Robinson, Steven I.

Background: Synovial sarcoma is rare and may present as a small, slow-growing mass. These tumors are often mistaken as benign and are therefore prone to unplanned and/or non-oncologic excision. We sought to identify the rate of unplanned excision of synovial sarcoma and risk factors for recurrence and survival among this cohort. Methods: The medical records of 246 patients evaluated at a single institution for synovial sarcoma between 1997 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 87 (35%) underwent unplanned, non-oncologic excision. The mean age of the cohort was 49 years. Primary tumors were located in the extremity (n = 63), abdomen (n = 6), thorax (n = 7), head/neck (n = 8), and paraspinal region (n = 3). The median maximum pre-treatment dimension of the primary tumor was 4.8 cm (IQR 7–2.4). Seventy-seven (86%) patients underwent re-excision of the tumor bed, 39 (45%) received chemotherapy, and 63 (72%) received radiation therapy. Results: Among patients who underwent unplanned excision, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 98% at 1 year and 82% at 5 years. Metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 91% at 1 year and 72% at 5 years. Disease-specific survival (DSS) was 98% at 1 year and 72% at 5 years. When adjusting for tumor size, tumors which underwent unplanned excision did not have worse recurrence or survival compared to those which had planned excision (p > 0.10). Size > 5 cm, monophasic subtype, and axial location were associated with increased risk of disease recurrence. Forty-six patients had residual tumor following re-excision, which was associated with worse MFS (HR 8.17, 95% CI [1.89, 35.2], p < 0.01) and DSS (HR 7.66, 95% CI [1.76, 33.4], p < 0.01). Patients who received radiotherapy had improved MFS (HR 6.4, 95% CI [1.42, 29.0], p = 0.02) and DSS (HR 5.86, 95% CI [1.27, 26.9], p = 0.02). Conclusions: One-third of patients presenting with synovial sarcoma were diagnosed after unplanned, non-oncologic excision. Patients with large, axial tumors had worse survival. Approximately half of patients who underwent unplanned excision had no residual tumor after pre-operative radiation. The use of radiation was associated with decreased rates of recurrence and improved disease-specific survival. Our results suggest that margin-negative re-resection and radiotherapy should be considered when feasible following unplanned excision of synovial sarcoma.

Background: Liposarcoma, one of the most prevalent sarcoma histologies, is recognized for its tendency for extra-pulmonary metastases. While oligometastatic cardiac disease is rarely reported, it poses a unique challenge as oligometastatic sarcomas are often managed with surgical resection. Case Report: We present a case of a 62-year-old man diagnosed with an oligometastatic myxoid liposarcoma (MLPS) to the heart 19 years after the primary tumor resection from the lower limb. The metastatic mass, situated in the pericardium adjacent and infiltrating the left ventricle, was not managed surgically but with a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The patient’s disease remains stable to date, for more than 10 years. Literature Review: We conducted a review of the literature to determine the preferred management approach for solitary cardiac metastases of sarcomas. We also conducted an in-depth analysis focusing on reported cases of MLPS metastasizing to the heart, aiming to extract pertinent data regarding the patient characteristics and the corresponding management strategies. Conclusions: Although clinical diagnoses of solitary or oligometastatic cardiac metastases from sarcomas are infrequent, this case underscores the significance of aggressive management employing chemotherapy and radiotherapy for chemosensitive and radiosensitive sarcomas, especially when surgical removal is high-risk. Furthermore, it challenges the notion that surgery is the exclusive therapeutic option leading to long-term clinical benefit in patients with recurrent sarcomas.

