Reduzzi, Carolina

e15060 Background: In metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC) Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) are an established prognostic indicator of patients (pts) with highly aggressive disease, poor clinical outcomes, and poor response rates to therapy. However, CTCs are typically found in < 20% of mBC pts and many pts without CTCs also progress. Cancer associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs) are inflammatory tumor macrophages also found in blood, in > 90% of mBC, and are indicators of poor clinical outcomes independent of CTCs. We conducted a prospective study to model CTC & CAML subtypes from 212 mBC pt blood samples prior to induction of new systemic therapies to optimize and validate risk models based on 2-year outcomes of Progression-free survival (PFS) & Overall survival (OS). Methods: An observational multi-institutional prospective study was conducted on 212 mBC pts prior to induction of a new line of therapy who were progressing on their current therapy. Anonymized (7.5ml) whole blood samples were taken prior to therapy induction and filtered by CellSieve filtration. Quantities and subtypes of CTCs & CAMLs were categorized by their expression of CK+/CD45+/CD14+ for CAMLs and CK+/CD45-/CD14- for CTCs. PFS (RECIST v1.1) and OS hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated by censored univariate & multivariate analysis at 2 years. Results: Pt median age was 51 years (range 25-92); TNBC (44%), ER/PR+ (30%), HER2+ (15%). Pts were treated with chemotherapy alone (18%), immune checkpoint inhibitor (46%), targeted (40%), hormone (8%) and unknown (5%). 38% (81/212) pts had ≥1 CTCs which correlated with significantly poorer PFS (HR = 1.9; 95%CI 1.3-2.7; p = 0.0016) and OS (HR = 2.0; 95%CI, 1.3-3.0; p = 00025), with the most significant risk at ≥8 CTCs (14% pts), PFS (HR = 3.8; 95%CI, 2.1-6.9; p < 0.0001) and OS (HR = 7.2; 95% CI, 3.4-14.9; p < 0.0001). Independently, 93% (n = 196/212) of pts had ≥1 CAML, with a threshold of >40um size (84% pts) had significantly poorer PFS (HR = 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.1; p = 0.0032), but not OS (HR = 1.5; 95%CI, 0.9-2.7; p = 0.1169). However, a threshold of >125um size CAML (43% pts) also had significantly poorer PFS (HR = 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.7; p = 0.0013) and OS (HR = 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.5; p = 0.0233). By combining models, the best outcomes were seen in pts with 0 CTCs & 0 CAMLs (mPFS = 12.6 & mOS = 21.3), followed by 0 CTCs & ≥40um CAMLs (mPFS = 5.2 & mOS = 17.5) and 0 CTCs & ≥125um CAMLs (mPFS = 4.9 & mOS = 15.2). Poorer outcomes were seen with ≥1 CTCs (mPFS = 3.3 & mOS = 13.5) and the worst outcomes with ≥8 CTCs (mPFS = 2.5 & mOS = 4.8). Conclusions: CTCs were uncommon in mBC pts but correlated with very poor clinical outcomes. In parallel analysis, CAMLs were common with CAML size correlating with increasingly poorer outcomes. By combining CTC & CAML subtypes, mBC pts were more accurately stratified by risk of progression and death. Additional multivariate studies correlating treatment class and tumor response rates are ongoing.

