Back to Authors

Yost, K.

https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3779-1886

Mayo Clinic

Michigan Cancer Research Consortium

Citations 3

Cluster randomized controlled trial of decision support for breast cancer chemoprevention, MiCHOICE
Crew, Katherine D. , Arnold, Kathryn B. , Dzingle, Sam, Michel, Alissa, DeLucie, Michael, Law, Cynthia W., Pruthi, Sandhya , Leon, Ana C Sandoval, Shirley, Rachel, Perdekamp, Maria T Grosse, Colonna, Sarah V, Krisher, Stacy L, King, Tari A. , Yee, Lisa D. , Braun-Inglis, Christa, Mangino, Debra A. , Wisinski, Kari B. , DeYoung, Claudia A, Ross, Masey, Floyd, Justin D., Kaster, Andrea, VanderWalde, Lindi, Saphner, Thomas J. , Zarwan, Corrine, Lo, Shelly, Graham, Cathy, Conlin, Alison, Yost, K. , Agnese, Doreen M, Jernigan, Cheryl, Neuhouser, Marian L, Arun, Banu, Pruthi, Sandhya , Anderson, Garnet L. , Michel, Alissa , DeLucie, M. T., Sandoval-Leon, Ana Cristina , Shirley, Rachel, Perdekamp, Maria T. Grosse, Colonna, Sarah V. , Krisher, Stacy, Ballinger, Tarah Jean , Braun‐Inglis, Christa , Ross, Masey, Graham, Cathy Lynne , Yost, Kathleen J. , Agnese, Doreen Marie , Hershman, Dawn L. , Zell, Jason A. , Kukafka, Rita

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | June 30, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jnci/djag216 Get It

Abstract Background Breast cancer chemoprevention is underutilized among high-risk women. We examined whether decision support could increase informed decision making. Methods We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of a patient-facing decision aid (RealRisks) and provider tool (BNAV) compared with standard education on the number of women with high-risk breast lesions making informed choices. Questionnaires were administered at baseline and 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was chemoprevention informed choice (defined as adequate knowledge and attitudes congruent with decision) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included breast cancer risk perceptions, worry, chemoprevention knowledge, decision conflict, and chemoprevention decision. Results Across 31 randomized sites, we enrolled 210 providers, who were primarily breast health specialists. Of these, 24 sites (14 intervention, 10 control) enrolled 412 patients. Among 287 patients evaluable for the primary outcome, there were no statistically significant differences in informed choice between the intervention and control arms at 6 months (35% vs 27%, respectively; P = .20) and 12 months (37% vs 25%, respectively; P = .05). At 6 months, women in the intervention compared with control arm were more likely to have accurate breast cancer risk perceptions (31% vs 21%, respectively; P = .03) and adequate chemoprevention knowledge (33% vs 23%, respectively; P = .04). At 12 months, 52% of women in the control and 50% in the intervention arm self-reported initiating chemoprevention. Conclusion Decision support led to modest improvements in accurate risk perceptions and chemoprevention knowledge but not informed choice. Relatively high chemoprevention uptake was achieved among women with high-risk breast lesions managed mainly by breast health specialists. Trial Registration NCT04496739, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04496739?cond=NCT04496739&viewType=Card&rank=1
Minimal important differences to assess cross-sectional differences among groups and minimal important changes to assess longitudinal within-patient changes for the Mayo Clinic Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life Index
Carlson, Matthew L., Lohse, Christine M., Tombers, Nicole M. , Mj, Link, Yost, K. , Carlson, Matthew, Lohse, Christine M. , Link, Michael J. , Yost, Kathleen J.

Journal of Neurosurgery | January 24, 2026 | Volume: 144 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 972-978

