Gardner, Kirby P.

Abstract Cancer Associated Macrophage Like cells (CAMLs) are antigen presenting circulating stromal cells found in the blood of cancer patients (pts). Recently, PD-L1 expression on CAMLs was described in breast (BC), lung (LC) and renal cell carcinomas (RCC), appearing to parallel the inflammatory PD-L1 state of the tumor microenvironment, and acting as a possible predictive biomarker for PD-L1/PD-1 immunotherapeutics (IMTs). We monitored CAML PD-L1 from 48 pts in an array of solid tumors, prior PD-L1/PD-1 IMTs induction, to evaluate CAML’s ability to predict response by progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Three single blind multi-year prospective studies were run to test PD-L1 CAML expression against PFS & OS, prior to induction of therapy in metastatic (m) LC (n=24), mBC (n=16) or mRCC (n=8). We recruited pts with pathologically confirmed progressing disease after at least one failed prior line of therapy. Blood samples (7.5 mL) were taken prior to start of new therapeutic regimes, i.e. pembrolizumab (n=36) or nivolumab (n=12). Whole blood was filtered by CellSieve microfilters to collect CAMLs, stain for PD-L1, and then scored as a binary high or low, to evaluate PFS & OS hazard ratios (HRs) by censored univariate & multivariate analysis at 24 months. CAMLs were found in 98% of all tested samples. Overall, pts with high CAML PD-L1 expression treated with IMT had significantly better PFS (HR=2.9, 95%CI=1.4–6.1, p=0.0067) and better OS (HR=2.7, 95%CI=1.2–6.1, p=0.0317) vs patients with low CAML PD-L1. These data suggests that PD-L1 expression in circulating CAMLs appears to predict pts with increased benefit to PD-L1/PD-1 IMTs in an array of tumor subtypes, though larger studies are needed to validate these findings. Private Funding by Creatv MicroTech, Inc. and supported grants by NCI-NIH (R43CA206840), and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)(W911NF-14-C-0098).

Abstract Background: Recently, it was described that macrophages and tumor cells can fuse to form tumor macrophage fusion cells (TMFs) which are detectable within primary tumors and patient’s (pts) circulation. However, there are multiple pathways and subsequent subtypes of TMFs, with limited data on the various TMF types, commonality in blood, and clinical relevance. Here we evaluated n=120 metastatic breast cancer (mBC) blood samples for CTCs & TMFs. We describe numerous types of TMFs with vastly different fusion phenotypes, including partial (i.e. some membrane interaction & both cells retaining their original phenotypes), homodimeric (i.e. both cells with fused membranes & sharing cytoplasm), cannibalistic (i.e. CTC within a CD14+ macrophage & cells retaining their individual phenotypes), binucleated (i.e. both cells completely merge & becoming one cell with dual expression phenotypes), and hyperploidy (i.e. multiple cells merge to form a large polyploid cell). As CTCs & TMFs are isolated in conjunction from a single blood sample, we evaluated both CTCs & all TMF subtypes to determine their prognostic and predictive values for aggressiveness of disease. Methods: We categorized and enumerated the 5 forms of TMFs from a prospective pilot study using n=120 mBC pts that were starting new lines of treatment. Whole peripheral blood (7.5mL) was procured, filtered and stained using cytokeratin & CD45/CD14 to identify CTCs & TMFs. We compared the presence of the various types of TMFs & CTCs to pt’s progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) hazard ratios (HRs), analyzed by censored univariate analysis based on RECIST v1.1 over 24 months. Results: CTCs were found in 39% (n=47/120), with partial fusion TMFs in 26% (n=31/120), homodimeric 2% (n=2/120), cannibalistic 0% (n=0/120), binucleated 2% (n=2/120), hyperploidy 93% (n=113/120). Presence of CTCs alone, binucleated, or hyperploidy TMFs were not prognostic for PFS (p=0.0988, p=0.4120, & p=0.7615 respectively), or OS (p=0.2015, p=0.0845, p=0.1121 respectively). However, TMFs with partial or homodimeric fusion were prognostic for worse PFS (HR=2.2, p=0.0063 and HR=6.0, p=0.0305, respectively) and for worse OS (HR=2.8, p=0.0037 and HR=8.8, p=0.0271, respectively). Furthermore, combining pts with any TMFs into one group, minus hyperploidy, was highly significant for worse PFS (HR=2.9, 95%CI 1.7-5.0, p=0.0002) and worse OS (HR=3.8, 95%CI 2.0-7.5, p=0.0002), though certain subtypes of hyperploidy were also indicative of worse outcomes. Conclusion: The study of TMFs is relativity limited and their existence is new in oncology. Here we detected and described TMFs in the blood of mBC pts while demonstrating an association with poor clinical outcomes. These data suggest TMF involvement in the pathogenic cascade of cancer and further understanding of their biology may be important in the study of tumorigenesis. Citation Format: Daniel L. Adams, R. Katherine Alpaugh, Rena G. Lapidus, Saranya Chumsri, Carolina Reduzzi, Kirby P. Gardner, Cha-Mei Tang, Giuseppe Del Priore, William V. Williams, Massimo Cristofanilli. Tumor macrophage fusion cells detected in the circulation of metastatic breast cancer patients is prognostic for rapid progression and death [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 2310.

