Back to Authors

Ballinger, Tarah Jean

0000-0002-6797-2758

Mayo Clinic

Indiana University Health

Citations 7

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Survivorship, Version 3.2026
Peterson, L., McDonough, Allison L. , Ansbaugh, Shannon M., Heredia, Ella J. Ariza, Armenian, Saro, Baker, K. Scott, Cathcart-Rake, Elizabeth J., Cohen, Stuart H. , Fairman, Nathan, Feliciano, Josephine, Flores, Tessa , Gabel, Nicolette , Hill‐Kayser, Christine E. , Hock, Karen, Kline-Quiroz, Cristina, Lee, Nita K., Mooney, Kathi, Moryl, Natalie , Neuman, Heather, Overholser, Linda, Patel, Chirayu G. , Porpiglia, Andrea, Saidain, Ava, Schapira, Lidia , Smith, Sophia K., Tenner, Laura, Ah, Diane Von , Zee, Phyllis, Freedman-Cass, Deborah, McMillian, Nicole, Ariza‐Heredia, Ella , Armenian, Saro H. , Ballinger, Tarah Jean , Cathcart-Rake, Elizabeth , Day, Andrew T. , Evgeniou, Evgenios , Feliciano, Josephine , Friedman, Debra L. , Hock, Karen , Kline‐Quiroz, Cristina , Moore, Halle C. F. , Neuman, Heather B. , Overholser, Linda , Porpiglia, Andrea S., Rogers, Laura Q. , Yang, Eric H. , Freedman-Cass, Deborah A., McMillian, Nicole R.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | August 17, 2026 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 8 | Pages: No page available

10.6004/jnccn.2026.0039 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Survivorship offer guidance for health care providers who care for survivors of adult-onset cancer. These guidelines include screening, evaluation, and treatment recommendations for common physical and psychosocial problems resulting from cancer and its treatment and provide a framework for care coordination. They also present guidance for helping cancer survivors to enhance their wellness and maintain a healthy lifestyle. This article summarizes the panel’s current recommendations and recent updates regarding anxiety, depression, distress, and trauma in cancer survivors.
Cluster randomized controlled trial of decision support for breast cancer chemoprevention, MiCHOICE
Crew, Katherine D. , Arnold, Kathryn B. , Dzingle, Sam, Michel, Alissa, DeLucie, Michael, Law, Cynthia W., Pruthi, Sandhya , Leon, Ana C Sandoval, Shirley, Rachel, Perdekamp, Maria T Grosse, Colonna, Sarah V, Krisher, Stacy L, King, Tari A. , Yee, Lisa D. , Braun-Inglis, Christa, Mangino, Debra A. , Wisinski, Kari B. , DeYoung, Claudia A, Ross, Masey, Floyd, Justin D., Kaster, Andrea, VanderWalde, Lindi, Saphner, Thomas J. , Zarwan, Corrine, Lo, Shelly, Graham, Cathy, Conlin, Alison, Yost, K. , Agnese, Doreen M, Jernigan, Cheryl, Neuhouser, Marian L, Arun, Banu, Pruthi, Sandhya , Anderson, Garnet L. , Michel, Alissa , DeLucie, M. T., Sandoval-Leon, Ana Cristina , Shirley, Rachel, Perdekamp, Maria T. Grosse, Colonna, Sarah V. , Krisher, Stacy, Ballinger, Tarah Jean , Braun‐Inglis, Christa , Ross, Masey, Graham, Cathy Lynne , Yost, Kathleen J. , Agnese, Doreen Marie , Hershman, Dawn L. , Zell, Jason A. , Kukafka, Rita

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | June 30, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jnci/djag216 Get It

