Ghafouri, Mohammad

Abstract Background Small studies suggest that constipation is a common symptom associated with a worse prognosis in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Objectives The aim was to compare the association between constipation, motor, and other non‐motor symptoms (NMS) in PD patients at baseline and in future. Methods Using the Fox Insight database, we compared baseline characteristics, risk of progressive motor symptoms, and incidence of NMS between PD patients with versus without constipation. Results Of 20,352 participants, 16,611 (82%) reported infrequent bowel movements and/or excessive straining, 15,594 (77%) had incomplete evacuation, and 14,165 (70%) reported both symptoms. Patients with constipation were generally older, white, women, had PD >5 years, and had higher NMS and comorbidity scores ( P < 0.001). Constipation was significantly associated with worse motor symptoms and most NMS , especially fecal incontinence (odds ratio [ OR] = 1.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49–1.82), dysphagia ( OR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.12–1.29), talking/moving during sleep ( OR = 1.39; 95% CI = 1.30–1.48), and urinary urgency ( OR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.16–1.32). Constipation was associated with a small, but statistically significant increased risk of some progressive motor symptoms. At a mean median follow‐up of 2.8 years, constipation was associated with an increased risk of incident gastrointestinal, autonomic, neuropsychiatric, sleep‐related, sensory NMS , such as dysphagia (hazard ratio [ HR] = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.35–1.51), fecal incontinence ( HR = 1.87; 95% CI = 1.74–2.01), falls ( HR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.35–1.52), hallucinations ( HR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.52–1.79), cognitive impairment ( HR = 1.38; 95% CI = 1.30–1.47), and talking/moving during sleep ( HR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.55–1.75). Conclusions Constipation is a common symptom associated with severity of motor and other NMS and portends a worse prognosis in persons with PD.

Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is a growing public health concern, with rising prevalence and significant impact on individuals across age groups. This systematic review examines 24 studies investigating pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for CUD among adolescents (up to 17), young adults (18–24), and older adults (25–65). Database searches were conducted for randomized controlled trials of CUD interventions reporting outcomes such as cannabis use, abstinence, withdrawal symptoms, and treatment retention. For adolescents, interventions such as contingent rewards and family engagement have shown promise, while young adults benefit from technology-based platforms and peer support. In older adults, pharmacological adjuncts combined with counseling have shown promise in enhancing treatment outcomes. However, optimal treatment combinations remain uncertain, highlighting the need for further research. Addressing CUD requires tailored interventions that acknowledge developmental stages and challenges across the lifespan. Although promising interventions exist, further comparative effectiveness research is needed to delineate the most efficacious approaches.