e14535 Background: Anti-programmed cell death ligand PD-L1/PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved for metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients (pts) with a tumor combined positive score (CPS) ≥10% in their tissue. However, many pts with < 10% CPS may also respond to ICIs. Recent studies in lung cancer have shown that circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and tumor-macrophage fusion cells (TMFCs) both express, and may upregulate, PD-L1 which is predictive for ICI responses. We initiated a prospective study to monitor PD-L1 in CTCs & TMFCs in mBC pts prior to receiving systemic ICIs to correlate their PD-L1 expression to progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 24 months. Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional prospective pilot study of n = 102 pts with pathologically confirmed mBC, having failed ≥1 prior lines of therapy, prior to receiving ICIs (n = 52 Pembrolizumab, n = 39 Retifanlimab, n = 5 Atezolizumab, and n = 1 Nivolumab). Anonymized blinded peripheral blood samples (7.5ml) were procured prior to ICI induction (T0) and (~40 days after ICI induction (T1). TMFCs & CTCs were isolated using Cellsieve microfilters with average PD-L1 expressions measured then categorized as negative/low or high. Tumor CPS was categorized as negative/low (< 10%) or high (> 10%). We compared TMFC PD-L1 to tissue CPS by linear regression. TMFC/CTC PD-L1 expression and tissue PD-L1 CPS were compared to pts’ PFS and OS by Cox proportional univariate and multivariate analysis over 24 months. Results: Of n = 102 pts, median age = 59 years (range 32-77); 42% (43/102) were ER+, 33% (33/102) were PR+, 5% (5/102) were HER2+, and 56% (57/102) were triple-negative. 32% (32/102) had an ECOG score of 0, 25% (26/102) had ECOG 1, and 43% of scores were unavailable. N = 42 pts had available tumor CPS data, which did not correlate to TMFC/CTC PD-L1 at T0 or T1. Pts with high CPS did not significantly predict for PFS (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.3-1.9; P = 0.7627) nor OS (HR = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.2-1.7; P = 0.4471). Pts with high TMFC/CTC PD-L1 at T0 also did not significantly predict for PFS (HR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.5-1.2; P = 0.2799) nor OS (HR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.4-1.6; P = 0.7220). However, of the n = 82 pts who provided T1 samples, high CTC/TMFC PD-L1 at T1 was significant for better PFS (HR = 2.55; 95% CI, 1.6-4.2; P = 0.0004) and better OS (HR = 2.06; 95%CI, 1.1-3.8; P = 0.0309). Conclusions: In this study of mBC pts treated with PD-L1 ICIs, tissue CPS did not correlate with PD-L1 expression in CTCs or TMFCs. Further, neither CPS nor baseline PD-L1 in CTC/TMFCs predicted for clinical outcomes in ICI therapies. However, PD-L1 in CTC/TMFCs ~40 days post-induction of ICI did predict for better response rates. While this study suggests predictive value of monitoring PD-L1 in blood during ICI therapies, further studies are required to refine and validate these findings.

Abstract Background: In metastatic cancer, Circulating Tumor cells (CTCs) are established prognostic indictors of patients (pts) less likely to respond to new lines of systemic therapy, with poor clinical outcomes, such as shorter progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). However, CTCs are typically found in specific malignancies (breast, prostate & colon), often in &lt;20% of pts with metastatic disease, and pts without CTCs may also rapidly progress. Recently, an inflammatory pro-tumorigenic macrophage emanating from tumor stroma (i.e. Cancer associated macrophage-like cell [CAML]) was found in &gt;90% of metastatic cancer pts, and whose phagocytic engorgement appears to correlate with poor outcomes, independent of CTCs. As CTCs and CAMLs are isolated in conjunction from a single blood sample, and both are prognostic for outcomes, we evaluated their utilization prior to induction of new systemic therapy in 6 types of metastatic cancer to model pt risk stratification based on 2 year outcomes. Methods: A prospective 2 year blind multi-institutional study was undertaken to model CTCs and CAMLs in prognosticating outcomes prior to induction of a new line of systemic therapy (n=233) in metastatic: Breast (n=60), Prostate (n=40), Pancreas (n=25), Colon (n=28), Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) (n=39), and Lung (n=40). Blood was filtered by CellSieveTM filters with subtypes of CTCs & hyper-enlarged CAMLs (≥100µm) enumerated. A machine learning algorithm was trained on this initial data set to develop predictive models which could stratify pt populations by risk for likelihood of PFS & OS over 2 years, including known clinical variables. Results: CTCs were absent in 80% (n=185/233) of pts, and their absence was prognostic for better PFS (HR=1.6, p=0.046), but not OS (HR=1.3, p=0.2045). In parallel, enlarged CAMLs (≥100µm) were found in 