Abstract Background Breast cancer chemoprevention is underutilized among high-risk women. We examined whether decision support could increase informed decision making. Methods We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of a patient-facing decision aid (RealRisks) and provider tool (BNAV) compared with standard education on the number of women with high-risk breast lesions making informed choices. Questionnaires were administered at baseline and 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was chemoprevention informed choice (defined as adequate knowledge and attitudes congruent with decision) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included breast cancer risk perceptions, worry, chemoprevention knowledge, decision conflict, and chemoprevention decision. Results Across 31 randomized sites, we enrolled 210 providers, who were primarily breast health specialists. Of these, 24 sites (14 intervention, 10 control) enrolled 412 patients. Among 287 patients evaluable for the primary outcome, there were no statistically significant differences in informed choice between the intervention and control arms at 6 months (35% vs 27%, respectively; P = .20) and 12 months (37% vs 25%, respectively; P = .05). At 6 months, women in the intervention compared with control arm were more likely to have accurate breast cancer risk perceptions (31% vs 21%, respectively; P = .03) and adequate chemoprevention knowledge (33% vs 23%, respectively; P = .04). At 12 months, 52% of women in the control and 50% in the intervention arm self-reported initiating chemoprevention. Conclusion Decision support led to modest improvements in accurate risk perceptions and chemoprevention knowledge but not informed choice. Relatively high chemoprevention uptake was achieved among women with high-risk breast lesions managed mainly by breast health specialists. Trial Registration NCT04496739, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04496739?cond=NCT04496739&viewType=Card&rank=1
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Survivorship, Version 2.2025
Sanft, Tara , Ansbaugh, Shannon M., Ariza‐Heredia, Ella , Ballinger, Tarah J. , Cohen, Stuart H. , Fairman, Nathan, Feliciano, Josephine , Flores, Tessa , Gabel, Nicolette , Goldman, Mindy, Hill‐Kayser, Christine E. , Hock, Karen , Kline‐Quiroz, Cristina , Koura, Divya, McDonough, Allison L. , Mooney, Kathi , Moryl, Natalie , Neuman, Heather B. , Patel, Chirayu G. , Peterson, Lindsay L. , Porpiglia, Andrea S., Saidain, Ava, Schapira, Lidia , Tenne, Laura, Ah, Diane Von , Zee, Phyllis C. , McMillian, Nicole R., Freedman-Cass, Deborah A., Tevaarwerk, Amyé , Ballinger, Tarah Jean , Day, Andrew T. , Armenian, Saro H. , Baker, Kevin Scott , Cathcart-Rake, Elizabeth , Evgeniou, Evgenios , Friedman, Debra L. , Lee, Nita Karnik , Moore, Halle C. F. , Overholser, Linda , Pirl, William F. , Rogers, Laura Q. , Smith, Sophia K. , Yang, Eric H. , Ah, Diane Von

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | June 11, 2025 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 208-217

10.6004/jnccn.2025.0028 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Survivorship include screening, evaluation, and treatment recommendations for common physical and psychosocial problems resulting from adult-onset cancer and its treatment and provide a framework for coordination of survivorship care. They also include recommendations to help cancer survivors enhance their wellness and maintain a healthy lifestyle. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s current recommendations and recent updates regarding physical activity, nutrition, and weight management for cancer survivors.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Survivorship, Version 2.2024
Sanft, Tara , Goldman, Mindy, Ansbaugh, Shannon, Fairman, Nathan, Feliciano, Josephine , Flores, Tessa , Gabel, Nicolette , Hill‐Kayser, Christine E. , Koura, Divya, McDonough, Allison L. , Melisko, Michelle , Mooney, Kathi , Moryl, Natalie , Neuman, Heather B. , Patel, Chirayu G. , Peterson, Lindsay L. , Porpiglia, Andrea S., Schapira, Lidia , Ah, Diane Von , Wake, Robert, Zee, Phyllis C. , McMillian, Nicole R., Freedman-Cass, Deborah A., Tevaarwerk, Amyé , Day, Andrew T. , Armenian, Saro H. , Baker, Kevin Scott , Ballinger, Tarah Jean , Demark‐Wahnefried, Wendy , Friedman, Debra L. , Lee, Kimberley T. , Lee, Nita Karnik , Moore, Halle C. F. , Overholser, Linda , Pirl, William F. , Schwartz, Anna L. , Smith, Sophia K. , Yang, Eric H. , Ah, Diane Von

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | December 16, 2024 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 648-658