11521 Background: Osteosarcomas (OS) comprise the majority of new primary bone tumors in the US and affect a bimodal distribution of young adults (2nd-3rd decades) and older adults >65 yrs. Most large collaborative studies demonstrating the efficacy of HDMTX-containing chemotherapy regimens in OS limited enrollment to patients <40 yrs. Our study aims to fill the gap of reported clinical outcomes in adult OS patients ≥ 40 yrs by describing the feasibility and tolerability of HDMTX in these patients at Mayo Clinic. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients ≥18 yrs with OS seen at our institution between 1/1/1980-9/30/2019 and who received ≥1 dose of HDMTX (12 g/m2, max 20 g). Extraosseous OS were excluded. Survival analyses were run for both the entire study population and the subset of patients age ≥40. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected. The primary outcome evaluated was 5-year overall survival (5-yr OS). Results: We identified 94 patients whose demographic data are summarized (Table). Twenty-three of 94 (24%) were ≥40 yrs. Both the median number of HDMTX doses received and number of patients who received ≥50% recommended doses were significantly less among patients ≥40 yrs. However, HDMTX-related AKI and median number of hospital days did not differ significantly between the age groups. Among all patients, 5-yr OS was significantly improved (p=0.0025) at 45% (95% CI 35%-58%) for those who received ≥50% doses HDMTX compared to 5-yr OS of 25% (95% CI 12%-53%) for those who did not. Among patients ≥40 yrs, 5-yr OS was significantly improved (p=0.017) at 86% (95% CI 63%-100%) for those who received ≥50% doses HDMTX compared to 5-yr OS of 31% (95% CI 14%-68%) for those who did not. Conclusions: In our cohort, 5-yr OS was superior in those patients who received at least 50% of the planned doses of HDMTX. Older adults were significantly less likely to receive the majority of planned doses, which may be due to clinician bias regarding anticipated toxicity. However, we show that common HDMTX-associated toxicities did not vary significantly by age. If feasible, we recommend referring older patients with osteosarcoma to centers equipped to handle the staffing and supportive care needs of HDMTX administration. [Table: see text]

11514 Background: The role of immunotherapy remains uncertain in most sarcomas. We recently showed significant antitumor benefit for cabozantinib (C) with N in AS previously treated with a taxane. Since chemotherapy-immunotherapy combinations may synergize, and paclitaxel remains a standard of care option for advanced AS, we hypothesized that P+N would be more effective than P alone. Methods: We report Arm 1 (P+N) and Arm 2 (P) of this open label, multi-arm, phase II study. Pts all had locally advanced/metastatic AS, and no prior taxane (including adjuvant) or checkpoint inhibitor prior to entry. Pts were randomized 1:1 (stratified scalp/face vs other) to receive P 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 every 4 weeks (wks), with (Arm 1) or without (Arm 2) N (480 mg intravenously every 4 wks). A pt could remain on study beyond disease progression (PD), after the initial 12 wk evaluation (4 wk confirmatory scan required), but responses were censored at 12 wks. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) comparing P+N to P, with an assumed improvement from a median of 4 to 7 months with N added to P (power = 85.3%, alpha = 0.148, and one interim analysis (Wieand rule) for futility planned after 30 events). Secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs), overall survival (OS), and pt reported outcomes (PRO). At PD, Arm 2 (P) pts were permitted to receive C+N. Results: 62 evaluable pts (P+N = 30, P = 32 pts) were balanced for age, race, ECOG PS 0 vs. 1, site of disease (including radiation related vs. not), while P+N had more females (60%) and P had more males (63%). Median PFS for P+N was 7.2 mo (5.3-17 mo), and 8.3 mo (4.0-18 mo) for P (hazard ratio (HR) 1.01 (95%CI: 0.55-1.9), p = 0.96). Median PFS for scalp/face was 16 mo (95%CI: 10-NR) for P+N and 8.3 mo (95%CI: 3.7-NR) for P. Median PFS for all others was 5.5 mo (95%CI 4.3-16) for P+N, and 6.0 mo (95%CI 4.1-NR) for P. Median OS was 18 mo (13-NR) in P+N, and 23 mo (15-NR) in P (HR 1.3 (95%CI: 0.63-2.7), p = 0.48). Overall confirmed ORR: P+N = 33% (10/30 pts, with 4 partial responses (PR) and 6 complete responses (CR) with scalp/face ORR = 73%, all others ORR = 11%). Overall ORR for P = 34% (11/32 pts, with 7 PR and 4 CR, with scalp/face ORR = 38%, all others ORR = 26%). Grade 3-4 AEs regardless of attribution occurred in 57% of P+N, and 44% of P, most commonly ( > 10%) fatigue, AST increase, and dyspnea for P+N (n = 3 each), and anemia (n = 4) for P. Conclusions: P alone can be an effective therapy in a subset of pts with AS. The combination of P+N failed to demonstrate improvement in median PFS over P alone, but may show benefit in scalp/face AS. OS trended better with P alone. No new safety signals were observed. The impact of weekly steroid premedication prior to P+N on these outcomes remains to be determined. PRO and exploratory analyses are ongoing. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24 CA196171; NCT04339738. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Clinical trial information: NCT04339738 .