3054 Background: Tumor Macrophage Fusion Cells (TMFCs) are hybrids fusions of tumor cells and macrophage/immune cells that have recently been documented in advanced solid tumors, such as metastatic Breast Cancer (mBC). Further, TMFCs are found in the blood of patients (pts) as a CD45+/CD14+ binucleated subtype of standard circulating tumor cells (CTCs), which are Cytokeratin+ (CK+) & CD45 negative, but distinct from highly hyperploidy cells known as cancer associated macrophage-like cells. However, no study has explored the clinical meaning of TMFCs in blood. To better elucidate the clinical meaning of TMFCs, we prospectively pooled 137 mBC pt samples prior to induction of new therapy, ie baseline (BL), and after therapy induction (FU). Both TMFCs or standard CTCs were identified and enumerated to analyze their prognostic value for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: In this prospective study, we collected 7.5 mL blood samples from n=137 mBC pts enrolled in prospective trials from multiple institutions before starting new treatment lines for newly progressive mBC. If possible, an optional FU sample was collected (n=73) after BL (median=4.9 weeks). TMFCs & CTCs were isolated using a CellSieve microfilter and differentiated by staining for CK, CD45, CD14, and DAPI. Cox proportional regression hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) for PFS & OS by univariate & multivariate analyses were based on RECIST v1.1, determined by local institutional pathologist over 24 months (M). Results: TMFCs were detected in 26.3% (n=36/137) at BL and associated with significantly worse PFS (HR=3.3, CI 1.9-5.7, p<0.001) & OS (HR=2.7, CI 1.4-5.1, p=0.005). TMFCs were also detected in 27.4% (n=20/73) at FU (n=73) and prognostic for PFS (HR=5.2, CI 2.3-11.9, p<0.001) & OS (HR=5.1, 1.8-14.2, p=0.004). Further, pts with increases in TMFCs between BL and FU had worse PFS (HR=4.3, CI 1.9-10.1, p=0.001) & OS (HR=4.5, CI 1.6-12.7, p=0.011). In contrast, pts with CTCs were found in 39.4% (n=54/137) at BL, which were prognostic for worse PFS (HR=2.0, CI 1.3-3.2, p=0.005) and not prognostic for OS (HR=1.7, CI 0.9-3.0, p=0.103). At FU, pts with CTCs were found in 38.4% (n=28/73), which were prognostic for worse PFS (HR=3.6, CI 1.8-7.3, p=0.001) & OS (HR=3.2, CI 1.3-8.0, p=0.021). Overall at BL, pts without CTCs or TMFCs had a 5.7 M mPFS & >24M mOS, CTCs alone had a 5.0 M mPFS & 20.3 M mOS, TMFCs had 2.0 M mPFS & 5.8 M mOS. At FU, pts without CTCs or TMFCs had a 5.8 M mPFS & 14.5 M mOS, CTCs alone had a 3.3 M mPFS & 14.6 M mOS, while TMFCs pts had a 1.7 M mPFS & 4.8 M mOS. Conclusions: TMFCs appear to represent a CTC subgroup with additional prognostic value to standard CTCs, that may correlate with significantly faster PFS and OS versus pts with CTCs alone, or without CTCs. Subtyping treatment regimens is ongoing to determine if the TMFC populations are responsive to specific therapy types in these mBC pts.

