Bockorny, Bruno

e16771 Background: AbGn-107 is an ADC directed against AG-7 antigen, a Lewis A-like glycol-epitope expressed in 24-61% of gastric (G), colorectal (CRC), pancreatic (PDA), and biliary (BIL) cancers. Based on promising antitumor activity of AbGn-107 in both in vitro and in vivo preclinical studies, we performed a Phase Ia trial in patients with the aforementioned GI malignancies. Methods: Standard 3+3 dose escalation was used. Key eligibility included locally advanced or metastatic G, CRC, PDA, or BIL cancer, previously treated, ECOG PS 0-1; positive AG-7 expression was not required. Two dosing intervals were tested: AbGn-107 administered i.v. Q4 weeks (at doses ranging from 0.1-1.2 mg/kg) and Q2 weeks (at doses from 0.8-1.0 mg/kg). Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were based on grade 3/4 hematologic and non-heme AEs occurring during the initial 4-week rx window. Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, with tumor assessments Q8 weeks. 1o objectives: safety and MTD; 2o objectives: PK, immunogenicity, and efficacy defined by ORR (RECIST 1.1). Results: 35 patients were enrolled across 6 dose levels (median age 61.5 yo (range 40 – 81); G (0)/CRC (12)/PDA (20)/BIL (3); median # lines of prior rx = 3 (range 1-7). Safety: 5 patients experienced Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, all at higher dose levels, inc. 1 episode of febrile neutropenia. Other frequent drug-related AEs, mostly grade 1/2, inc. fatigue (29%), nausea (20%), and diarrhea (14%). DLTs included grade 4 CK elevation (n = 1) at 0.8 mg/kg Q4W and grade 3 arthralgias (n = 1) at 1.2 mg/kg Q4W. Based on safety profile and PK data, 1.0 mg/kg Q2W was selected as the dose schedule for cohort expansion phase. Efficacy: Median duration of treatment = 56 days (range, 8 – 225 days). Six pts have demonstrated a minor response by RECIST (range, -1.3 to -21.1%); 4 pts (all PDA) have had durable dz control > 180 days. Conclusions: Overall, AbGn-107 appears well-tolerated with encouraging prelim signs of efficacy in unselected pts with heavily pre-treated advanced GI cancers. Updated safety and efficacy data will be provided at the time of the meeting for the cohort expansion phase of this study (currently open across multiple sites in U.S. and Taiwan), in which subjects with G, CRC, PDA, and BIL cancers are pre-screened for high levels of AG-7 tumor expression. Clinical trial information: NCT02908451 .

ABSTRACT The health care-associated pneumonia (HCAP) criteria have a limited ability to predict pneumonia caused by drug-resistant bacteria and favor the overutilization of broad-spectrum antibiotics. We aimed to derive and validate a clinical prediction score with an improved ability to predict the risk of pneumonia due to drug-resistant pathogens compared to that of HCAP criteria. A derivation cohort of 200 microbiologically confirmed pneumonia cases in 2011 and 2012 was identified retrospectively. Risk factors for pneumonia due to drug-resistant pathogens were evaluated by logistic regression, and a novel prediction score (the drug resistance in pneumonia [DRIP] score) was derived. The score was then validated in a prospective, observational cohort of 200 microbiologically confirmed cases of pneumonia at four U.S. centers in 2013 and 2014. The DRIP score (area under the receiver operator curve [AUROC], 0.88 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.82 to 0.93]) performed significantly better ( P = 0.02) than the HCAP criteria (AUROC, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.64 to 0.79]). At a threshold of ≥4 points, the DRIP score demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.67 to 0.88), a specificity of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.87), a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.78), and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.93). By comparison, the performance of HCAP criteria was less favorable: sensitivity was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.67 to 0.88), specificity was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.73), PPV was 0.53 (95% CI, 0.42 to 0.63), and NPV was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.92). The overall accuracy of the HCAP criteria was 69.5% (95% CI, 62.5 to 75.7%), whereas that of the DRIP score was 81.5% (95% CI, 74.2 to 85.6%) ( P = 0.005). Unnecessary extended-spectrum antibiotics were recommended 46% less frequently by applying the DRIP score (25/200, 12.5%) than by use of HCAP criteria (47/200, 23.5%) ( P = 0.004), without increasing the rate at which inadequate treatment recommendations were made. The DRIP score was more predictive of the risk of pneumonia due to drug-resistant pathogens than HCAP criteria and may have the potential to decrease antibiotic overutilization in patients with pneumonia. Validation in larger cohorts of patients with pneumonia due to all causes is necessary.