28% (n=51/185) of pts without CTCs, and were also prognostic for worse PFS (HR=2.0, p=0.0082) and OS (HR=1.9, p=0.0412). Specifically, CTCs were found in 55% (n=33) breast, 20% (n=8) prostate, 12% (n=3) pancreas, 11% (n=3) colon, 0% (n=0) RCC, and 0% (n=0) lung pts. Enlarged CAMLs were found in 45% (n=27) breast, 20% (n=8) prostate, 44% (n=11) pancreas, 44% (n=17) colon, 18% (n=7) RCC and 20% (n=8) lung pts. Overall, models indicated that ≥1 CTC (n=47) had mPFS=3.9 & mOS=14.9, while pts with 0 CTCs and ≥100µm CAMLs (n=51) had a mPFS=6.9 & mOS=13.8, and pts with 0 CTCs and &lt;100µm CAMLs (n=134) had a mPFS=10.7 & mOS&gt;24 months. Conclusions: These initial models confirm that both CTCs and enlarged CAMLs are prognostic indicators of worse PFS & OS. The simultaneous quantification both CTCs and CAMLs allows for more accurate pan-cancer risk stratification in an array of cancer pt populations. Additional clinical variables incorporated into the models may allow better risk subtyping and possibly forecast optimal treatment regimens. Citation Format: Daniel L. Adams, Steven H. Lin, Massimo Cristofanilli, Carolina Reduzzi, Saranya Chumsri, Martin J. Edelman, Susan Tsai, Raymond C. Bergan, Mohammed Aldakkak, Thai H. Ho, Cha-Mei Tang. Combining circulating tumor cells and cancer associated macrophage-like cells enhances risk stratification models in pan-cancer metastatic disease [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 1068.

Abstract Background: Currently, the gold standard in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment is assessing cancer cell mitosis in tumor tissue biopsies, which identifies patients with more aggressive cancer subtypes that may require more tailored treatment regimens. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cancer cells that detach from primary tumors, enter the bloodstream, and seed metastatic sites, are a well-known non-invasive blood biomarker which can also be used to aid in stratifying metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients with highly aggressive subtypes. Initial pilot studies have identified a particular subtype of CTCs which are undergoing mitosis that appears to correlate with very poor survival outcomes compared to non-mitotic CTCs alone. In a multi-institutional prospective study, we isolated CTCs from the blood of n=167 mBC patients to categorize mitotic CTCs and evaluate their association with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) over a 3 year period. Methods: Peripheral blood samples (7.5ml) were collected from n=167 mBC patients progressing on systemic therapies and prior to new systemic therapy induction (i.e. chemotherapy n=102, hormone therapy n=13, immunotherapy n=63, targeted therapy n=62). Samples were processed using CellSieve microfilters to isolate CTCs via size exclusion and fluorescently stained for CD45, Cytokeratin, and DAPI. CTCs were imaged, enumerated, and subtyped based on the presence of ≥1 mitotic event, using previously established visual indicators. PFS and OS were assessed over 3 years by censored univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: CTCs were detected in ∼47% (n=79/167) of patients, while mitotic CTCs were identified in a subset of this group, ∼48% (n=38/79). The presence of any CTC was associated with poor outcomes (PFS HR=0.49, 95%CI=0.3-0.7, p=0.0002 and OS: HR=0.42, 95%CI=0.3-0.7, p=0.0002). However, the presence of mitotic CTCs correlated with significantly poorer outcomes compared to non-mitotic CTCs (PFS: HR=0.3, 95%CI=0.2-0.5, p&lt;0.0001 and OS: HR=0.3, 95%CI=0.2-0.6, p=0.0002). Further, patients with no CTCs had a median PFS (mPFS) of 6 months and median OS (mOS) of 22 months, patients with non-mitotic CTCs had a mPFS of 4 months and mOS of 14.5 months; patients with mitotic CTCs had a mPFS of 2.4 months and mOS of 4.4 months. Notably, 95% of patients with a mitotic CTC progressed within 6 months, regardless of systemic therapy type. Interestingly, there were 5 patients who survived longer than 1 year with a mitotic CTC all of which were receiving specific targeted therapies. Conclusion: In this study, the detection of CTCs indicated poor outcomes in patients. Additional cytological analysis of CTCs further identified CTCs undergoing mitosis which correlated to highly aggressive disease with the poorest survival rates. These results indicate that while the presence of CTCs is a prognostic indicator for survival, subtyping CTCs and identifying mitosis may correlate to therapy response. This study highlights the need for larger, more comprehensive studies to expand upon and validate these findings. Citation Format: A. B. Duffy, M. Cristofanilli, C. Reduzzi, W. V. Williams, G. Del Priore, S. Chumsri, C. Tang, T. Iwase, N. T. Ueno, D. L. Adams. Mitotic Circulating Tumor Cells Correlates with Poor Clinical Outcomes in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients over a 3 Year Period [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-01-05.