10.6004/jnccn.2024.0062 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Survivorship include recommendations for screening, evaluation, and treatment of psychosocial and physical problems resulting from adult-onset cancer and its treatment. They also include recommendations to promote healthy behaviors and immunizations in survivors and provide a framework for care coordination. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s current recommendations regarding sexual health and fertility.
Abstract OT1-15-01: SWOG 1904: Cluster-randomized controlled trial of patient and provider decision support to increase chemoprevention informed choice among women with atypical hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ (MiCHOICE)
Arnold, Kathryn B. , Stieb, Andrew, Amenta, Jacquelyn , Law, Cynthia, Sandoval-Leon, Ana, King, Tari A. , Mangino, Debra A. , Pruthi, Sandhya , Perdekamp, Maria Grosse , Braun‐Inglis, Christa , Krisher, Stacy, Yee, Lisa, Bertoni, Danielle M., Seaward, Samantha A. , Wisinski, Kari B. , Floyd, Justin D., Zarwan, Corrine, VanderWalde, Lindi, Ross, Masey M., Steen, Preston D. , Lo, Shelly S. , Conlin, Alison, Yost, Kathleen J. , Ellerton, John , Lin, Erin, Sardesai, Sagar , Jernigan, Cheryl, Arun, Banu, Sardesai, Sagar , Seaward, Samantha A , Crew, Katherine D. , Anderson, Garnet L. , Sandoval-Leon, Ana Cristina , Colonna, Sarah V. , Yee, Lisa, Ballinger, Tarah Jean , Ross, Masey, Pederson, Holly J. , Hershman, Dawn L. , Neuhouser, Marian L. , Kukafka, Rita

Cancer Research | March 2, 2023 | Volume: 83 | Issue: 5_Supplement | Pages: OT1-15-01-OT1-15-01

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-ot1-15-01 Get It

Abstract Background: Despite evidence of substantial breast cancer risk reduction, few high-risk women adopt chemopreventive medications such as selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) or aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Women with benign breast disease, such as atypical hyperplasia (AH) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), have an increased risk of developing breast cancer and derive a greater benefit from antiestrogens compared to other high-risk women. Reasons for low uptake of chemoprevention include insufficient patient and clinician knowledge about antiestrogens, time constraints during the clinical encounter, and concerns about side effects. To address these barriers, we have developed patient and provider web-based decision support tools to improve informed choice about breast cancer chemoprevention among women with AH or LCIS. Study design: We are conducting a cluster-randomized controlled trial of clinical decision support to improve chemoprevention informed choice among women with AH or LCIS and their treating providers. Twenty-six U.S. sites through the SWOG Cancer Research Network were randomly assigned 1:1 to standard educational materials alone or in combination with the patient-centered decision aid (RealRisks) and provider decision support tool (BNAV). A total of 415 patients and 200 healthcare providers will be recruited from these sites. RealRisks consists of interactive modules to calculate personalized breast cancer risk and elicit preferences on chemoprevention. The modules are available in English and Spanish. BNAV is comprised of self-directed case-based learning modules on breast cancer risk assessment and chemoprevention. Patients complete questionnaires at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Providers complete surveys at baseline and after their enrolled patient’s 6-month clinical encounter. The primary endpoint is chemoprevention informed choice at 6 months, using a measure combining knowledge, attitude, and intention scales. Secondary endpoints include perceived breast cancer risk/worry, chemoprevention knowledge/intention, decision conflict/regret, shared decision-making, and chemoprevention uptake. For patients who begin chemoprevention, adherence and reasons for discontinuation are assessed annually for up to 5 years. Barriers and facilitators to implementing RealRisks and BNAV into clinic workflow will be assessed by conducting patient and provider interviews at baseline and mid-implementation. Eligibility criteria: Eligible patients include women, age 35-74 years, with AH or LCIS, no history of breast cancer, no prior use of SERMs or AIs, no bilateral mastectomies, English or Spanish-speaking, and access to the internet. Eligible providers include breast surgeons, medical oncologists, primary care providers, and physician extenders who see patients with AH or LCIS. Statistical methods: We have 90% power to detect a 15% increase in the frequency of chemoprevention informed choice with a 1-sided 0.025 level test, assuming an intraclass correlation (ICC) of 0.02 to account for clustering, roughly equal accrual at each site, 10% loss to follow-up, and ≤10% event rate in the control arm. Current/target accrual: The trial was activated on 9/1/2020. As of 7/7/2022, all 26 sites have been randomized, 157/200 providers and 184/415 patients have been enrolled. Discussion: Our hybrid effectiveness/implementation study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-level intervention in promoting informed decision-making about breast cancer chemoprevention. Study results will provide valuable insights on how the decision support tools are integrated in diverse clinical settings. Citation Format: Katherine D. Crew, Garnet Anderson, Kathryn Arnold, Andrew Stieb, Jacquelyn N. Amenta, Cynthia Law, Ana Sandoval-Leon, Sarah Colonna, Tari King, Debra Mangino, Sandhya Pruthi, Maria Grosse Perdekamp, Christa Braun-Inglis, Stacy Krisher, Lisa Yee, Danielle Bertoni, Samantha Seaward, Kari B. Wisinski, Justin Floyd, Corrine Zarwan, Tarah J. Ballinger, Lindi VanderWalde, Masey M. Ross, Preston Steen, Shelly Lo, Alison Conlin, Kathleen Yost, John Ellerton, Erin Lin, Holly J. Pederson, Sagar Sardesai, Cheryl Jernigan, Dawn Hershman, Marian L. Neuhouser, Banu K. Arun, Rita Kukafka. SWOG 1904: Cluster-randomized controlled trial of patient and provider decision support to increase chemoprevention informed choice among women with atypical hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ (MiCHOICE) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-15-01.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Survivorship, Version 1.2022
Sanft, Tara , Peterson, Lindsay L. , Rodriguez, Maria Alma , Ansbaugh, Shannon, Demark‐Wahnefried, Wendy , Dickinson, Kristin , Fairman, Nathan, Goldman, Mindy, Henry, N. Lynn , Hill‐Kayser, Christine E. , Khakpour, Nazanin , Koura, Divya, McDonough, Allison L. , Melisko, Michelle , Mooney, Kathi , Moryl, Natalie , Neuman, Heather B. , Patel, Chirayu G. , Porpiglia, Andrea S., Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Schapira, Lidia , Shockney, Lillie D. , Syrjala, Karen L. , Yang, Eric H. , Zee, Phyllis C. , McMillian, Nicole R., Freedman-Cass, Deborah A., Broderick, Gregory, Henry, N Lynn , Yang, Eric , Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy , Day, Andrew T. , Armenian, Saro H. , Baker, Kevin Scott , Ballinger, Tarah Jean , Broderick, Gregory A. , Friedman, Debra L. , Hudson, Melissa M. , Moore, Halle C. F. , O’Connor, Tracey L. , Overholser, Linda , Paskett, Electra D. , Pirl, William F. , Smith, Sophia K. , Tevaarwerk, Amyé