10.3171/2025.9.jns251249 Get It

OBJECTIVE The minimal important difference (MID) and minimal important change (MIC) are two metrics that bridge the gap between statistical significance and clinical relevance and are critical to managing clinical decisions and conducting clinical research. The objective of this study was to define MIDs to evaluate cross-sectional differences among groups and to define MICs to evaluate longitudinal within-patient changes for the Mayo Clinic Vestibular Schwannoma Quality of Life (VSQOL) Index. METHODS Anchor-based methods were used to define MIDs and MICs for the VSQOL Index domain scores, which range from 0 to 100 points, for a national cohort of 1050 patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma, 644 of whom completed the VSQOL Index twice approximately 1 year apart. RESULTS The median of the MID estimates for the VSQOL Index domains were: hearing problems (17, IQR 12.5–21); dizziness and imbalance (21, IQR 18–23); pain, discomfort, and tinnitus (19.5, IQR 15–23.5); problems with face or eyes (18, IQR 17–28); impact on physical, emotional, and social well-being (19.5, IQR 14.5–23.5); difficulty with thinking and memory (23.5, IQR 18.5–28.5); global quality of life (12, IQR 8–16); and satisfaction or regret (13.5, IQR 7–17). MIC estimates for the hearing problems and satisfaction and regret domains were not obtained because the correlations between these domain scores and their associated anchors were not sufficiently strong. The MIC estimates (minimum and maximum) for the remaining domains were: dizziness and imbalance (7.2 and 8.3); pain, discomfort, and tinnitus (8.3 and 8.5); problems with face or eyes (7.0 and 7.4); impact on physical, emotional, and social well-being (2.1 and 8.0); and difficulty with thinking and memory (12.9 and 15.0). The median of the MIC estimates for global quality of life was 5.2 (IQR 3.7–5.6). CONCLUSIONS The MIDs and MICs reported herein provide a framework to interpret quality-of-life benefit or harm cross-sectionally among groups and longitudinally within patients. Moving forward, these values should be considered when interpreting studies using the VSQOL Index to assess disease-specific quality of life in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma.
Abstract P1-12-10: Regimen-specific rates of chemotherapy-related amenorrhea in breast cancer survivors
Gast, K.C, Cathcart-Rake, EJ, Norman, A. R. , Eshragi, L, Obidegwu, Nwamaka, Yost, K. , Nichols, HB, Rosenberg, S, Su, HI, Stewart, Erin, Couch, F.J., Vachon, Celine M. , Ruddy, KJ, Norman, A, Yost, Kathleen J. , Nichols, Hazel B. , Stewart, E, Vachon, Celine M.

Cancer Research | May 11, 2019 | Volume: 79 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: P1-12-10-P1-12-10

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p1-12-10 Get It

Abstract Background: Chemotherapy can damage the ovaries and cause amenorrhea, a surrogate for infertility. Young women often wish to understand and minimize their risk of chemotherapy-related amenorrhea (CRA). However, the incidence of CRA with regimens that do not include either an anthracycline or cyclophosphamide is poorly studied. For patients with HER-2 positive disease, these anthracycline and cyclophosphamide-sparing regimens (e.g., docetaxel-carboplatin) are common (in combination with Her-2 directed therapy) in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Methods: Women diagnosed with breast cancer under age 50 and within the past 10 years were recruited through a Dr. Susan Love Research Foundation Army of Women e-mail blast. Those who provided their contact information were mailed a consent form and medical record authorization form. Participants then received a web-based survey that inquired about receipt of and type of chemotherapy (including date of last dose) and date of last menstrual period (LMP). Patient-reported LMP was compared to date of final chemotherapy dose to determine if the LMP occurred before (defined as “CRA”) or after the last chemotherapy dose. When available, medical record data was used in place of survey data regarding type of chemotherapy used. Exclusion criteria included: LMP prior to diagnosis date, receipt of multiple chemotherapy regimens or no chemotherapy regimens, receipt of ovarian suppression medications (which interfere with interpretation of menstrual data), surgical menopause prior to or at the same time as diagnosis, a cancer diagnosis more than 10 years prior, incomplete menstrual data on the survey, report of an unknown chemotherapy regimen, and no date available for the last chemotherapy dose without an LMP within a month prior to survey completion. Fisher Exact test was used to compare CRA rates between regimens. Rates after two anthracycline-sparing regimens (taxane/cyclophosphamide; taxane/carboplatin) were compared to rates after anthracycline/cyclophosphamide/taxane. Results: 273 women consented to participate in this study, 258 of whom filled out the web survey. 151 of them were eligible for this analysis with a median age at diagnosis of 41 (range 24-49) and a median time from last chemotherapy dose to survey of 62.5 months (range 2-138). CRA occurred in 51.2% of the 86 participants who received an anthracycline, cyclophosphamide, and a taxane, in 41.9% of the 43 participants who received only a taxane and cyclophosphamide (p=0.35), and in 13.3% of the 15 participants who received carboplatin with a taxane (p=0.01). When the 11 patients who were <12 months since last chemotherapy were excluded, CRA rates changed minimally. Age did not differ by regimen, but median time since chemotherapy was shorter in the taxane/carboplatin group (35 months vs. 68 months). Trastuzumab with or without pertuzumab was administered in 100% of patients who received carboplatin/taxane, in 23.3% of patients who received taxane and cyclophosphamide, and in 22.1% of patients who received anthracycline/cyclophosphamide/taxane. Conclusions: This study suggests that carboplatin/taxane may be substantially less gonadotoxic than cyclophosphamide-based (neo)adjuvant regimens. Further research is necessary to confirm these findings. Citation Format: Gast KC, Cathcart-Rake EJ, Norman A, Eshragi L, Obidegwu N, Yost K, Nichols HB, Rosenberg S, Su HI, Stewart E, Couch F, Vachon C, Ruddy KJ. Regimen-specific rates of chemotherapy-related amenorrhea in breast cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-12-10.