e15045 Background: Increased cancer cell mitosis in tumor tissue is widely regarded as an indicator of aggressive disease, a predictor of shorter survival, and an indicator of response to specific anthracycline based chemotherapies. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are cancer cells that detach from primary tumors, enter the bloodstream, and seed metastatic sites, which in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) are also predictors of poor prognosis and reduced therapy response. Furthermore, small preliminary studies have identified a specific subtype of mitotic CTCs that appears to correlate with poor survival rates compared to CTC detection alone. However, larger studies have yet to be conducted to validate the clinical utility of mitotic CTCs. In this large multi-institutional prospective study, we isolated CTCs from the blood of n = 155 mBC pts to subtype mitotic CTCs to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) over 2 years. Methods: Peripheral blood samples (7.5ml) were prospectively collected from n = 155 mBC pts progressing on systemic therapies and prior to new systemic therapy induction (i.e., chemotherapy n = 90, hormone therapy n = 13, immunotherapy n = 51, targeted therapy n = 62). Samples were processed using CellSieve microfilters to isolate CTCs via size exclusion and fluorescently stained for CD45, Cytokeratin, and DAPI. CTCs were imaged, enumerated, and subtyped based on the presence of ≥1 mitotic event, using established visual indicators. PFS and OS were assessed over 2 years by censored univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: CTCs were detected in ~45% (n = 70/155) of pts, while mitotic CTCs were identified in a subset of this group, ~23% (n = 35/155). The presence of any CTC was associated with poor outcomes (PFS HR = 2.16, 95%CI = 1.4-3.2, p = 0.0002 and OS: HR = 2.51, 95%CI = 1.5-4.0, p = 0.0002). The presence of mitotic CTCs correlated with significantly poorer outcomes (PFS: HR = 5.6, 95%CI = 3.1-10.2, p < 0.0001 and OS: HR = 7.3, 95%CI = 3.7-14.5, p < 0.0001). Overall, pts with no CTCs had a median PFS (mPFS) of 7 months and median OS (mOS) of 24 months, pts with non-mitotic CTCs had a mPFS of 6 months and mOS of 15 months; pts with both CTCs and mitotic CTCs had a mPFS of 3 months and mOS of 5 months. Notably, 97% of pts with a mitotic CTC progressed within 6 months, regardless of systemic therapy type. Interestingly at 2 years, a sole non-progressive pt with a mitotic CTC was receiving alpelisib (a specialized PI3KCA inhibitor). Conclusions: Overall, the detection of CTCs indicated poor outcomes in pts, with mitotic CTCs correlating with significantly more aggressive disease and further reduced survival rates regardless of systemic therapy type. This study highlights the need for larger, more comprehensive studies to expand upon and validate these findings.