Abstract Background Radiation‐associated soft tissue sarcomas (RA‐STS) are rare complications of patients receiving radiation therapy (RT) and are generally associated with a poor prognosis. Most of the literature surrounding RA‐STS of the chest is centered on angiosarcoma. Therefore, we aim to document the management and outcome of patients with non‐angiosarcoma RA‐STS of the chest. Methods We reviewed 17 patients (all female, median age 65 years) diagnosed with RA‐STS. The most common primary malignancy was breast carcinoma ( n = 15), with a median RT dose of 57.9 Gy. All patients underwent surgical resection; five patients (29%) received radiotherapy; and five patients (29%) received peri‐operative chemotherapy. Results The 5‐year local recurrence and metastatic‐free survival were 61% and 60%, while the 5‐year disease‐specific survival was 53%. Local recurrence was associated with death due to disease (HR 9.06, p = 0.01). Complications occurred in nine of patients, most commonly due to a wound complication ( n = 7). At the most recent follow‐up, the median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score was 63%. Conclusion RA‐STS involving the chest wall are aggressive tumors with a high risk of local relapse and death due to disease. Local recurrence was associated with death due to disease; as such, we recommend aggressive surgical management with evaluation for adjuvant therapies.

e23554 Background: Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma (FDCS) is a low-grade neoplasm arising from follicular dendritic cells. Its diagnosis is challenging due to its extreme rarity, and the optimal management remains unknown. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of FDCS patients (pts) seen at Mayo Clinic, MN since 2018. Time to event analyses were done from the time of diagnosis. Results: Ten pts with FDCS were identified (Table). The median age was 60 years (range, 38-76) and 5 were males. Abdominal pain was the most common presenting symptom (30%) followed by constitutional symptoms, shortness of breath, and vision change. In 3 pts, the diagnosis was incidental. The 2 most common primary locations were abdomen/pelvis (50%) and mediastinum (30%). Six pts (60%) presented with advanced disease and 3 (30%) had Castleman’s disease. Most (60%) had advanced disease. Six pts had Epstein-Barr virus in situ hybridization and all tested negative. Seven pts had next generation sequencing and 5 (83%) had genetic alterations detected with CDKN2A/B alterations being most frequent (3 pts, all with advanced disease). The median follow up was 4.3 years (range, 0.2-13.3). In the 4 patients with localized disease, 3 underwent complete surgical excision resulting in complete remissions (CRs). The one who received radiation had a partial remission (PR). The median time to progression after 1st line treatment was 4 months (all with advanced disease). All 3 pts who died had advanced disease and 2 had CDKN2A/B alterations. Conclusions: In FDCS, localized diseases managed by surgical excision with or without radiation can achieve long term remissions. Advanced diseases generally do not respond to multimodality therapy including immunotherapy but can have disease stabilization with variable survival. CDKN2A/B mutations were common and potentially associated with a worse outcome. Better understanding of the impact of the FDCS mutational landscape on prognosis may provide novel approaches to therapy. [Table: see text]

