Betzler, Bjorn K

ABSTRACT Background Ab‐interno canaloplasty (ABiC) may be performed as a standalone procedure or in combination with phacoemulsification (ABiC+Phaco). This study aims to examine the comparative surgical outcomes of both procedures. Methods PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched for randomised controlled trials, cohort studies and retrospective case series published from inception to 31 March 2025 that compared outcomes of standalone ABiC and ABiC+Phaco in the treatment of open‐angle glaucoma (OAG). Random‐effects meta‐analysis was performed to pool the mean difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) and glaucoma medications compared to baseline. Results Eight studies with a pooled total of 663 eyes were included in final analysis. There was no significant difference in IOP‐lowering efficacy between ABiC+Phaco and standalone ABiC across all timepoints (6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years) with a mean difference of 0.25 mmHg (95% CI: −0.98 to 1.48) at 3 years. There was also no significant difference in glaucoma medication reduction between ABiC+Phaco and standalone ABiC across all timepoints, with a mean difference of 0.03 medication reduction (95% CI: −0.18 to 0.23) at 3 years. A small IOP‐lowering benefit of ABiC+Phaco versus standalone ABiC in primary OAG‐only studies (mean difference 0.75 mmHg, 95% CI: 0.03–1.47) was observed at 3 years. Conclusion Our meta‐analysis suggests that phacoemulsification may not offer significant additional IOP and glaucoma medication reduction to standalone ABiC. However, results should be interpreted with caution due to a moderate risk of bias across all included studies. Regardless, our findings are consistent with existing literature on the effect of adjunctive phacoemulsification on other ab‐interno MIGS.

Précis: ASOCT features of greater bleb height, thicker bleb walls, and lower reflectivity are associated with trabeculectomy success, supporting the ASOCT’s utility in monitoring and predicting outcomes postsurgery through standardized imaging protocols. Purpose: To evaluate and quantify the relationship between bleb characteristics on ASOCT with surgical outcomes. Methods: A literature search was conducted across Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus for studies from the past 20 years, until 16 September 2024, on “glaucoma,” “trabeculectomy,” and “ASOCT.” Data collected included patient characteristics, each study’s definition of bleb success, clinical outcomes, as well as bleb characteristics. A literature review was conducted on studies that could not be used for meta-analysis. Results: Eleven studies, with a pooled total of 528 eyes in 517 patients, were included in the final meta-analysis. Successful blebs had significantly higher mean bleb height [mean difference (MD) 0.38 mm, 95% CI: 0.20-0.56 mm, P=0.002], greater maximum bleb wall thickness (MD: 0.21 mm, 95% CI: 0.07-0.35 mm, P=0.009), and decreased reflectivity (MD: −48.9%, 95% CI: −78.3 to −19.4%, P=0.010), compared with failed blebs. No significant differences were found in bleb fluid cavity height and bleb area. Narrative synthesis revealed that wider blebs, increased fluid-filled cavity height, increased number of microcysts, larger filtration opening widths, and multiform bleb walls were also associated with higher rates of bleb success. Early bleb parameters were statistically significant predictors of bleb success up to 12 months postoperatively. Conclusions: Greater bleb height, thicker bleb walls, and lower reflectivity on ASOCT are consistently associated with successful trabeculectomy outcomes. The ASOCT may be useful in predicting bleb success and in supplementing postoperative monitoring, hence guiding timely medical or procedural interventions, to ensure long-term bleb success.