Abstract Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are cancer cells that detach from tumors, enter the blood and seed distant sites. CTCs spread as single cells, or cluster aggregates, and can be heterogenous with differing biological phenotypes, i.e. epithelial, mesenchymal, progenitor, & stem cell. Three clinically relevant CTC subtypes are often described in patients (pts) 1) CTCs with normal epithelial traits (strong filamentous cytokeratin (CK+ & CD45-/CD14-), 2) Epithelial-mesenchymal CTCs (EMTs), cancer cells with downregulated epithelial & upregulated mesenchymal traits (low diffused CK+, CD45-/CD14-) and 3) tumor-macrophage fusion cells (TMFCs), cancer cells that fuse with macrophages (polynucleated DAPI+, diffuse CK+ and CD14+/CD45+). To better elucidate the biological and clinical importance of the 3 CTC subtypes, we isolated CTCs by a marker agnostic method from the blood of n=49 metastatic cancer pts. We then enumerated and phenotypically subtyped CTCs comparing clinical utility of clustering and CTC heterogeneity over 2 years. Peripheral blood samples were collected from 49 metastatic cancer pts, breast (n=38), pancreatic (n=9), colon (n=3), lung (n=1), and prostate (n=1). Whole blood (7.5mL) was filtered by size exclusion using CellSieve microfilters and fluorescently stained for CD45, CD14, CK, and DAPI to identify CTCs, EMTs and TMFCs. Cells were imaged, enumerated and fluors quenched by the QUAS-R technique; followed by re-stained for CD44, CD24, CD133, CD144, N-Cadherin, EpCAM, and Vimentin. Markers were categorized as negative, low, medium, or high. A heterogeneity biomarker score was developed as high, 2-3 log deviations between marker expression, or low 0-1. Pt progressive free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed over 2 years. CTCs were found in 40% of pts, EMTs in 51%, & TMFCs in ∼93%. For subtyping, CD44 was in CTCs 88%, EMTs 59%, & TMFCs 91%; CD24 in CTCs 40%, EMTs 41%, & TMFCs 6%; CD133 in CTCs 100%, EMTs 8%, & TMFCs 100%; CD144 in CTCs 100%, EMTs 77%, & TMFCs 82%; N-cadherin in CTCs 100%, EMTs 0%, & TMFCs 45%; Vimentin in CTCs 51%, EMTs 100%, & TMFCs 83%; EpCAM in CTCs 74%, EMTs 12%, & TMFCs 20%. CTCs and EMTs were found to have high heterogeneity in 30% of samples in both individual cells and clusters, with a high biomarker heterogeneity significantly correlated with poorer outcomes (PFS: HR=15.4, p=0.0014, CI=3.4-68.9; OS: HR=12.4, p=0.0056, CI=2.6-59.1). TMFCs were found to have high heterogeneity, 40% of samples, but this was not correlated with outcomes. In this pilot study, it appeared that isolated CTC, EMTs and TMFCs subtypes have differing heterogenous expressions of epithelial, mesenchymal, progenitor, and stem cell markers. Further, high rates biomarker heterogeneity in CTCs and EMTs, but not TMFCs, correlated with faster rates of progression & death. Larger validation experiments with biomarker stratification is ongoing. Citation Format: Alexis B. Duffy, Massimo Cristofanilli, Carolina Reduzzi, Cha-Mei Tang, Saranya Chumsri, Susan Tsai, Mohammed Aldakkak, Daniel L. Adams. Heterogeneity of epithelial, mesenchymal, progenitor, and stem cell phenotypes on CTCs correlates to clinical outcomes in metastatic cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 1989.

