McCarter, Stuart J.

Abstractα-synucleinopathies are a complex group of progressive neurodegenerative disorders with an increasingly recognized long prodromal period, during which sleep dysfunction is a hallmark. Sleep disorders during the prodromal synucleinopathy period, primarily isolated rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) and daytime hypersomnolence correlate best with the recently proposed “body-first” Lewy body disease progression. iRBD is the most widely recognized form of prodromal α-synucleinopathy, and patients with iRBD show abnormal α-synuclein in tissues and biofluids even in the absence of cognitive or motor symptoms. More importantly, individuals with iRBD have an elevated risk for near-term development of a clinically diagnosable symptomatic synucleinopathy. Other sleep disorders such as hypersomnia and circadian rhythm dysfunction also occur across the synucleinopathy spectrum, although their prognostic significance is less well understood than iRBD. Finally, isolated REM sleep without atonia may represent an even earlier stage of prodromal synucleinopathy, but further studies are needed.

AbstractBackgroundEvidence for abnormal amyloid‐β (Aβ) plaque accumulation is necessary prior to initiating anti‐amyloid therapy in early symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease (AD). While the clinical trials for lecanemab and related drugs utilized positron emission tomography (PET) to demonstrate brain amyloidosis, current appropriate use recommendations for clinical practice consider PET or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers as satisfactory for this purpose. Here, we present four clinical cases where CSF biomarker results were discordant from amyloid PET, with the potential to result in erroneous treatment targeting.MethodPatients were seen at a tertiary care subspecialty clinic in consideration for lecanemab therapy. All patients had office examination, neuropsychological assessment, structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), amyloid PET (with either 11C‐Pittsburgh compound B or 18F‐florbetapir), CSF AD biomarkers (Roche Elecsys p‐tau181/Aβ42 and Fujirebio Lumipulse Aβ42/Aβ40 ratios), and apolipoprotein E (APOE) allele testing. Amyloid PET interpretations were made by consensus visual review from experienced readers.ResultAll four patients had clinical diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia (Table 1). Two patients had positive CSF p‐tau181/Aβ42 and Aβ42/40 ratios with negative amyloid PET (indicating sparse to no neuritic plaques). Case 1 displayed aphasia (characterized by anomia and deep dysgraphia) and imaging findings possibly compatible with semantic dementia. Case 2 displayed a gait abnormality and imaging signs of abnormal CSF dynamics. Two other patients had negative CSF p‐tau181/Aβ42 measures with positive amyloid PET (indicating moderate to frequent neuritic plaques). In those instances, the clinical syndrome and imaging studies were strongly supportive of AD and the CSF Aβ42/40 ratio was “likely positive” (Table 1). For one patient (Case 4), tau PET and Lumipulse plasma p‐tau217 concentration were both positive.ConclusionClinicians prescribing anti‐amyloid therapies should be aware of the possibility for CSF biomarkers to be discordant from amyloid PET status in select scenarios. These cases highlight the value of considering PET imaging in the presence of clinically atypical features, concern for mixed etiology, or strong clinical suspicion for AD despite negative CSF biomarkers. Larger series are needed to identify broader patterns contributing to biomarker discordance by assay, modality (PET versus CSF/plasma measures), and medical/neurologic comorbidities.

AbstractBackgroundSleep’s crucial role in maintaining brain health is increasingly recognized, particularly due to the rising prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases. It not only supports cognitive function but also aids in clearing brain metabolic waste through cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics. During sleep, especially in the non‐rapid eye movement (NREM) phase, CSF flow increases, essential for removing neurotoxic substances like amyloid‐beta proteins. This study explores the link between sleep respiratory patterns and CSF flow promotion.MethodElectroencephalography (EEG), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) were simultaneously acquired during sleep from Gu, et al. (n = 29) (Gu et al. 2022). Respiration, measured via a respiratory belt, calculated respiratory volume (RV) as the standard deviation within a 5 second sliding window. EEG data processed delta band power (1‐4Hz) averaged across channels. Parcellated fMRI data using the brain template followed by the calculation of the averaged gray matter (GM) blood‐oxygen‐level‐dependent (BOLD) signal using the GM mask. CSF inflow was manually extracted from the fMRI’s bottom slice at the foramen magnum level. Subsequently, all signals were temporally aligned to the peak of the CSF inflow signal.ResultAt the time of CSF inflow (time = 0 sec. in the Figure 1A‐D), we observed an earlier increase in RV and EEG delta power, followed by changes in the GM BOLD signal (Figure 1). EEG and RV changes preceded the BOLD signal changes, which, in turn, preceded changes in CSF flow. Sensitivity to detect RV involvement during MRI varied with the placement of the respiratory belt, being least sensitive on the chest and more on the abdomen.ConclusionThese findings raise an interesting question on the role respiratory patterns during sleep, particularly in the NREM phase. Speculatively, RV change may influence CSF circulation during NREM sleep (Figure 1E). This enhancement in CSF flow is crucial for the clearance of metabolic waste from the brain, potentially reducing the risk of neurodegenerative diseases. Our findings indicate that respiratory volume may serve as a significant marker for CSF circulation during sleep.

