,073 patients (mean age 44.7 ± 14.9, 78.1% [7872/10,073] female, 80.3% [8087/10,073] White patients) included in the study, 34.5% (3478/10,073) reported visiting the emergency department at least once during the study period. Characteristics significantly associated with self‐reported emergency department utilization included younger age (odds ratio = 0.81 [95% CI = 0.78–0.85] per decade), Black patients (vs. White patients) (1.47 [1.26–1.71]), Medicaid (vs. private insurance) (1.50 [1.29–1.74]), and worse area deprivation index (1.04 [1.02–1.07]). Additionally, worse PROMs were associated with greater odds of emergency department utilization: higher (worse) HIT‐6 (1.35 [1.30–1.41] per 5‐point increase), higher (worse) PHQ‐9 (1.14 [1.09–1.20] per 5‐point increase), and lower (worse) PROMIS‐GH Physical Health T‐scores (0.93 [0.88–0.97]) per 5‐point increase. Conclusion Our study identified several characteristics associated with self‐reported emergency department utilization for headache. Worse PROM scores may be helpful in identifying which patients are at greater risk for utilizing the emergency department.