Abstract Background: Circulating tumor cell clusters (CTCCs) are aggregated groups of tumor cells that detached from primary tumors and circulate the bloodstream. However, while Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) are a well studied phenomenon, CTCCs remain relatively unexplored and ill-defined, with only a few descriptive investigations evaluating their clinical utility. Adding to CTCC complexity is that various subtypes exist, including homotypic clusters consisting of a homogenous population of tumor cells and heterotypic CTCCs made of CTCs with immune/stromal white blood cells (WBCs). Furthermore, CTCs can undergo Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT), a process characterized by loss of epithelial traits and upregulation of mesenchymal traits, and can form clustered EMTs (CEMTs). Moreover, CTCs can fuse with macrophages forming Tumor Macrophage Hybrid Cells, aka Cancer-Associated Macrophage Like cells (CAMLs) when in circulation. We enumerated all these types of cells and complex aggregates in the peripheral blood of patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Methods: We enumerated the 6 populations from patient samples enrolled in IRB aproved prospective pilot studies. Whole peripheral blood (7.5mL) was filtered and stained with cytokeratin (CK) & CD45/CD14 to identify CTCs. CTCs were defined as an intact DAPI nuclei and strong filamentous CK. Homotypic CTCCs were defined as ≥2 CTCs attached together. Heterotypic CTCCs were defined as ≥1 CTC attached to ≥1 WBC. EMTs were defined as having DAPI nuclei and weak non-filamentous CK. CEMTS were defined as ≥2 EMTs. CAMLs were defined as having an enlarged polynucleated DAPI, and positive for CD45/CD14 or non-filamentous CK. Median progression free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) over 24 months (m) were evaluated. Results: We evaluated the blood of 79 mBC patients. Single CTCs were found in 57% of patients (n=34/79), homotypic CTCCs 15% (n=12/79), heterotypic CTCCs 66% (n=27/79), EMTs 56% (n=44/79), CEMTs 23% (n=18/79) and CAMLs 97% (n=77/79). Over 24 ms, patierns with detectable heterotypic CTCCs & homotypic CTCCs had the shortest response times at mPFS=2.8 & mOS=5.8 ms, or mPFS=2.1 & mOS=4.3 ms, respectively. This was followed by CTCs mPFS=3.7 & mOS=13.7 ms, EMTs mPFS=4.3 & mOS=14.4 ms, CAMLs mPFS=4.3 & mOS=14.4 ms, and CEMT mPFS=4.7 & mOS=13.2 ms. Additionally, CTCCs were rare in HER2+ patients at 4.4% (n=1/23), but no associations to other hormone statuses were found. Conclusion: CTCCs appear to represent an array of subtypes with different biological and clinical meanings. Here we enumerated CTCC subtypes in the blood of mBC patients and stratified the various types to clinical outcomes. These data suggest CTCCs are clinically important and further understanding of their biology in the context of tumor pathogenesis is needed. Citation Format: Daniel L. Adams, Carolina Reduzzi, Aravind Aryasomayajula, R. Katherine Alpaugh, Saranya Chumsri, Cha-Mei Tang, Giuseppe Del Priore, William V. Williams, Massimo Cristofanilli. Identifying and stratifying circulating tumor cell cluster subtypes in metastatic breast cancer patients and evaluating their clinical outcomes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 2303.