The usage of beta blockers in breast cancer (BC) patients is implicated in the reduction in distant metastases, cancer recurrence, and cancer mortality. Studies suggest that the adrenergic pathway is directly involved in sympathetic-driven hematopoietic activation of pro-tumor microenvironmental proliferation and tumor cell trafficking into the circulation. Cancer-associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs) are pro-tumor polynucleated monocytic cells of hematopoietic origin emanating from tumors which may aid in circulating tumor cell (CTC) dissemination into the circulation. We examined the linkage between Beta-2 adrenergic receptor (B2AR) signaling in CAMLs and CTCs by establishing expression profiles in a model BC cell line (MDA-MB-231). We compared the model to CAMLs and CTCs found in patents. Although internalization events were observed in patients, differences were found in the expression of B2AR between the tumor cell lines and the CAMLs found in patients. High B2AR expression on patients’ CAMLs was correlated with significantly more CAMLs in the circulation (p = 0.0093), but CTCs had no numerical relationship (p = 0.1565). High B2AR CAML expression was also significantly associated with a larger size of CAMLs (p = 0.0073), as well as being significantly associated with shorter progression-free survival (p = 0.0097) and overall survival (p = 0.0265). These data suggest that B2AR expression on CAMLs is closely related to the activation, intravasation, and growth of CAMLs in the circulation.

Abstract Background: CCR5 is a motility chemokine receptor implicated in tumor progression, whose activation and endocytosis may identify highly aggressive breast cancer (BC) subtypes likely to spread via the circulatory system. We first studied the activation and endocytosis of CCR5 in response to its ligand CCL5 (RANTES) in the model BC cell line MDA-MB231. We then screened two types of circulating tumor-associated cells (TACs) with known negative clinical outcomes, 1) circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and 2) cancer-associated macrophage-like (CAMLs) cells, to evaluate CCR5 upregulation in relation to disease progression in metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Methods: MB231 cells were used to visualize CCR5 activation within the cell's surface and intracellular space using an anti-CCR5 antibody after stimulation with RANTES. MB231 cells were stained with LAMP-1A to verify co-localization of CCR5 and RANTES to endosomes. Anonymized peripheral blood samples from (n=54) mBC patients were obtained in accordance with local IRB regulations and with informed consent. TACs were isolated using a low-flow CellSieve Microfiltration system and stained for Cytokeratin, CD45, and CCR5. CCR5 expression signal and localization were evaluated on all TACs via fluorescence microscopy. Results: CCR5 in MB231 cells appeared as ~1μm clusters known as “CCR5 pools”, which can be found on the cell's surface, within the cytoplasm, and in the nuclear space. CCR5 pools were upregulated in the presence of RANTES, which appears to relate to endocytosis and nuclear translocation. Within the TACs of mBCs, we found similar patterns of CCR5 pooling with 70% of patients (n=38) having CCR5+ CAMLs and 41% (n=22) having CCR5+ CTCs. It was found that higher numbers of CCR5 pools (≥10pools/cell) were correlated to a 2-fold increase in both CTCs and CAMLs in circulation. In the analysis of outcome data, it was determined that patients having ≥10 CCR5 pools on their CAMLs was a highly significant predictor of worse progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (PFS HR=4.8, CI 95% 1.9-11.6, p=0.0015) and (OS HR=3.6, CI 95% 1.3-10.0, p=0.0331). In CTCs ≥10 pools/cell was not a significant predictor for worse PFS and OS. However, ≥5 CCR5 pools/cell significantly predicted for worse PFS but not OS (PFS HR=2.9, CI 95% 1.2-7.4, p=0.0418 and OS HR=3.3, CI 95% 1.1-9.3, p= 0.0539). Conclusion: We observed the activation and endocytosis of CCR5 pools using RANTES in MD-MB231 cell lines, and then demonstrated that this upregulated motility pathway appears to be conserved in migratory cells in mBC patients. Further, this upregulation of CCR5 appears to correlate with worse clinical outcomes, which may provide an explanation for how tumor-associated cells move into circulation and acquire metastatic potential. Citation Format: Ashvathi Raghavakaimal, Massimo Cristofanilli, Cha-Mei Tang, R. K. Alpaugh, Kirby P. Gardener, Saranya Chumsri, Daniel L. Adams. CCR5 upregulation in two subtypes of tumor associated circulating cells predict worse prognosis in metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 589.