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | October 14, 2022 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1080-1090

10.6004/jnccn.2022.0052 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Survivorship are intended to help healthcare professionals who work with survivors to ensure that the survivors’ complex and varied needs are addressed. The NCCN Guidelines provide screening, evaluation, and treatment recommendations for the consequences of adult-onset cancer and its treatment; recommendations to help promote physical activity, weight management, and immunizations in survivors; and a framework for care coordination. This article summarizes updates to the NCCN Guidelines pertaining to preventive health for cancer survivors, including recommendations about alcohol consumption and vaccinations.
Patient‐reported outcomes in the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium
Bowen, Deborah J. , Shinn, Eileen H. , Gregrowski, Sophie, Kimmick, Gretchen , Dominici, Laura S. , Smith, Karen L. , Rocque, Gabrielle B. , Ruddy, Kathryn J. , Pollastro, Teri, Melisko, Michelle , Ballinger, Tarah J. , Fayanju, Oluwadamilola M. , Smith, Karen Lisa , Rocque, Gabrielle , Fayanju, Oluwadamilola M , Wolff, Antonio C , Frank, Elizabeth S. , Ballinger, Tarah Jean , Wolff, Antonio C.

Cancer | November 19, 2019 | Volume: 126 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 922-930

10.1002/cncr.32615 Get It

Members of the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium conducted an expert‐driven literature review to identify a list of domains and to evaluate potential measures of these domains for inclusion in a list of preferred measures. Measures were included if they were easily available, free of charge, and had acceptable psychometrics based on published peer‐reviewed analyses. A total of 22 domains and 52 measures were identified during the selection process. Taken together, these measures form a reliable and validated list of measurement tools that are easily available and used in multiple cancer trials to assess patient‐reported outcomes in relevant patients.