AbstractBackgroundLimbic‐predominant age‐related TDP‐43 encephalopathy (LATE) is a neuropathologically‐defined disease, and it is frequently comorbid with Alzheimer’s disease neuropathological change (ADNC). However, the neurological syndrome associated with LATE neuropathological change (LATE‐NC) is not defined. We propose a set of clinical criteria for a limbic‐predominant amnestic neurodegenerative syndrome (LANS) that is highly associated with LATE‐NC. These criteria assess degree of certainty (highest, high, moderate, low) based on features that are measurable in vivo, including older age at evaluation, a mild clinical syndrome, impaired semantic knowledge, disproportionate hippocampal atrophy, limbic hypometabolism, absence of neocortical degeneration patterns and low likelihood of neocortical tau. We operationalized these criteria using two large datasets with clinical and pathologic outcomes.MethodWe screened autopsied patients from Mayo Clinic and ADNI cohorts and applied the LANS criteria to those with an antemortem predominant amnestic syndrome (Mayo, n = 165; ADNI, n = 53). We compared frequencies of neuropathological diagnoses across LANS likelihoods, compared longitudinal CDR‐SB trajectories across LANS likelihoods, and stratified ADNC/LATE‐NC patients according to their LANS likelihood and compared their longitudinal CDR‐SB trajectories to those with ADNC or LATE‐NC.ResultADNC, ADNC/LATE‐NC and LATE‐NC accounted for 35%, 37% and 4% of cases in the Mayo cohort, respectively, and 30%, 22%, and 9% of cases in the ADNI cohort, respectively (Fig. 1). ADNC cases had the lowest LANS likelihoods, LATE‐NC patients had the highest likelihoods, and ADNC/LATE‐NC patients had intermediate likelihoods. Patients with high LANS likelihoods had a milder and slower clinical course and more severe temporo‐limbic degeneration compared to those with low likelihoods (Fig. 2). ADNC/LATE‐NC patients with higher likelihoods had more temporo‐limbic degeneration and a slower rate of cognitive decline, and those with lower likelihoods had more lateral temporo‐parietal degeneration and a faster rate of cognitive decline (Fig. 3).ConclusionThe implementation of LANS criteria has implications for disambiguating the different driving etiologies of progressive amnestic presentations in older age to guide prognosis, treatment, and clinical trial design and enrollment. The development of in vivo biomarkers specific to TDP‐43 pathology are needed to further refine molecular associations between LANS and LATE‐NC and precise antemortem diagnoses of LATE.

Abstract Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is associated with an increased risk for cognitive impairment and dementia, which likely involves Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Non-rapid eye movement slow-wave activity (SWA) has been implicated in amyloid clearance, but it has not been studied in the context of longitudinal amyloid accumulation in OSA. This longitudinal retrospective study aims to investigate the relationship between polysomnographic and electrophysiological SWA features and amyloid accumulation. From the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging cohort, we identified 71 participants ≥60 years old with OSA (mean baseline age = 72.9 ± 7.5 years, 60.6% male, 93% cognitively unimpaired) who had at least 2 consecutive Amyloid Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB)-PET scans and a polysomnographic study within 5 years of the baseline scan and before the second scan. Annualized PiB-PET accumulation [global ΔPiB(log)/year] was estimated by the difference between the second and first log-transformed global PiB-PET uptake estimations divided by the interval between scans (years). Sixty-four participants were included in SWA analysis. SWA was characterized by the mean relative spectral power density (%) in slow oscillation (SO: 0.5–0.9 Hz) and delta (1–3.9 Hz) frequency bands and by their downslopes (SO-slope and delta-slope, respectively) during the diagnostic portion of polysomnography. We fit linear regression models to test for associations among global ΔPiB(log)/year, SWA features (mean SO% and delta% or mean SO-slope and delta-slope), and OSA severity markers, after adjusting for age at baseline PiB-PET, APOE ɛ4 and baseline amyloid positivity. For 1 SD increase in SO% and SO-slope, global ΔPiB(log)/year increased by 0.0033 (95% CI: 0.0001; 0.0064, P = 0.042) and 0.0069 (95% CI: 0.0009; 0.0129, P = 0.026), which were comparable to 32% and 59% of the effect size associated with baseline amyloid positivity, respectively. Delta-slope was associated with a reduction in global ΔPiB(log)/year by −0.0082 (95% CI: −0.0143; −0.0021, P = 0.009). Sleep apnoea severity was not associated with amyloid accumulation. Regional associations were stronger in the pre-frontal region. Both slow-wave slopes had more significant and widespread regional associations. Annualized PiB-PET accumulation was positively associated with SO and SO-slope, which may reflect altered sleep homeostasis due to increased homeostatic pressure in the setting of unmet sleep needs, increased synaptic strength, and/or hyper-excitability in OSA. Delta-slope was inversely associated with PiB-PET accumulation, suggesting it may represent residual physiological activity. Further investigation of SWA dynamics in the presence of sleep disorders before and after treatment is necessary for understanding the relationship between amyloid accumulation and SWA physiology.