Rummans, Teresa A.

Background: Substance use disorders (SUDs) are highly prevalent, affecting over 48.5 million Americans. Available treatments for SUD remain insufficient, and many patients do not respond to existing interventions despite adequate adherence to treatments. While novel therapies for SUD are urgently needed, the use of psychedelic drugs for the treatment of SUDs has shown promise. Objectives: This overview of systematic reviews summarizes existing evidence on hallucinogens—serotonergic psychedelics and ketamine—for the treatment of SUD. Methods: A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted to identify relevant evidence for using serotonergic and non-serotonergic psychedelics for the treatment of SUDs. After initial screening (n = 468 studies), 62 studies were retrieved and assessed for eligibility, and a total of 16 systematic reviews were included. Conclusions: Although preliminary, evidence suggests that the use of serotonergic and non-serotonergic psychedelics for the treatment of SUD may provide advantages over traditional therapeutics, and these compounds may eventually become part of the next generation of treatments for SUD under specific circumstances. Research with these drugs has faced significant challenges, though, and caution when interpreting results is warranted, given high risk of bias and several other methodological limitations from the studies to date. Furthermore, risks associated with these drugs are not negligible. For now, the use of psychedelic drugs for the treatment of SUDs remains experimental, and existing evidence is insufficient to support its use in clinical practice.

Background: Invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation in psychiatry represents a burgeoning field that leverages advanced neuromodulation techniques to address substance use disorders (SUDs). Aims: This narrative review synthesizes findings from multiple reviews to evaluate the efficacy of neuromodulation in treating SUDs. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted between December 2024 and April 2025, focusing on systematic reviews and meta-analyses that examined various neuromodulation modalities, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS). The selected reviews were analyzed to identify common themes, outcomes, and gaps in the current understanding of these treatments for SUDs. Results: 11 reviews met the final inclusion criteria; 5 focused on non-invasive neuromodulation (rTMS, tDCS) and 6 on invasive neuromodulation (DBS). Non-invasive neurostimulation was associated with modest improvements in craving and cognitive dysfunction in individuals with SUDs. Similarly, invasive neuromodulation (DBS), through high-frequency stimulation of the bilateral nucleus accumbens, appeared to reduce cravings and improve comorbid psychiatric symptoms in both preclinical and human studies. Importantly, small sample sizes, heterogeneity in targets and stimulation protocols, and short follow-up periods significantly limit the generalizability of current findings from both non-invasive and invasive neuromodulation studies. Conclusions: As novel and more effective therapies for the treatment of SUD are desperately needed, procedural interventional psychiatry holds promise. However, despite encouraging results, existing evidence is still preliminary, and larger, rigorously designed studies are warranted to further establish the safety and efficacy of neuromodulatory interventions for SUD treatment.

Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is a growing public health concern, with rising prevalence and significant impact on individuals across age groups. This systematic review examines 24 studies investigating pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for CUD among adolescents (up to 17), young adults (18–24), and older adults (25–65). Database searches were conducted for randomized controlled trials of CUD interventions reporting outcomes such as cannabis use, abstinence, withdrawal symptoms, and treatment retention. For adolescents, interventions such as contingent rewards and family engagement have shown promise, while young adults benefit from technology-based platforms and peer support. In older adults, pharmacological adjuncts combined with counseling have shown promise in enhancing treatment outcomes. However, optimal treatment combinations remain uncertain, highlighting the need for further research. Addressing CUD requires tailored interventions that acknowledge developmental stages and challenges across the lifespan. Although promising interventions exist, further comparative effectiveness research is needed to delineate the most efficacious approaches.

Objective: To investigate patterns and trends of co-prescriptions of stimulants and sedatives within the last 6 years at a tertiary care center. Method: Patients 18 years of age and older who were dispensed at least one stimulant prescription from an institutional pharmacy between 1/1/2015 and 7/1/2021 were included. Prescription data for any co-prescribed sedative/hypnotic were collected. Results: Both the number of stimulant dispenses and the number of patients with stimulant dispenses increased significantly with yearly incidence rate ratios of 1.115 (95% CI [1.110, 1.119]) and 1.090 (95% CI [1.084, 1.096]), respectively. The number of patients with a stimulant dispensed who also had a benzodiazepine or “Z-drug” sedative-hypnotic dispensed at any point in the search timeframe increased significantly with incidence rate ratios of 1.077 and 1.092, respectively. The number of stimulant dispenses, number of patients with stimulant dispenses, and number of patients with a stimulant dispensed who also had both a benzodiazepine and Z-drug dispensed at any point in the search timeframe increased significantly more in Non-White than in White patients. Conclusions: The results confirm previous findings of increases in dispensing of stimulants over the past 6 years and report increased polypharmacy of stimulants and sedative-hypnotics.