Abstract Background: Recently, it was described that macrophages and tumor cells can fuse to form tumor macrophage fusion cells (TMFs) which are detectable within primary tumors and patient’s (pts) circulation. However, there are multiple pathways and subsequent subtypes of TMFs, with limited data on the various TMF types, commonality in blood, and clinical relevance. Here we evaluated n=120 metastatic breast cancer (mBC) blood samples for CTCs & TMFs. We describe numerous types of TMFs with vastly different fusion phenotypes, including partial (i.e. some membrane interaction & both cells retaining their original phenotypes), homodimeric (i.e. both cells with fused membranes & sharing cytoplasm), cannibalistic (i.e. CTC within a CD14+ macrophage & cells retaining their individual phenotypes), binucleated (i.e. both cells completely merge & becoming one cell with dual expression phenotypes), and hyperploidy (i.e. multiple cells merge to form a large polyploid cell). As CTCs & TMFs are isolated in conjunction from a single blood sample, we evaluated both CTCs & all TMF subtypes to determine their prognostic and predictive values for aggressiveness of disease. Methods: We categorized and enumerated the 5 forms of TMFs from a prospective pilot study using n=120 mBC pts that were starting new lines of treatment. Whole peripheral blood (7.5mL) was procured, filtered and stained using cytokeratin & CD45/CD14 to identify CTCs & TMFs. We compared the presence of the various types of TMFs & CTCs to pt’s progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) hazard ratios (HRs), analyzed by censored univariate analysis based on RECIST v1.1 over 24 months. Results: CTCs were found in 39% (n=47/120), with partial fusion TMFs in 26% (n=31/120), homodimeric 2% (n=2/120), cannibalistic 0% (n=0/120), binucleated 2% (n=2/120), hyperploidy 93% (n=113/120). Presence of CTCs alone, binucleated, or hyperploidy TMFs were not prognostic for PFS (p=0.0988, p=0.4120, & p=0.7615 respectively), or OS (p=0.2015, p=0.0845, p=0.1121 respectively). However, TMFs with partial or homodimeric fusion were prognostic for worse PFS (HR=2.2, p=0.0063 and HR=6.0, p=0.0305, respectively) and for worse OS (HR=2.8, p=0.0037 and HR=8.8, p=0.0271, respectively). Furthermore, combining pts with any TMFs into one group, minus hyperploidy, was highly significant for worse PFS (HR=2.9, 95%CI 1.7-5.0, p=0.0002) and worse OS (HR=3.8, 95%CI 2.0-7.5, p=0.0002), though certain subtypes of hyperploidy were also indicative of worse outcomes. Conclusion: The study of TMFs is relativity limited and their existence is new in oncology. Here we detected and described TMFs in the blood of mBC pts while demonstrating an association with poor clinical outcomes. These data suggest TMF involvement in the pathogenic cascade of cancer and further understanding of their biology may be important in the study of tumorigenesis. Citation Format: Daniel L. Adams, R. Katherine Alpaugh, Rena G. Lapidus, Saranya Chumsri, Carolina Reduzzi, Kirby P. Gardner, Cha-Mei Tang, Giuseppe Del Priore, William V. Williams, Massimo Cristofanilli. Tumor macrophage fusion cells detected in the circulation of metastatic breast cancer patients is prognostic for rapid progression and death [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 2310.

3054 Background: Tumor Macrophage Fusion Cells (TMFCs) are hybrids fusions of tumor cells and macrophage/immune cells that have recently been documented in advanced solid tumors, such as metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC). Further, TMFCs are found in the blood of patients (pts) as a CD45+/CD14+ binucleated subtype of standard circulating tumor cells (CTCs), which are Cytokeratin+ (CK+) & CD45 negative, but distinct from highly hyperploidy cells known as cancer associated macrophage-like cells. However, no study has explored the clinical meaning of TMFCs in blood. To better elucidate the clinical meaning of TMFCs, we prospectively pooled 137 mBC pt samples prior to induction of new therapy, ie baseline (BL), and after therapy induction (FU). Both TMFCs or standard CTCs were identified and enumerated to analyze their prognostic value for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: In this prospective study, we collected 7.5 mL blood samples from n=137 mBC pts enrolled in prospective trials from multiple institutions before starting new treatment lines for newly progressive mBC. If possible, an optional FU