11505 Background: Potentiation of chemotherapy, without increased toxicity, to improve outcome is an area of interest. Preclinical and clinical evidence shows simultaneous utilization of antiangiogenic agents and chemotherapy have a synergistic effect. We hypothesized that the dual targeting of VEGF and c-MET pathways with cabozantinib (CAB) would result in clinical benefit for patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) when combined with temozolomide (TMZ), an alkylating agent. Utilization of CAB/TMZ is anticipated to produce a synergistic antitumor effect worthwhile to explore in STS. Methods: A multicenter phase II study of CAB/TMZ in patients with unresectable/metastatic leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and other STS was conducted by the Midwest Sarcoma Trials Partnership. Age ≥ 18, adequate performance status, organ function, measurable disease (RECIST 1.1), and 0-5 prior chemotherapy regimens were required. CAB 40 mg PO daily plus TMZ 150-200 mg/m2 PO 1-5 days were given in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients enrolled in 2 cohorts: 1. Uterine and non-uterine LMS 2. Other STS. The first 14 subjects to be enrolled in the study in either cohort served as a safety lead in. The primary endpoint was progression-free rate (PFR) at 12 weeks for cohort 1. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety and tolerability. The exploratory endpoint was to estimate the correlation of PFR and OS to expression levels of VEGF, amongst others. A Simon 2-stage design was used. Results: A total of 42 patients were enrolled in Cohort 1, and 30 in Cohort 2, across 5 sites. For Cohort 1, median age was 59 years (range 35-86), 85.7% were non-Hispanic, 73.8% were female, 61.9% had ECOG of 0. The PFR at 12 weeks was 45.9% (for 37 evaluable patient) with a median PFS of 6.4 months (95% CI 4.6-6.7). Five PR were observed for an ORR of 13.5%. For Cohort 2, median age was 63 (20-86), 83.3% were non-Hispanic, 36.7% were female, 53.3% had ECOG of 0. The PFR at 12 weeks was 50% (for 28 evaluable patients) with a median PFS of 3.2 months (95% CI 1.4-4.6). One PR was observed. Reported grade 3-4 adverse events attributed to one or both intervention drugs affecting ≥10% of patients (n = 70) included hypertension (10%), decreased neutrophils (18.7%), decreased platelets (31%). Conclusions: The combination therapy of CAB/TMZ in patients with unresectable or metastatic LMS exceeded its primary endpoint with a PFR at 12 weeks > 39%. The PFS of 6.4 months in Cohort 1 exceeds rates achieved with second line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and alkylators in LMS patients. Treatment was feasible and did not reveal any previously unreported toxicities. The combination with CAB with TMZ demonstrated meaningful clinical benefit and is worth further exploration in LMS. Clinical trial information: NCT04200443 .

11503 Background: Collectively, sarcomas have demonstrated less benefit from immunotherapy than many other cancers. Pts with AS have limited options, particularly after taxane chemotherapy. Although AS is a vascular malignancy, anti-VEGF therapies have minimal monotherapy clinical activity. Some cutaneous AS have a high UV damage signature, but other AS often do not. Cabozantinib (C) is a multikinase inhibitor that may alter PD-1 expression in regulatory T cells, promoting an immune permissive environment when combined with nivolumab (N), a fully human anti PD-1 MAB. We hypothesize that the combination of C+N will be an effective therapy in AS, across AS subtypes. Methods: This open-label multi-arm study enrolled pts with locally advanced/metastatic AS. Arm 3, reported here, enrolled pts who had received a taxane for AS (including adjuvant) prior to study enrollment. Pts were not restricted on number of prior lines, but prior anti-VEGF and immunotherapies were not allowed. Eligible pts received C (40 mg po daily) with N (480 mg IV every 4 wks). Treatment was permitted beyond progressive disease (PD) in the 1st 12 wks (4 wk confirmatory scan), but PD response was censored at 12 wks. The Simon 2-stage design (null and alternative overall response rate (ORR) were 10% and 35%, respectively) required ≥1 confirmed response in 9 pts in the 1st stage, and >4 of 18 pts (91.4% power, alpha 0.095) for the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were adverse events (AEs), progression free, overall survival (PFS, OS), and pt-reported outcomes (PRO). Results: 21 eligible pts [median age 66 yrs (32-92), 10 female] received ≥1 dose of C+N. Primary disease sites: 12 cutaneous (scalp/face), 1 liver, 2 breast, 6 other. All pts received prior taxanes (11/21 = 52% as adjuvant therapy) and 5/21 (24%) had also received prior anthracycline (all relapsed AS). Primary endpoint: 13 of the first 18 evaluable patients (72%) experienced objective response (OR, 95%CI: 47%-90%). After a median follow-up of 11.2 mo, 13 of 21 pts achieved OR (11 partial response, 2 complete), for ORR 62% (95%CI: 38-82%). Responses were seen in pts with primary cutaneous disease 7/12 (58%) and noncutaneous disease 6/9 (67%). Median PFS was 9.6 mo (5.3-NR), and OS 20.5 mo (14.4-NR). Off treatment reasons include: progressive disease (14), comorbid condition unrelated to AS or study (1); 6 pts remain on study. Grade (G) 3 hypertension was the only possibly treatment related AE (TRAE) occurring in ³10%. No G 4/5 TRAE were reported. Conclusions: C + N demonstrated significant antitumor activity in taxane-pretreated AS and was well tolerated without new safety concerns. Activity of the combination was seen across AS subtypes. PRO and exploratory analyses are ongoing. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24 CA196171; U10CA180820; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . U10CA180868; U10CA180888. NCT04339738. Clinical trial information: NCT04339738 .

