Yeong, Trevor James Jun‐Ming

ABSTRACT Background Ab‐interno canaloplasty (ABiC) may be performed as a standalone procedure or in combination with phacoemulsification (ABiC+Phaco). This study aims to examine the comparative surgical outcomes of both procedures. Methods PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched for randomised controlled trials, cohort studies and retrospective case series published from inception to 31 March 2025 that compared outcomes of standalone ABiC and ABiC+Phaco in the treatment of open‐angle glaucoma (OAG). Random‐effects meta‐analysis was performed to pool the mean difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) and glaucoma medications compared to baseline. Results Eight studies with a pooled total of 663 eyes were included in final analysis. There was no significant difference in IOP‐lowering efficacy between ABiC+Phaco and standalone ABiC across all timepoints (6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years) with a mean difference of 0.25 mmHg (95% CI: −0.98 to 1.48) at 3 years. There was also no significant difference in glaucoma medication reduction between ABiC+Phaco and standalone ABiC across all timepoints, with a mean difference of 0.03 medication reduction (95% CI: −0.18 to 0.23) at 3 years. A small IOP‐lowering benefit of ABiC+Phaco versus standalone ABiC in primary OAG‐only studies (mean difference 0.75 mmHg, 95% CI: 0.03–1.47) was observed at 3 years. Conclusion Our meta‐analysis suggests that phacoemulsification may not offer significant additional IOP and glaucoma medication reduction to standalone ABiC. However, results should be interpreted with caution due to a moderate risk of bias across all included studies. Regardless, our findings are consistent with existing literature on the effect of adjunctive phacoemulsification on other ab‐interno MIGS.