sample was collected (n=73) after BL (median=4.9 weeks). TMFCs & CTCs were isolated using a CellSieve microfilter and differentiated by staining for CK, CD45, CD14, and DAPI. Cox proportional regression hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) for PFS & OS by univariate & multivariate analyses were based on RECIST v1.1, determined by local institutional pathologist over 24 months (M). Results: TMFCs were detected in 26.3% (n=36/137) at BL and associated with significantly worse PFS (HR=3.3, CI 1.9-5.7, p<0.001) & OS (HR=2.7, CI 1.4-5.1, p=0.005). TMFCs were also detected in 27.4% (n=20/73) at FU (n=73) and prognostic for PFS (HR=5.2, CI 2.3-11.9, p<0.001) & OS (HR=5.1, 1.8-14.2, p=0.004). Further, pts with increases in TMFCs between BL and FU had worse PFS (HR=4.3, CI 1.9-10.1, p=0.001) & OS (HR=4.5, CI 1.6-12.7, p=0.011). In contrast, pts with CTCs were found in 39.4% (n=54/137) at BL, which were prognostic for worse PFS (HR=2.0, CI 1.3-3.2, p=0.005) and not prognostic for OS (HR=1.7, CI 0.9-3.0, p=0.103). At FU, pts with CTCs were found in 38.4% (n=28/73), which were prognostic for worse PFS (HR=3.6, CI 1.8-7.3, p=0.001) & OS (HR=3.2, CI 1.3-8.0, p=0.021). Overall at BL, pts without CTCs or TMFCs had a 5.7 M mPFS & >24M mOS, CTCs alone had a 5.0 M mPFS & 20.3 M mOS, TMFCs had 2.0 M mPFS & 5.8 M mOS. At FU, pts without CTCs or TMFCs had a 5.8 M mPFS & 14.5 M mOS, CTCs alone had a 3.3 M mPFS & 14.6 M mOS, while TMFCs pts had a 1.7 M mPFS & 4.8 M mOS. Conclusions: TMFCs appear to represent a CTC subgroup with additional prognostic value to standard CTCs, that may correlate with significantly faster PFS and OS versus pts with CTCs alone, or without CTCs. Subtyping treatment regimens is ongoing to determine if the TMFC populations are responsive to specific therapy types in these mBC pts.

Abstract Background: Micronuclei (MN) are a result of biological DNA repair mechanisms which form due to internal chromosomal aberrations indicating sub-clonal cancer populations with higher cell survivability and drug therapy resistance. MN are often observed as small fragments of nucleic acids excised from a primary nucleus in Circulating Stomal Cells (CStCs) in response to DNA damage. CStCs with damaged DNA undergoing repair mechanisms, such as those that form MN, are likely to have upregulated expression of programmed cell death ligand (PD-L1) which can be abnormally high on cancer cells that have high mutational burdens. We evaluated CStCs in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients for presence of MN and the cell's PD-L1 expression, to determine its prognostic significance to clinical outcomes. Methods: We enumerated MN formation in CStCs in a prospective pilot study using n=76 mBC patients starting new lines of treatment. Whole peripheral blood (7.5mL) was procured and filtered for CStCs and then stained for PD-L1. DAPI was used to identify MN, defined by small (&lt;3 µm) DAPI+ circular formations within the cytoplasm, separate from the primary nucleus. We compared number of MN to PD-L1 expression of all cells, and the MN presence to all available clinical variables. Patients’ progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) hazard ratios (HRs) were analyzed by censored univariate analysis based on RECIST v1.1 over two-years. Results: MN were identified in 62% (n=46/76) of CStCs and MN positive CStCs had a significantly higher PD-L1 expression than MN negative CStCs (p=0.0082). A linear relationship between increasing MN number and higher PDL-1 expression within cells was identified, R=0.9411. Further, presence of MN with in CStCs was significantly prognostic for worse PFS (HR=2.62 95%CI 1.50-4.59, p=0.0012) and worse OS (HR= 3.07 95%CI 1.56-6.03, p = 0.002) over 24 months. Conclusion: MN formations in mBC are observable biomarkers of an underlying repair mechanism which suggest the survivability of sub-clonal cancer populations associated with more aggressive cancer subtypes with worsening progression rates. Further studies to evaluate the effect of PD-1 immunotherapies in MN positive patients is ongoing. Citation Format: Dimpal M. Kasabwala, Massimo Cristofanilli, R. Katherine Alpaugh, Saranya Chumsri, Carolina Reduzzi, Cha-Mei Tang, Rena G. Lapidus, Giuseppe Del Priore, William V. Williams, Daniel L. Adams. Micronuclei in circulating stromal cells correlates with PD-L1 expression and predicts progression in metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 304.