Abstract Background Extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma are rare tumors within the Ewing sarcoma family. Initial staging studies for extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma historically have included imaging and bone marrow aspiration and biopsy (BMAB). However, recent studies on Ewing sarcoma of bone have questioned the utility of BMAB in the initial staging of patients, but no studies of which we are aware have evaluated the role of BMAB in extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma. We suspected that BMAB was of low diagnostic yield in patients with extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma and exposed patients to potential morbidity without an impact on their clinical course. Question/purpose Is BMAB a useful test in the staging of extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma? Methods Between January 1996 and December 2021, our institution evaluated 109 patients with a listed diagnosis of extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma. Those patients were retrospectively reviewed for this study. Of those, we considered patients with biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma. Biopsy was performed based on institutional protocols, with all diagnoses assigned by a board-certified pathologist. Based on that criteria, 96% (105 of 109) were eligible. An additional 18% (20 of 109) were excluded because records of their initial diagnostic and staging workup were not available. This left 78% (85 of 109) for analysis. Of those, 52% (44 of 85) were male. The average age was 32 ± 16 years. Primary tumor locations included extremities in 26% (22 of 85), paraspinal in 20% (17 of 85), chest in 19% (16 of 85), retroperitoneum in 13% (11 of 85), intraabdominal in 12% (10 of 85), intrapelvic in 7% (6 of 85), and head or neck in 4% (3 of 85). Initial diagnostic and staging information, including the use of PET-CT, bone scan, CT chest, and BMAB, was collected. Metastatic disease at the time of presentation or during follow-up was noted. The utility of BMAB was determined by the rate of positive tests in those undergoing BMAB during the initial staging process. Descriptive statistical analysis was sufficient to address the study question, and therefore no comparative statistics were performed. Results BMAB was obtained during the initial staging process in 64% (54 of 85) of patients. This BMAB was negative in all 54 patients, including those with known metastatic disease. Conclusion Diagnosing metastatic disease in extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma is important as the presence of metastases at diagnosis adversely affects prognosis. The routine use of BMAB in the staging process of extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma is of low diagnostic yield. BMAB is unlikely to diagnose metastatic involvement even in patients with known metastases to bone. We do not have enough data to suggest whether other modalities, such as PET-CT, might be more useful. Similar studies should be pursued to determine the utility of the remainder of staging modalities in patients with extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma to elucidate the most efficient and effective staging protocol. Level of Evidence Level III, diagnostic study

AbstractPurposeExtraskeletal Ewing sarcoma (EES), is a rare soft tissue sarcoma. Treatment for EES commonly involves chemotherapy and surgical resection (ST) or less commonly combined chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy (ST + RT). The purpose of the current study was to evaluate our institutional experience treating EES.MethodsWe reviewed 36 (18 males:18 females) patients (mean age 30 years) with a nonretroperitoneal/visceral EES treated with either ST (n = 24, 67%) or ST + RT (n = 12, 33%). All patients were treated with chemotherapy, most commonly vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide/ifosfamide and etoposide (VDC/IE, n = 23, 66%) Radiotherapy was mostly delivered preoperatively (n = 9). The mean follow‐up was 8 years.ResultsThe 10‐year disease specific survival for patients was 78%, with no difference in the survival between patients in the ST versus the ST + RT groups (83% vs. 71%, p = 0.86). There was no difference in the 10‐year local recurrence (91% vs. 100%, p = 0.29) or metastatic free survival (87% vs. 75%, p = 0.45) between the ST and ST + RT groups.ConclusionThe results of the current study highlight the ability to achieve excellent local control with chemotherapy and surgery for EES. We recommend for multidisciplinary management of patients with EES, including chemotherapy and surgery, with use of radiotherapy if there is concern for a potentially close margin of resection.