e24087 Background: Patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers experience a substantial amount of distress. Limited research suggests that mindfulness-based interventions may improve quality of life and reduce anxiety. The virtually delivered Resilient Living program consisted of online modules, a print journal, and a total of 4 virtual training sessions focused on techniques for managing stress and building resilience (mindful presence, uplifting emotions, reframing experiences through principles of gratitude, compassion, acceptance, meaning, and forgiveness). The current pilot study was performed to assess the feasibility of the virtual Resilient Living Program for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers, as well as preliminary effects on anxiety and related outcomes. Methods: Eligible patients included those age ≥18 years with a diagnosis of advanced cancer with expected prognosis > 6 months. Feasibility was defined as consent of at least 25% of eligible patients and their caregivers. Adherence was defined as 75% of the enrolled participants completing at least 3 of the 4 Resilient Living sessions. The primary outcome measure was anxiety as measured by the GAD-7; others included stress (PSS), quality of life (LASA), sleep (ISI), resiliency (Resiliency Scale), and fatigue (PROMIS-Fatigue SF). Results: Seventy-two eligible patients were referred to the study, of these 33 patients enrolled (46% enrollment), 15 also had a caregiver enroll. Thirty participants completed at least 3 virtual sessions (63% adherence). Data was collected at baseline, week 5 (after 2 session), week 9 (after 4 sessions), and week 12 (1 month after completion) for patients and caregivers. There were statistically significant improvements in anxiety at weeks 5, 9 and 12 (i.e., p < 0.05). Other results are outlined in the table. Conclusions: Virtual participation in the Resilient Living Program is feasible and acceptable for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers. Data from this pilot study suggest that the program may positivity impact anxiety, stress, sleep, quality of life and resiliency. A larger randomized prospective clinical trial is warranted to confirm these preliminary findings. Clinical trial information: NCT04480008. [Table: see text]

Background: It is standard of care and an accreditation requirement to screen for and address distress and psychosocial needs in patients with cancer. This study assessed the availability of mental health (MH) and chemical dependency (CD) services at US cancer centers. Methods: The 2017–2018 American Hospital Association (AHA) survey, Area Health Resource File, and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital Compare databases were used to assess availability of services and associations with hospital-level and health services area (HSA)–level characteristics. Results: Of 1,144 cancer centers surveyed, 85.4% offered MH services and 45.5% offered CD services; only 44.1% provided both. Factors associated with increased adjusted odds of offering MH services were teaching status (odds ratio [OR], 1.76; 95% CI, 1.18–2.62), being a member of a hospital system (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.31–3.07), and having more beds (OR, 1.04 per 10-bed increase; 95% CI, 1.02–1.05). Higher population estimate (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97–0.99), higher percentage uninsured (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.86–0.95), and higher Mental Health Professional Shortage Area level in the HSA (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98–1.00) were associated with decreased odds of offering MH services. Government-run (OR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.30–6.22) and nonprofit centers (OR, 3.48; 95% CI, 1.78–6.79) showed increased odds of offering CD services compared with for-profit centers. Those that were members of hospital systems (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.14–2.29) and had more beds (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.03) also showed increased odds of offering these services. A higher percentage of uninsured patients in the HSA (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88–0.97) was associated with decreased odds of offering CD services. Conclusions: Patients’ ability to pay, membership in a hospital system, and organization size may be drivers of decisions to co-locate services within cancer centers. Larger organizations may be better able to financially support offering these services despite poor reimbursement rates. Innovations in specialty payment models highlight opportunities to drive transformation in delivering MH and CD services for high-need patients with cancer.

Background. There is limited information concerning whether social determinants of health affect postliver transplant (LT) outcomes. This study aims to understand to what extent the health of LT recipients’ counties of residence influence long-term LT outcomes. Methods. We used the United Network for Organ Sharing data to identify adult LT recipients transplanted between January 2010 and June 2018. Patient-level data were matched to county-level County Health Ranking (CHR) data using transplant recipient zip code, and nationwide CHRs were created. Mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine associations between CHRs and graft and patient survival post-LT. Results. Health outcomes rank was significantly associated with posttransplant graft and patient survival, with worst tertile counties showing a 13% increased hazard of both graft failure and patient mortality compared to the best tertile counties. Conclusions. Although county health is associated with LT outcomes, it also appears that LT recipient selection is effective at mitigating major disparities based on county of residence and helps yield equitable outcomes in this respect.